Preoperative Evaluation for Free Functional Muscle Transfer in Upper Extremity Amyoplasia: A Multicenter Report of 3 Cases.

CASE: A multicenter series of 3 patients with amyoplasia of the upper extremity were indicated for gracilis free functional muscle transfer (FFMT) to restore elbow flexion and found to have an absent gracilis. A final case is discussed detailing standardized evaluation with ultrasound to confirm gracilis before surgical intervention. CONCLUSION: In amyoplasia, the gracilis muscle may be absent or have fatty infiltration, making this donor muscle inadequate. Preoperative ultrasound to determine the presence of the gracilis is noninvasive and recommended in patients with amyoplasia of the upper extremity being considered for FFMT.

Hirayama Disease: Surgical Restoration of Hand Function.

PURPOSE: Hirayama disease (HD) is a rare, nonfamilial, self-limiting, progressive lower cervical myelopathy, resulting in debilitating distal upper-extremity motor deficits, mimicking high ulnar neuropathy, lower trunk brachial plexopathy, or C8-T1 radiculopathy. Although most literature focuses on pathophysiology and prevention of disease progression, there remains limited discussion regarding treatment to improve upper-extremity function in patients with stable disease. The upper-extremity manifestations of HD are reviewed along with surgical options for restoring hand function. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients with HD who underwent reconstruction to improve hand function was undertaken. Demographic data, preoperative electrodiagnostic and electromyographic, and physical examination findings were collected. Outcome data involved postoperative grip, pinch, and functional assessment documented on clinical visits. Qualitative descriptions of the surgical techniques are described. RESULTS: Among six patients identified, four met the inclusion criteria and underwent tendon transfers and selected joint arthrodeses. All patients were diagnosed as teenagers, were right hand-dominant, and three were male. Unilateral symptoms were present in one patient and were bilateral in the rest. All patients were treated with tendon transfers for thumb opposition, grasp, anticlaw, and thumb interphalangeal joint arthrodesis. All patients had postoperative grip strength improvement. The average follow-up was 3.2 years. CONCLUSIONS: Hirayama disease is a rare disease often managed by spine surgeons and neurologists who may be unaware of options for restoring hand function deficits. Technical strategies and outcomes of improving hand function in HD have not been adequately described. Surgical options to improve hand function are tailored to the deficits and include tendon transfers, select joint arthrodeses, and/or tenodeses. Risk of disease progression and expectations following hand reconstruction must be managed carefully. TYPE OF STUDY LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic V.

Superficial Branch of the Radial Nerve Versus Sural Nerve Grafting After Traumatic Adult Brachial Plexus Injury.

The purpose of this study was to compare two sources of nerve graft for brachial plexus reconstruction: the denervated superficial branch of the radial nerve (SBRN) and the sural nerve. Ninety-seven patients who underwent brachial plexus reconstruction with denervated SBRN nerve (24 patients with 24 grafts) or with sural nerve grafting (73 patients with 83 nerve grafts) were included. The two groups were compared with respect to postoperative muscle reinnervation, disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) scores. In the SBRN group, only four (17%) of the nerve grafts provided grade III or higher muscle function. In the sural nerve group, 31 (37%) of the nerve grafts provided grade III or higher muscle function. Smoking had a negative impact on muscle recovery. Denervated SBRN grafts are associated with inferior outcomes when compared with sural nerve grafts in the treatment of traumatic adult brachial plexus injuries. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 33(2):080-083, 2024).

Triceps-to-Biceps Tendon Transfer Technique for Restoration of Elbow Flexion in Adult Brachial Plexus Injury.

Restoration of elbow flexion is a priority in treating adult traumatic brachial plexus injuries. A tendon transfer is an ideal option for patients not candidates for reconstructive nerve surgery or free-functioning muscle transfer. For patients with a partial brachial plexus injury or a pan plexus injury with adequate recovered triceps function and loss of elbow flexion, a triceps-to-biceps tendon transfer is a nonmicrosurgical option to restore elbow flexion. The technique of triceps-to-biceps transfer in which the complete triceps tendon is transferred laterally, secured lateral to the radial tuberosity, and reinforced with suture to the biceps tendon is described.

Motor Examination of the Brachial Plexus.

Serial physical examination is often required in the evaluation of brachial plexus injuries. (Noland, 2019) A comprehensive evaluation that includes a thorough history, electrodiagnostic evaluation, and imaging studies, in addition to physical examination, can provide valuable information about the location of the lesion, prognosis for recovery, and whether surgical intervention is necessary. After brachial plexus reconstruction, physical examinations are also performed to document clinical improvement and identify any residual issues. The videos included in this clinical examination techniques section demonstrate the muscle strength examination testing for the brachial plexus and offer best practices for documentation.

Evaluating the Ability of Brachial Plexus-Injured Patients to Control an Externally Powered (Myoelectric) Hand Prosthesis.

BACKGROUND: Restoration of hand function after traumatic brachial plexus injury (BPI) remains a formidable challenge. Traditional methods such as nerve or free muscle transfers yield suboptimal results. Advancements in myoelectric prostheses, characterized by novel signal acquisition and improved material technology, show promise in restoring functional grasp. This study evaluated the ability of adults with a BPI injury to control an externally powered prosthetic hand using nonintuitive signals, simulating the restoration of grasp with a myoelectric prosthesis. It also assessed the effectiveness of a comprehensive multidisciplinary evaluation in guiding treatment decisions. METHODS: A multidisciplinary brachial plexus team assessed adults with compromised hand function due to BPI. The feasibility of amputation coupled with fitting of a myoelectric prosthesis for grasp reconstruction was evaluated. Participants' ability to control a virtual or model prosthetic hand using surface electromyography (EMG) as well as with contralateral shoulder motion-activated linear transducer signals was tested. The patient's input and injury type, along with the information from the prosthetic evaluation, were used to determine the reconstructive plan. The study also reviewed the number of participants opting for amputation and a myoelectric prosthetic hand for grasp restoration, and a follow-up survey was conducted to assess the impact of the initial evaluation on decision-making. RESULTS: Of 58 subjects evaluated, 47 (81%) had pan-plexus BPI and 42 (72%) received their initial assessment within 1 year post-injury. Forty-seven patients (81%) could control the virtual or model prosthetic hand using nonintuitive surface EMG signals, and all 58 could control it with contralateral uniscapular motion via a linear transducer and harness. Thirty patients (52%) chose and pursued amputation, and 20 (34%) actively used a myoelectric prosthesis for grasp. The initial evaluation was informative and beneficial for the majority of the patients, especially in demonstrating the functionality of the myoelectric prosthesis. CONCLUSIONS: The study indicates that adults with traumatic BPI can effectively operate a virtual or model myoelectric prosthesis using nonintuitive control signals. The simulation and multidisciplinary evaluation influenced informed treatment choices, with a high percentage of patients continuing to use the myoelectric prostheses post-amputation, highlighting its long-term acceptance and viability. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Injury and Biological Factors Impact Shoulder Function following Autogenous Grafting of Spinal Nerves for Pan-Brachial Plexus Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Shoulder function following spinal nerve grafting in pan-brachial plexus injuries(Pan-BPI) is not well described. The purpose of this study was twofold: 1)to evaluate shoulder abduction(ABD) and external rotation(ER) after grafting of viable spinal nerves to the suprascapular nerve(SSN), axillary nerve(AxN), or posterior division of the upper trunk(PDUT); and 2)to determine patient characteristics, injury severity/characteristics, and nerve graft factors that influenced outcomes. METHODS: 362 Pan-BPI reconstruction patients from a single institution were reviewed for those who underwent spinal nerve grafting for shoulder reanimation between 2001 and 2018. Patient demographics, injury severity scores(ISS), graft characteristics, strength, range of motion for shoulder ABD and ER, and patient-reported outcomes were recorded. Patients were divided into three groups based on the recovery of shoulder function: no return, ABD only, and ABD and ER. RESULTS: 110 patients underwent spinal nerve grafting, with 41 meeting inclusion criteria. 17(41.5%) had no return of shoulder function, 14(34.1%) had ABD alone, and 10(24.4%) had ABD and ER. Patients with recovery of both ABD and ER were significantly younger(18.6±5.56), had lower BMI(22.4±4.0), and lower ISS(10.5±6.24, p=0.003). Multivariable analysis found that with increasing age(OR:0.786, 95%CI:0.576,0.941) and ISS(OR:0.820, 95%CI:0.606-0.979), odds for return of ABD and ER significantly decreased. CONCLUSIONS: In Pan-BPI, 24.4% of patients demonstrated return of both ABD and ER following spinal nerve grafting to SSN and either AxN or PDUT. Age, BMI, and ISS were associated with poorer recovery of shoulder function. Careful patient selection and consideration of age, BMI, and ISS may improve outcomes of spinal nerve grafting for shoulder reanimation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

The role of vascularized bone grafting for scaphoid nonunions in adolescents.

A total of 26 adolescent patients were treated for scaphoid nonunion with a vascularized bone graft from either the medial femoral condyle or dorsal distal radius. There was an 85% union incidence, improved carpal alignment and a low incidence of complications.

The 2-by-2 Inch "Key Window" in the Upper Extremity: An Anatomical Appraisal of the Accessibility and Proximity of the Major Nerves and Vessels.

BACKGROUND: The brachial plexus is a network of nerves located between the neck and axilla, which receives input from C5-T1. Distally, the nerves and blood vessels that supply the arm and forearm form a medial neurovascular bundle. The purpose of this study was to illustrate that a peripheral nerve dissection via a 2 × 2 inch window would allow for identification and isolation of the major nerves and blood vessels that supply the arm and forearm. METHODS: A right side formalin-fixed latex-injected cadaveric arm was transected at the proximal part of the axillary fold and included the scapular attachments. Step-by-step anatomical dissection was carried out and documented with three-dimensional digital imaging. RESULTS: A 2 × 2 inch window centered 2 inches distal to the axillary fold on the medial surface of the arm enabled access to the major neurovascular structures of the arm and forearm: the median nerve, ulnar nerve, medial antebrachial cutaneous nerve, radial nerve and triceps motor branches, musculocutaneous nerve and its biceps and brachialis branches and lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve, basilic vein and brachial artery and vein, and profunda brachii artery. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates that the majority of the neurovascular supply in the arm and forearm can be accessed through a 2 × 2 inch area in the medial arm. Although this "key window" may not be entirely utilized in the operative setting, our comprehensive didactic description of peripheral nerve dissection in the cadaver laboratory can help in safer identification of complex anatomy encountered during surgical procedures.

Validation of the Root Analysis Score for C5 Viability in Patients With Pan-Brachial Plexus Injury.

PURPOSE: Pan-brachial plexus injury patients present a reconstructive challenge. The root analysis score, developed from parsimonious multivariable modeling of 311 pan-brachial plexus injury patients, determines the probability of having a viable C5 nerve based on four categories: positive C5 Tinel test, intact C5 nerve on computed tomography myelogram, lack of hemidiaphragmatic elevation, and absence of midcervical paraspinal fibrillations. METHODS: Root analysis scores were calculated for a separate cohort of patients with pan-brachial plexus injuries. Scores were validated by the presence or absence of a graftable C5 root, based on supraclavicular exploration and intraoperative electrophysiologic testing. Receiver operating characteristic curve, accuracy, and concordance statistic of the scores were calculated. Patients were divided into three root analysis score cohorts: less than 50 (low), 50-75 (average), and 75-100 points (high) based on dividing the score into quartiles and combining the lowest two. The probability, sensitivity, and specificity of each cohort having an available C5 nerve were based on the intraoperative assessment. RESULTS: Eighty patients (mean age, 33.1 years; 15 women and 65 men) were included. Thirty-one patients (39%) had a viable C5 nerve. The root analysis calculator had an overall accuracy of 82.5%, a receiver operating characteristic of 0.87, and a concordance statistic of 0.87, demonstrating high overall predictive value; 6.5% of patients with a score of less than 50 (94% sensitivity and 43% specificity), 16.1% of patients with a score of 50-75 (94% sensitivity and 67% specificity), and 77.4% of patients with a score of 75-100 (77% sensitivity and 90% specificity) had a graftable C5 nerve. CONCLUSIONS: The root analysis score demonstrated high accuracy and predictive power for a viable C5 nerve. In patients with a score of less than 50, the necessity of supraclavicular root exploration should balance patient factors, presentation timing, and concomitant injuries. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnosis II.

Global trends and outcomes of nerve transfers for treatment of adult brachial plexus injuries.

The presentation, management and outcomes of brachial plexus injuries are likely to be subject to regional differences across the globe. A comprehensive literature search was performed to identify relevant articles related to spinal accessory to suprascapular, intercostal to musculocutaneous, and ulnar and/or median nerve fascicle to biceps and/or brachialis motor branch nerve transfers for treatment of brachial plexus injuries. A total of 6007 individual brachial plexus injuries were described with a mean follow-up of 38 months. The specific indication for accessory to suprascapular and intercostal to musculocutaneous transfers were considerably different among regions (e.g. upper plexus vs. pan-plexal), while uniform for fascicular transfer for elbow flexion (e.g. upper plexus +/- C7). Similarly, functional recovery was highly variable for accessory to suprascapular and intercostal to musculocutaneous transfers, while British Medical Research Council grade ≥3 strength after fascicular transfer for elbow flexion was frequently obtained. Overall, differences in outcomes seem to be inherent to the specific transfer being utilized.Level of evidence: III.

The failed adult traumatic brachial plexus reconstruction.

Traumatic adult brachial plexus injuries typically cause immediate loss of upper limb function. Timely multidisciplinary treatment in specialized centres often results in a useful helper arm. Both the patient and the surgical team can benefit from an open discussion to set realistic expectations. Surgical reconstruction is customized for each patient, considering their injury factors and functional objectives. Optimizing pain control, adherence to procedure indications and using meticulous surgical techniques help minimize the risk of failing to meet the patient's goals. The need for potential alternative treatment(s) if the desired result is not achieved should be detailed before the initial reconstruction. This review discusses late treatment options, including tendon transfers, joint fusions, free functioning muscle transfers and prosthetics, for managing the failed primary reconstruction of the traumatic adult brachial plexus.

Complications of operatively treated distal radial fractures.

Distal radial fractures represent the most common fractures of the upper extremity. Operative treatment is performed for approximately one-third of distal radial fractures in the adult population. Complications following operative treatment of distal radial fractures vary depending on the treatment modality and can be stratified into preoperative and postoperative complications. Complications can occur in the near, intermediate and long term. The most common complications seen are tendon irritation and rupture, chronic regional pain syndrome (CRPS), carpal tunnel syndrome, ulnar or radial neuropathy, compartment syndrome, malunion, inadequate fixation or loss of fixation, symptomatic hardware, post-traumatic arthritis, stiffness and infection. Careful planning, treatment and patient selection can help to mitigate these complications.Level of evidence: V.

Investigation Into the Effects of Intra-Articular Steroid on Post-Traumatic Osteoarthritis in Distal Radius Fractures: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study.

PURPOSE: The aim of this prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blinded pilot study was to determine the rates of post-traumatic osteoarthritis and assess joint space width in the presence or absence of a single intra-articular injection of corticosteroid after an acute, intra-articular distal radius fracture (DRF). METHODS: Forty patients received a single, intra-articular, radiocarpal joint injection of 4 mg of dexamethasone (DEX) (n = 19) or normal saline placebo (n = 21) within 2 weeks of a surgically or nonsurgically treated intra-articular DRF. The primary outcome measure was minimum radiocarpal joint space width (mJSW) on noncontrast computed tomography scans at 2 years postinjection. Secondary outcomes were obtained at 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years postinjection and included Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand; Michigan Hand Questionnaire; Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation; wrist range of motion; and grip strength. RESULTS: At 2-year follow-up, there was no difference in mean mJSW between the DEX group (2.2 mm; standard deviation, 0.6; range, 1.4-3.2) and the placebo group (2.3 mm; standard deviation, 0.7; range, 0.9-3.9). Further, there were no differences in any secondary outcome measures at any postinjection follow-up interval. CONCLUSIONS: Radiocarpal joint injection of corticosteroid within 2 weeks of an intra-articular DRF does not appear to affect the development of post-traumatic osteoarthritis within 2 years follow-up in a small pilot cohort. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic II.

The Effect of Local Purified Exosome Product, Stem Cells, and Tacrolimus on Neurite Extension.

PURPOSE: The combination of cellular and noncellular treatments has been postulated to improve nerve regeneration through a processed nerve allograft. This study aimed to evaluate the isolated effect of treatment with purified exosome product (PEP), mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), and tacrolimus (FK506) alone and in combination when applied in decellularized allografts. METHODS: A three-dimensional in vitro-compartmented cell culture system was used to evaluate the length of regenerating neurites from the neonatal dorsal root ganglion into the adjacent peripheral nerve graft. Decellularized nerve allografts were treated with undifferentiated MSCs, 5% PEP, 100 ng/mL FK506, PEP and FK506 combined, or MSCs and FK506 combined (N = 9/group) and compared with untreated nerve autografts (positive control) and nerve allografts (negative control). Neurite extension was measured to quantify nerve regeneration after 48 hours, and stem cell viability was evaluated. RESULTS: Stem cell viability was confirmed in all MSC-treated nerve grafts. Treatments with PEP, PEP + FK506, and MSCs + FK506 combined were found to be superior to untreated allografts and not significantly different from autografts. Combined PEP and FK506 treatment resulted in the greatest neurite extension. Treatment with FK506 and MSCs was significantly superior to MSC alone. The combined treatment groups were not found to be statistically different. CONCLUSIONS: Although all treatments improved neurite outgrowth, treatments with PEP, PEP + FK506, and MSCs + FK506 combined had superior neurite growth compared with untreated allografts and were not found to be significantly different from autografts, the current gold standard. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Purified exosome product, a cell-free exosome product, is a promising adjunct to enhance nerve allograft regeneration, with possible future avenues for clinical translation.

A three-dimensional computed tomography study of the palmar ulnar corner fragment in distal radial fractures.

Fixing palmar ulnar corner fragments of distal radial fractures can be challenging. We described the palmar ulnar corner fragment morphology in a retrospective cohort study of 40 patients who underwent preoperative wrist computed tomography scans. Palmar ulnar corner fractures were categorized based on articular cross-sectional area, sagittal angulation relative to the radius long axis, palmar cortical length, radioulnar width and associated palmar radiocarpal subluxation. Three types emerged: type 1 fragments involved 37% (SD 10) of the radiocarpal articular surface and were extended in the sagittal plane; type 2 fragments involved 28% (SD 10) of the articular surface and had a long palmar cortex, of which 57% had palmar carpal subluxation; and type 3 fragments involved 13% (SD 2) of the articular surface, had a short palmar cortex and all had palmar carpal subluxation. Understanding palmar ulnar corner fragment morphology may guide optimal reduction and fixation strategy and prevent palmar radiocarpal subluxation, especially in type 3 fractures.Level of evidence IV.