Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros




Base de datos
Asunto de la revista
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg ; 67(5): 799-808, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38182107

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To investigate dissection severity, need for bailout stenting and limb outcomes in patients undergoing antegrade vs. retrograde revascularisation. METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent either antegrade or retrograde revascularisation after failed antegrade recanalisation of long femoropopliteal chronic total occlusion (CTO) due to symptomatic peripheral artery disease between January 2017 and June 2022 were studied. Retrospective case control matching was used to adjust for lesion length and calcification using the peripheral artery calcification scoring system (PACSS). Procedural outcomes included severity of dissection (Type A to F dissections, numerically graded on a scale from 0 - 6 with increasing severity) after angioplasty and number and location of stents needed to be implanted during the index procedure. Additionally, clinically driven target lesion revascularisation (CD-TLR) and major (above ankle) amputation rates were assessed during follow up. RESULTS: A total of 180 patients were analysed who underwent antegrade (n = 90) or retrograde after failed antegrade (n = 90) recanalisation. The median patient age was 76.0 (interquartile range [IQR] 67.0, 82.0) years and 76 (42.2%) were female. Moreover, 78 patients (43.3%) had intermittent claudication, whereas 102 (56.7%) had chronic limb threatening ischaemia (CLTI). The mean lesion length was 30.0 (IQR 24.0, 36.0) cm with moderate to severe (3.0 [IQR 2.0, 4.0]) lesion calcification. Dissection severity after angioplasty was higher in the antegrade than retrograde after failed antegrade recanalisation group (4.0 [IQR 3.0, 4.0] vs. 3.0 [IQR 2.0, 4.0]; p < .001). Additionally, the number of stents in all segments and the rate of bailout stenting in popliteal segments was significantly higher with the antegrade strategy (2.0 [IQR 1.0, 3.0] vs. 1.0 [IQR 0, 2.0], p < .010; and 37% vs. 14%, p < .001). During a median follow up of 1.48 (IQR 0.63, 3.09) years, CD-TLR rates (p = .90) and amputation rates in patients with CLTI (p = .15) were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: In complex femoropopliteal CTOs, retrograde after failed antegrade recanalisation, is safe for endovascular revascularisation, which in experienced hands may result in less severe dissections and lower rates of stent placement. However, considering the relatively short follow up, CD-TLR and amputation rates were not statistically different between the two approaches. [German Clinical Trials Register: DRKS00015277.].


Asunto(s)
Amputación Quirúrgica , Arteria Femoral , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica , Arteria Poplítea , Stents , Humanos , Anciano , Femenino , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Arteria Femoral/cirugía , Arteria Femoral/fisiopatología , Arteria Femoral/diagnóstico por imagen , Arteria Poplítea/cirugía , Arteria Poplítea/fisiopatología , Arteria Poplítea/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/cirugía , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/fisiopatología , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/terapia , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico por imagen , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Amputación Quirúrgica/estadística & datos numéricos , Recuperación del Miembro/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Insuficiencia del Tratamiento , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Grado de Desobstrucción Vascular , Procedimientos Endovasculares/instrumentación , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/métodos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA