A Seminested PCR Method for the Diagnosis of Invasive Fungal Infections in Combat Injured.

Background: Among combat injured, invasive fungal infections (IFIs) result in significant morbidity. Cultures and histopathology are the primary diagnostic methods for IFIs, but they have limitations. We previously evaluated a panfungal polymerase chain reaction assay, which was 83% sensitive and 99% specific for angioinvasive IFIs. Here, we evaluated 3 less resource-intensive seminested assays targeting clinically relevant fungi in the order Mucorales and genera Aspergillus and Fusarium. Methods: Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue specimens from a multicenter trauma IFI cohort (2009-2014) were used. Cases were US military personnel injured in Afghanistan with histopathologic IFI evidence. Controls were patients with similar injury patterns and no laboratory IFI evidence (negative culture and histopathology). Seminested assays specific to Mucorales (V4/V5 regions of 18S rDNA), Aspergillus (mitochondrial tRNA), and Fusarium (internal transcribed spacer [ITS]/28A regions of DNA) were compared with a panfungal assay amplifying the internal transcribed spacer 2 region of rDNA and to histopathology. Results: Specimens from 92 injury sites (62 subjects) were compared with control specimens from 117 injuries (101 subjects). We observed substantial agreement between the seminested and panfungal assays overall, especially for the order Mucorales. Moderate agreement was observed at the genus level for Aspergillus and Fusarium. When compared with histopathology, sensitivity and specificity of seminested assays were 67.4% and 96.6%, respectively (sensitivity increased to 91.7% when restricted to sites with angioinvasion). Conclusions: Prior studies of seminested molecular diagnostics have focused on culture-negative samples from immunocompromised patients. Our findings underscore the utility of the seminested approach in diagnosing soft-tissue IFIs using formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue samples, especially with angioinvasion.

Mental and Physical Health-Related Quality of Life Following Military Polytrauma.

INTRODUCTION: The long-term impact of deployment-related trauma on mental and physical health-related quality of life (HRQoL) among military personnel is not well understood. We describe the mental and physical HRQoL among military personnel following deployment-related polytrauma after their discharge from the hospital and examine factors associated with HRQoL and longitudinal trends. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The U.S. military personnel with battlefield-related trauma enrolled in the Trauma Infectious Diseases Outcomes Study were surveyed using SF-8 Health Surveys at 1 month post-discharge (baseline) and at follow-up intervals over 2 years. Inclusion in the longitudinal analysis required baseline SF-8 plus responses during early (3 and/or 6 months) and later follow-up periods (12, 18, and/or 24 months). Associations of demographics, injury characteristics, and hospitalization with baseline SF-8 scores and longitudinal changes in SF-8 scores during follow-up were examined. Survey responses were used to calculate the Mental Component Summary score (MCS) and the Physical Component Summary score (PCS). The MCS focuses on vitality, mental health, social functioning, and daily activity limitations, whereas PCS is related to general health, bodily pain, physical functioning, and physical activity limitations. Longitudinal trends in SF-8 scores were assessed using chi-square tests by comparing the median score at each timepoint to the median 1-month (baseline) score, as well as comparing follow-up scores to the immediately prior timepoint (e.g., 6 months vs. 3 months). Associations with the 1-month baseline SF-8 scores were assessed using generalized linear regression modeling and associations with longitudinal changes in SF-8 were examined using generalized linear regression modeling with repeated measures. RESULTS: Among 781 enrollees, lower baseline SF-8 total scores and PCS were associated with spinal and lower extremity injuries (P < .001) in the multivariate analyses, whereas lower baseline MCS was associated with head/face/neck injuries (P < .001). Higher baseline SF-8 total was associated with having an amputation (P = .009), and lower baseline SF-8 total was also associated with sustaining a traumatic brain injury (TBI; P = .042). Among 524 enrollees with longitudinal follow-up, SF-8 scores increased, driven by increased PCS and offset by small MCS decreases. Upward SF-8 total score and PCS trends were associated with time post-hospital discharge and limb amputation (any) in the multivariate analyses (P < .05), whereas downward trends were independently associated with spinal injury and developing any post-discharge infection (P ≤ .001). Patients with lower extremity injuries had lower-magnitude improvements in PCS over time compared to those without lower extremity injuries (P < .001). Upward MCS trend was associated with higher injury severity (P = .003) in the multivariate analyses, whereas downward trends were independently associated with having a TBI (P < .001), time post-hospital discharge (P < .001), and occurrence of post-discharge infections (P = .002). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, HRQoL increased during the 2-year follow-up period, driven by PCS improvement. Increasing HRQoL was associated with time since hospital discharge and limb amputation, whereas a downward trend in HRQoL was associated with spinal injury and post-discharge infection. The longitudinal decline in MCS, driven by TBI occurrence, time since hospital discharge, and developing post-discharge infections, emphasizes the importance of longitudinal mental health care in this population.

Epidemiology of cranial infections in battlefield-related penetrating and open cranial injuries.

BACKGROUND: Penetrating brain injuries are a potentially lethal injury associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. We examined characteristics and outcomes among military personnel who sustained battlefield-related open and penetrating cranial injuries during military conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan. METHODS: Military personnel wounded during deployment (2009-2014) were included if they sustained an open or penetrating cranial injury and were admitted to participating hospitals in the United States. Injury characteristics, treatment course, neurosurgical interventions, antibiotic use, and infection profiles were examined. RESULTS: The study population included 106 wounded personnel, of whom 12 (11.3%) had an intracranial infection. Posttrauma prophylactic antibiotics were prescribed in more than 98% of patients. Patients who developed central nervous system (CNS) infections were more likely to have undergone a ventriculostomy ( p = 0.003), had a ventriculostomy in place for a longer period (17 vs. 11 days; p = 0.007), had more neurosurgical procedures ( p < 0.001), and have lower presenting Glasgow Coma Scale ( p = 0.01) and higher Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scores ( p = 0.018). Time to diagnosis of CNS infection was a median of 12 days postinjury (interquartile range, 7-22 days) with differences in timing by injury severity (critical head injury had median of 6 days, while maximal [currently untreatable] head injury had a median of 13.5 days), presence of other injury profiles in addition to head/face/neck (median, 22 days), and the presence of other infections in addition to CNS infections (median, 13.5 days). The overall length of hospitalization was a median of 50 days, and two patients died. CONCLUSION: Approximately 11% of wounded military personnel with open and penetrating cranial injuries developed CNS infections. These patients were more critically injured (e.g., lower Glasgow Coma Scale and higher Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scores) and required more invasive neurosurgical procedures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic and Epidemiological; Level IV.

Predictors of Massive Transfusion Protocol Initiation Among Trauma Patients Transported From the Scene Via Flight Emergency Management Services.

OBJECTIVE: Early identification of the subset of trauma patients with acute hemorrhage who require resuscitation via massive transfusion protocol (MTP) initiation is vital because such identification can ensure the availability of resuscitation products immediately upon hospital arrival and result in improved clinical outcomes, including reduced mortality. However, there are currently few studies on the predictors of MTP in the unique setting of flight transport. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of adult trauma patients transported from the scene via flight to 6 trauma centers between March 1, 2019, and January 21, 2021. Patients were included if they had emergency medical service vitals documented. The variables collected included demographics, comorbidities, cause of injury, body regions injured, in-flight treatments, and transport vitals. The primary outcome was MTP initiated by the receiving hospital. RESULTS: A total of 212 patients were included, of whom 16 (8%) had MTP initiated. During flight transport, 24 (11%) received whole blood, 9 (4%) received packed red blood cells, 11 (5%) had a tourniquet placed, and 5 (2%) received tranexamic acid. In adjusted analyses, receiving whole blood during transport (odds ratio [OR] = 8.52, P < .01), systolic blood pressure ≤ 90 mm Hg (OR = 8.07, P < .01), and a Glasgow Coma Scale score < 13 (OR = 8.38, P < .01) were independently associated with MTP. CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective cohort study showed that 3 factors readily available in the flight setting-receipt of whole blood, systolic blood pressure, and Glasgow Coma Scale score-are strong predictors of MTP at the receiving facility, particularly when considered in aggregate.

Adherence to Antibiotic Recommendations and Infection Among Patients With Open Long-Bone Fractures: An Examination of Antibiotic Prioritization in Fracture Management.

Open fractures are at high risk of infection because of exposure of bone and tissue to the environment. Initiation of intravenous antibiotics is recommended within 1 hour of hospital arrival, although the presence of other severe injuries may lead to delays in fracture management. This retrospective study of adult patients with open long-bone fractures admitted to six level 1 trauma centers between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2019, aimed to examine adherence to antibiotic recommendations. Associations between receiving recommendation-adherent antibiotics and patient and injury characteristics were investigated univariately and in adjusted regression analyses. The most common fracture locations among the 404 patients included were the tibia (43%) and fibula (26%). Fifty-eight percent of patients received recommendation-adherent antibiotics. After adjustment, patient demographics, comorbidities, cause of injury, and overall injury severity did not show significant associations with adherence to recommendations. Concomitant serious abdominal (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]=0.44) and spinal injuries (AOR=0.23) were associated with lower odds of receiving recommendation-adherent antibiotics. Additionally, fractures of certain locations were associated with increased odds of adherence (humerus: AOR=2.78; fibula: AOR=1.64), as were type 3 fractures (AOR=1.55). The overall infection rate was 4%, and adherence to antibiotic recommendations was not associated with infection (3% vs 5% for nonadherent, P=.34). Results suggest that although full recommendation adherence was somewhat low among this patient population, certain injury characteristics were predictive of adherence rates. Current antibiotic recommendations may benefit from consideration of how antibiotic initiation may fit into the prioritization of injury management, especially in patients with polytrauma with other severe injuries. [Orthopedics. 2023;46(1):54-58.].

Associations of Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratios with Reperfusion and Functional Outcomes in Ischemic Stroke after Endovascular Therapy.

OBJECTIVES: Treatment of ischemic stroke with endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) leads to improved outcomes compared to IV tPA. The neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), a marker of inflammation, has been proposed to predict outcomes in ischemic stroke patients and may be used to identify patients at risk for poor outcomes after EVT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective study of adult ischemic stroke patients undergoing EVT between 1/1/2018 and 12/31/2020. Outcomes were successful reperfusion (TICI score ≥2B), favorable discharge NIHSS (≤4), favorable discharge and 3-month mRS (≤2), and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH). The primary exposure was NLR, measured pre- and post-EVT. Other variables collected included demographics and timing of stroke onset, arrival, groin puncture, tPA, and recanalization. RESULTS: A total of 592 patients were included. The most common vessel involved was the middle cerebral artery (73%). Lower admission NLR was associated with favorable discharge NIHSS and favorable discharge and 3-month mRS (all P < 0.01). NLRs measured after EVT were associated with all the primary outcomes. Improvements in NLR after EVT were associated with favorable discharge (P = 0.02) and 3-month mRS (P = 0.02) and lower incidence of sICH (P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Because of the long-term functional deficits that can persist after ischemic stroke, it is vital to identify patients with higher probability for these outcomes. The results from this study showed that favorable NLR measures, as well as favorable trends in NLR over time, are associated with improved outcomes, indicating that NLR is a useful marker to identify patients at risk for poor functional outcomes.

Factors associated with delays in medical and surgical open facial fracture management.

Objectives: Open fractures are at risk of infection because of exposure of bone and tissue to the environment. Facial fractures are often accompanied by other severe injuries, and therefore fracture management may be delayed until after stabilization. Previous studies in this area have examined timing of multiple facets of care but have tended to report on each in isolation (eg, antibiotic initiation). Methods: This was a retrospective study of adult patients admitted to five trauma centers from January 1, 2017 to March 31, 2021 with open facial fractures. Variables collected included demographics, injury mechanism, details on facial and non-facial injuries, facial fracture management (irrigation and debridement (I&D), irrigation without debridement, open reduction internal fixation (ORIF), antibiotics), and other hospital events. The study hypothesized that the presence of serious non-facial injuries would be associated with delays in facial fracture management. The primary aims were to describe open facial fracture management practices and examine factors associated with early versus delayed fracture management. A secondary aim was to describe infection rates. Early treatment was defined as within 24 hours of arrival for I&D, irrigation without debridement, and ORIF and within 1 hour for antibiotics. Results: A total of 256 patients were included. Twenty-seven percent had major trauma (Injury Severity Score ≥16). The presence of serious head injury/traumatic brain injury was associated with delayed I&D (ORearly=0.04, p<0.01), irrigation without debridement (ORearly=0.09, p<0.01), and ORIF (ORearly=0.10, p<0.01). Going to the OR within 24 hours was associated with early I&D (ORearly=377.26, p<0.01), irrigation without debridement (ORearly=13.54, p<0.01), and ORIF (ORearly=154.92, p<0.01). The infection rate was 4%. Conclusions: In this examination of multiple aspects of open facial fracture management, serious injuries to non-facial regions led to delays in surgical fracture management, consistent with the study hypothesis. Level of evidence: Level III, prognostic/epidemiological.

Characterization of peritoneal reactive ascites collected from acute appendicitis and small bowel obstruction patients.

BACKGROUND: Pathological abdominal adhesions can cause bowel obstructions. A history of appendectomy (appy) increases patient rehospitalization risk directly related to adhesions. To potentially identify strategies for adhesion treatment, we characterized reactive ascites (rA) collected during appy or adhesiolysis for small bowel obstruction (SBO). METHODS: This is a non-randomized, prospective observational study recruiting patients with non-perforated appendicitis or SBO from three Level 1 trauma centers in the United States. rA were analyzed via liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) (n = 31), bead-based quantification cytokines and chemokines (n = 32) and soluble receptors (n = 30), and LC-MS metabolomics (n = 18). RESULTS: LC-MS showed that samples contained albumin, apolipoprotein A1, and transthyretin and that metabolites increased in SBO vs appy rA were biomarkers of oxidative stress. Multi-plex analyses showed levels of 17 cytokines/chemokines and 6 soluble receptors were significantly different in appy vs SBO rA. Top increased proteins in appy compared to SBO rA by 20.14-, 11.53-, and 8.18-fold were granulocyte-colony stimulating factor, C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 10, and interleukin-10, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: These data further define pro- and anti-inflammatory mediators and metabolites that may drive formation or perpetuate chronic abdominal adhesions. Future research is to further explore whether attenuation of these factors may decrease pathologic adhesion formation.

Are trauma research programs in academic and non-academic centers measured by equal standards? A survey of 137 level I trauma centers in the United States.

BACKGROUND: American College of Surgeons level I trauma center verification requires an active research program. This study investigated differences in the research programs of academic and non-academic trauma centers. METHODS: A 28-question survey was administered to ACS-verified level I trauma centers in 11/12/2020-1/7/2021. The survey included questions on center characteristics (patient volume, staff size), peer-reviewed publications, staff and resources dedicated to research, and funding sources. RESULTS: The survey had a 31% response rate: 137 invitations were successfully delivered via email, and 42 centers completed at least part of the survey. Responding level I trauma centers included 36 (86%) self-identified academic and 6 (14%) self-identified non-academic centers. Academic and non-academic centers reported similar annual trauma patient volume (2190 vs. 2450), number of beds (545 vs. 440), and years of ACS verification (20 vs. 14), respectively. Academic centers had more full-time trauma surgeons (median 8 vs 6 for non-academic centers) and general surgery residents (median 30 vs 7) than non-academic centers. Non-academic centers more frequently ranked trauma surgery (100% vs. 36% academic), basic science (50% vs. 6% academic), neurosurgery (50% vs. 14% academic), and nursing (33% vs. 0% academic) in the top three types of studies conducted. Academic centers were more likely to report non-profit status (86% academic, 50% non-academic) and utilized research funding from external governmental or non-profit grants more often (76% vs 17%). CONCLUSIONS: Survey results suggest that academic centers may have more physician, resident, and financial resources available to dedicate to trauma research, which may make fulfillment of ACS level I research requirements easier. Structural and institutional changes at non-academic centers, such as expansion of general surgery resident programs and increased pursuit of external grant funding, may help ensure that academic and non-academic sites are equally equipped to fulfill ACS research criteria.

Effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on the ability of level 1 trauma centers to meet American College of Surgeons research requirements.

INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic has had major effects on hospitals' ability to perform scientific research while providing patient care and minimizing virus exposure and spread. Many non-COVID-19 research has been halted, and funding has been diverted to COVID-19 research and away from other areas. METHODS: A 28-question survey was administered to all level 1 trauma centers in the USA that included questions about how the pandemic affected the trauma centers' ability to fulfill the volume and research requirements of level 1 verification by the American College of Surgeons (ACS). RESULTS: The survey had a 29% response rate (40/137 successful invitations). Over half of respondents (52%) reported reduced trauma admissions during the pandemic, and 7% reported that their admissions dropped below the volume required for level 1 verification. Many centers diverted resources from research during the pandemic (44%), halted ongoing consenting studies (33%), and had difficulty fulfilling research requirements because of competing clinical priorities (40%). DISCUSSION: Results of this study show a need for flexibility in the ACS verification process during the COVID-19 pandemic, potentially including reduction of the required admissions and/or research publication volumes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, cross-sectional study.

Effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on health insurance coverage among trauma patients: a study of six level I trauma centers.

BACKGROUND: Increased unemployment during the COVID-19 pandemic has likely led to widespread loss of employer-provided health insurance. This study examined trends in health insurance coverage among trauma patients during the COVID-19 pandemic, including differences in demographics and clinical characteristics by insurance type. METHODS: This was a retrospective study on adult patients admitted to six level 1 trauma centers between January 1, 2018 and June 30, 2020. The primary exposure was hospital admission date: January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2018 (Period 1), January 1, 2019 to March 15, 2020 (Period 2), and March 16, 2020 to June 30, 2020 (Period 3). Covariates included demographic and clinical variables. χ² tests examined whether the rates of patients covered by each insurance type differed between the pandemic and earlier periods. Mann-Whiney U and χ² tests investigated whether patient demographics or clinical characteristics differed within each insurance type across the study periods. RESULTS: A total of 31 225 trauma patients admitted between January 1, 2018 and June 30, 2019 were included. Forty-one per cent (n=12 651) were admitted in Period 1, 49% (n=15 258) were from Period 2, and 11% (n=3288) were from Period 3. Percentages of uninsured patients increased significantly across the three periods (Periods 1 to 3: 15%, 16%, 21%) (ptrend=0.02); however, there was no accompanying decrease in the percentages of commercial/privately insured patients (Periods 1 to 3: 40%, 39%, 39%) (ptrend=0.27). There was a significant decrease in the percentage of patients on Medicare during the pandemic period (Periods 1 to 3: 39%, 39%, 34%) (p<0.01). DISCUSSION: This study found that job loss during the COVID-19 pandemic resulted in increases of uninsured trauma patients. However, there was not a corresponding decrease in commercial/privately insured patients, as may have been expected; rather, a decrease in Medicare patients was observed. These findings may be attributable to a growing workforce during the study period, in combination with a younger overall patient population during the pandemic. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Retrospective, level III study.

Compliance with American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) recommendations for thromboembolic prophylaxis in the intensive care unit: a level I trauma center experience.

BACKGROUND: Recommendations are for nearly universal venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis in critically ill hospitalized patients because of their well-recognized risks. In those intensive care units (ICUs) where patient care is more uniformly directed, it may be expected that VTE prophylaxis would more closely follow this standard over units that are less uniform, such as open-model ICUs. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study on all patients aged 18+ admitted to an open ICU between 6/1/2017 and 5/31/2018. Patients were excluded if they had instructions to receive comfort measures only or required therapeutic anticoagulant administration. Prophylaxis administration practices, including administration of mechanical and/or pharmacologic prophylaxis and delayed (≥48 h post-ICU admission) initiation of pharmacologic prophylaxis, were compared between patients admitted to the ICU by the trauma service versus other departments. Root causes for opting out of pharmacological prophylaxis were documented and compared between the two study groups. RESULTS: One-hundred two study participants were admitted by the trauma service, and 98 were from a non-trauma service. Mechanical (98% trauma vs. 99% non-trauma, P = 0.99) and pharmacologic (54% vs. 44%, P = 0.16) prophylaxis rates were similar between the two admission groups. The median time from ICU admission to pharmacologic prophylaxis initiation was 53 h for the trauma service and 10 h for the non-trauma services (P ≤ 0.01). In regression analyses, trauma-service admission (odds ratio (OR) = 2.88, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.21-6.83) and increasing ICU length of stay (OR = 1.13, 95% CI 1.05-1.21) were independently associated with pharmacologic prophylaxis use. Trauma-service admission (OR = 8.30, 95% CI 2.18-31.56) and increasing hospital length of stay (OR = 1.15, 95% CI 1.03-1.28) were independently associated with delayed prophylaxis initiation. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the receipt of VTE prophylaxis of any type was close to 100%, due to the nearly universal use of mechanical compression devices among ICU patients in this study. However, when examining pharmacologic prophylaxis specifically, the rate was considerably lower than is currently recommended: 54% among the trauma services and 44% among non-trauma services.

Associations of Antithrombotic Timing and Regimen with Ischemic Stroke and Bleeding Complications in Blunt Cerebrovascular Injury.

BACKGROUND: Blunt cerebrovascular injuries (BCVIs) are associated with long-term neurological effects. The first-line treatment for BCVIs is antithrombotics, but consensus on the optimal choice and timing of treatment is lacking. METHODS: This was a retrospective study on patients aged at least 18 years admitted to 6 level 1 trauma centers between 1/1/2014 and 12/31/2017 with grade 1-4 BCVI and treated with antithrombotics. Differences in treatment practices were examined across the 6 centers. The primary outcome was ischemic stroke, and secondary outcomes were related to bleeding complications: blood transfusion and intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). Treatment characteristics examined were time to diagnosis and first computerized tomography angiography, time of total treatment course, time on each antithrombotic (anticoagulants, antiplatelets, combination), time from hospital arrival to antithrombotic initiation, and treatment interruption, i.e., treatment halted for a surgical procedure and restarted postoperatively. Chi-square, Fisher exact, Spearman's rank-order correlation, Wilcoxon rank-sum, Kruskal-Wallis, and Cox proportional hazards models with time-varying covariates were used to evaluate associations with the outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 189 patients with BCVI were included. The median (IQR) time from arrival to antithrombotic initiation was 27 (8-61) hours, and 28% of patients had treatment interrupted. The ischemic stroke rate was 7.5% (n = 14), with most strokes (64%, n = 9) occurring between arrival and treatment initiation. Treatment interruption was associated with ischemic stroke (75% of patients with stroke had an interruption versus 24% of patients with no stroke; P < .01). Time on anticoagulants was not associated with ischemic stroke (P = .78), transfusion (P = .43), or ICH (P = .96). Similarly, time on antiplatelets (P = .54, P = .65, P = .60) and time on combination therapy (P = .96, P = .38, P = .57) were not associated with these outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The timing and consistency of antithrombotic administration are critical in preventing adverse outcomes in patients with BCVI. Most ischemic strokes in this study population occurred between arrival and antithrombotic initiation, representing events that may potentially be intervened upon by earlier treatment. Future studies should examine the safety of continuing treatment through surgical procedures.

The impact of a randomized dietary and physical activity intervention on chronic inflammation among obese African-American women.

Lifestyle interventions may reduce inflammation and lower breast cancer (BrCa) risk. This randomized trial assessed the impact of the Sistas Inspiring Sistas Through Activity and Support (SISTAS) study on plasma C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6) and Dietary Inflammatory Index (DII). This unblinded, dietary and physical activity trial was implemented in 337 obese (body mass index [BMI] ≥30 kg/m2) African American (AA) women recruited between 2011 and 2015 in South Carolina through a community-based participatory approach with measurements at baseline, 3 months, and 12 months. Participants were randomized into either intervention (n = 176) or wait-list control group (n = 161). Linear mixed-effect models were used for analyses of CRP and IL-6. Baseline CRP was significantly higher in those with greater obesity, body fat percentage, and waist circumference (all p <.01). No difference was observed between groups for CRP or IL-6 at 3 or 12 months; however, improvements in diet were observed in the intervention group compared to the control group (p = .02) at 3 months but were not sustained at 12 months. Although the intervention was not successful at reducing levels of CRP or IL-6, a significant decrease was observed in DII score for the intervention group, indicating short-term positive dietary change.

Long-term mortality and causes of death among patients with mild traumatic brain injury: a 5-year multicenter study.

Objective: Undergoing mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) increases mortality risk, but it is unclear what drives this finding. This study explored associations with mortality in patients with mTBI.Methods: This was a retrospective study of patients with mTBI and controls admitted to six level 1 trauma centers in 1/1/2009-12/31/2013. Mortality data were from the CDC National Death Index. Patients with mTBI were identified by ICD-9 code, Glasgow Coma Scale 13-15, Injury Severity Score (ISS) <16, and loss of consciousness ≤1 hour. Controls had hospital length of stay ≤24 hours, ISS<16, and no head injury.Results: This study included 964 patients with mTBI and 5,567 controls. mTBI was associated with a 47% increased 5-year mortality risk (HR = 1.47, 95% CL 1.08-2.01). Patients with mTBI were more likely to die of a neurodegenerative disease (17% vs 11%, P = .119). Cardiovascular (HR = 1.80, 95% CL 1.17-2.77), neurological (HR = 3.33, 95% CL 2.07-5.38), and respiratory (HR = 1.70, 95% CL 1.01-2.86) comorbidities were associated with mortality in patients with mTBI.Conclusions: Patients with mTBI are at increased mortality risk in the 5 years post-injury. Mortality in patients with mTBI was most influenced by preexisting conditions.

The effect of discharge destination and primary insurance provider on hospital discharge delays among patients with traumatic brain injury: a multicenter study of 1,543 patients.

BACKGROUND: Hospital length of stay (HLOS) is a commonly used measure of hospital quality and is influenced by clinical and non-clinical factors. To reduce HLOS, it is key to identify factors placing patients at increased risk of lengthy HLOS and discharge delays. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients age ≥ 18 admitted to four level 1 trauma centers between 1/1/2015 and 3/31/2018 with traumatic brain injury (TBI). The primary outcome was discharge delay, defined as discharge ≥24 h after case management notes indicated the patient was ready for discharge. The independent variables of interest were primary insurance provider and discharge destination. Chi-square, Fisher exact, and unadjusted and adjusted logistic regression analyses were used to assess associations between discharge delay and the two primary independent variables, as well as other patient demographic and clinical characteristics. Complications developing during the delay period were also examined. RESULTS: A total of 1543 patients with TBI were included. The median age was 61 years, and the median HLOS was 5 days. Approximately half of patients were discharged home (54%). The most common insurance providers were Medicare (35%) and commercial/private (35%). Two-hundred ten (14%) patients experienced a discharge delay. The median delay period was 3 days, and the most common reasons for delay were insurance authorization (52%) and lack of accepting bed (41%). Compared to being discharged home, patients discharged to a skilled nursing facility (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 10.35) or intermediate care facility (AOR = 10.64) had the highest odds of discharge delay. Compared to Medicare patients, uninsured/self-pay patients (AOR = 2.98) and those with Medicaid (AOR = 2.83) or commercial/private insurance (AOR = 2.22) had higher odds of delay. Thirty-two patients (15% of those delayed) experienced at least one complication during the delay, some of which were clinically severe. CONCLUSIONS: A substantial portion of TBI patients in this study experienced discharge delays, and discharge destination and primary insurance provider were significant drivers of these delays. Evaluation of a facility's quality of care should consider the specific causes of these delays.

Factors to Consider When Evaluating Rates of Pharmacologic Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis Administration Among Trauma Patients.

It is generally believed that pharmacologic prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism (VTE) is underused. However, previous studies have not shown associations between increased prophylaxis administration and reductions in VTE. We here investigated prophylaxis administration and VTE incidence among trauma patients at our facility to determine whether to further increase prophylaxis administration after implementation of a standardized monitoring protocol. Univariate analyses and regression models were used to evaluate the protocol's effect on VTE, identify clinical factors associated with VTE and with receiving prophylaxis, and identify over- or under-prophylaxed patients. A final prophylaxis rate of 71.2% was achieved, an increase from the 40.8% reported by the Trauma Quality Improvement Program in 2015, with no accompanying reduction in VTE (1.5% pre and postintervention). Factors that identified patients at lower probability of receiving prophylaxis were those that increased bleeding risk: severe head injuries (odds ratio [OR] = 0.13) and preexisting bleeding (OR = 0.69) and renal/kidney (OR = 0.46) disorders. A large group of patients was both at increased odds of receiving prophylaxis and at low risk of VTE, representing a group that may be considered for nonpharmacologic options. Examination of current prophylaxis practices and identification of underuse or overuse is beneficial before expending effort to increase prophylaxis administration to reduce VTE.

Food insecurity, childhood hunger and caregiver life experiences among households with children in South Carolina, USA.

OBJECTIVE: We explored how positive and negative life experiences of caregivers are associated with household food insecurity. DESIGN: The Midlands Family Study (MFS) was a cross-sectional study with three levels of household food security: food secure, food insecure without child hunger and food insecure with child hunger. Ordinal logistic regression analysis was used for analyses of negative and positive life experiences (number, impact, type) associated with food insecurity. SETTING: An eight-county region in South Carolina, USA, in 2012-2013. PARTICIPANTS: Caregivers (n 511) in households with children. RESULTS: Caregivers who reported greater numbers of negative life experiences and greater perceived impact had increased odds of household food insecurity and reporting their children experienced hunger. Each additional negative life experience count of the caregiver was associated with a 16 % greater odds of food insecurity without child hunger and a 28 % greater odds of child hunger. Each one-unit increase in the negative impact score (e.g. a worsening) was associated with 8 % higher odds of food insecurity without child hunger and 12 % higher odds of child hunger. Negative work experiences or financial instability had the strongest association (OR = 1·8; 95 % CI 1·5, 2·2) with child hunger. Positive life experiences were generally not associated with food security status, with one exception: for each unit increase in the number of positive experiences involving family and other relationships, the odds of child hunger decreased by 22 %. CONCLUSIONS: More research is needed to understand approaches to build resilience against negative life experiences and strengthen positive familial, community and social relationships.

Lung cancer screening: Practice guidelines and insurance coverage are not enough.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) is expected to increase early detection of lung cancer and improve survival. The growth in the number of advanced nurse practitioners (NPs) in primary care settings increases the likelihood that an NP will serve as a patient's provider. This study's purpose was to examine knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding LDCT among NPs who work in primary care settings. METHODS: An explanatory, sequential, mixed-method design used a 32-item questionnaire, followed by a semi-structured telephone interview. The development of the survey and interview questions were guided by a conceptual framework representing a temporal sequence for behavior change and potential barriers to guideline adherence. CONCLUSIONS: Nurse practitioners believe that shared decision making with their high-risk patients about LDCT is within their scope of their practice. Working in time-constrained primary care settings, NPs have limited abilities to improve the uptake of LDCT. Substantial patient barriers exist that deter follow through on providers' recommendation. Disseminating guidelines and authorizing health insurance reimbursement is insufficient. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Research is needed that investigates the screening process so that barriers can be closely studied. Culture change is needed where early detection has greater value for insurers, providers, and patients.

Should Measures of Health Care Availability Be Based on the Providers or the Procedures? A Case Study with Implications for Rural Colorectal Cancer Disparities.

PURPOSE: Patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) living in rural areas have lower survival rates than those in urban areas, potentially because of lack of access to quality CRC screening and treatment. The purpose of this study was to compare traditional physician density (ie, colonoscopy provider availability per capita) against a new physician density measure using an example case of colonoscopy volume and quality. The latter is particularly relevant for rural providers, who may have fewer patients and are more frequently nongastroenterologists. METHODS: We conducted a secondary data analysis of the 2014 Medicare Provider Utilization and Payment Database and the National Cancer Institute State Cancer Profile Database. Volume-weighted physician density scores at the state and county levels were created, accounting for (1) the physician's annual colonoscopy volume and (2) whether the physician performs ≥100 procedures per year. We compared volume-weighted versus traditional density, overall and by rurality, and examined their correlation with CRC screening, incidence, and mortality rates. FINDINGS: The difference between volume-weighted and traditional density scores was particularly large in rural parts of the West and Midwest, and it was most similar in the Northeast. Although weak, correlations with CRC outcomes were stronger for volume-weighted density, and they did not differ by rurality. CONCLUSIONS: Our new method is an improvement over traditional methods because it considers the variation of physician procedure volume, and it has a stronger correlation with population health outcomes. Weighted density scores portray a more realistic picture of physician supply, particularly in rural areas.