Arsenic in Drinking Water and Diabetes.

Arsenic is ubiquitous in soil and water environments and is consistently at the top of the Agency for Toxic Substances Disease Registry (ATSDR) substance priority list. It has been shown to induce toxicity even at low levels of exposure. One of the major routes of exposure to arsenic is through drinking water. This review presents current information related to the distribution of arsenic in the environment, the resultant impacts on human health, especially related to diabetes, which is one of the most prevalent chronic diseases, regulation of arsenic in drinking water, and approaches for treatment of arsenic in drinking water for both public utilities and private wells. Taken together, this information points out the existing challenges to understanding both the complex health impacts of arsenic and to implementing the treatment strategies needed to effectively reduce arsenic exposure at different scales.

The NRF2-p97-NRF2 negative feedback loop.

p97 is a ubiquitin-targeted ATP-dependent segregase that regulates proteostasis, in addition to a variety of other cellular functions. Previously, we demonstrated that p97 negatively regulates NRF2 by extracting ubiquitylated NRF2 from the KEAP1-CUL3-RBX1 E3 ubiquitin ligase complex, facilitating proteasomal destruction. In the current study, we identified p97 as an NRF2-target gene that contains a functional ARE, indicating the presence of an NRF2-p97-NRF2 negative feedback loop that maintains redox homeostasis. Using CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing, we generated endogenous p97 ARE-mutated BEAS-2B cell lines. These p97 ARE-mutated cell lines exhibit altered expression of p97 and NRF2, as well as a compromised response to NRF2 inducers. Importantly, we also found a positive correlation between NRF2 activation and p97 expression in human cancer patients. Finally, using chronic arsenic-transformed cell lines, we demonstrated a synergistic effect of NRF2 and p97 inhibition in killing cancer cells with high NRF2 and p97 expression. Our study suggests dual upregulation of NRF2 and p97 occurs in certain types of cancers, suggesting that inhibition of both NRF2 and p97 could be a promising treatment strategy for stratified cancer patients.

The dark side of NRF2 in arsenic carcinogenesis.

Arsenic is an environmental toxicant that significantly enhances the risk of developing disease, including several cancers. While the epidemiological evidence supporting increased cancer risk due to chronic arsenic exposure is strong, therapies tailored to treat exposed populations are lacking. This can be accredited in large part to the chronic nature and pleiotropic pathological effects associated with prolonged arsenic exposure. Despite this fact, several putative mediators of arsenic promotion of cancer have been identified. Among these, the critical transcription factor NRF2 has been shown to be a key mediator of arsenic's pro-carcinogenic effects. Importantly, the dependence of arsenic-transformed cancer cells on NRF2 upregulation exposes a targetable liability that could be utilized to treat arsenic-promoted cancers. In this chapter, we briefly introduce the "light" vs "dark" side of the NRF2 pathway. We then give a brief overview of arsenic metabolism, and discuss the epidemiological and experimental evidence that support arsenic promotion of different cancers, with a specific emphasis on mechanisms mediated by chronic, non-canonical activation of NRF2 (i.e., the "dark" side). Finally, we briefly highlight how the non-canonical NRF2 pathway plays a role in other arsenic-promoted diseases, as well as research directions that warrant further investigation.

Anti-Ferroptotic Effects of Nrf2: Beyond the Antioxidant Response.

The transcription factor Nrf2 was originally identified as a master regulator of redox homeostasis, as it governs the expression of a battery of genes involved in mitigating oxidative and electrophilic stress. However, the central role of Nrf2 in dictating multiple facets of the cellular stress response has defined the Nrf2 pathway as a general mediator of cell survival. Recent studies have indicated that Nrf2 regulates the expression of genes controlling ferroptosis, an ironand lipid peroxidation-dependent form of cell death. While Nrf2 was initially thought to have anti-ferroptotic function primarily through regulation of the antioxidant response, accumulating evidence has indicated that Nrf2 also exerts anti-ferroptotic effects via regulation of key aspects of iron and lipid metabolism. In this review, we will explore the emerging role of Nrf2 in mediating iron homeostasis and lipid peroxidation, where several Nrf2 target genes have been identified that encode critical proteins involved in these pathways. A better understanding of the mechanistic relationship between Nrf2 and ferroptosis, including how genetic and/or pharmacological manipulation of Nrf2 affect the ferroptotic response, should facilitate the development of new therapies that can be used to treat ferroptosis-associated diseases.

NRF2 controls iron homeostasis and ferroptosis through HERC2 and VAMP8.

Enhancing the intracellular labile iron pool (LIP) represents a powerful, yet untapped strategy for driving ferroptotic death of cancer cells. Here, we show that NRF2 maintains iron homeostasis by controlling HERC2 (E3 ubiquitin ligase for NCOA4 and FBXL5) and VAMP8 (mediates autophagosome-lysosome fusion). NFE2L2/NRF2 knockout cells have low HERC2 expression, leading to a simultaneous increase in ferritin and NCOA4 and recruitment of apoferritin into the autophagosome. NFE2L2/NRF2 knockout cells also have low VAMP8 expression, which leads to ferritinophagy blockage. Therefore, deletion of NFE2L2/NRF2 results in apoferritin accumulation in the autophagosome, an elevated LIP, and enhanced sensitivity to ferroptosis. Concordantly, NRF2 levels correlate with HERC2 and VAMP8 in human ovarian cancer tissues, as well as ferroptosis resistance in a panel of ovarian cancer cell lines. Last, the feasibility of inhibiting NRF2 to increase the LIP and kill cancer cells via ferroptosis was demonstrated in preclinical models, signifying the impact of NRF2 inhibition in cancer treatment.

Decreased autophagosome biogenesis, reduced NRF2, and enhanced ferroptotic cell death are underlying molecular mechanisms of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Caloric excess and sedentary lifestyles have led to an epidemic of obesity, metabolic syndrome, and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). The objective of this study was to investigate the mechanisms underlying high fat diet (HFD)-induced NAFLD, and to explore NRF2 activation as a strategy to alleviate NAFLD. APPROACH AND RESULTS: Herein, we demonstrated that high fat diet (HFD) induced lipid peroxidation and ferroptosis, both of which could be alleviated by NRF2 upregulation. Mechanistically, HFD suppressed autophagosome biogenesis through AMPK- and AKT-mediated mTOR activation and decreased ATG7, resulting in KEAP1 stabilization and decreased NRF2 levels in mouse liver. Furthermore, ATG7 is required for HFD-induced NRF2 downregulation, as ATG7 deletion in Cre-inducible ATG7 knockout mice decreased NRF2 levels and enhanced ferroptosis, which was not further exacerbated by HFD. This finding was recapitulated in mouse hepatocytes, which showed a similar phenotype upon treatment with saturated fatty acids (SFAs) but not monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFAs). Finally, NRF2 activation blocked fatty acid (FA)-mediated NRF2 downregulation, lipid peroxidation, and ferroptosis. Importantly, the HFD-induced alterations were also observed in human fatty liver tissue samples. CONCLUSIONS: HFD-mediated autophagy inhibition, NRF2 suppression, and ferroptosis promotion are important molecular mechanisms of obesity-driven metabolic diseases. NRF2 activation counteracts HFD-mediated NRF2 suppression and ferroptotic cell death. In addition, SFA vs. MUFA regulation of NRF2 may underlie their harmful vs. beneficial effects. Our study reveals NRF2 as a key player in the development and progression of fatty liver disease and that NRF2 activation could serve as a potential therapeutic strategy.

NRF2 and Diabetes: The Good, the Bad, and the Complex.

Despite decades of scientific effort, diabetes continues to represent an incredibly complex and difficult disease to treat. This is due in large part to the multifactorial nature of disease onset and progression and the multiple organ systems affected. An increasing body of scientific evidence indicates that a key mediator of diabetes progression is NRF2, a critical transcription factor that regulates redox, protein, and metabolic homeostasis. Importantly, while experimental studies have confirmed the critical nature of proper NRF2 function in preventing the onset of diabetic outcomes, we have only just begun to scratch the surface of understanding the mechanisms by which NRF2 modulates diabetes progression, particularly across different causative contexts. One reason for this is the contradictory nature of the current literature, which can often be accredited to model discrepancies, as well as whether NRF2 is activated in an acute or chronic manner. Furthermore, despite therapeutic promise, there are no current NRF2 activators in clinical trials for the treatment of patients with diabetes. In this review, we briefly introduce the transcriptional programs regulated by NRF2 as well as how NRF2 itself is regulated. We also review the current literature regarding NRF2 modulation of diabetic phenotypes across the different diabetes subtypes, including a brief discussion of contradictory results, as well as what is needed to progress the NRF2 diabetes field forward.

The intricacies of NRF2 regulation in cancer.

The complex role of NRF2 in the context of cancer continues to evolve. As a transcription factor, NRF2 regulates various genes involved in redox homeostasis, protein degradation, DNA repair, and xenobiotic metabolism. As such, NRF2 is critical in preserving cell function and viability, particularly during stress. Importantly, NRF2 itself is regulated via a variety of mechanisms, and the mode of NRF2 activation often dictates the duration of NRF2 signaling and its role in either preventing cancer initiation or promoting cancer progression. Herein, different modes of NRF2 regulation, including oxidative stress, autophagy dysfunction, protein-protein interactions, and epigenetics, as well as pharmacological modulators targeting this cascade in cancer, are explored. Specifically, how the timing and duration of these different mechanisms of NRF2 induction affect tumor initiation, progression, and metastasis are discussed. Additionally, progress in the discovery and development of NRF2 inhibitors for the treatment of NRF2-addicted cancers is highlighted, including modulators that inhibit specific NRF2 downstream targets. Overall, a better understanding of the intricate nature of NRF2 regulation in specific cancer contexts should facilitate the generation of novel therapeutics designed to not only prevent tumor initiation, but also halt progression and ultimately improve patient wellbeing and survival.

Non-canonical NRF2 activation promotes a pro-diabetic shift in hepatic glucose metabolism.

OBJECTIVE: NRF2, a transcription factor that regulates cellular redox and metabolic homeostasis, plays a dual role in human disease. While it is well known that canonical intermittent NRF2 activation protects against diabetes-induced tissue damage, little is known regarding the effects of prolonged non-canonical NRF2 activation in diabetes. The goal of this study was to determine the role and mechanisms of prolonged NRF2 activation in arsenic diabetogenicity. METHODS: To test this, we utilized an integrated transcriptomic and metabolomic approach to assess diabetogenic changes in the livers of wild type, Nrf2-/-, p62-/-, or Nrf2-/-; p62-/- mice exposed to arsenic in the drinking water for 20 weeks. RESULTS: In contrast to canonical oxidative/electrophilic activation, prolonged non-canonical NRF2 activation via p62-mediated sequestration of KEAP1 increases carbohydrate flux through the polyol pathway, resulting in a pro-diabetic shift in glucose homeostasis. This p62- and NRF2-dependent increase in liver fructose metabolism and gluconeogenesis occurs through the upregulation of four novel NRF2 target genes, ketohexokinase (Khk), sorbitol dehydrogenase (Sord), triokinase/FMN cyclase (Tkfc), and hepatocyte nuclear factor 4 (Hnf4A). CONCLUSION: We demonstrate that NRF2 and p62 are essential for arsenic-mediated insulin resistance and glucose intolerance, revealing a pro-diabetic role for prolonged NRF2 activation in arsenic diabetogenesis.

Erythrocytic bioactivation of nitrite and its potentiation by far-red light.

BACKGROUND: Nitrite is reduced by heme-proteins and molybdenum-containing enzymes to form the important signaling molecule nitric oxide (NO), mediating NO signaling. Substantial evidence suggests that deoxygenated hemoglobin within red blood cells (RBCs) is the main erythrocytic protein responsible for mediating nitrite-dependent NO signaling. In other work, infrared and far red light have been shown to have therapeutic potential that some attribute to production of NO. Here we explore whether a combination of nitrite and far red light treatment has an additive effect in NO-dependent processes, and whether this effect is mediated by RBCs. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using photoacoustic imaging in a rat model as a function of varying inspired oxygen, we found that far red light (660 nm, five min. exposure) and nitrite feeding (three weeks in drinking water at 100 mg/L) each separately increased tissue oxygenation and vessel diameter, and the combined treatment was additive. We also employed inhibition of human platelet activation measured by flow cytometry to assess RBC-dependent nitrite bioactivation and found that far red light dramatically potentiates platelet inhibition by nitrite. Blocking RBC-surface thiols abrogated these effects of nitrite and far-red light. RBC-dependent production of NO was also shown to be enhanced by far red light using a chemiluminescence-based nitric oxide analyzer. In addition, RBC-dependent bioactivation of nitrite led to prolonged lag times for clotting in platelet poor plasma that was enhanced by exposure to far red light. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that nitrite leads to the formation of a photolabile RBC surface thiol-bound species such as an S-nitrosothiol or heme-nitrosyl (NO-bound heme) for which far red light enhances NO signaling. These findings expand our understanding of RBC-mediated NO production from nitrite. This pathway of NO production may have therapeutic potential in several applications including thrombosis, and, thus, warrants further study.