Functional outcome after interdisciplinary, acute rehabilitation in COVID-19 patients: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Survivors of severe COVID-19 often exhibit a variety of sequelae including loss of mobility and ADL (activities of daily living) capacity. Acute rehabilitation (AR) is an interdisciplinary rehabilitation intervention applied early while still in a hospital setting. The goal of AR is to improve functional limitations and to increase functional independence at discharge. It is established in the treatment of patients with other severe diseases such as sepsis, polytrauma, or stroke. Data concerning AR in COVID-19 are sparse. AIM: To evaluate the changes in physical function during AR in patients after severe COVID-19. METHODS: This monocentric, retrospective observational study examined the functional outcomes of a sample of COVID-19-patients who received interdisciplinary AR at a university hospital. Inclusion criteria were a positive SARS-CoV-2 test in 05/2020-01/2022 and transfer to AR after intensive care treatment. 87 patients were elegible for evaluation, 3 of whom were excluded because of death during AR. Data were extracted from the hospital information system. In a pre-post analysis, mobility (Charité Mobility Index), ADL (Barthel Index), and oxygen demand were assessed. In addition, discharge location after AR, factors associated with AR unit length of stay, and functional improvements were analyzed. RESULTS: Data of 84 patients were analyzed. Mobility increased significantly from a median of 4 [1.25-6] CHARMI points at admission to a median of 9 [8.25-9] at discharge (p < 0.001). ADL increased significantly from a median of 52.5 [35.0-68.75] Barthel Index points at admission to a median of 92.5 [85-95] at discharge (p < 0.001). Oxygen demand decreased from 80.7 to 30.5% of patients. The majority (55.9%) of patients were discharged home, while 36.9% received direct follow-up rehabilitation. Older age correlated significantly with lower scores on the discharge assessment for mobility (Spearman's ϱ = -0.285, p = 0.009) and ADL (Spearman's ϱ = -0.297, p = 0.006). CONCLUSION: Acute rehabilitation is a viable option for COVID-19 patients with severe functional deficits after ICU treatment to achieve functional progress in mobility and ADL, reduce oxygen requirements and enable follow-up rehabilitation. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER AND DATE OF REGISTRATION FOR PROSPECTIVELY REGISTERED TRIALS: Trial registration number: DRKS00025239. Date of registration: 08 Sep 2021.

[Acute rehabilitation after COVID-19 infection : A selected case series]. / Akutrehabilitation nach COVID­19­Infektion : Eine ausgewählte Fallserie.

BACKGROUND: While the first wave of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic mainly affected the old, currently younger patients also become infected and hospitalized. After severe and critical COVID-19 infections and also after surviving acute phase symptoms, these patients often show symptoms (e.g. exertional dyspnea), organ damage (e.g. of the lungs, the cardiovascular system) as well as psychological impairments. OBJECTIVE: The severe courses after critical cases of COVID-19 represent challenges for rehabilitation and require more than ever rehabilitative treatment approaches even in acute hospitals. METHODS: This article presents a selected case series of patients with a typical constellation of pre-existing conditions due to immunosuppression plus critical course of COVID-19 and indications for acute rehabilitation. RESULTS: This case series depicts the long duration of hospitalization with high numbers of hours on ventilation in the intensive care unit. At the time of transfer to acute rehabilitation these patients are immobile and have severe limitations in all activities of daily life, so that an inpatient rehabilitation in an acute hospital is indicated and the usual means of continuation of rehabilitation were not feasible. The sequelae of lying prone and complications, such as exertional desaturation in the early stage of convalescence are detected in the acute phase of early rehabilitation. CONCLUSION: After severe COVID-19 infections new challenges for rehabilitation are to be expected, so that rehabilitative treatment approaches with an interdisciplinary early rehabilitation in an acute hospital are urgently needed. Finally, acute rehabilitation not only enables a seamless treatment chain for these patients but also the flow of patients from the intensive care unit to ensure the functioning of local infrastructures.

[Interdisciplinary Acute Medical Rehabilitation after Sepsis - A Retrospective Analysis]. / Fachübergreifende Frührehabilitation nach Sepsis ­ Eine retrospektive Analyse .

BACKGROUND: Surviving sepsis may have consequences of high impact for the patients' further life regarding functioning in mobility and activities of daily living, among other fields. Patients consecutively have a great need of rehabilitation interventions beginning with early mobilization in the Intensive Care Unit ICU. Acute medical rehabilitation is a concept of early rehabilitation still in the acute care hospital, normally beginning after a direct transferal from the ICU. Its aim is to improve the patients' functioning in mobility and activities of daily living (ADL) to enable further post-acute rehabilitation interventions. METHODS: In this retrospective analysis a sample of patients who received acute medical rehabilitation after surviving a sepsis or severe sepsis was followed. The study targeted the question if basic functions of mobility and ADL could be improved by acute medical rehabilitation. Furthermore, the need for aid supply was evaluated, as well as the type of discharge or transferal after acute care. RESULTS: The increase of mobility and ADL capability before and after acute medical rehabilitation was highly significant (p<0.001 each) and showed very large effect sizes (d=1.3, 1.4 respectively). Aid supply was organized for 92% of patients. A majority of patients could receive consecutive post-acute rehabilitation after re-gaining function. DISCUSSION: The data shows the enormous gain in functioning that can be reached with an acute medical rehabilitation intervention after ICU treatment of sepsis.

[Why and How Should I Assess Frailty? A Guide for the Preoperative Anesthesia Clinic]. / Warum und wie sollte ich Frailty erfassen? ­ ein Ansatz für die Anästhesieambulanz.

Introduction: Frailty is a condition of decreased physiological reserves seen in approx. one third of elderly anesthesiological patients, and affecting many aspects of treatment as well as outcome. Although there are over 60 measurement instruments, frailty assessment is still poorly implemented. Understanding why and how to assess frailty is key to its implementation in preoperative anesthesia clinics. Method: After presenting the impact of perioperative frailty and the benefits of an early diagnosis on health related quality of life, we present an overview of the most important tools that can be used in the preoperative frailty assessment. Results: Early diagnosis offer several optimization opportunities for the perioperative period. The most efficient frailty assessment tools are presented and discussed, including physical, cognitive, and psychosocial aspects. Conclusion: Frailty assessments vary immensely in terms of required time, equipment, and expertise. We recommend at least one test for each domain of frailty, so as to obtain a more holistic view of the patient's physiological reserve. The implementation of an adequate and consistent preoperative frailty assessment has the potential to improve patient safety as well as short and long term outcomes.

Introduction of the Charité Mobility Index (CHARMI) - A Novel Clinical Mobility Assessment for Acute Care Rehabilitation.

INTRODUCTION: Mobility is an essential part of a person's functioning and independence. It encompasses locomotive functions, but also the more basic functions of positioning and transferring. Despite the availability of several mobility-related assessment instruments to date, there is a need for assessment instruments with the specific capability to display the full range of mobilisation. Our aim was to develop and validate a scoring instrument with hierarchical composition where every score value stands for a defined mobility level. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: A previously developed and validated pilot instrument was applied to assess patients (n = 113) admitted to an acute rehabilitation programme. Mobility was assessed during admission, subsequently at weekly intervals and at discharge to acquire a detailed status of mobility at multiple time points and individual mobilisation profiles over time. The scoring instrument was then remodelled based on clinical criteria to establish an easy-to-use scoring system with hierarchical composition. Psychometric properties were calculated using an independent sample of 87 consecutive patients. RESULTS: Content validity could be affirmed. The psychometric tests demonstrated excellent convergent validity with the three mobility items of the Barthel Index (r = 0.93), despite an adequately lower correlation with the whole Barthel Index (r = 0.63). Adequate floor and ceiling effects (20%) and a large responsiveness to change (ǀdǀ = 1.7, p < 0.001) between admission and discharge values were demonstrated. Inter-rater reliability was excellent (κ = 0.88). CONCLUSIONS: The Charité Mobility Index (CHARMI) is a promising, easy-to-use hierarchical scoring instrument assessing the full individual spectrum from immobility to unlimited mobility, including positioning, transfer and locomotion items. It allows for monitoring of mobilisation.

Severe disease activity and complications of immunosuppressive therapy: a challenge for acute hospital-based rehabilitation in rheumatology.

Acute rehabilitation refers to the multidisciplinary rehabilitative treatment of patients in continuing need of integrated acute and rehabilitative longterm care. As a result of the advances in acute rheumatology and improved emergency services, an increasing number of patients survive episodes of severe disease and complications of immunosuppressive therapy. These patients require not only treatment of their acute medical problems but also specialized multidisciplinary acute rehabilitation starting as early as possible during their hospital stay. We describe 4 typical cases from the major fields of rheumatology. (1) Acute rehabilitation of a 63-year-old woman with rheumatoid arthritis after replacement of both preexisting knee endoprostheses in one session and removal of the left hip endoprosthesis due to infection and sepsis. (2) Rehabilitation of a 29-year-old man with a 7-year history of ankylosing spondylitis who lived in an adjustable easy chair for 2 years due to severe pain prior to admission. (3) A 61-year-old woman with active refractory Wegener's granulomatosis who developed respiratory insufficiency due to aspergillus and pseudomonas pneumonia. (4) The acute rehabilitation of a 21-year-old woman with systemic lupus erythematosus and a history of 14 laparotomies due to severe acute pancreatitis and multiple gut perforations. Acute rehabilitation was complicated by a large defect of the abdominal wall and significant critical illness polyneuropathy. Our report points out differences between acute, postacute, and longterm rehabilitation, describes the mobilization of patients in acute rheumatology units, and defines specific problems encountered in acute hospital-based rehabilitation of rheumatological patients.