Update on the contraceptive contraindications.

BACKGROUND: The choice of contraceptive methods has considerably increased over recent years. However, all available methods are not appropriate for all women, especially those with medical conditions or individual characteristics in whom any pregnancy, particularly unintended pregnancy, is at higher risk. The safety of contraception is crucial for these women and evidence-based guidance to help healthcare providers choosing a suitable method has been published. The aim of our review is to make an update on the main contraceptive contraindications. METHODS: The World Health Organisation Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use (WHO-MEC) published in 2015 are referred to throughout this review. The rationale behind the recommendations for women with cardiovascular, rheumatic, neurologic, gynaecological or endocrine disorders was first analysed. The national adaptations of the WHO-MEC, especially the French, British, and American ones, were then scrutinized. MAIN FINDINGS: Overall, the MECs considered tend to provide the same recommendations. However, there are some noticeable differences that may be useful to know. Hence, for a given condition, differences in categorisation have been noticed where limited or controversial scientific evidence relating to this condition exists, especially regarding hormonal contraceptives. Some medical conditions or characteristics, included in some MECs but not in others, have also been identified. CONCLUSION: MECs represent valuable tools to help clinicians to prescribe the most acceptable and safe contraceptive method for each individual woman. Although it may be useful to consult different MECs for some complex conditions, prescribers should always bear in mind that these MECs are only guidelines and that their clinical judgment should always prevail.

ESC expert statement on the effects on mood of the natural cycle and progestin-only contraceptives.

Hormonal fluctuations during the natural cycle, as well as progestins used for hormonal contraception, can exert effects on mood especially in vulnerable women. Negative effects of levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine contraception on mood are rare.

[Contraception during perimenopause: The spermicides option]. / Contraception des femmes en périménopause : place des spermicides.

AIM: In perimenopause, the increased cardiovascular and cancer risk and the increased incidence of gynaecologic disorders have a major impact on the choice of an appropriate contraceptive method. The aim of this review is to assess the potential benefit of spermicides at this stage of woman's life. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This review presents the eligibility criteria of the different contraceptive methods according to national and international guidelines, together with a literature review of the efficacy and side-effects of the two major spermicidal preparations, benzalkonium chloride and nonoxynol-9, with specific focus on the over-40 age group. RESULTS: The guidelines do not contraindicate any contraceptive method in women after 40. The efficacy data of spermicides show high variation between publications, with no age-specific differences. A special group suitable for spermicide use for contraception is perimenopausal women, particularly those with contraindications to other contraceptive methods or unwilling to use them. An additional benefit of some spermicides could be their lubricant effect. CONCLUSION: The spermicide option should be included into contraceptive counselling for women aged over 40, with evidence-based information about their mechanism of action, efficacy and safety. There is, however, a need for efficacy and acceptability studies on spermicides, with special reference to this age group.

[Contraception in breastfeeding women: place for spermicides]. / Contraception des femmes allaitantes: place des spermicides.

Any contraceptive method prescribed to a breastfeeding woman should be not only adapted to her physiological condition after delivery and to the health of her newborn, but should also meet her expectations. According to the French guidelines, combined hormonal contraception is prohibited up to 6 weeks after delivery in breastfeeding women and is not recommended within 6 months. Intrauterine devices and oral progestin alone may be utilized only from the fourth week after delivery. Spermicides have a privileged indication in breastfeeding women. Indeed, they have no restriction in national and international guidelines. In France, spermicides primarily include myristalkonium chloride and benzalkonium chloride that does not pass into maternal milk according Liebert. In addition to their safe use, the lubricant effect of some specialties can be useful. Spermicides can be used in combination with a condom as well as with the lactational amenorrhea method. The acceptability and success of spermicides in breastfeeding woman depends largely on the information of users, their motivation and understanding of the conditions of use.

Contraception after breast cancer: a retrospective review of the practice among French gynecologists in the 2000's.

PURPOSE OF INVESTIGATION: To describe the French practices regarding contraception after breast cancer in the 2000's. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 2,500 forms were sent to gynecologists practicing in France. Inclusion criteria were premenopausal patients who had a history of breast cancer and who had been prescribed contraception after diagnosis. Between June 1, 2002 and January 1, 2003, 197 evaluable responses were retrieved. RESULTS: The median age of the sample was 38.5 years. The most commonly used form of contraception was an intrauterine device (n = 144, 73.1%). Hormonal contraception was prescribed for 42 patients (21.3%), and other methods were used in 29 patients (14.7%) (Condoms n = 14, tubal sterilization n = 7, and others n = 8). Recurrence occurred in 27 patients (13%); 2.9% in the progestin group, 16.3% in the IUD group, and 14.8% with the other methods). CONCLUSIONS: It is necessary to evaluate current contraception practices after breast cancer to evaluate the efficacy and safety of contraception in these patients.

Comparison of a 24-day and a 21-day pill regimen for the novel combined oral contraceptive, nomegestrol acetate and 17ß-estradiol (NOMAC/E2): a double-blind, randomized study.

BACKGROUND Nomegestrol acetate/17ß-estradiol (NOMAC/E(2)) is a new monophasic oral contraceptive combining NOMAC (2.5 mg), a highly selective progesterone-derived progestogen, with E(2) (1.5 mg), which is structurally identical to endogenous estrogen. The objective of this study was to compare the effects on ovarian activity of two different NOMAC/E(2) regimens. METHODS This was a double-blind, randomized study. Healthy, premenopausal women (aged 18-38 years, previous menstrual cycle length 28 ± 7 days) were randomized by computer-generated code to once-daily NOMAC/E(2) for three consecutive 28-day cycles: either 24 days with a 4-day placebo interval (n = 40) or 21 days with a 7-day placebo interval (n = 37) per cycle. Follicular growth (primary outcome measure), plasma hormone profiles and bleeding patterns were assessed. RESULTS There was no evidence of ovulation during treatment with either NOMAC/E(2) regimen. The largest follicle diameter was significantly smaller in the 24-day group than in the 21-day group [mean (SD) mm in cycle 2: 9.0 (3.0) versus 11.3 (5.3) (P = 0.02); in cycle 3: 9.2 (3.0) versus 11.5 (6.0) (P = 0.04)]. Mean FSH plasma levels were significantly lower in the 24-day versus the 21-day group on Day 24 of cycles 1 and 2. Withdrawal bleeding duration was significantly shorter in the 24-day than in the 21-day group [mean (SD) days after cycle 1: 3.5 (1.3) versus 5.0 (2.6) (P = 0.002); after cycle 2: 3.9 (1.6) versus 4.8 (1.7) (P = 0.03)]. CONCLUSIONS The 24-day NOMAC/E(2) regimen was associated with greater inhibition of follicular growth and shorter duration of withdrawal bleeding than the 21-day regimen, suggesting the shorter pill-free interval results in a greater margin of contraceptive efficacy and tolerability, and fewer withdrawal symptoms.

[Compliance with hormone replacement therapy in menopausal women: results of a two-year prospective French study comparing transdermal treatment with fixed oral combination therapy]. / Observance du traitement hormonal substitutif de la ménopause: résultats d'une étude prospective française de deux ans, comparant un traitement transdermique et une association fixe par voie orale.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate rates of continuation with hormone replacement therapy (HRT) at 2 years in 2 cohorts of female patients, one of which was treated with a set combination of oral oestradiol valerate and medroxyprogesterone acetate and the other with percutaneous 17 beta-oestradiol gel combined with an oral progestogen selected by the prescribing doctor. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective, randomised, open study, including 885 patients followed for 2 years whose 477 were in the oral HRT cohort and 408 were in the dermal cohort. Randomisation was done by group with prescription of the selected HRT for the cohort. The 2 treatment groups were compared using chi(2) tests and Fisher's exact test for qualitative variables, Student's t test or Wilcoxon's test for qualitative variables and Kaplan-Meier survival curves for continuation of HRT, with comparisons using the log-rank test. The prognostic value of baseline parameters on subsequent continuation of HRT was studied using the Cox model (Wald test, odds ratio). RESULTS; Among the 885 treated patients, 711 received the HRT assigned to their cohort (382 in the oral HRT cohort, 329 in the dermal HRT cohort). After 2 years, 77.9% of the patients in the oral HRT cohort and 73.4% of the patients in the dermal HRT cohort were continuing to take their prescribed HRT (P = 0. 076): 37.9% of patients in the oral HRT cohort and 20.2% of patients in the dermal HRT cohort (P < 0.001) continued taking their treatment without any modification. CONCLUSION: Although there was no significant difference in the level of compliance in the 2 groups, it is nonetheless worth noting that the HRT compliance with a sequential fixed estroprogestogen combination was, in this trial, at least equal to that with the free combination of a transdermal estrogen and a progestogen whose nature, dosage and sequence duration are selected by the prescriber. On the other hand, treatment modifications occurred more frequently in the cutaneous HRT group, which is logical as free combination affords to adapt the treatment to each patient.

[Compliance with hormone replacement therapy in menopause: effect of an original education program. The COMET study]. / Observance du traitement hormonal substitutif de la ménopause: effet d'un programme d'éducation original. L'étude COMET.

OBJECTIVE: To study the impact of an original education program on compliance to hormone replacement therapy (HRT) in post-menopausal women. METHODS: Data were obtained from 1,192 post-menopausal women (age: 53 +/- 5 years) included in the study with an onset less than six months: E2 gel (n = 791) or patch (n = 401) + progestins, and randomized in either educational program (Ep = 600) or regular verbal counselling (VC = 592). A patient is considered bad compliant with HRT when she prematurely stopped the study, whatever the reason of the cessation. The groups EP and VC are homogeneous for the age distribution, the HRT regimen, the date of onset and the climateric symptoms scores. RESULTS: There is a significant difference between EP and VC groups in compliance, respectively 86 and 81% (p < 0.027). This difference is partially explained by the significant improvement in the patch subgroups (EP: 86% versus VC: 77%, p = 0.028). The trend observed in the gel group is not significant (EP: 85% and VC: 82%) due to the high level of compliance usually noticed in women treated with the gel and the verbal counselling. The significative difference in the compliance observed during the verbal counselling between the continuous (76%) and the sequential (86%, p = 0.001) HRT regimen disappears with the educational program (continuous: 84% and sequential: 87%, NS). CONCLUSION: This first large study on the HRT compliance in France, using a patient educational material, validates its efficacy to reach a better compliance than with regular verbal counselling. Even though in the daily practice, about 40% of the patients discontinue the treatment during the first year, 81% of the women followed in this study continue to receive the HRT after nine months of use. The original educational program of the COMET study improves significatively this high compliance (+ 5% from the verbal counselling). Thus, the combination of the doctor verbal counselling and an educational material is desirable to obtain a good compliance with HRT.

A multinational evaluation of the efficacy, safety and acceptability of the Protectaid contraceptive sponge.

OBJECTIVE: The Protectaid sponge (Gefar Pharma, Switzerland) is a new feminine barrier contraceptive method containing three low-dose spermicidal agents. In order to evaluate its efficacy and safety profiles, an international, multicenter study has been conducted in four countries. METHODS: Healthy, presumably fertile and sexually active women were enrolled in this study and were followed at 15 days, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months. Contraceptive efficacy was assessed by a pregnancy test, while safety was evaluated by performing gynecological examinations as well as reporting adverse events. The 'acceptability' of the sponge by the women was assessed through a standard questionnaire. RESULTS: A total of 129 women were enrolled in the study, generating 1182 cycles of use of the sponge. The overall efficacy rate was 77%, with no significant influence of age or parity. Acceptability was high, with 85% of subjects being symptom- or problem-free while using the sponge. Finally, the safety profile was very good, with no clinically significant evidence of local or systemic adverse reactions. CONCLUSION: The new Protectaid sponge is a safe and effective non-hormonal contraceptive method for women.

Guaranteeing freedom of choice in matters of contraception and abortion in Europe: some personal remarks.

The most important beneficial effect of modern contraception is that it has promoted the concept of birth control as a fundamental right of women from the viewpoint of equality between men and women. This right will lead to further rights for women, in particular, that of a free choice in respect of their sex lives, their method of procreation and, in more general terms, their way of life and their legitimate place in society.