Breakthrough COVID-19 Infection Among the General Community, Frontline Workers, and Healthcare Workers During the Second and Third Wave in North India: A Longitudinal Study.

BACKGROUND: Vaccination is among the most important public health tools for preventing the harm caused by communicable diseases. This was particularly true in the case of COVID-19 vaccination during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, no vaccine is 100% effective, and all carry the risk of breakthrough infection in vaccinated individuals. METHODOLOGY: This longitudinal observational study was done on COVID-19-vaccinated individuals at a vaccination site in a tertiary care hospital. The study participants were categorized into the general community, frontline workers, and healthcare workers and were followed up during the study period from June 2021 to May 2022 post-vaccination. They were interviewed by telephone regarding adverse effects and breakthrough infections post-vaccination during the second and third wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in India. Incidence of breakthrough infection was calculated in all three categories after they received their first, second, and booster doses of vaccination. RESULTS: Fever was the most common adverse effect among all the categories of participants after the first and second doses. Incidence of breakthrough infection after the second dose of vaccination among frontline workers (RR: 5.7, 95% CI: 0.7-44.2) and healthcare workers (RR: 18.9, 95% CI: 2.6-138.6) was observed to be higher compared to the general community, but no such difference was observed among the three categories after the first dose of vaccination. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of breakthrough infection was found to be the highest in healthcare workers, followed by frontline workers compared to the general community, justifying their work profile and the risk associated with it.

A qualitative study on factors affecting adherence to antidiabetic medication in patients approaching a health center in an urban area.

Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the factors affecting adherence to antidiabetic medication among diabetic patients in India. Setting and Design: A qualitative study was conducted among 40 diabetic patients aged >30 years, on treatment for more than a year without any complications in the Urban Health Centre of Dayanand Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana, Punjab, India. Materials and Methods: A semistructured questionnaire was harnessed to congregate data by interviewing the patients for 30-40 min in person. The interviews were recorded in the form of audios by acquiring informed consent and transcribed verbatim. The factors were then divided into barriers and enablers which were further subdivided into themes and subthemes as a result of which four major themes were built including individual, social, organizational, and community levels. These major themes were further categorized into several subthemes to assess the nonadherence to antidiabetic medications. Results: The results of the interviews depicted that the lack of knowledge, financial problems, familial issues, misconceptions regarding the disease, and side effects of taking medications daily were the major altruist for nonadherence, whereas on the other hand, positive perception about the disease, family support, and getting medications on affordable prices by some health-care institutes played an important role in enabling medication adherence as about 50% patients were adherent to the medications. Moreover, various interventions were used to escort the patients regarding medication compliance and blood glucose level monitoring such as lifestyle modifications (diet and exercise), use of reminders for medication intake on time, encouraging them to visit health-care centers, or hospitals on time for regular check-ups and by educating them regarding the long-term effects of diabetes and its prevention.

Contact Tracing of Healthcare Workers Exposed to COVID-19 Infection in a Tertiary-Care Hospital: Containing the Contagion.

Introduction: Healthcare workers (HCWs) are at higher risk of getting infected with COVID-19 infection due to their close proximity to COVID-19-positive patients. We studied the risk stratification and positivity rate in HCWs at risk of getting COVID-19 infection as well as the possible factors responsible for their being at risk of COVID-19 infection during the study period. Material and Methods: This prospective study was conducted after approval by the institutional ethics committee. The data regarding demographic variables, risk stratification, COVID-19 (reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction) report, and possible sources of exposure for HCWs were recorded in a proforma by personal/telephonic interviews as well as from hospital records from March 2020 to June 2021. The data generated were entered into Microsoft Excel® software and analyzed using percentages, proportions, and Chi-square tests for qualitative variables. Results: COVID-19 infection's positivity rate was 19.5% among high-risk and 0.6% among low-risk HCW contacts. HCWs working in non-COVID-19 areas (67.9%) were more at risk than those working in COVID-19 areas (32.1%). In contrast, the COVID-19 positivity rate was significantly higher among high-risk contact HCWs from COVID-19 areas (34.2%) than in non-COVID-19 areas (12.6%). The maximum COVID-19 positivity rate was seen in high-risk contacts with body fluid exposure (21%), performing aerosol-generating procedures (20%), and close exposure in operation theaters (18%). Conclusions: Risk stratification is an important tool to contain infection among HCWs who had unprotected close contact with a COVID-19-positive case. With appropriate contact tracing, we were able to avoid over- and under-quarantine, save many man-hours as well as contain the spread of infection. HCWs should not only wear appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) during work hours but should also practice mask-wearing and social distancing while they are in the community.

Coping strategies and emotional responses adopted by health care workers during COVID-19 pandemic-braving the storm.

Background and Aims: Health care workers (HCWs) are caught in the middle of the COVID-19 pandemic storm and are exposed to a large degree of physical and emotional stress. This study was planned to describe the stressors, stress levels, emotional responses, and coping strategies adopted by HCWs amidst this pandemic. Material and Methods: This cross-sectional, web-based survey was conducted after ethics approval, using a structured performa incorporating standardized stress (PSS-10 C), emotional responses (PANAS-10), and coping strategy (Brief COPE) scales. The snowball sampling technique was used to conduct the study and collect data. Data were analyzed using SPSS 26 version (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) statistical software. A P value of <0.05 was considered significant. Results: Out of 402 participants (65% doctors and 35% nurses), 87% perceived moderate stress levels, and nearly half of the participants were interns, residents, and medical officers. Infection to self or family members (77.1%), survival of sick patients (75.6%), aggression by patients and relatives (70.3%), and long duty hours (67%) were some of the major stressors as reported by HCWs. The most common positive emotion felt was being alert (19.17 ± 5.57) and negative emotion perceived was being upset (15.6 ± 6.06). Many participants adopted emotion and problem-focused coping strategies such as planning and strategization (68%) and positive reframing (67.6%), whereas dysfunctional coping strategies such as venting and denial were adopted less commonly. Conclusion: Moderate stress levels perceived by HCWs are a cause for concern. Emotional responses of HCWs to stress vary; however, appropriate coping strategies including emotional and problem-focused coping strategies are the need of the hour to tackle pandemic-related stress.

Psychiatric comorbidities among people with epilepsy: A population-based assessment in disadvantaged communities.

Psychiatric disorders are frequent among people with epilepsy but often under-recognized. The diagnosis and treatment of these disorders in low- and low-middle-income countries (LMICs) are challenging. METHODS: This cross-sectional survey included people recruited during a community epilepsy screening program involving 59,509 individuals from poor communities in Ludhiana in Northwest India. Adults (age ≥18 years) with confirmed epilepsy on antiseizure medications were screened for depression and anxiety using the Neurological Disorders Depression Inventory for Epilepsy (NDDI-E) and Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) twice over two years of follow-up. They were later interviewed for symptoms using the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale, which was then confirmed by assessments by an experienced psychiatrist. RESULTS: Of the 240 people with confirmed epilepsy, 167 (70%) were adults, of whom, 116 (70%) eventually participated in the study. The NDDI-E with a cut-off of 15 identified depression in 14 (12%) of 116 people after one year of follow-up and 17 (15%) at two years. The GAD-7 using a cut-off of 6 identified 22 (19%) at one year and 32 (28%) with anxiety at two years. The area under the curves for NDDI-E was estimated as 0.62 (95%CI, 0.51-0.73; SE: 0.06; p = 0.04) and for GAD-7 as 0.62 (95%CI, 0.46-0.78; SE: 0.08; p = 0.12). Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale identified 63 (54%) people with psychiatric symptoms, for whom, a psychiatric diagnosis was confirmed in 60 (52%). A psychiatric diagnosis was associated with education below high school [Odds Ratio (OR): 2.59, 95%CI, 1.12-5.1; p = 0.03], later age of seizure onset (OR, 1.05, 95%CI: 1.0-1.10; p = 0.04), seizure frequency of at least one/year at enrolment (OR, 2.36, 95%CI: 1.0-5.58; p = 0.05) and the use of clobazam (OR, 5.09, 95%CI, 1.40-18.42; p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Depression and anxiety are common in people with epilepsy. Our findings underscore the low yields of screening instruments, NDDI-E and GAD-7, and comparatively better professionally-administered diagnostic assessments in resource-limited settings in LMICs. Moreover, previously established cut-offs do not apply to the community studied.

A cluster-randomized trial comparing home-based primary health care and usual clinic care for epilepsy in a resource-limited country.

OBJECTIVE: To ascertain whether home-based care with community and primary healthcare workers' support improves adherence to antiseizure medications, seizure control, and quality of life over routine clinic-based care in community samples of people with epilepsy in a resource-poor country. METHODS: Participants included consenting individuals with active epilepsy identified in a population survey in impoverished communities. The intervention included antiseizure medication provision, adherence reinforcement and epilepsy self- and stigma management guidance provided by a primary health care-equivalent worker. We compared the intervention group to a routine clinic-based care group in a cluster-randomized trial lasting 24 months. The primary outcome was antiseizure medication adherence, appraised from monthly pill counts. Seizure outcomes were assessed by monthly seizure aggregates and time to first seizure and impact by the Personal Impact of Epilepsy scale. RESULTS: Enrolment began on September 25, 2017 and was complete by July 24, 2018. Twenty-four clusters, each comprising ten people with epilepsy, were randomized to either home- or clinic-care. Home-care recipients were more likely to have used up their monthly-dispensed epilepsy medicine stock (regression coefficient: 0.585; 95% confidence intervals, 0.289-0.881; P = 0.001) and had fewer seizures (regression coefficient: -2.060; 95%CI, -3.335 to -0.785; P = 0.002). More people from clinic-care (n = 44; 37%) than home-care (n = 23; 19%) exited the trial (P = 0.003). The time to first seizure, adverse effects and the personal impact of epilepsy were similar in the two arms. SIGNIFICANCE: Home care for epilepsy compared to clinic care in resource-limited communities improves medication adherence and seizure outcomes and reduces the secondary epilepsy treatment gap.

Epidemiological correlates of hepatitis C infection- A case control analysis from a tertiary care hospital.

Background: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is considered one of the growing public health problems. Identification of HCV-associated risk factors is pivotal for developing appropriate prevention strategies. Objectives: To determine the epidemiological variables of HCV infection in a tertiary care hospital. Methods: This hospital-based case-control study was conducted in a tertiary care hospital in Punjab on 320 subjects, including 160 cases and controls each. Cases and controls were matched by age (±5 years), gender, and residence. A patient ≥18 years of age fulfilling the biomarker criteria with or without clinical criteria diagnosed in the last 1 month was considered as a case. The information on socio-demographic characteristics and previous exposures to selected risk factors was collected through detailed interviews of the subjects. Analysis was performed using SPSS 20 statistical software. Odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated to measure the strength of association between cases and controls for each risk factor. Results: Odds of having HCV infection was significantly higher among those with a history of blood transfusion (OR: 2.30, 95%CI: 1.14-4.63), dental procedure (OR: 4.82, 95%CI: 2.38-9.77) and intravenous injection/infusion from quacks (OR: 3.26, 95%CI: 1.47-7.19), injectable drug use (OR: 26.69, 95%CI: 3.55-200.24), non-injectable drug use (OR: 2.37, 95%CI: 1.44-3.90), tattooing (OR: 7.91, 95%CI: 2.31-27.08), and piercing from street hawkers (OR: 2.25, 95%CI: 1.18-4.29). Multivariate analysis identified history of blood transfusion, dental procedure, intravenous injection/infusion from quacks, injecting drug use, and piercing as independent risk factors for HCV infection. Conclusion: The study identified multiple risk factors for acquiring HCV infection and suggest appropriate interventions targeting high-risk populations.

Endocrine and Metabolic Manifestations of COVID-19 Patients Admitted to an Intensive Care Unit.

CONTEXT: The effects of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on the endocrine system remain uncertain. OBJECTIVE: Our study aimed to explore the possible effects of COVID-19 on endocrine organs and to determine the impact of glycemic status, 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels, calcium levels, and thyroid dysfunction on the final outcome of patients with COVID-19. DESIGN AND METHODS: This single-center, retrospective study evaluated endocrine function abnormalities in 102 patients hospitalized with COVID-19 in the intensive care unit (ICU). RESULTS:  Of 102 patients admitted to ICU, 42 (41.2%) succumbed to illness. The most frequently observed abnormality in thyroid function tests was low free triiodothyronine (FT3) levels (56%). A thyroid profile indicating thyrotoxicosis was detected in five (4.9%) patients, and overt hypothyroidism was identified in two (1.9%) patients. New-onset diabetes was detected in five (4.9%) patients whereas diabetic ketoacidosis at presentation was found in six (5.9%) cases. Rhino-orbital mucormycosis was detected in one patient with diabetes during treatment of COVID-19 while three (2.9%) patients were diagnosed with pulmonary mucormycosis after recovery from COVID-19. Hypocalcemia was observed in 52 (51 %) patients. Out of 42 patients who died, 32 patients had low FT3, 26 patients had high glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c), and 33 patients had low 25-hydroxyvitamin D. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that low concentration of 25-hydroxyvitamin D, low FT3 and higher HbA1c levels were significantly associated with increased mortality. CONCLUSION:  New-onset thyrotoxicosis in COVID-19 patients is mostly due to subacute thyroiditis. Hypocalcemia is also frequently encountered in patients with moderate disease and those with critical COVID-19. A high index of suspicion is required to timely diagnose mucormycosis in COVID-19 patients with diabetes.

How trainee doctors and nurses react to simulated scenarios of violence against healthcare workers: A cross-sectional study.

Medical and nursing students may have to face healthcare-related violence, especially now as they may be doing clinical duty during the Covid-19 pandemic. This study was conducted to analyse the perceptions and attitudes of medical and nursing students towards violence against healthcare workers (HCWs), when presented with audio-visual depiction of simulated scenarios. This cross-sectional study was conducted over a period of six months (April to September 2019) among the undergraduate medical and nursing students of first, second, pre-final and final years making it a total of 800 students. Video clips were shown to the students pertaining to HCWs' interactions with patients and relatives, and their responses were noted. Among 615 participants who completed the proforma, 248 (40%) students reported having observed or experienced violence in their clinical postings. Overall, 70.7% of medical and 68.5% of nursing students said that they would report incidents of violence to the authority. The questionnaire based on video-based simulated scenarios brought forth the perception that in triggering an act of violence, both the healthcare worker and the attendant could be at fault and full disclosure of complications was a necessary step in preventing such an act of violence. Sensitisation about the same should be incorporated into the teaching curriculum by using simulated scenarios to prepare them to manage such incidents.

Prevalence of psychological outcomes and its associated factors in healthcare personnel working during COVID-19 outbreak in India.

Background: Care of COVID-19 patients has been shown to affect the mental health of healthcare personnel (HCP), however, there is little data reflecting psychological health of HCP in India. Aims: The present study was undertaken to assess the prevalence of psychological outcomes and its association with various sociodemographic and occupational factors among the HCP in India. Methodology: A cross-sectional, online survey, using snowball sampling method was conducted between June 1, 2020, and June 22, 2020. The HCP working in COVID-19 designated hospitals across India were invited to participate. Patient Health Questionnaire-4 and 19-item stress-related questionnaire were used to evaluate symptoms of overall anxiety, depression, COVID-19 infection specific anxiety, exhaustion, and workload. Results: In this cross-sectional study with 2334 HCP from 27 states and 7 union territories of India; 17.9% of participants had depression, 18.7% had overall anxiety, 26.5% had exhaustion, 30.3% reported heavy workload, and 25.4% had COVID-19 infection-specific anxiety, respectively. The HCP working in states with higher caseload was a common risk factor for overall anxiety (odds ratio [OR], 1.7; P < 0.001), depression (OR, 1.6; P < 0.001), COVID-19 infection-specific anxiety (OR, 2.5; P < 0.001), exhaustion (OR, 3.1; P < 0.001), and heavy workload (OR, 2.6; P < 0.001). Nurses were more at risk for depression (OR, 2.2; P < 0.001), anxiety specific to COVID-19 infection (OR, 1.3; P = 0.034), and heavy workload (OR, 2.9; P < 0.001); while doctors were more at risk for overall anxiety (OR, 2.0; P = 0.001) and exhaustion (OR, 3.1; P < 0.001). Conclusions: Frontline workers, specifically nurses and doctors, and those working in states with high COVID-19 caseload are more at risk for adverse psychological outcomes. The relatively less prevalence compared with other countries, is perhaps a reflection of measures undertaken, including early lockdown, ensuring better all-round preparedness and social norms.

From rapid antigen testing for COVID-19 to final outcome: An experience from industrial city of Ludhiana.

Context: The ongoing corona pandemic has created medical crises all over the world. An increased surge in the number of COVID-19 cases was observed in the month of August, September and October 2020. Punjab has around 10 Lakh migrant workers. Intensive rapid antigen testing was done during this surge among factory workers. With this background, the study aims to find out the positivity rate of rapid antigen testing and to find out the final outcome of the COVID positive cases in terms of morbidity. Materials and methods: Screening of factory workers working in various factories was done for COVID-19 by rapid antigen testing from 26th august to 31st October 2020. Those who tested positive were clinically examined, counseled, and followed up telephonically to get information regarding their course of illness. The collected information was entered in Microsoft excel sheet and analyzed using SPSS. Results: A total of 11045 factory workers were screened using the rapid antigen test. The mean age of subjects was 33.37 ± 10.97 years. The majority of them were males (88.3%) and migrants (who did not belong to Punjab) (97.3%). The majority of the subjects (97.3%) had no symptoms at the time of screening. COVID-19 positivity rate increased with age, was found to be higher in males (2.3%) as compared to females. Conclusion: The positivity rate was higher in asymptomatic males and local resident workers. Rapid antigen testing is an important public health measure to prevent the further spread of the disease during a pandemic due to its quick results and detection of asymptomatic patients.

Assessment of diabetes risk profile in a rural population of northern India using the Indian Diabetes Risk Score - A community-based study.

Background: Diabetes is one of the leading killers among noncommunicable diseases of the present time and poses a considerable burden to the society in terms of public health. The Indian Diabetes Risk Score (IDRS) can be used as a risk assessment tool to estimate the population at risk and plan appropriate interventions. The present study was conducted to assess the diabetes risk profile of a rural population of Punjab by using IDRS. Materials and Methods: This was a cross-sectional study conducted in two phases after obtaining approval from the Institutional Ethics Committee. Phase 1 was done in Rural Health Training Center (RHTC), Pohir, where every fifth patient attending the outpatient department was included in the study. Phase 2 was conducted in village Gopalpur, which is one of the villages in the field practice area of Department of Community Medicine, where participants were enrolled by conducting house to house survey after taking their informed consent. Sociodemographic characteristics, risk factor profile, and the IDRS of the participants were noted. The data was analyzed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 26.0 to calculate the percentages. Pearson's Chi-square test was used for qualitative variables, and mean, standard deviation and analysis of variance (ANOVA) were used for quantitative variables. A P value of less than 0.05 was considered significant. Results: A total of 252 subjects (99 male and 153 female) from RHTC and 213 subjects (71 male and 142 female) from village Gopalpur participated in the study, with their mean IDRS being 44.8 ± 15.7 and 46.6 ± 21.1, respectively. On calculating the IDRS of participants enrolled in RHTC, it was found that 15.5% had low, 56% had moderate, and 28.5% had high risk, whereas from village Gopalpur, 19.2% had low, 57.3% had moderate, and 23.5% had high risk for developing diabetes mellitus. The risk for developing diabetes was found to be higher among females, subjects living in joint families, and subjects with high body mass index (BMI). The mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure showed an increasing trend with increase in IDRS score of the participants. Conclusion: The present study showed that even in rural areas, nearly one-fourth of the adult population was at high risk, whereas more than half of the population was at moderate risk of developing diabetes mellitus. This corroborates the World Health Organization's (WHO's) stand to declare diabetes as a public health emergency and to devise ways to urgently mitigate this problem. Therefore, awareness and health education campaigns should be implemented in rural areas for early identification of risks, which will help in prevention and hence decreasing the burden of the disease.

Diabetes and rhino-orbito-cerebral mucormycosis - A deadly duo.

BACKGROUND: Rhino-orbito-cerebral mucormycosis(ROCM) is an uncommon yet potentially fatal fungal infection predominantly seen in immunocompromised individuals. However, there is very limited data available from India regarding outcome of patients with ROCM and diabetes mellitus. OBJECTIVE: To ascertain clinical parameters and factors in the final outcome of patients with diabetes mellitus and ROCM. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This series included retrospective analysis of medical records of 91 patients with diabetes mellitus who were diagnosed with ROCM from january 2007 to june 2019 at a tertiary care hospital in Punjab. RESULTS: The mean age of patients was 52.6 years (range 18-82 years), with men constituting the majority (71.4 %). Ophthalmoplegia was the most frequent presenting feature seen in 77 % of patients followed by proptosis (71 %). Intracranial involvement was seen in 20 % of the patients and cavernous sinus thrombosis was diagnosed in 9(10 %) patients. Out of 91 patients, 81 patients were subjected to appropriate surgical procedure depending upon site and extent of involvement by mucorales. A total of 53 (58.2 %) patients survived while 38(41.8 %) patients succumbed. Delay in presentation to hospital, intracranial extension and loss of vision at presentation adversely affected the outcome (p < 0.05). Aggressive surgical management in the form of multiple debridements was superior to single debridement (p < 0.05). Diabetic ketoacidosis did not significantly affect the outcome (p = 0.359). CONCLUSIONS: ROCM in patients with diabetes mellitus, is a rapidly progressive disease with a high fatality rate and grave outcome unless diagnosed early and managed aggressively.

Bedside Ultrasonographic Assessment of Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter As a Means of Detecting Raised Intracranial Pressure in Neuro-Trauma Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study.

BACKGROUND: Optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) measurement is emerging as a noninvasive method to estimate raised ICP. It is helpful in situations where imaging of brain or direct ICP monitoring is not available or feasible. Use of ONSD is still limited, so this study was planned to determine whether the bedside sonographic measurement of ONSD can reliably predict elevated ICP in neuro-trauma patients. METHODOLOGY: After approval from Hospital Ethics Committee, this cross-sectional study was conducted in hundred traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients with suspected elevated ICP, admitted to neurosurgical ICU. The severity of brain injury was assessed according to Glasgow coma scale (GCS), initial CT scan findings, and revised trauma score (RTS). All patients underwent ONSD sonography of the eye and CT scan subsequently. ONSD of ≥5.0 mm was considered as a benchmark of raised ICP. RESULTS: Mean ONSD of the study group with ONSD ≥5.0 mm was 5.6 ± 0.3 mm. ONSD was raised in 46% of patients, more so in patients with low GCS (3-6). The relationship of ONSD with GCS, CT scan findings, and RTS was highly significant. The sensitivity of the bedside sonographic measurement ONSD to detect raised ICP was 93.2% and specificity was 91.1% when compared with CT scan. Positive Predictive Value of the ONSD measurement was 89.1% and the negative predictive value was 94.4%. CONCLUSION: Ultrasonographic assessment of ONSD is a reliable modality to detect raised ICP in neurotrauma patients. It can be helpful in the early initiation of treatment of elevated ICP, thus preventing secondary brain damage.

Colitis and Crohn's Foundation (India): a first nationwide inflammatory bowel disease registry.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The national registry for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) was designed to study epidemiology and prescribing pattern of treatment of IBD in India. METHODS: A multicenter, cross-sectional, prospective registry was established across four geographical zones of India. Adult patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) or Crohn's disease (CD) were enrolled between January 2014 and December 2015. Information related to demographics; disease features; complications; and treatment history were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 3,863 patients (mean age, 36.7 ± 13.6 years; 3,232 UC [83.7%] and 631 CD [16.3%]) were enrolled. The majority of patients with UC (n = 1,870, 57.9%) were from north, CD was more common in south (n = 348, 55.5%). The UC:CD ratio was 5.1:1. There was a male predominance (male:female = 1.6:1). The commonest presentation of UC was moderately severe (n = 1,939, 60%) and E2 disease (n = 1,895, 58.6%). Patients with CD most commonly presented with ileocolonic (n = 229, 36.3%) inflammatory (n = 504, 79.9%) disease. Extraintestinal manifestations were recorded among 13% and 20% of patients in UC and CD respectively. Less than 1% patients from both cohorts developed colon cancer (n = 26, 0.7%). The commonly used drugs were 5-aminosalicylates (99%) in both UC and CD followed by azathioprine (34.4%). Biologics were used in only 1.5% of patients; more commonly for UC in north and CD in south. CONCLUSIONS: The national IBD registry brings out diversities in the 4 geographical zones of India. This will help in aiding research on IBD and improving quality of patient care.

Clinical characteristics of epilepsy in resource-limited communities in Punjab, Northwest India.

OBJECTIVES: To describe clinical characteristics of a community-based epilepsy cohort from resource-limited communities in Punjab, Northwest India. METHODS: The cohort was gathered following a two-stage screening survey. We cross-sectionally examined and followed up the cohort for one year. A panel of neurologists assigned seizure types, syndromes, and putative etiologies and categorized drug responsiveness. RESULTS: The cohort of 240 included 161 (67.1%) men, 109 (45.4%) illiterates and 149 (62.1%) unemployed. Current age was >18 years in 155 (64.6%) but age at epilepsy onset was <18 years in 173 (72.1%). Epilepsies due to structural and metabolic causes were diagnosed in 99 (41.3%), but syndromic assignments were not possible in 97 (40.4%). After one year, drug-resistant epilepsy was established in 74 (30.8%). Perinatal events (n = 35; 14.6%) followed by CNS infections (n = 32; 13.3%) and traumatic brain injury (n = 12; 5.0%) were common risk factors. Most of those with CNS infections (n = 19; 63.3%), perinatal antecedents (n = 23; 76.7%), and other acquired risk factors (n = 27; 90.0%) presented with epilepsy due to structural and metabolic causes. Perinatal events were the putative etiology for nearly 40.7% of generalized epilepsies due to structural and metabolic causes and 28.2% of all epilepsies with onset <10 years. SIGNIFICANCE: Existing classifications schemes should be better suited to field conditions in resource-limited communities in low- and middle-income countries. The finding of drug-resistant epilepsy in nearly at least a third in a community-based sample underscores an unmet need for enhancing services for this segment within healthcare systems. Perinatal events, CNS infections, and head injury account for a third of all epilepsies and hence preventative interventions focusing on these epilepsy risk factors should be stepped up.

Saroglitazar in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and diabetic dyslipidemia: a prospective, observational, real world study.

Saroglitazar, a dual peroxisome proliferator activated receptor α/γ agonist, approved for diabetic dyslipidemia (DD), is potential therapeutic option for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). This prospective, observational, real-world study aimed to determine efficacy and safety of Saroglitazar in patients with NAFLD and DD. We included patients with DD and NAFLD who received Saroglitazar 4 mg once daily for 24 weeks. Blood investigations, liver stiffness measurement (LSM) and controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) (FibroScan) were compared at baseline and 24 weeks. Of 163 patients screened, 107 were included, and 101 completed 24 weeks treatment (mean age 50.4 ± 12.3 years, 78.5% males, mean body mass index 28.8 ± 4.2). After 24 weeks, alanine transaminase (ALT) reduced significantly from 94 (47-122) to 39 (31-49) (p < 0.0001) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) (U/L) from 89 (43-114) to 37 (30-47) (p < 0.0001) and LSM (kPa) from 8.4 (7.1-9.3) to 7.5 (6.4-8.4) (p = 0.0261). CAP, glycated hemoglobin and lipid parameters also improved significantly. On linear regression, there was significant association between percent change in ALT and AST with TG reduction after treatment (p = 0.024 and 0.037 respectively).We conclude that Saroglitazar leads to significant improvement in transaminases, LSM, and CAP in NAFLD patients with DD.

Mortality implications and factors associated with nonengagement in a public epilepsy care initiative in a transient population.

BACKGROUND: Community-based, public care programs are a requisite to close the epilepsy treatment gap in disadvantaged communities in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Potential beneficiaries may, however, choose not to engage in these programs. AIMS: The aim of the study was to describe factors associated with and mortality consequences of nonacceptance of a public epilepsy care initiative. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, we contacted 207 (36%) people out of 575 who screened positive for epilepsy during a population-based survey of 59,509 people. They were invited for neurological evaluation and care provision (including antiseizure medications (ASMs)) but chose not to engage. Structured questionnaires and qualitative interviews were conducted to determine reason for their nonengagement. Factors associated with nonengagement were evaluated by univariate and multivariate analysis. We conducted verbal autopsies for those who had died. RESULTS: Ten (5%) of the 207 individuals died since the initial screening; six with epilepsy-related causes. Of those who could be contacted (n = 48), 40 (19%) were confirmed to have epilepsy. Nonengaging individuals were likely to be older (odds ratio (OR): 1.02; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.01, 1.11), locals (OR: 4.32; 95% CI, 1.55, 12.03), and earn less than US$ 78/month (OR: 3.6; 95% CI, 1.62, 8.06). Reasons for not engaging included a belief that epilepsy is inconsequential, loss of daily wages owing to healthcare facility visit and physical infirmity. CONCLUSIONS: Nonacceptance of a community-based public epilepsy care initiative is associated with high premature mortality, mostly attributed to epilepsy-related causes. Older age, ethnic status, and economic deprivation are factors associated with nonacceptance, though the underlying reasons may be varied.

Epilepsy knowledge, attitudes, and practices among primary healthcare providers in an Indian district.

INTRODUCTION: Scaling up the involvement of primary care providers in epilepsy management in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) requires an understanding of their epilepsy knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP). AIM: The aim of the study was to document levels of knowledge about, attitudes towards, and practices regarding epilepsy among different ranks of primary healthcare providers in a North-Western Indian district. METHODS: The survey included government medical officers (MOs), auxiliary nurse midwives (ANMs), and accredited social health activists (ASHAs). They were administered a specially designed KAP questionnaire. Responses were analyzed according to rank. RESULTS: The survey showed that nearly 10% of ANMs and almost a fifth of ASHAs had never heard about epilepsy. A quarter of MOs and over two-thirds of ANMs and ASHAs had never provided care to someone with epilepsy. There were significant differences in the levels of knowledge between the three groups of workers. CONCLUSIONS: Closing the huge gaps in KAP by educating primary care and community health workers about epilepsy should be a priority before engaging them in the epilepsy care delivery.

Assessment of knowledge gaps and perceptions about COVID-19 among health care workers and general public-national cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: COVID-19 has impacted everyone's life and livelihood in one way or the other. Individual response to measures taken to control the rapid spread of this disease depend on their knowledge and perceptions. Hence, we proposed to evaluate responses about COVID-19 among the health care workers (HCWs) as well as general public participants (GPPs). MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was a cross-sectional, observational survey conducted during the peak of the pandemic. The 35-items questionnaire was prepared using Google forms and distributed through e-mails and social media. RESULTS: The 1,026 responses comprised of 558 HCWs (54.4%) and 468 GPPs (45.6%). The most reliable source of information was TV news for 43% GPPs, whereas it was HCWs/Local health authorities for 36.8% HCWs. HCWs had sufficient knowledge regarding COVID-19, while it was relatively low among GPPs (average correct response 65% and 53%, respectively). Intra-group analysis with respect to age, sex, qualification, and socioeconomic status showed that knowledge about mode of transmission by airborne aerosols was significantly low with respect to qualification among GPPs while younger age group (<40 years) HCWs had significantly more knowledge about mode of transmission and asymptomatic carriers. Paranoia of contracting the infection was significantly higher in GPPs with upper and middle socioeconomic status and younger HCWs. CONCLUSION: HCWs had moderate level of knowledge, whereas GPPs had low to moderate knowledge, with large scope of improvement in both groups. Continued education, both at professional and community level will not only be helpful but also necessary to improve knowledge, avert negative attitudes and control the devastating pandemic.