Short-term effects of etifoxine on human gut microbiome in healthy men.

Background: Neurosteroids have recently gained in interest as a treatment strategy for affective disorders. Etifoxine is known for its dual mode of action, one of which is to stimulate endogenous neurosteroid synthesis. The gut microbiome has been studied in affective disorders, but it has not been investigated in the context of human etifoxine or neurosteroid interventions. Methods: We performed a crossover study with 36 healthy male volunteers who received etifoxine versus alprazolam and placebo in a balanced Williams design. Participants were randomized into six sequences and went through three 5-day treatments followed by wash-out phases of 9 days. Bacterial compositions in stool samples were determined by high-throughput 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing. Results: Gut microbiome analyses revealed no relevant effects between treatments with respect to alpha and beta diversity. Differential abundance analyses yielded etifoxine treatment as the only effect related to changes in microbial features with reductions of Faecalibacterium duncaniae, Roseburia hominis and Lactobacillus rogosae (i.e., Bacteroides galacturonicus). Conclusion: Here we report on the first human investigation of the gut microbiome with short-term etifoxine intervention. Differences in diversity and compositional structure of the microbiome were more likely due to between- subject effects rather than medication. However, five-day treatment with etifoxine reduced the abundance of a few bacterial species. These species are currently seen as beneficial components of a healthy intestinal microbiome. This reduction in abundances may be related to elevated endogenous neurosteroids.

Inhalation-modulated detection of olfactory BOLD responses in the human brain.

Introduction: In contrast to other sensory domains, detection of primary olfactory processes using functional magnetic resonance imaging has proven to be notably challenging with conventional block designs. This difficulty arises from significant habituation and hemodynamic responses in olfactory areas that do not appear to align with extended boxcar functions convolved with a generic hemodynamic response model. Consequently, some researchers have advocated for a transition to event-related designs, despite their known lower detection power compared to block designs. Methods: Here, we conducted a block design experiment with 16s of continuous odorant stimulation alternating with 16s of continuous odorless air stimulation in 33 healthy participants. We compared four statistical analyses that relied either on standard block designs (SBD1-2) or on block designs that were modulated by the participants' individual breathing patterns (MBD1-2). Results: We found that such modulated block designs were comparatively more powerful than standard block designs, despite having a substantially lower design efficiency. Using whole-brain effect size maps, we observed that the right insular and medial aspects of the left piriform cortex exhibited a preference for a breathing-modulated analysis approach. Discussion: Research in olfaction that necessitates designs with longer-lasting blocks, such as those employed in the investigation of state-dependent processing, will benefit from the breathing-modulated analyses outlined in this study.