Real-world effectiveness and safety of handheld ultrasound in pleural procedures.

The use of ultrasound for pleural procedures is associated with a decreased risk of complications. Handheld ultrasounds allow for easier evaluation of the pleural space. Limited data exists for the use of such devices for pleural procedures. The primary objective of our study was to assess the effectiveness and safety of handheld ultrasound for pleural procedures. We performed a prospective observational study, including all consecutive patients who underwent pleural procedures using the handheld ultrasound between September 2021 and November 2023. A total of 332 pleural procedures were attempted with handheld ultrasound, of which 329 pleural procedures (99.1%) were successfully performed. The median volume of fluid drained was 500 (interquartile range: 300-800). Thoracentesis was performed in 127 patients (38.5%), tube thoracostomy in 179 patients (54.4%), and medical thoracoscopy in 23 patients (7.0%). Exudative pleural effusions were found in 264 patients (80.0%), of which 152 (46.2%) were determined to be due to infectious etiologies. A total of 4 (1.2%) patients had a complication due to the procedure. 2 patients (0.6%) had a pneumothorax, while 2 patients (0.6%) developed a hemothorax. A total of 101 patients had either low platelets (<50×109/L) or use of anti-platelet or anti-coagulant drugs. 128 patients (38.8%) were on positive pressure support during the pleural procedure. Our study shows that handheld ultrasounds are effective and safe for pleural procedures, including cases with septated pleural effusions and patients on anti-platelet or anti-coagulant drugs.

Pleural fluid characteristics of patients with COVID-19 infection.

INTRODUCTION: Pleural effusions are known to occur in many cases of COVID-19. Data on typical characteristics of COVID-19-associated pleural effusions are limited. The goal of this project was to characterize the pleural fluid from patients with COVID-19. METHODS: We retrospectively collected electronic medical record data from adults hospitalized at a large metropolitan hospital system with COVID-19 infection who had a pleural effusion and a thoracentesis performed. We assessed pleural fluid characteristics and applied Light's criteria. RESULTS: We identified 128 effusions from 106 unique patients; 45.4% of the effusions had fluid/serum protein ratio greater than 0.5, 33.9% had fluid/serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) greater than 0.6, and 56.2% had fluid LDH greater than 2/3 of the serum upper limit of normal. Altogether, 68.5% of effusions met at least one of these three characteristics and therefore were exudative by Light's criteria. The white blood cell (WBC) differential was predominantly lymphocytic (mean 42.8%) or neutrophilic (mean 28.7%); monocytes (mean 12.7%) and eosinophils (mean 2.5%) were less common. CONCLUSION: We demonstrate that 68.5% of pleural effusions in patients with COVID-19 infection were exudative and hypothesize that COVID-19-associated pleural effusions are likely to be exudative with WBC differential more likely to be predominantly lymphocytic.

Development and content validation of the checklist for assessing placement of a small-bore chest tube (CAPS) for small-bore chest tube placement.

Background: Small-bore chest tube (SBCT) placement via modified Seldinger technique is a commonly performed invasive procedure for treatment of pleural effusion and pneumothorax. When performed suboptimally, it may lead to serious complications. Validated checklists are central to teaching and assessing procedural skills and may result in improved health care quality. In this paper, we describe the development and content validation of a SBCT placement checklist. Methods: A literature review across multiple medical databases and seminal textbooks was performed to identify all publications describing procedural steps involved in SBCT placement. No studies were identified that involved systematic development of a checklist for this purpose. After the first iteration of a comprehensive checklist (CAPS) based on literature review was developed, the modified Delphi technique involving a panel of nine multidisciplinary experts was used to modify it and establish its content validity. Results: After four Delphi rounds, the mean expert-rated Likert score across all checklist items was 6.85 ± 0.68 (out of 7). The final, 31-item checklist had a high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.846) with 95% of the responses (by nine experts across 31 checklist items) being a numerical score of 6 or 7. Conclusions: This study reports the development and content validity of a comprehensive checklist for teaching and assessing SBCT placement. For purposes of demonstrating construct validity, this checklist should next be studied in the simulation and clinical setting.

Diagnostic value of bronchoscopy in Sars-Cov-2 infection: A systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the diagnostic performance of bronchoscopy in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 infection. METHODS: The systematic review was conducted in April 2021 and comprised search of published articles and preprint servers for original articles assessing diagnostic performance of bronchoscopy in patients with suspected coronavirus disease 2019 infection. The primary outcome of interest was diagnostic sensitivity of bronchoalveolar lavage in the patients. The quality of each study was assessed using the Quality Assessment, Data Abstraction and Synthesis-2 tool. RESULTS: Of the 29 full-text articles assessed for eligibility, 4(13.8%) were included collectively comprising 209 patients who had undergone bronchoalveolar lavage. Mean sensitivity of bronchoalveolar lavage was 83.5% ± 10.63 (range: 68.2-940%). Overall, the 4 studies had an unclear or low risk of bias. CONCLUSIONS: Limited data suggested that bronchoscopy with bronchoalveolar lavage did not have reliably higher diagnostic sensitivity than that reported for either nasopharyngeal or oropharyngeal swabs.

Comparing modalities for risk assessment in patients with pulmonary lesions and nondiagnostic bronchoscopy for suspected lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Bronchoscopy is commonly utilized for non-surgical sampling of indeterminant pulmonary lesions, but nondiagnostic procedures are common. Accurate assessment of the risk of malignancy is essential for decision making in these patients, yet we lack tools that perform well across this heterogeneous group of patients. We sought to evaluate the accuracy of three previously validated risk models and physician-assessed risk (PAR) in patients with a newly identified lung lesion undergoing bronchoscopy for suspected lung cancer where the result is nondiagnostic. METHODS: We performed an analysis of prospective data collected for the Percepta Bronchial Genomic Classifier Multicenter Registry. PAR and three previously validated risk models (Mayo Clinic, Veteran's Affairs, and Brock) were used to determine the probability of lung cancer (low, intermediate, or high) in 375 patients with pulmonary lesions who underwent bronchoscopy for possible lung cancer with nondiagnostic pathology. Results were compared to the actual adjudicated prevalence of malignancy in each pre-test risk group, determined with a minimum of 12 months follow up after bronchoscopy. RESULTS: PAR and the risk models performed poorly overall in the assessment of risk in this patient population. PAR most closely matched the observed prevalence of malignancy in patients at 12 months after bronchoscopy, but all modalities had a low area under the curve, and in all clinical models more than half of all the lesions labeled as high risk were truly or likely benign. The studied risk model calculators overestimate the risk of malignancy compared to PAR, particularly in the subset in older patients, irregularly bordered nodules, and masses > 3 cm. Overall, the risk models perform only slightly better when confined to lung nodules < 3 cm in this population. CONCLUSION: The currently available tools for the assessment of risk of malignancy perform suboptimally in patients with nondiagnostic findings following a bronchoscopic evaluation for lung cancer. More accurate and objective tools for risk assessment are needed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: not applicable.

Bilateral Bronchoscopic Lung Volume Reduction After Surgical Fissure Completion.

Although bilateral lung volume reduction surgery has been shown to be safe and effective in carefully selected patients with upper lobe-predominant emphysema and hyperinflation, bronchoscopic lung volume reduction via placement of endobronchial valves is conventionally performed only unilaterally. Furthermore, it is not offered to patients with interlobar collateral ventilation because of the lack of clinical efficacy. We describe two novel management approaches including (1) bilateral bronchoscopic lung volume reduction, and (2) a combined thoracic surgical and interventional pulmonary procedure involving surgical fissure completion followed by endobronchial valve placement, which culminated in safe and effective lung volume reduction of both lungs along with an excellent patient outcome.

Characteristics and impact of bedside procedure services in the United States: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Bedside procedure services are increasingly employed within internal medicine departments to meet clinical needs and improve trainee education. Published literature on these largely comprises single-center studies; an updated systematic review is needed to synthesize available data. PURPOSE: This review examined published literature on the structure and function of bedside procedure services and their impact on clinical and educational outcomes (PROSPERO ID: 192466). DATA SOURCES: Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses framework, multiple databases were searched for publications from 2000 to 2021. STUDY SELECTION, DATA EXTRACTION, AND DATA SYNTHESIS: Thirteen single-center studies were identified, including 12 observational studies and 1 randomized trial. Data were synthesized in tabular and narrative format. Services were typically staffed by hospitalists or pulmonologists. At a minimum, each offered paracentesis, thoracentesis, and lumbar puncture. While there was considerable heterogeneity in service structures, these broadly fit either Model A (service performing the procedure) or Model B (service supervising the primary team). Procedure services led to increases in procedure volumes and self-efficacy among medical residents. Assessment of clinical outcomes was limited by heterogeneous definitions of complication rates and by sparse head-to-head data involving suitable comparators. Published data pointed to high success rates, low complication rates, and high patient satisfaction, with a recent study also demonstrating a decreased length of stay. CONCLUSIONS: There are relatively few published studies describing the characteristics of bedside procedure services and their impact on clinical and educational outcomes. Limited data point to considerable heterogeneity in service design, a positive impact on medical trainees, and a positive impact on patient-related outcomes.

Bronchial thermoplasty: State of the art.

Since the publication of a sham-controlled, randomized trial (AIR2) and subsequent marketing approval by the US Food and Drug Administration, we have significantly advanced our understanding of bronchial thermoplasty (BT)'s scientific basis, long-term safety, clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness. In particular, the last 2 years have witnessed multiple research publications on several of these counts. In this review, we critically appraise our evolving understanding of BT's biologic underpinnings and clinical impact, offer an evidence-based patient workflow guide for the busy pulmonologist and highlight both current challenges as well as potential solutions for the researcher and the clinician.

Epidemiologic Trends in Pleural Infection. A Nationwide Analysis.

Rationale: Recent trends in the care and outcomes of pleural infection are not well characterized.Objectives: To investigate trends in hospital-based healthcare use, outcomes, and management of pleural infection across the United States.Methods: We identified adult hospitalizations for pleural infection from 2005 through 2014 in the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project-National Inpatient Sample using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Edition Clinical Modification diagnosis codes. We calculated weighted estimates of national trends in hospitalization, hospital length of stay, hospital mortality, inflation-adjusted cost, and management practices. We tested trend significance using fitted regression models.Results: Over one decade, there was a significant decline in hospitalizations (54.4 per million to 41.2 per million U.S. adult population), length of stay (13.5 ± 0.2 to 11.2 ± 0.2 d), mortality (4.2-2.6%), and costs ($32,829 to $29,458) (all P < 0.001). Both tube thoracostomy and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery saw an increase as the procedure of first choice, along with declining use of thoracotomy (all P < 0.001). Most patients who underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (94%) or tube thoracostomy (64.9%) as the initial procedure did not require a second invasive procedure.Conclusions: Over the 21st century's first decade and a half, inpatient costs, use, and mortality have improved among U.S. adults hospitalized with pleural infection. Simultaneously, there has been a shift toward less invasive interventions upfront.

Management of Malignant Pleural Effusions.

Malignant pleural effusion frequently complicates both solid and hematologic malignancies and is associated with high morbidity, mortality, and health care costs. Although no pleura-specific therapy is known to impact survival, both pleurodesis and indwelling pleural catheter (IPC) placement can significantly alleviate symptoms and improve quality of life. The optimal choice of therapy in terms of efficacy and particularly cost-effectiveness depends on patient preferences and individual characteristics, including lung expansion and life expectancy. Attempting chemical pleurodesis through an IPC in the outpatient setting appears to be a particularly promising approach in the absence of a nonexpandable lung.