Treating Seizures and Improving Newborn Outcomes for Infants with Hypoxic-Ischemic Encephalopathy.

Hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy is the most common cause of neonatal seizures. Continuous electroencephalographic monitoring is recommended given high rates of subclinical seizures. Prompt diagnosis and treatment of seizures may improve neurodevelopmental outcomes. International League Against Epilepsy guidelines indicate that (1) phenobarbital remains the first-line treatment of neonatal seizures and (2) early discontinuation of antiseizure medications following resolution of acute provoked seizures, and prior to discharge home, is recommended. Long-term follow-up of these infants is necessary to screen for postneonatal epilepsy and support neurodevelopment.

Retrospective Multicenter Cohort Study on Safety and Electroencephalographic Response to Lacosamide for Neonatal Seizures.

BACKGROUND: There is growing evidence supporting the safety and effectiveness of lacosamide in older children. However, minimal data are available for neonates. We aimed to determine the incidence of adverse events associated with lacosamide use and explore the electroencephalographic seizure response to lacosamide in neonates. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from seven pediatric hospitals from January 2009 to February 2020. For safety outcomes, neonates were followed for ≤30 days from index date. Electroencephalographic response of lacosamide was evaluated based on electroencephalographic reports for ≤3 days. RESULTS: Among 47 neonates, 98% received the first lacosamide dose in the intensive care units. During the median follow-up of 12 days, 19% of neonates died, and the crude incidence rate per 1000 patient-days (95% confidence interval) of the adverse events by diagnostic categories ranged from 2.8 (0.3, 10.2) for blood or lymphatic system disorders and nervous system disorders to 10.5 (4.2, 21.6) for cardiac disorders. Electroencephalographic seizures were observed in 31 of 34 patients with available electroencephalographic data on the index date. There was seizure improvement in 29% of neonates on day 1 and also in 29% of neonates on day 2. On day 3, there was no change in 50% of neonates and unknown change in 50% of neonates. CONCLUSIONS: The results are reassuring regarding the safety of lacosamide in neonates. Although some neonates had fewer seizures after lacosamide administration, the lack of a comparator arm and reliance on qualitative statements in electroencephalographic reports limit the preliminary efficacy results.

A novel clinical risk scoring system for neurodevelopmental outcomes among survivors of neonatal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE).

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to develop a risk scoring system as a predictor of 24-month neurodevelopmental outcomes (cognitive, language, and motor) for neonates treated with therapeutic hypothermia for hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE). METHODS: This was a chart review of infants with HIE treated with therapeutic hypothermia who were admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) at the University of Michigan between 2009 and 2019 and followed in the neonatal developmental clinic until 24 months of age. We examined bivariate associations between the neonatal characteristics and Bayley-III scores. We then performed stepwise logistic regression. To create the risk scores, a participant was given one point for each of the factors included in the final model. RESULTS: Fifty-five infants were included. The final model for Bayley cognitive abnormality included abnormal neonatal neurologic exam (p < 0.0001), white matter/watershed MRI abnormality (p = 0.01), 5-min Apgar score (p = 0.02), and EEG-confirmed seizures (p = 0.04). The model for language abnormality included abnormal neurologic exam (p = 0.0002), seizures (p = 0.007), clinical severity of HIE (p = 0.06), and basal ganglia/thalamus MRI abnormality (p = 0.17). The model for motor abnormality included seizures (p = 0.03), abnormal neurologic exam (p = 0.06) and basal ganglia/thalamus MRI abnormality (p = 0.02). The positive predictive values for the risk scores were 60 %, 85 % and 71 %, respectively, for the Bayley-III cognitive, language and motor domains. CONCLUSION: Our study identifies early clinical features that differentially predict domains of neurodevelopmental outcome and associated risk scores that may be of value to both clinicians and families. This novel scoring system should next be validated in a larger, prospective study.

Feeding and developmental outcomes after neonatal seizures-A prospective observational study.

Objective: Among neonates with acute symptomatic seizures, we evaluated whether inability to take full feeds at time of hospital discharge from neonatal seizure admission is associated with worse neurodevelopmental outcomes, after adjusting for relevant clinical variables. Methods: This prospective, 9-center study of the Neonatal Seizure Registry (NSR) assessed characteristics of infants with seizures including: evidence of brainstem injury on MRI, mode of feeding upon discharge, and developmental outcomes at 12, 18, and 24 months. Inability to take oral feeds was identified through review of medical records. Brainstem injury was identified through central review of neonatal MRIs. Developmental outcomes were assessed with the Warner Initial Developmental Evaluation of Adaptive and Functional Skills (WIDEA-FS) at 12, 18, and 24 months corrected age. Results: Among 276 infants, inability to achieve full oral feeds was associated with lower total WIDEA-FS scores (160.2±25.5 for full oral feeds vs. 121.8±42.9 for some/no oral feeds at 24 months, p<0.001). At 12 months, a G-tube was required for 23 of the 49 (47%) infants who did not achieve full oral feeds, compared with 2 of the 221 (1%) who took full feeds at discharge (p<0.001). Conclusions: Inability to take full oral feeds upon hospital discharge is an objective clinical sign that can identify infants with acute symptomatic neonatal seizures who are at high risk for impaired development at 24 months.

Treatment of seizures in the neonate: Guidelines and consensus-based recommendations-Special report from the ILAE Task Force on Neonatal Seizures.

Seizures are common in neonates, but there is substantial management variability. The Neonatal Task Force of the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) developed evidence-based recommendations about antiseizure medication (ASM) management in neonates in accordance with ILAE standards. Six priority questions were formulated, a systematic literature review and meta-analysis were performed, and results were reported following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) 2020 standards. Bias was evaluated using the Cochrane tool and risk of Bias in non-randomised studies - of interventions (ROBINS-I), and quality of evidence was evaluated using grading of recommendations, assessment, development and evaluation (GRADE). If insufficient evidence was available, then expert opinion was sought using Delphi consensus methodology. The strength of recommendations was defined according to the ILAE Clinical Practice Guidelines development tool. There were six main recommendations. First, phenobarbital should be the first-line ASM (evidence-based recommendation) regardless of etiology (expert agreement), unless channelopathy is likely the cause for seizures (e.g., due to family history), in which case phenytoin or carbamazepine should be used. Second, among neonates with seizures not responding to first-line ASM, phenytoin, levetiracetam, midazolam, or lidocaine may be used as a second-line ASM (expert agreement). In neonates with cardiac disorders, levetiracetam may be the preferred second-line ASM (expert agreement). Third, following cessation of acute provoked seizures without evidence for neonatal-onset epilepsy, ASMs should be discontinued before discharge home, regardless of magnetic resonance imaging or electroencephalographic findings (expert agreement). Fourth, therapeutic hypothermia may reduce seizure burden in neonates with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (evidence-based recommendation). Fifth, treating neonatal seizures (including electrographic-only seizures) to achieve a lower seizure burden may be associated with improved outcome (expert agreement). Sixth, a trial of pyridoxine may be attempted in neonates presenting with clinical features of vitamin B6-dependent epilepsy and seizures unresponsive to second-line ASM (expert agreement). Additional considerations include a standardized pathway for the management of neonatal seizures in each neonatal unit and informing parents/guardians about the diagnosis of seizures and initial treatment options.

Neonatal brain MRI and short-term outcomes after acute provoked seizures.

OBJECTIVE: We investigated how diagnosis and injury location on neonatal brain MRI following onset of acute provoked seizures was associated with short term outcome. STUDY DESIGN: A multicenter cohort of neonates with acute provoked seizures enrolled in the Neonatal Seizure Registry. MRIs were centrally evaluated by a neuroradiologist for location of injury and radiologic diagnosis. Clinical outcomes were determined by chart review. Multivariate logistic regression was used to examine the association between MRI findings and outcomes. RESULTS: Among 236 newborns with MRI at median age 4 days (IQR 3-8), 91% had abnormal MRI. Radiologic diagnoses of intracranial hemorrhage (OR 3.2 [1.6-6.5], p < 0.001) and hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (OR 2.7 [1.4-5.4], p < 0.003) were associated with high seizure burden. Radiologic signs of intracranial infection were associated with abnormal neurologic examination at discharge (OR 3.9 [1.3-11.6], p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Findings on initial MRI can help with expectant counseling on short-term outcomes following acute provoked neonatal seizures.

Variation in electroencephalography and neuroimaging for children receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

BACKGROUND: Seizures, strokes, and intracranial hemorrhage are common and feared complications in children receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support. Researchers and clinicians have proposed and deployed methods for monitoring and detecting neurologic injury, but best practices are unknown. We sought to characterize clinicians' approach to electroencephalography (EEG) and brain imaging modalities in children supported by ECMO. METHODS: We performed a retrospective observational cohort study among US Children's Hospitals participating in the Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS) from 2016 to 2021. We identified hospitalizations containing ECMO support. We stratified these admissions by pediatric, neonatal, cardiac surgery, and non-cardiac surgery. We characterized the frequency of EEG, cranial ultrasound, brain computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and transcranial Doppler during ECMO hospitalizations. We reported key diagnoses (stroke and seizures) and the prescription of antiseizure medication. To assess hospital variation, we created multilevel logistic regression models. RESULTS: We identified 8746 ECMO hospitalizations. Nearly all children under 1 year of age (5389/5582) received a cranial ultrasound. Sixty-two percent of the cohort received an EEG, and use increased from 2016 to 2021 (52-72% of hospitalizations). There was marked variation between hospitals in rates of EEG use. Rates of antiseizure medication use (37% of hospitalizations) and seizure diagnoses (20% of hospitalizations) were similar across hospitals, including high and low EEG utilization hospitals. Overall, 37% of the cohort received a CT and 36% received an MRI (46% of neonatal patients). Stroke diagnoses (16% of hospitalizations) were similar between high- and low-MRI utilization hospitals (15% vs 17%, respectively). Transcranial Doppler (TCD) was performed in just 8% of hospitalizations, and 77% of the patients who received a TCD were cared for at one of five centers. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort of children at high risk of neurologic injury, there was significant variation in the approach to EEG and neuroimaging in children on ECMO. Despite the variation in monitoring and imaging, diagnoses of seizures and strokes were similar across hospitals. Future work needs to identify a management strategy that appropriately screens and monitors this high-risk population without overuse of resource-intensive modalities.

Seizure Burden, EEG, and Outcome in Neonates With Acute Intracranial Infections: A Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Limited data exist regarding seizure burden, electroencephalogram (EEG) background, and associated outcomes in neonates with acute intracranial infections. METHODS: This secondary analysis was from a prospective, multicenter study of neonates enrolled in the Neonatal Seizure Registry with seizures due to intracranial infection. Sites used continuous EEG monitoring per American Clinical Neurophysiology Society guidelines. High seizure burden was defined a priori as seven or more EEG-confirmed seizures. EEG background was categorized using standardized terminology. Primary outcome was neurodevelopment at 24-months corrected age using Warner Initial Developmental Evaluation of Adaptive and Functional Skills (WIDEA-FS). Secondary outcomes were postneonatal epilepsy and motor disability. RESULTS: Twenty-seven of 303 neonates (8.9%) had seizures due to intracranial infection, including 16 (59.3%) bacterial, 5 (18.5%) viral, and 6 (22.2%) unknown. Twenty-three neonates (85%) had at least one subclinical seizure. Among 23 children with 24-month follow-up, the WIDEA-FS score was, on average, 23 points lower in children with high compared with low seizure burden (95% confidence interval, [-48.4, 2.1]; P = 0.07). After adjusting for gestational age, infection etiology, and presence of an additional potential acute seizure etiology, the effect size remained unchanged (ß = -23.8, P = 0.09). EEG background was not significantly associated with WIDEA-FS score. All children with postneonatal epilepsy (n = 4) and motor disability (n = 5) had high seizure burden, although associations were not significant. CONCLUSION: High seizure burden may be associated with worse neurodevelopment in neonates with intracranial infection and seizures. EEG monitoring can provide useful management and prognostic information in this population.

Inequities in Therapy for Infantile Spasms: A Call to Action.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine whether selection of treatment for children with infantile spasms (IS) varies by race/ethnicity. METHODS: The prospective US National Infantile Spasms Consortium database includes children with IS treated from 2012 to 2018. We examined the relationship between race/ethnicity and receipt of standard IS therapy (prednisolone, adrenocorticotropic hormone, vigabatrin), adjusting for demographic and clinical variables using logistic regression. Our primary outcome was treatment course, which considered therapy prescribed for the first and, when needed, the second IS treatment together. RESULTS: Of 555 children, 324 (58%) were non-Hispanic white, 55 (10%) non-Hispanic Black, 24 (4%) non-Hispanic Asian, 80 (14%) Hispanic, and 72 (13%) other/unknown. Most (398, 72%) received a standard treatment course. Insurance type, geographic location, history of prematurity, prior seizures, developmental delay or regression, abnormal head circumference, hypsarrhythmia, and IS etiologies were associated with standard therapy. In adjusted models, non-Hispanic Black children had lower odds of receiving a standard treatment course compared with non-Hispanic white children (odds ratio [OR], 0.42; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.20-0.89; p = 0.02). Adjusted models also showed that children with public (vs. private) insurance had lower odds of receiving standard therapy for treatment 1 (OR, 0.42; CI, 0.21-0.84; p = 0.01). INTERPRETATION: Non-Hispanic Black children were more often treated with non-standard IS therapies than non-Hispanic white children. Likewise, children with public (vs. private) insurance were less likely to receive standard therapies. Investigating drivers of inequities, and understanding the impact of racism on treatment decisions, are critical next steps to improve care for patients with IS. ANN NEUROL 2022;92:32-44.

Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Developmental Service Delivery in Children With a History of Neonatal Seizures.

BACKGROUND: Children with a history of acute provoked neonatal seizures are at high risk for disability, often requiring developmental services. The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has led to widespread changes in how health care is delivered. Our objective was to determine the magnitude of service interruption of among children born between October 2014 and December 2017 and enrolled in the Neonatal Seizure Registry (NSR), a nine-center collaborative of pediatric centers in the United States. METHODS: This is a prospective cohort study of children with acute provoked seizures with onset ≤44 weeks' gestation and evaluated at age three to six years. Parents of children enrolled in the NSR completed a survey about their child's access to developmental services between June 2020 and April 2021. RESULTS: Among 144 children enrolled, 72 children (50%) were receiving developmental services at the time of assessment. Children receiving services were more likely to be male, born preterm, and have seizure etiology of infection or ischemic stroke. Of these children, 64 (89%) experienced a disruption in developmental services due to the pandemic, with the majority of families (n = 47, 73%) reporting that in-person services were no longer available. CONCLUSIONS: Half of children with acute provoked neonatal seizures were receiving developmental services at ages three to six years. The COVID-19 pandemic has led to widespread changes in delivery of developmental services. Disruptions in services have the potential to impact long-term outcomes for children who rely on specialized care programs to optimize mobility and learning.

Proposal for an updated seizure classification framework in clinical trials.

The International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) seizure classification scheme has been periodically updated to improve its reliability and applicability to clinicians and researchers alike. Here, members of the Epilepsy Study Consortium propose a pragmatic seizure classification, based on the ILAE scheme, designed for use in clinical trials with a focus on outcome measures that have high reliability, broad interpretability across stakeholders, and clinical relevance in the context of the development of novel antiseizure medications. Controversies around the current ILAE classification scheme are discussed in the context of clinical trials, and pragmatic simplifications to the existing scheme are proposed, for intended use by investigators, industry sponsors, and regulatory agencies.

Parent-Reported Sleep Profile of Children With Early-Life Epilepsies.

BACKGROUND: Sleep comorbidities are common, and sometimes severe, for children with early-life epilepsies (ELEs). Yet, there is a paucity of data regarding the profile of these sleep disturbances and their complications. METHODS: Participants registered with the Rare Epilepsy Network (REN) were queried about sleep via online questionnaires. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression were performed. RESULTS: Median age of the 356 children was 56 months (interquartile range 30 to 99), 56% were female, and 53% (188/356) endorsed a sleep concern. Frequent nighttime awakenings (157 of 350; 45%), difficulty falling asleep (133 of 350; 38%), and very restless sleep (118 of 345; 34%) were most endorsed. Nocturnal seizures were associated with sleep concerns and were reported in 75% (268 of 356) of children. Of the children with nocturnal seizures, 56% (118 of 268) had sleep concerns. Of the children without nocturnal seizures, 43% (38 of 88) had sleep concerns. Sleep concerns were most common in dup15q syndrome (16 of 19; 84%). Children aged 4 to ≤10 years (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 16.1; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.0, 131.0) and 10 to <13 years (aOR 22.2; 95% CI 2.6, 188.6) had a greater odds of having a sleep concern compared with children aged ≤6 months. Female sex appeared protective for sleep concerns (aOR 0.6; 95% CI 0.4, 0.9). The association between sleep concerns and nocturnal seizures was weaker when adjusted for sex and age category in a logistic regression model. CONCLUSIONS: Reported sleep concerns are highly prevalent in children with ELEs and persist with age, in contrast to what is expected in healthy children. There may be unmet sleep-related clinical needs in children with ELEs.

Sleep of infants and toddlers during 12 months of the COVID-19 pandemic in the midwestern United States.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Cultural sleep practices and COVID-19 mitigation strategies vary worldwide. The sleep of infants and toddlers during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States is understudied. METHODS: Caregivers of children aged < 3 years responded to a cross-sectional survey during 2020 (divided into quarters, with the year quarter 1 being largely prelockdown). We assessed the global effect of year quarter on parent-reported total sleep time (hours) and sleep onset latency (hours) using an analysis of variance. We used multivariable linear regression to assess the adjusted effect of year quarter on total sleep time, sleep onset latency, and parental frustration. We used logistic regression to assess the adjusted effect of year quarter on nap consistency. RESULTS: Of 594 children, the mean age was 18.5 ± 9.7 months; 52% were female. In the adjusted analyses, the reference categories were as follows: quarter 1 (year quarter), ≤ 6 months (age category), and < $25,000 (annual household income). Total sleep time was associated with age category (ages 12 to ≤ 24 months: ß = -2.86; P = .0004; ages 24 to ≤ 36 months: ß = -3.25; P < .0001) and maternal age (ß = -0.04; P = .05). Sleep onset latency was associated with year quarter (year quarter 3: ß = 0.16; P = .04), age category (ages 24 to ≤ 36 months: ß = 0.28; P < .0001), annual household income ($100,000-$150,000: ß = -0.15; P = .03; > $150,000: ß = -0.19; P = .01), and lack of room-sharing (ß = -0.09; P = .05). Parental frustration with sleep increased with age (all P < .05) and lack of room-sharing (P = .01). The effect of lack of room-sharing on nap consistency approached significance (adjusted odds ratio, 1.88; 95% confidence interval, 0.95-3.72). CONCLUSIONS: Social factors such as lower household income and room-sharing affected the sleep of U.S. infants and toddlers as opposed to the COVID-19 lockdown itself. CITATION: Gupta G, O'Brien LM, Dang LT, Shellhaas RA. Sleep of infants and toddlers during 12 months of the COVID-19 pandemic in the midwestern United States. J Clin Sleep Med. 2022;18(5):1225-1234.