Tension force causes cell cycle arrest at G2/M phase in osteocyte-like cell line MLO-Y4.

Bone remodelling is the process of bone resorption and formation, necessary to maintain bone structure or for adaptation to new conditions. Mechanical loadings, such as exercise, weight bearing and orthodontic force, play important roles in bone remodelling. During the remodelling process, osteocytes play crucial roles as mechanosensors to regulate osteoblasts and osteoclasts. However, the precise molecular mechanisms by which the mechanical stimuli affect the function of osteocytes remain unclear. In the present study, we analysed viability, cell cycle distribution and gene expression pattern of murine osteocyte-like MLO-Y4 cells exposed to tension force (TF). Cells were subjected to TF with 18% elongation at 6 cycles/min for 24 h using Flexcer Strain Unit (FX-3000). We found that TF stimulation induced cell cycle arrest at G2/M phase but not cell death in MLO-Y4 cells. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between TF-stimulated and unstimulated cells were identified by microarray analysis, and a marked increase in glutathione-S-transferase α (GSTA) family gene expression was observed in TF-stimulated cells. Enrichment analysis for the DEGs revealed that Gene Ontology (GO) terms and Kyoto Encyclopedia Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways related to the stress response were significantly enriched among the upregulated genes following TF. Consistent with these results, the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) was elevated in TF-stimulated cells. Activation of the tumour suppressor p53, and upregulation of its downstream target GADD45A, were also observed in the stimulated cells. As GADD45A has been implicated in the promotion of G2/M cell cycle arrest, these observations may suggest that TF stress leads to G2/M arrest at least in part in a p53-dependent manner.

Pain and removal force associated with bracket debonding: a clinical study.

OBJECTIVE: Pain is a problem during bracket removal, and more comfortable treatment is needed. This study examined the association of pain with the removal force required for ceramic brackets, compared with metal and plastic brackets, to determine which removal method resulted in less pain and discomfort. METHODOLOGY: 81 subjects (mean age, 25.1 years; 25 males and 56 females) were enrolled, from whom 1,235 brackets (407 ceramic, 432 plastic, and 396 metal) were removed. Measured teeth were distinguished at six segments. Pain was measured with a visual analogue scale (VAS) during the removal of each bracket. An additional grip was placed on the grips of debonding pliers with right-angled beaks; a mini loading cell sensor pinched by the grips was used to measure removal force during debonding. VAS and force values were statistically analyzed. The Kruskal-Wallis test followed by the Mann-Whitney U test with Bonferroni correction were performed for multiple comparisons; multiple regression analysis was also performed. RESULTS: Forces in the upper and lower anterior segments were significantly smaller (p<0.05) than those in the other segments. Pain tended to be greater in the upper and lower anterior segments than in the posterior segments. In all segments, the removal force was greater for metal brackets than for plastic or ceramic brackets. Ceramic brackets caused significantly greater pain than plastic brackets for the upper and lower anterior segments. Debonding force was involved in the brackets, following adjustments for pain, upper left segment, age, and sex. CONCLUSIONS: Pain and discomfort are likely to occur during bracket debonding.

Pain and removal force associated with bracket debonding: a clinical study

Abstract Objective: Pain is a problem during bracket removal, and more comfortable treatment is needed. This study examined the association of pain with the removal force required for ceramic brackets, compared with metal and plastic brackets, to determine which removal method resulted in less pain and discomfort. Methodology: 81 subjects (mean age, 25.1 years; 25 males and 56 females) were enrolled, from whom 1,235 brackets (407 ceramic, 432 plastic, and 396 metal) were removed. Measured teeth were distinguished at six segments. Pain was measured with a visual analogue scale (VAS) during the removal of each bracket. An additional grip was placed on the grips of debonding pliers with right-angled beaks; a mini loading cell sensor pinched by the grips was used to measure removal force during debonding. VAS and force values were statistically analyzed. The Kruskal-Wallis test followed by the Mann-Whitney U test with Bonferroni correction were performed for multiple comparisons; multiple regression analysis was also performed. Results: Forces in the upper and lower anterior segments were significantly smaller (p<0.05) than those in the other segments. Pain tended to be greater in the upper and lower anterior segments than in the posterior segments. In all segments, the removal force was greater for metal brackets than for plastic or ceramic brackets. Ceramic brackets caused significantly greater pain than plastic brackets for the upper and lower anterior segments. Debonding force was involved in the brackets, following adjustments for pain, upper left segment, age, and sex. Conclusions Pain and discomfort are likely to occur during bracket debonding.