Zoom Boom or Bust? Understanding Post-Pandemic Interest in Facial Plastic Surgery via Google Trends.

OBJECTIVE: To understand post-pandemic interest in plastic surgery procedures via Joinpoint analysis of Google Trends search data. METHODS: Google Trends was used to quantify search volumes from January 2019-December 2022 for select cosmetic face and body procedures in the United States. A keyword analytic tool (Keywords Everywhere) extracted absolute search volumes (average monthly searches). Joinpoint analysis assessed search trends over time reported as monthly percentage change (MPC). RESULTS: All procedures queried, including a non-cosmetic control (cataract surgery), demonstrated expected declines at the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. Blepharoplasty, face lift, neck lift, and Botox demonstrated statistically significant increase in search volumes that remained elevated relative to pre-pandemic levels. Rhinoplasty, fillers, and abdominoplasty interest increased initially followed by return to pre-pandemic levels by the end of 2022. The remainder of search terms did not show a clear temporal associated with COVID-19 lockdowns. CONCLUSION: The "Zoom Boom" appears to be a real phenomenon reflected by sustained increase in public interest in relation to facial plastic procedures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: NA Laryngoscope, 2024.

Polyfracture and Cranial Injuries Drive the Cost and Inpatient Burden of Zygoma Fractures.

IMPORTANCE: Facial trauma makes up a significant number of emergency room visits, with morbidity costs in excess of 1 billion dollars each year. Few studies have evaluated the economic outcomes of management and inpatient burden of facial trauma, most focusing solely on the mandible and isolated midface fractures. OBJECTIVE: The authors aim to evaluate characteristics associated with increased cost and length of hospitalization of zygoma fracture management. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Level 1-trauma academic medical center. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with zygoma fractures who presented to our institution from 2008 to 2021. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Demographics, injury mechanisms, associated injuries, treatment information, and associated costs were collected. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify the patient and fracture characteristics associated with increased cost and length of hospitalization. RESULTS: Our 14-year experience identified 689 patients with zygoma fractures who presented from 2008 to 2021. Seventy percent were male, and 40% occurred in Caucasian patients. The mean cost, adjusted for inflation, was $21,799.34, and the mean length of hospitalization was 5.5 days. Four or more fractures, associated cranial or intracranial injuries, and length of stay were associated with significantly higher cost, and 4 or more fractures, associated cranial or intracranial injuries, and female gender were associated with significantly longer length of hospitalization. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This study represents one of the largest comprehensive databases of zygoma fractures and one of the first to provide a descriptive cost and inpatient burden analysis. To improve outcomes and reduce hospital cost and inpatient burden, protocols should be implemented to address the factors that the authors identified as contributing to increased cost and length of hospitalization.

Trends in Management and Cost Burden of Facial Fractures: A 14-Year Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To discuss patient demographics and management and better understand the economic impact associated with the treatment of facial fractures at a major metropolitan level 1 trauma center. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. METHODS: We identified 5088 facial fractures in 2479 patients who presented from 2008 to 2022. Patient demographics, mechanism of injury, associated injuries, treatment information, and hospital charges were collected and analyzed to determine factors associated with surgical management and increased cost burden. RESULTS: Our 14-year experience identified 1628 males and 851 females with a mean age of 45.7 years. Orbital fractures were most common (41.2%), followed by maxilla fractures (20.8%). The most common mechanism was fall (43.0%). Surgical management was recommended for 41% of patients. The odds of surgical management was significantly lower in female patients, patients age 65 and older, and patients who presented after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. The odds of surgical management was significantly higher for patients who had a mandible fracture or greater than 1 fracture. The average cost of management was highest for naso-orbito-ethmoidal fractures ($37,997.74 ± 52,850.88), followed by LeFort and frontal fractures ($29.814.41 ± 42,155.73 and $27,613.44 ± 39.178.53, respectively). The highest contributor to the total average cost of management was intensive care unit-related costs for every fracture type, except for mandible fractures for which the highest contributor was operating room (OR)-related costs. CONCLUSIONS: This study represents one of the largest comprehensive databases of facial fractures and one of the first to provide a descriptive cost analysis of facial trauma management. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 134:3120-3126, 2024.

Augmented Virtual Examination for Cosmetic and Functional Rhinoplasty.

Background: Few studies have critically evaluated the quality of data obtained during telemedical evaluations of patients with nasal complaints. Objective: To compare the quality of data provided by remote endoscopic and external nasal examination with those by in-person evaluations for rhinoplasty and functional nasal surgery, measured by detectability of anatomic features, and to assess associated patient experience measured by reported ease, discomfort, and likelihood of peer recommendation. Materials and Methods: Twenty healthy subjects performed a nasal self-examination using an endoscope and webcam under remote videoconferencing service (VCS) guidance. They subsequently underwent in-person examination and were surveyed about their experience. Inter-rater reliability was calculated using kappa coefficients. Detectability of anatomic features by in-person versus virtual examination was compared using Wilcoxon and chi-square tests. Results: Median subject age was 27.5 years (range 23-77). Kappa coefficients were 0.78 for in-person and 0.66 for virtual evaluations. Only the internal nasal valve and inferior turbinate were better visualized in person. There were no differences between detectability of external features on in-person versus virtual examinations. Subjects' average likelihood of recommending this technology (1-10) was 8.65 (SD 1.4). Conclusions: Intranasal examination by physician-guided remote endoscopy and webcam-based facial analysis demonstrate nasal anatomy comparable with in-person evaluation and anterior rhinoscopy.

Augmented otorhinologic evaluation in telemedical visits.

PURPOSE: To determine if an endoscopic otologic and rhinologic examination performed by a patient and interpreted remotely by an otolaryngologist is non-inferior to in-person examination, and to assess the feasibility of this system for telemedical visits. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty healthy subjects performed a self-examination of their ears and nose using a commercially available endoscope under remote guidance by an otolaryngology provider over Zoom. This same provider and another otolaryngologist also performed separate, in-person examinations of each subject and rated their findings. Finally, both providers blindly reviewed a video recording of each virtual exam four weeks later and rated their findings. Subjects were surveyed about their experience. Interrater reliability was calculated using Cohen's kappa coefficients and the ability to detect different anatomic structures and features by in-person vs. virtual examination was compared using Wilcoxon tests and Chi-squared proportion tests. RESULTS: The subjects' average age was 30 (SD 11.5) years. Interrater reliability was excellent; kappa coefficients were 0.72 and 0.81 (p < 0.001) for virtual and in-person exams, respectively. Of the 3 anatomic structures within the ear exam, none showed a difference in detectability between virtual and in-person exams. Of the 12 structures in the nasal exam, 3 were better visualized in-person and 9 showed no difference. Subject satisfaction was excellent; the average likelihood of recommending this virtual technology to peers (1-10) was 8.65 (SD 1.4). CONCLUSIONS: Patient self-examination of the ears and nose using a portable endoscope may be an effective strategy for obtaining valuable data during telemedical otolaryngology visits.

Critical Degree of Orbital Floor Displacement Drives Operative Repair of Zygomaticomaxillary Complex Fractures: Findings from a 10-Year Retrospective Study.

Among zygomaticomaxillary complex (ZMC) fractures presenting to a tertiary urban academic center, the authors hypothesized the presence of both clinical and radiographic predictors of operative management. The investigators conducted a retrospective cohort study of 1,914 patients with facial fractures managed at an academic medical center in New York City between 2008 and 2017. The predictor variables were based on both clinical data and features of pertinent imaging studies, and the outcome variable was an operative intervention. Descriptive and bivariate statistics were computed and the p-value was set at 0.05. In total, 196 patients sustained ZMC fractures (5.0%) and 121 (61.7%) ZMC fractures were treated surgically. All patients who presented with globe injury, blindness, retrobulbar injury, restricted gaze, or enophthalmos and a concurrent ZMC fracture were managed surgically. The most common surgical approach was the gingivobuccal corridor (31.9% of all approaches), and there were no significant immediate postoperative complications. Younger patients (38.9 ± 18 years vs. 56.1 ± 23.5 years, p < 0.0001) and patients with greater than or equal to 4 mm of orbital floor displacement were more likely to receive surgical treatment than observation (82 vs. 56%, p = 0.045), as were patients with comminuted orbital floor fractures (52 vs. 26%, p = 0.011). In this cohort, patients more likely to undergo surgical reduction were young patients with ophthalmologic symptoms on presentation and at least 4 mm displacement of the orbital floor. Low kinetic energy ZMC fractures may warrant surgical management as often as high-energy ZMC fractures. While orbital floor comminution has been shown to be a predictor for operative reduction, in this study we also demonstrated a difference in the rate of reduction based on the severity of orbital floor displacement. This may have significant implications in both the triage and selection of patients most suitable for operative repair.

Applying Occam's Razor and Descending the Reconstructive Ladder: The Modified Cheek Advancement Flap for Reconstruction of Nasal Defects.

Nasal reconstruction has important functional and cosmetic considerations, as proper repair of nasal defects is necessary to maintain function of the nasal airway and to recreate the normal appearance of this central facial structure. Cheek advancement flaps provide matched, mobile, and highly vascularized tissue for the reconstruction of nasal defects, allowing for the concealment of incisions within natural creases in a one-stage approach. However, cheek advancement flaps are often underutilized for nasal reconstruction because of their difficulty in restoring nasal contour. We describe reconstruction of 19 nasal dorsal and sidewall defects 0.8 to 3 cm in size. We incorporated a periosteal anchoring suture to maintain/restore nasal contour and additionally removed a half standing cone inferior to the defect to prevent encroachment of the nasal ala or alar crease. All patients were evaluated at least 3 months postoperatively. In all patients, we were able to restore concavity of the nasofacial sulcus, preserve the biconvex nasal tips, prevent alar flaring and retraction, and conserve the alar groove. All patients had excellent functional and cosmetic outcomes. We believe this modified cheek advancement flap provides functionally and aesthetically superior results and can be considered as a first-line approach for repair of nasal dorsal and sidewall defects in subselected patients.

Essential inpatient otolaryngology: what COVID-19 has revealed.

PURPOSE: To identify areas of critical otolaryngology contributions to inpatient care resistant to disruption by the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: Medical records of 614 otolaryngology consults seen between January and June of 2019 and 602 seen between January and June of 2020 were reviewed. Extracted data included patient demographics, SARS-CoV-2 status, medical comorbidities, consult location, consult category, reason for consult, procedures performed, and overall outcome. Prevalence of data items was compared using t tests and Chi-squared tests. RESULTS: The number of monthly consults to the otolaryngology service remained approximately stable after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. However, there was a substantial increase in ICU consults and a decrease in ER and floor consults. The proportion of otology, rhinology, and head and neck consults decreased while that of airway consults-most of which were tracheostomy-related-greatly increased. While the top ten reasons for consult remained essentially the same, they dramatically increased as a percentage of consults during COVID-19 (55-92%), whereas there was a dramatic decrease in the proportion of less frequent consults. CONCLUSION: The changes in otolaryngology consultation patterns seen after the onset of the pandemic are multifactorial, but may be attributed to novel pathologies, attitudes, and policies. Nonetheless, these patterns reveal that a set of core otolaryngologic issues, including acute airway issues, head and neck lesions, severe sinusitis and epistaxis, are essential and need to be addressed in the inpatient setting, whereas the significant drop in other consults suggests that they may be appropriately managed on an outpatient basis.