Cochlear Apex Triangulation Utilizing Ct Measures And Middle Ear Landmarks.

Objective: To better characterize the cochlear apex in relation to surgically relevant landmarks to guide surgeons and improve procedural success of apical electrode placement. Study Design: Retrospective image analysis. Setting: Tertiary referral center. Patients: Cochlear implant recipients with available preoperative computed tomography (CT) imaging. Intervention: None. Main Outcome Measure: Cochlear dimensions and cochlear apex distance measures to surgically relevant middle ear landmarks and critical structures. Results: Eighty-two temporal bone CT scans were analyzed utilizing multiplanar reformats. The average lateral width of promontory bone over the cochlear apex was 1.2 mm (standard deviation [SD], 0.3). The anteroposterior distance from the round window (avg, 4.2 mm; SD, 0.5), oval window (avg, 3.3 mm; SD, 0.3), cochleariform process (avg, 2.3; SD, 0.5), and superior-inferior distance from the cochleariform process (avg, -0.9; SD, 0.8) to the cochlear apex were measured. The relationship of the cochlear apex to critical structures was highly variable.A newly developed stapes vector was created and found to mark the posterior/superior boundary of the apex in 94% of patients. When a vector parallel to the stapes vector was drawn through the round window, it marked the anterior/inferior boundary of the cochlear apex in 89% of patients. Conclusions: This study assists in characterizing cochlear apex anatomy and its relation to surrounding structures as a means of improving procedural accuracy and reducing trauma during apical cochleostomy. Understanding both distance relationships and expected boundaries of the apex could help to inform future surgical approaches.

Characterizing Cochlear Implant Trans-Impedance Matrix Heatmaps in Patients With Abnormal Anatomy.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize transimpedance matrix (TIM) heatmap patterns in patients at risk of labyrinthine abnormality to better understand accuracy and possible TIM limitations. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review of TIM patterns, preoperative, and postoperative imaging. SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: Patients undergoing cochlear implantation with risk of labyrinthine abnormality. INTERVENTION: None. RESULTS: Seventy-seven patients were evaluated. Twenty-five percent (n = 19) of patients had a TIM pattern variant identified. These variants were separated into 10 novel categories. Overall, 9% (n = 6) of electrodes were malpositioned on intraoperative x-ray, of which 50% (n = 3) were underinserted, 17% (n = 1) were overinserted, 17% (n = 1) had a tip foldover, and 17% (n = 1) had a coiled electrode. The number of patients with a variant TIM pattern and normal x-ray was 18% (n = 14), and the number of patients with normal TIM pattern and malposition noted on x-ray was 3% (n = 2; both were electrode underinsertions that were recognized due to open circuits and surgical visualization).A newly defined skip heat pattern was identified in patients with IP2/Mondini malformation and interscalar septum width <0.5 mm at the cochlear pars ascendens of the basal turn. CONCLUSIONS: This study defines novel patterns for TIM heatmap characterization to facilitate collaborative and comparative research moving forward. In doing so, it highlights a new pattern termed skip heat, which corresponds with a deficient interscalar septum of the cochlea pars ascendens of the basal turn in patients with IP2 malformation. Overall, the data assist the surgeon in better understanding the implications and limitations of TIM patterns within groups of patients with risk of labyrinthine abnormalities.

A Consensus to Revise the Minimum Speech Test Battery-Version 3.

PURPOSE: The Minimum Speech Test Battery (MSTB) for adults was introduced in 1996 (Nilsson et al., 1996) and subsequently updated in 2011 (Advanced-Bionics et al., 2011). The MSTB has been widely used by clinicians as a guide for cochlear implant (CI) candidacy evaluations and to document post-operative speech recognition performance. Due to changes in candidacy over the past 10 years, a revision to the MSTB was needed. METHOD: In 2022, the Institute for Cochlear Implant Training (ICIT) recruited a panel of expert CI audiologists to update and revise the MSTB. This panel utilized a modified Delphi consensus process to revise the test battery and to improve its applicability considering recent changes in CI care. RESULTS: This resulted in the MTSB-Version 3 (MSTB-3), which includes test protocols for identifying not only traditional CI candidates but also possible candidates for electric-acoustic stimulation and patients with single-sided deafness and asymmetric hearing loss. The MSTB-3 provides information that supplements the earlier versions of the MSTB, such as recommendations of when to refer patients for a CI, recommended patient-reported outcome measures, considerations regarding the use of cognitive screeners, and sample report templates for clinical documentation of pre- and post-operative care. Electronic versions of test stimuli, along with all the materials described above, will be available to clinicians via the ICIT website (https://www.cochlearimplanttraining.com). CONCLUSION: The goal of the MSTB-3 is to be an evidence-based test battery that will facilitate a streamlined standard of care for adult CI candidates and recipients that will be widely used by CI clinicians.

The Effect of Bimodal Hearing on Postoperative Quality of Life.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to examine how bimodal stimulation affects quality of life (QOL) during the postoperative period following cochlear implantation (CI). These data could potentially provide evidence to encourage more bimodal candidates to continue hearing aid (HA) use after CI. METHODS: In this prospective study, patients completed preoperative and 1-, 3-, and 6-month post-activation QOL surveys on listening effort, speech perception, sound quality/localization, and hearing handicap. Fifteen HA users who were candidates for contralateral CI completed the study (mean age 65.6 years). RESULTS: Patients used both devices at a median rate of 97%, 97%, and 98% of the time at 1, 3, and 6 months, respectively. On average, patients' hearing handicap scores decreased by 16% at 1 month, 36% at 3 months, and 30% at 6 months. Patients' listening effort scores decreased by a mean of 10.8% at 1 month, 12.6% at 3 months, and 18.7% at 6 months. Localization significantly improved by 24.3% at 1 month and remained steady. There was no significant improvement in sound quality scores. CONCLUSION: Bimodal listeners should expect QOL to improve, and listening effort and localization are generally optimized using CI and HA compared to CI alone. Some scores improved at earlier time points than others, suggesting bimodal auditory skills may develop at different rates.

Auditory brainstem implantation: surgical experience and audiometric outcomes in the pediatric population.

OBJECTIVE: Pediatric data regarding treatment via an auditory brainstem implant (ABI) remains sparse. The authors aimed to describe their experience at their institution and to delineate associated demographic data, audiometric outcomes, and surgical parameters. METHODS: An IRB-approved, retrospective chart review was conducted among the authors' pediatric patients who had undergone auditory brainstem implantation between 2012 and 2021. Demographic information including sex, age, race, coexisting syndrome(s), history of cochlear implant placement, average duration of implant use, and follow-up outcomes were collected. Surgical parameters collected included approach, intraoperative findings, number of electrodes activated, and complications. RESULTS: A total of 19 pediatric patients had an ABI placed at the authors' institution, with a mean age at surgery of 4.7 years (range 1.5-17.8 years). A total of 17 patients (89.5%) had bilateral cochlear nerve aplasia/dysplasia, 1 (5.3%) had unilateral cochlear nerve aplasia/dysplasia, and 1 (5.3%) had a hypoplastic cochlea with ossification. A total of 11 patients (57.9%) had a history of cochlear implants that were ineffective and required removal. The mean length of implant use was 5.31 years (0.25-10 years). Two patients (10.5%) experienced CSF-related complications requiring further surgical intervention. The most recent audiometric outcomes demonstrated that 15 patients (78.9%) showed improvement in their hearing ability: 5 with sound/speech awareness, 5 able to discriminate among speech and environmental sounds, and 5 able to understand common phrases/conversation without lip reading. Nine patients (47.4%) are in a school for the deaf and 7 (36.8%) are in a mainstream school with support. CONCLUSIONS: The authors' surgical experience with a multidisciplinary team demonstrates that the retrosigmoid approach for ABI placement in children with inner ear pathologies and severe sensorineural hearing loss is a safe and effective treatment modality. Audiometric outcome data showed that nearly 79% of these patients had an improvement in their environmental and speech awareness. Further multicenter collaborations are necessary to improve these outcomes and potentially standardize/enhance electrode placement.

HiRes ultra series cochlear implant field recall: failure rates and early outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate rates of Advanced Bionics Ultra 3D/Ultra cochlear implant failure in the setting of a worldwide device recall and report surgical and auditory outcomes after revision. METHODS: Retrospective chart review was performed for adult and pediatric patients implanted with at risk devices at our center from 2016 to 2020. Device failure rates, surgical, and auditory outcomes were recorded and analyzed. RESULTS: Of 113 at-risk devices, 20 devices (17.7%) in 18 patients (two bilaterally implanted) were identified as failures. All devices were with mid-scala electrodes. Eleven patients (61.1%) were children and 7 (38.9%) adults. Twelve patients were found to have failing devices after reporting subjective performance decline; the remainder were prompted by manufacturer notification. All were revised, with the majority (83.3%) choosing the same manufacturer. All had uncomplicated original and revision insertions. Among adults, average word scores on the revised side were stable pre- to post-revision (P = 0.95). DISCUSSION: Patients with device failure due to this field action performed well after revision implantation. Patients with bilateral at-risk devices but evidence of unilateral failure may elect to undergo simultaneous empiric revision of the contralateral device. Three patients who elected to change device manufacturers on revision have variable results that require further investigation. CONCLUSIONS: Patients requiring revision for a device field action overall perform well. At-risk devices continue to require monitoring as a growing number are likely to fail over time.

Predictive Value of Transimpedance Matrix Measurements to Detect Electrode Tip Foldover.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the ability of the transimpedance matrix (TIM) measurement to detect cochlear implant electrode tip foldover by comparing results to a "gold standard," the intraoperative plain film radiograph. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case series. SETTING: Tertiary referral hospital. PATIENTS: One hundred three patients who underwent cochlear implantation between June 2020 and August 2021. INTERVENTIONS: Intraoperative electrophysiologic monitoring (electrode impedances, neural response telemetry, and TIM measurement) and modified Stenver's view plain film radiographs. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Identification of tip foldover on both TIM and plain films. RESULTS: In total, 103 patients (117 ears) had both a TIM measurement and intraoperative X-ray available for review, including 68 adults and 35 children. One hundred patients (85%) received the Cochlear Slim Modiolar electrode. Tip foldovers were noted in three of 117 implants (2.5%). In all cases, TIM was able to detect the foldover, and the electrode arrays were reinserted with the patients still under anesthesia, with repeat X-ray demonstrating a normal configuration. Two other abnormal TIM patterns were identified. One was in a patient with an obstructed cochlea in whom only 10 electrodes could be inserted, the other was in a patient with a common cavity abnormality. One additional patient underwent electrode repositioning intraoperatively because of overinsertion. In this patient, the TIM appeared to be within normal limits, but the over-insertion was apparent on X-ray. Overall, the sensitivity and specificity of TIM measurements in detecting electrode tip foldover were both 100%. CONCLUSION: TIM measurements were able to accurately identify tip foldovers. More research is needed to define the adjunctive role of TIM as an intraoperative measure.

American Cochlear Implant Alliance Task Force Guidelines for Clinical Assessment and Management of Adult Cochlear Implantation for Single-Sided Deafness.

The indications for cochlear implantation have expanded to include individuals with profound sensorineural hearing loss in the impaired ear and normal hearing (NH) in the contralateral ear, known as single-sided deafness (SSD). There are additional considerations for the clinical assessment and management of adult cochlear implant candidates and recipients with SSD as compared to conventional cochlear implant candidates with bilateral moderate to profound sensorineural hearing loss. The present report reviews the current evidence relevant to the assessment and management of adults with SSD. A systematic review was also conducted on published studies that investigated outcomes of cochlear implant use on measures of speech recognition in quiet and noise, sound source localization, tinnitus perception, and quality of life for this patient population. Expert consensus and systematic review of the current literature were combined to provide guidance for the clinical assessment and management of adults with SSD.

Cochlear Implant Outcomes in CHARGE Syndrome: Updated Perspectives.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate outcomes of auditory implants in children with CHARGE syndrome and describe the evolution in management of hearing loss in this complex population. METHODS: A retrospective case review was performed at a tertiary referral center. Children with CHARGE syndrome who received either a cochlear implant (CI) or auditory brainstem implant (ABI) were included. Clinical records, demographic information, CHARGE features, neuroimaging, audiology, hearing rehabilitation interventions, operative notes, and outcomes were reviewed. RESULTS: Thirteen children with CHARGE syndrome underwent a total of 19 cochlear implants between 2008 and 2020. Among the congenitally deafened children (n = 9), six underwent bilateral implantation (five simultaneous and one sequential). Bilateral implantation was performed even in the presence of diminutive-appearing cochlear nerves. The average age of implantation was 1.1 years, and the mean device use time was 9.4 hours per day. Patients showed improvements in subjective family assessment related to hearing. In this group, two patients use oral communication, five use total communication, and two use sign language exclusively. Among the children with progressive hearing loss, the mean age of hearing deterioration was 4.4 years of age, and the device use time on average was 9.8 hours per day. The highest performer in the cohort was a child who lost hearing in their only hearing ear at age 4 and had normal cochleovestibular anatomy on that side. One child received an auditory brainstem implant at age two after deriving no benefit from a CI and can detect environmental sounds but is currently a nonuser. Over time, we noted that implantation occurred earlier in life and that practice has shifted toward bilateral implantation. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to a previous institutional cohort, children evaluated in this study were often implanted at a younger age and bilaterally with significantly improved outcomes. A CI evaluation should be considered in children with CHARGE syndrome to maximize sensory input and auditory ability.

Stimulating the Cochlear Apex Without Longer Electrodes: Preliminary Results With a New Approach.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate a new surgical and signal processing technique that provides apical stimulation of the cochlea using a cochlear implant without extending the length of the electrode array. PATIENTS: Three adult patients who underwent cochlear implantation using this new technique. INTERVENTIONS: The patients received a cochlear implant. The surgery differed from the standard approach in that a ground electrode was placed in the cochlear helicotrema via an apical cochleostomy rather than in its typical location underneath the temporalis muscle. Clinical fitting was modified such that low frequencies were represented using the apically placed electrode as a ground. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Pitch scaling and speech recognition. RESULTS: All surgeries were successful with no complications. Pitch scaling demonstrated that use of the apically placed electrode as a ground lowered the perceived pitch of electric stimulation relative to monopolar stimulation. Speech understanding was improved compared with preoperative scores. CONCLUSIONS: The new surgical approach and clinical fitting are feasible. A lower pitch is perceived when using the apically placed electrode as a ground relative to stimulation using an extracochlear ground (i.e., monopolar mode), suggesting that stimulation can be provided more apically without the use of a longer electrode array. Further work is required to determine potential improvements in outcomes and optimal signal processing for the new approach.

Effect of antifibrotic therapy in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis undergoing lung transplant in the peri and post-operative period.

BACKGROUND: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease with high mortality. Lung transplant remains a cornerstone of treatment despite the advent of antifibrotic therapy. In light of the increasing number of patients on antifibrotic therapy prior to lung transplantation it is paramount to demonstrate these medications do not augment postoperative complications following transplant. RESEARCH QUESTION: Does antifibrotic therapy increase perioperative complications and mortality in lung transplant recipients? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review of all patients actively listed for lung transplant at Temple University Hospital from June 2014 to April 2017 with a listing diagnosis of IPF. Subjects who received treatment with antifibrotic therapy (either pirfenidone or nintedanib) up until the time of lung transplantation were compared to subjects not on therapy. Data was collected regarding baseline demographics, pulmonary function tests, IPF exacerbations, perioperative bleeding and cardiac events, and outcomes in the postoperative period. RESULTS: A total of 94 subjects were included in the study: 42 subjects on antifibrotic therapy (28 pirfenidone, 14 nintedanib) and 52 subjects not on therapy in the pre-transplant period. Baseline characteristics were similar between study groups. Subjects treated with antifibrotic therapy pre-transplant were noted to have less FVC decline, fewer hospitalizations, and greater weight loss while on the transplant waiting list. No difference in post-transplant airway anastomosis complications, bleeding or mortality was observed between study groups. INTERPRETATION: Subjects with IPF on antifibrotic therapy prior to lung transplantation had better preservation of lung function in the pre-transplant period, and similar outcomes in the postoperative period compared to those not on antifibrotic therapy before lung transplant.

Cochlear Implantation in Adults With Single-sided Deafness: Outcomes and Device Use.

OBJECTIVE: To describe our experience with adults undergoing cochlear implantation (CI) for treatment of single-sided deafness (SSD). STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case review. SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: Fifty-three adults with SSD. INTERVENTIONS: Unilateral CI. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Speech perception testing in quiet and noise, tinnitus suppression, and device usage from datalogs. RESULTS: The mean age at CI was 53.2 years (SD 11.9). The mean duration of deafness was 4.0 years (SD 7.8). The most common etiology was idiopathic sudden SNHL (50%). Word recognition improved from 8.7% (SD 15) preoperatively to 61.8% (SD 20) at a mean follow-up of 3.3 years (SD 1.8) (p < 0.0001). Adaptive speech recognition testing in the "binaural with CI" condition (speech directed toward the front and noise toward the normal hearing ear) revealed a significant improvement by 2.6-dB SNR compared to the preoperative unaided condition (p = 0.0002) and by 3.6-dB SNR compared to when a device to route sound to the contralateral side was used (p < 0.0001). Tinnitus suppression was reported to be complete in 23 patients (43%) and improved in 20 patients (38%) while the device was on. The addition of the CI did not lead to a decrement in hearing performance in any spatial configuration. Device usage averaged 8.7 (SD 3.7) hours/day. CONCLUSIONS: Cochlear implantation in adult SSD patients can suppress tinnitus and achieve speech perception outcomes comparable with CI in conventional candidates. Modest improvements in spatial hearing were also observed and primarily attributable to the head shadow effect. Careful patient selection and counseling regarding potential benefits are important to optimize outcomes.

Assessing temporal responsiveness of primary stimulated neurons in auditory brainstem and cochlear implant users.

The reasons why clinical outcomes with auditory brainstem implants (ABIs) are generally poorer than with cochlear implants (CIs) are still somewhat elusive. Prior work has focused on differences in processing of spectral information due to possibly poorer tonotopic representation and higher channel interaction with ABIs than with CIs. In contrast, this study examines the hypothesis that a potential contributing reason for poor speech perception in ABI users may be the relative lack of temporal responsiveness of the primary neurons that are stimulated by the ABI. The cochlear nucleus, the site of ABI stimulation, consists of different neuron types, most of which have much more complex responses than the auditory nerve neurons stimulated by a CI. Temporal responsiveness of primary stimulated neurons was assessed in a group of ABI and CI users by measuring recovery of electrically evoked compound action potentials (ECAPs) from single-pulse forward masking. Slower ECAP recovery tended to be associated with poorer hearing outcomes in both groups. ABI subjects with the longest recovery time had no speech understanding or even no hearing sensation with their ABI device; speech perception for the one CI outlier with long ECAP recovery time was well below average. To the extent that ECAP recovery measures reveal temporal properties of the primary neurons that receive direct stimulation form neural prosthesis devices, they may provide a physiological underpinning for clinical outcomes of auditory implants. ECAP recovery measures may be used to determine which portions of the cochlear nucleus to stimulate, and possibly allow us to enhance the stimulation paradigms.

Cochlear Implant Outcomes in Neurofibromatosis Type 2: Implications for Management.

OBJECTIVE: To describe our institutional experience with cochlear implantation (CI) for rehabilitation of hearing loss in Neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) patients. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review between 1989 and 2019. SETTING: Tertiary-care center. PATIENTS: Twenty-four patients (67% female, mean age 45.6years) with NF2. Management of their ipsilateral vestibular schwannoma included microsurgery (n=12), stereotactic radiation (n=5), and observation (n=7). INTERVENTIONS: Cochlear implantation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Ability to obtain open-set speech, daily device usage and long-term device benefit. RESULTS: All patients achieved some degree of sound awareness with CI. Nineteen patients (79%) achieved open-set speech understanding with a mean word-recognition score of 43% (range 0-88%). Patients with tumors 1.5 cm or less demonstrated the better speech understanding, without significant differences among treatment modalities. For tumors greater than 1.5 cm, patients who underwent microsurgery had a lower rate of open-set speech understanding compared to those treated with radiation or observation. Regular daily device use in 83% of patients was found. Long-term use (>10years) was observed in several patients, though some ultimately required reimplantation with an auditory brainstem implant due to progressive tumor growth. Mean follow-up duration was 4.1 years (range 0.4-15). CONCLUSIONS: Cochlear implantation can be an effective treatment for hearing loss in NF2 patients provided the cochlear nerve is intact, regardless of prior management for the ipsilateral tumor. The degree of benefit varies and is influenced by tumor size. Management strategies that preserve the cochlear nerve maximize the interval during which a CI could be of benefit to NF2 patients.

Cochlear Implantation in Children with Single-Sided Deafness.

OBJECTIVE: To describe our experience with children undergoing unilateral cochlear implantation (CI) for treatment of single-sided deafness (SSD). STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case series. METHODS: A retrospective case review from a tertiary referral center involving 14 pediatric patients (<18 years) with SSD who underwent unilateral CI. Speech perception testing in quiet and noise in the CI-only and bimodal conditions with at least 1 year of device use and device usage from data logs represent the main outcome measures. RESULTS: The mean age at CI was 5.0 years (median 4.4, range 1.0-11.8 years). The mean duration of deafness was 3.0 years (median 2.4, range 0.6-7.0 years). Mean follow-up was 3.4 years. Speech perception testing with a minimum of 1 year post-CI was available in eight patients. The mean word recognition scores (WRS) in the CI-only condition was 56%; a significant improvement from baseline. Testing in background noise with spatially separated speech and noise revealed that patients scored as well or better with the CI-on versus CI-off in all conditions and in no cases was interference from the CI noted. Data logs were reviewed for device usage which revealed an average use of 6.5 hr/d. CONCLUSION: Cochlear implantation is a viable treatment option for pediatric SSD in this self-selected cohort. Open-set speech and improvement in background noise can be achieved. Careful patient selection and thorough counseling on expectations is paramount to achieving successful outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV Laryngoscope, 131:E271-E277, 2021.

Clinical predictors and explant lung pathology of acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.

BACKGROUND: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is characterised by constant threat of acute exacerbation of IPF (AE-IPF). It would be significant to identify risk factors of AE-IPF. We sought to determine the prognostic value of lung transplantation candidacy testing for AE-IPF and describe explant pathology of recipients with and without AE-IPF before lung transplantation. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of 89 IPF patients listed for lung transplantation. Data included pulmonary function testing, echocardiography, right heart catheterisation, imaging, oesophageal pH/manometry and blood tests. Explanted tissue was evaluated by pulmonary pathologists and correlated to computed tomography (CT) findings. RESULTS: Out of 89 patients with IPF, 52 were transplanted during stable IPF and 37 had AE-IPF before transplantation (n=28) or death (n=9). There were no substantial differences in candidacy testing with and without AE-IPF. AE-IPF had higher rate of decline of forced vital capacity (FVC) (21±22% versus 4.8±14%, p=0.00019). FVC decline of >15% had a hazard ratio of 7.2 for developing AE-IPF compared to FVC decline of <5% (p=0.004). AE-IPF had more secondary diverse histopathology (82% versus 29%, p<0.0001) beyond diffuse alveolar damage. There was no correlation between ground-glass opacities (GGO) on chest CT at any point to development of AE-IPF (p=0.077), but GGO during AE-IPF predicted secondary pathological process beyond diffuse alveolar damage. CONCLUSIONS: Lung transplantation candidacy testing including reflux studies did not predict AE-IPF besides FVC absolute decline. CT did not predict clinical or pathological AE-IPF. Secondary diverse lung pathology beyond diffuse alveolar damage was present in most AE-IPF, but not in stable IPF.

From Bimodal Hearing to Sequential Bilateral Cochlear Implantation in Children-A Within-Subject Comparison.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the performance changes after sequential bilateral cochlear implantation in a pediatric population of bimodal cochlear implant (CI) users. To evaluate the factors which influence the parental and recipient decision to discontinue hearing aid use and seek a second implant. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case review, within-subject comparison. SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: Thirty-one pediatric (<18 yr) bimodal CI users who underwent sequential bilateral CI. INTERVENTIONS: Sequential bilateral CI. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Parental and/or recipient's reasons for discontinuing their hearing aid and pursuing a second implant, device usage from datalogs, speech understanding in the bimodal and bilateral CI condition. RESULTS: Parents/patients were motivated to pursue sequential bilateral CI based on their positive performance with CI1, the expectation of further improvement with a second CI, and the prospect of having a second independently functional ear. In the bimodal condition, mean word recognition score (WRS), sentence recognition in quiet (SIQ), and sentence recognition in noise (SIN) scores were 87.4, 97.3, and 92.9% respectively. At 1-year post-sequential bilateral CI, the mean WRS, SIQ, and SIN score were 92.7, 98.7, and 97.7%, respectively. The improvement in bilateral CI speech scores compared with bimodal scores was statistically significant for WRS (p = 0.015). A ceiling effect limited the ability to detect further meaningful differences on speech perception testing. CONCLUSIONS: The bilateral CI condition demonstrates equivalent or slightly superior performance compared with the bimodal condition. Several non-speech benefits were elicited from parents as reasons for pursuing a second implant. Close monitoring of the residual acoustic hearing, inquiring about the perceived benefits provided by the HA, and early counseling regarding the potential for sequential bilateral CI are important aspects in determining if and when a second implant is indicated.

Performance with an Auditory Brainstem Implant and Contralateral Cochlear Implant in Pediatric Patients.

OBJECTIVE: To assess bimodal auditory performance in children with a cochlear implant (CI) and contralateral auditory brainstem implant (ABI). METHODS: This is a retrospective case review performed at a tertiary referral center. Four patients with cochlear nerve deficiency initially underwent cochlear implantation but were not benefiting from their devices and underwent ABI in the contralateral ear. The main outcome measures included age-appropriate speech perception and production assessments. RESULTS: Three subjects performed better on their auditory perception assessments using both of their devices than with either device alone. One subject had only preliminary outcomes, but subjectively performed best with both devices. CONCLUSIONS: We observed continued improvement in CI performance over time, even if no benefit was evident before the decision for ABI. This could suggest that ABI and CI have a synergistic effect, or it could simply be the adaptive ability of the developing brain to utilize the signals coming from these devices. There is preliminary evidence to support choosing the ear contralateral to the CI for an ABI in a pediatric patient with bilateral cochlear nerve deficiency.

Early experience and health related quality of life outcomes following auditory brainstem implantation in children.

OBJECTIVE: To assess auditory brainstem implant (ABI) outcomes in children with a prospective study. METHODS: Twelve patients with cochlear nerve deficiency received an auditory brainstem implant. Patients were evaluated with age appropriate speech perception and production assessments, and health related quality of life (HRQoL) surveys for parents of subjects and for subjects if age appropriate. RESULTS: Twelve patients received an ABI without major complications. Eleven out of twelve received some auditory benefit from their ABI. Parental HRQoL ratings were positive for all domains with the exception of communication. Self reported overall HRQoL metrics from two subjects were also positive. CONCLUSIONS: ABI is a good option for patients who are not eligible for or fail CI. Our findings show that despite varying degrees of postoperative performance, HRQoL ratings were positive. The presence of additional disabilities and health problems resulted in less positive HRQoL outcomes. Our results emphasize the need to assess outcomes in these patients beyond speech perception and communication.

Effect of Acute Exacerbation of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis on Lung Transplantation Outcome.

BACKGROUND: Acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (AE-IPF) has an expected median survival of 3 months. Lung transplantation is a potentially lifesaving therapy for AE-IPF. However, the current knowledge of transplantation outcomes during AE-IPF is limited to a few small retrospective studies, reporting only 1-year post-transplantation survival. METHODS: Study population included patients with IPF consecutively listed for lung transplantation at a single institution between the years 2012 and 2016. We collected lung allocation score (LAS), hospitalization, and survival data. The primary outcome was survival among patients transplanted during stable IPF vs during AE-IPF. RESULTS: Of 89 patients with IPF listed for lung transplantation, 52 were transplanted during stable IPF and 37 were hospitalized due to AE-IPF. Of these 37 patients, nine died before transplantation, and 28 were transplanted during AE-IPF. Fifty percent of patients transplanted during AE-IPF died in a mean follow-up of 1.6 ± 1.2 years compared with 12% of patients transplanted during stable IPF who died in a mean follow-up of 2.6 ± 1.2 years. The Kaplan-Meier survival curves post-transplantation after 1 and 3 years for patients who were transplanted during stable IPF were 94% and 90% vs 71% and 60% in patients who were transplanted during AE-IPF (P = .0001). LAS above 80 conferred a 3-year hazard ratio for mortality of 5.7 vs LAS lower than 80 (95% CI, 2.33-14.0; P < .0005). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with IPF transplanted during AE-IPF had significantly worse short-term and long-term survival compared with patients transplanted during stable IPF. Patients with AE-IPF and very high LAS may not experience the survival advantage expected from lung transplantation.