Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros




Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Popul Health Manag ; 25(6): 781-788, 2022 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36454231

RESUMEN

Screening for social determinants of health (SDOH) is recommended, but numerous barriers exist to implementing SDOH screening in clinical spaces. In this study, the authors identified how both active and passive information retrieval methods may be used in clinical spaces to screen for SDOH and meet patient needs. The authors conducted a retrospective sequential cohort analysis comparing the active identification of SDOH through a patient-led digital manual screening process completed in primary care offices from September 2019 to January 2020 and passive identification of SDOH through natural language processing (NLP) from September 2016 to August 2018, among 1735 patients at a large midwestern tertiary referral hospital system and its associated outlying primary care and outpatient facilities. The percent of patients identified by both the passive and active identification methods as experiencing SDOH varied from 0.3% to 4.7%. The active identification method identified social integration, domestic safety, financial resources, food insecurity, transportation, housing, and stress in proportions ranging from 5% to 36%. The passive method contributed to the identification of financial resource issues and stress, identifying 9.6% and 3% of patients to be experiencing these issues, respectively. SDOH documentation varied by provider type. The combination of passive and active SDOH screening methods can provide a more comprehensive picture by leveraging historic patient interactions, while also eliciting current patient needs. Using passive, NLP-based methods to screen for SDOH will also help providers overcome barriers that have historically prevented screening.


Asunto(s)
Tamizaje Masivo , Determinantes Sociales de la Salud , Humanos , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Vivienda , Almacenamiento y Recuperación de la Información
2.
J Infect Dis ; 224(12): 2105-2112, 2021 12 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34010401

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Placental malaria has been associated with increased cord blood maternal microchimerism (MMc), which in turn may affect susceptibility to malaria in the offspring. We sought to determine the impact of maternal peripheral Plasmodium falciparum parasitemia during pregnancy on MMc and to determine whether maternal cells expand during primary parasitemia in the offspring. METHODS: We conducted a nested cohort study of maternal-infant pairs from a prior pregnancy malaria chemoprevention study. Maternal microchimerism was measured by quantitative polymerase chain reaction targeting a maternal-specific marker in genomic DNA from cord blood, first P falciparum parasitemia, and preparasitemia. Logistic and negative binomial regression were used to assess the impact of maternal peripheral parasitemia, symptomatic malaria, and placental malaria on cord blood MMc. Generalized estimating equations were used to assess predictors of MMc during infancy. RESULTS: Early maternal parasitemia was associated with increased detection of cord blood MMc (adjusted odds ratio = 3.91, P = .03), whereas late parasitemia, symptomatic malaria, and placental malaria were not. The first parasitemia episode in the infant was not associated with increased MMc relative to preparasitemia. CONCLUSIONS: Maternal parasitemia early in pregnancy may increase the amount of MMc acquired by the fetus. Future work should investigate the impact of this MMc on immune responses in the offspring.


Asunto(s)
Quimerismo/estadística & datos numéricos , Malaria Falciparum/genética , Enfermedades Placentarias/genética , Plasmodium falciparum/aislamiento & purificación , Complicaciones Parasitarias del Embarazo/genética , Adolescente , Adulto , Estudios de Cohortes , Susceptibilidad a Enfermedades , Femenino , Humanos , Malaria Falciparum/diagnóstico , Malaria Falciparum/epidemiología , Salud Materna , Parasitemia/epidemiología , Placenta/parasitología , Enfermedades Placentarias/epidemiología , Embarazo , Complicaciones Parasitarias del Embarazo/epidemiología
3.
Hosp Pediatr ; 10(10): 877-883, 2020 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32989003

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Evaluation of well-appearing neonates for early-onset sepsis (EOS) remains controversial. Multiple risk stratification approaches are currently used for the evaluation of EOS. Our aim was to quantify and compare frequency of laboratory evaluation and empirical antibiotics between published and local EOS approaches. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included 8240 infants born ≥35 + 0/7 weeks' gestation at an institution from October 1, 2014, to March 1, 2018. Excluded from analysis were 156 patients who exhibited either major congenital anomalies or required antibiotics for surgical issues. A total of 1680 patient charts with risk factors for EOS were reviewed for further demographic data, clinical presentation, laboratory results, and probable recommendations from 4 EOS risk assessment approaches. RESULTS: Laboratory evaluation recommendation was 7.1% for Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2010 guidelines and local 2016 EOS algorithm, 6% for local 2019 EOS algorithm, and 5.9% for Kaiser Permanente neonatal EOS calculator (neonatal EOS calculator). Antibiotic recommendation was 6% for 2010 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines, 4.3% for neonatal EOS calculator, and 3.3% for local 2016 and 2019 EOS algorithms. CONCLUSIONS: Of the 4 approaches reviewed, the local 2019 EOS algorithm and the neonatal EOS calculator were similar in recommending the lowest frequency of laboratory evaluation and the local 2016 and 2019 EOS algorithms had the lowest recommended antibiotic usage in this population.


Asunto(s)
Sepsis Neonatal , Sepsis , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Sepsis Neonatal/diagnóstico , Sepsis Neonatal/tratamiento farmacológico , Sepsis Neonatal/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Sepsis/diagnóstico , Sepsis/tratamiento farmacológico , Sepsis/epidemiología
4.
Biol Methods Protoc ; 5(1): bpaa009, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32665976

RESUMEN

Dried blood spots (DBS) are widely utilized as part of universal newborn screening and as a means of transporting samples from field sites. We use DBS from African field sites to assess for rare maternal-fetal cell exchange during pregnancy known as microchimerism. We aimed to develop a protocol to maximize the quantity of high-quality genomic DNA (gDNA) extracted from DBS. The total gDNA yield obtained from control DBS utilizing a Qiagen-based protocol and a Chelex® 100 resin-based protocol was first compared. Variations of the Chelex® protocol were subsequently tested to develop an optimized protocol. The gDNA was quantified by qPCR targeting the human beta-globin gene. DNA yield for a given experimental condition was normalized to a Chelex® control performed on the same day, and the total yields were compared using a Student's t-test. The control Chelex® protocol yielded 590% more DNA than the QIAamp® DNA Blood Mini Kit . The absolute efficiency of the control Chelex® protocol was 54%, compared to an absolute efficiency of 9% for the QIAamp® DNA Blood Mini Kit. Modification of the Chelex® protocol to include a second heat precipitation from the same DBS increased the gDNA yield by 29% (P < 0.001). Our optimized protocol including this modification increased the absolute efficiency of extraction to 68%. The gDNA extracted using the Chelex® protocol was stable through repeated freeze-thaw cycles. In a mock microchimerism experiment, rare donor alleles at a frequency of 10 in 100 000 could be identified in gDNA from DBS extracted using the optimized Chelex® protocol. Our findings may be of significance for a diverse range of applications that utilize DBS and require high-quality DNA, including newborn screening programs, pathogen and drug resistance screening from remote field sites, forensics, and rare allele detection.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA