Hepatitis C Treatment Among Primary Care and Specialty Providers: A Single Center Study, 2015 to 2022.

INTRODUCTION: Despite national goals to eliminate Hepatitis C (HCV) and the advancement of curative, well-tolerated direct-acting antiviral (DAAs) regimens, rates of HCV treatment have declined nationally since 2015. Current HCV guidelines encourage treatment of HCV by primary care providers (PCPs). Payors have reduced restrictions to access DAAs nationally and in California however it remains unclear if the removal of these restrictions has impacted the proportion of PCPs prescribing DAAs at a health system level. Our objective was to examine the proportion of DAAs prescribed by PCPs and specialists and to describe the population receiving treatment in a single health system from 2015 to 2022. METHODS: We examined the proportion of DAAs prescribed by PCPs and specialists and the population receiving treatment through a retrospective analysis of claims data in the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Health System from 2015 to 2022. We described number of prescriptions for HCV medication prescribed by PCPs and specialists by year, medication type, and physician specialty. We also described numbers of prescriptions by patient demographics and comorbidities. RESULTS: A total of 1515 adult patients received a prescription for HCV medication through the UCLA Health System between 2015 and 2022. The proportion of patients receiving prescriptions for PCPs peaked at 19% in 2016, yet decreased to 5.7% in 2022, an average of 13% across all years. Median age of patients receiving treatment was 60 years old, and 56% of patients receiving HCV treatment had commercial insurance as their primary payer. CONCLUSIONS: HCV treatment declined from 2015 to 2022 among specialists and PCPs in our health system. Older patients comprised the majority of patients receiving treatment, suggesting a need for novel approaches to reach patients under 40, an age group with significant increases in HCV transmission.

Need for and Receipt of Substance Use Disorder Treatment Among Adults, by Gender, in the United States.

OBJECTIVES: Disparities in substance use disorder (SUD) treatment use persist across groups, including gender. Using a gender-informed approach to expand treatment capacity and reduce barriers to treatment engagement is vital. We examined SUD treatment need and receipt among people with SUD in the United States, by gender, and assessed gender-specific sociodemographic factors associated with unmet need for SUD treatment and reported treatment barriers. METHODS: We conducted an analysis of data among adults aged ≥18 with a past-year SUD from the National Survey on Drug Use and Health (2015-2018). We computed population-adjusted frequencies and proportions for SUD treatment need and receipt and assessed gender differences. Multivariate logistic regression assessed gender-specific sociodemographic variables associated with SUD treatment receipt. RESULTS: Among adults with a past-year SUD, 63.4% were men and 36.6% were women (P < .001), only 10.6% received SUD treatment, and a greater percentage of women than men needed treatment for opioid use disorder (11.9% vs 9.9%; P = .002). Receipt of SUD treatment was lowest among women with alcohol use disorder followed by men with alcohol use disorder (7.5% vs 8.9%; P = .052). Non-Latinx Black men had fewer than half the adjusted odds of receiving SUD treatment than non-Latinx White men (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 0.44; 95% CI, 0.27-0.71). Latinx women (aOR = 0.37; 95% CI, 0.18-0.73) and non-Latinx Black women (aOR = 0.51; 95% CI, 0.27-0.94) had significantly lower odds of receiving SUD treatment than non-Latinx White women. CONCLUSIONS: As public health efforts target expanding SUD treatment capacity and addressing disparities in use of SUD treatment, interventions informed by gender and culture should be prioritized.

Medicaid participation among practitioners authorized to prescribe buprenorphine.

INTRODUCTION: This study examines Medicaid participation among buprenorphine waivered providers in Virginia in 2019, with a particular focus on the prescribing differences between different physician specialties, nurse practitioners and physicians assistants (NP and PA). METHODS: Secondary data sources include the 2019 DEA list of buprenorphine waivered prescribers, Virginia Medicaid claims for buprenorphine, physician characteristics from the Virginia Department of Health Professions, SAMHSA Behavioral Treatment Services Locator, and area level characteristics. This cross-sectional study is based on a linkage of Medicaid claims data to a list of Virginia practitioners authorized to prescribe buprenorphine in 2019. Using a two-part logistic regression, we assess prescriber license type and local area factors that are associated with: (1) the probability of prescribing buprenorphine to any Medicaid patients in 2019; (2) the number of Medicaid patients treated by each prescriber in 2019. RESULTS: Adjusted odds ratios show that nurse practitioners with buprenorphine waivers are more likely to treat any Medicaid patients compared to physicians (odds ratio (OR), 2.016; p = 0.000). Among prescribers who treated any Medicaid patients, the probability of treating a large number of Medicaid patients was higher among nurse practitioners relative to physicians (OR, 2.869, p = 0.002). Medicaid participation was much higher among prescribers with patient limits of 100 and 275 compared to prescribers with patient limits of 30 (OR, 6.66, p = 0.000 and 29.40, p = 0.000, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: State Medicaid programs have been at the forefront of addressing their state's opioid epidemic, including expanding access to buprenorphine treatment. This study provides evidence that targeted outreach efforts should include NP license types as well as physicians, and is consistent with prior studies showing that NP are especially important in filling treatment gaps for underserved areas and populations.

Addiction and Depression: Unmet Treatment Needs Among Reproductive Age Women.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the current unmet major depression and substance use disorder (SUD) treatment needs among reproductive age women METHODS: Data from the 2007 to 2014 National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) were analyzed to determine proportions of women ages 18 to 44 years with unmet treatment need for depression and SUD. Logistic regression determined factors associated with receiving past year SUD and major depression treatment among those in need. RESULTS: Only 9.2% of women with past year SUD treatment need received treatment (95% CI 8.3-10.1%) compared to 60.7% for those in need of depression treatment (95% CI 59.5-62.0%). Over time, treatment receipt for depression increased significantly (OR 1.4, 95% CI 1.15-1.67) but not for substance use disorders (OR 1.4, 95% CI 0.69-1.45). Neither pregnant nor parenting women were more likely to receive treatment for SUD or depression. Young and racial/ethnically minority women were less likely to receive needed behavioral health treatment for either condition. CONCLUSIONS: Depression and SUD treatment need are common among women. However, treatment receipt differs between these behavioral health conditions.

Trends in Cannabis Treatment Admissions in Adolescents/Young Adults: Analysis of TEDS-A 1992 to 2016.

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to evaluate changes in cannabis use patterns, referral sources, and admissions in adolescents and young adults (YAs). As the United States increasingly moves toward liberalization of cannabis laws, it is critical to have baseline information of use patterns in this population. METHODS: Data were drawn from Treatment Episode Data Set-Admissions (TEDS-A) for adolescents (12-17 years) and young adults (18-24 years) entering treatment from 1992 to 2016 for primary cannabis use (N = 3,794,213). Rao-Scott chi-square tests were used to test for significant changes in proportions of individuals admitted to treatment for primary cannabis use and between 4-year increments from 1992 to 2016 (N = 1,052,724). Logistic regression assessed odds of admissions for primary cannabis use versus other substances. RESULTS: Treatment admissions for cannabis among adolescents/YAs rose 3-fold from 1992 (49,996) to 1996 (125,858). The majority of referrals came from the criminal justice system (56%). Cannabis is increasingly the sole substance of use, with polysubstance use decreasing from 89% in 1992 to 59% in 2016. While alcohol-related treatment admissions were most common in 1992, admissions for treatment of cannabis use (followed by heroin and alcohol) were highest (38%) by 2016. Being an adolescent (odds ratio [OR] 3.1, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.1-3.2), non-Hispanic black (OR 6.2, 95% CI 6.2-6.3), male (female OR 0.6, 95% CI 0.6-0.6) with co-occurring alcohol use (OR 25.9, 95% CI 25.7-26.1) was associated with admission for treatment of primary cannabis use as compared with other substances. CONCLUSIONS: Public health efforts will be needed to ensure ongoing access and referral to treatment as the legal status of cannabis continues to change. Prevention and treatment efforts should target co-occurring alcohol and cannabis use.

Unmet substance use disorder treatment need among reproductive age women.

BACKGROUND: Substance use disorder (SUD) is a chronic medical condition in need of long-term treatment. The objective of the study is to describe the current unmet SUD treatment need among reproductive age women living in the United States with a focus on pregnancy and parenting status. METHODS: Data were drawn from the 2007-2014 National Survey of Drug Use and Health for women 18-44 years old. The primary outcomes were past year SUD treatment need and receipt. Women with a SUD treatment need included those with a SUD and/or expressing a need for SUD treatment. Women were classified as pregnant, parenting (living with their children) or not pregnant nor parenting. Multivariable logistic regression determined if pregnancy/parenting status was associated with treatment need and receipt controlling for demographic factors. RESULTS: Among reproductive age women with a past year SUD treatment need, only 9.3 % (95 % CI 8.4-10.2 %) received treatment. Pregnant and parenting women were not more likely to receive treatment (pregnant AOR 0.9; 95 % CI 0.5-1.8 & parenting AOR 0.7; 95 % CI 0.5-0.9) compared to not pregnant nor parenting women. Black (AOR 0.3; 95 % CI 0.2-0.5) and Hispanic women (AOR 0.6; 95 % CI 0.4-0.9) were less likely to receive treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Few reproductive age women who need SUD treatment receive it in the US. Although pregnant women are considered a priority population, they are not receiving priority services. Racial disparities in unmet SUD treatment need exist. Barriers to SUD treatment, such as expanding gender informed services, must be addressed.

Rates of and Factors Associated With Patient-reported Illicit Drug Use Screening by Health Care Professionals in the United States From 2013 to 2015.

OBJECTIVES: To examine rates of and factors associated with patient-reported illicit drug use screening by health care professionals. METHODS: The National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH), limited to individuals who reported prior year healthcare service utilization, was used to capture the odds of patient-reported illicit drug use screening for survey years 2013 to 2015. Screened patients were contrasted with those not screened by demographic and behavioral characteristics. Adjusted models were produced by year and adjusted odds ratios were compared for changes across years. A separate adjusted model including year as a fixed effect was produced to estimate changes in overall adjusted screening odds. RESULTS: The percentage of individuals reporting screening by a health care provider increased from 48.5% in 2013 to 50.9% (2014), and 54.3% (2015) (P < 0.0001). The adjusted model, including year as a fixed effect, indicated that the odds of screening significantly increased from 2013 to 2015. In multivariable regression, individuals reporting screening were more likely to be female, of higher income and educational strata, and received drug or alcohol treatment in the past year and were less likely to be non-Hispanic Asian. CONCLUSIONS: Only roughly half of individuals seen by a healthcare provider report illicit drug use screening. Racial disparities in screening persist although they are overall decreasing. Coupling screening with treatment initiation, rather than brief intervention, may increase screening rates.

Interracial couples and breastfeeding initiation in the United States.

In the past decade, the prevalence of interracial couples has steadily increased. Recent reports state that nearly one in five marriages are between spouses of different races. Interracial couples receive less social support and are more likely to separate. As a result, children born to these couples may be at an increased risk of poor health outcomes. This study aims to investigate the relationship between interracial couples and breastfeeding initiation. Data from the 2014 Vital Statistics Natality Birth database were analyzed. Data were restricted to singleton births and infants with no congenital malformations. Racial composition of parents was categorized as non-Hispanic (NH) white, NH black; Hispanic; NH white/NH black; NH white/Hispanic; and NH black/Hispanic. Breastfeeding initiation (yes; no) was categorized according to information from the child's birth certificate file. Multiple logistic regression was used to generate crude and adjusted odds ratios and 99% confidence intervals. After adjusting for confounders, all interracial couples with at least one Hispanic parent had increased odds of breastfeeding initiation. Interracial white and black parents had 18% lower odds of breastfeeding initiation. The lowest odds of breastfeeding initiation were observed among intraracial black parents, who had 43% lower odds of breastfeeding initiation compared to intraracial white parents. Breastfeeding non-initiation continues to pose the greatest risk for infants with at least one black parent. Nurses, midwives, physicians, and other medical staff should discuss potential barriers that may be unique to interracial couples and provide additional breastfeeding education and support.