Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Más filtros




Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Birth Defects Res ; 113(2): 189-202, 2021 01 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33348463

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Down syndrome is the most common chromosomal disorder at birth and is often accompanied by structural birth defects. Current data on major structural defects in this population are limited. METHODS: States and territorial population-based surveillance programs submitted data on identified cases of Down syndrome and identified structural birth defects during 2013-2017. We estimated prevalence by program type and maternal and infant characteristics. Among programs with active case ascertainment, we estimated the prevalence of birth defects by organ system and for specific defects by maternal age (<35, ≥35) and infant sex. RESULTS: We identified 13,376 cases of Down syndrome. Prevalence among all programs was 12.7 per 10,000 live births. Among these children, 75% had at least one reported co-occurring birth defect diagnosis code. Among 6,210 cases identified by active programs, 66% had a cardiovascular defect with septal defects being the most common: atrial (32.5%), ventricular (20.6%), and atrioventricular (17.4%). Defect prevalence differed by infant sex more frequently than by maternal age. For example, atrioventricular septal defects were more common in female children (20.1% vs. 15.1%) while limb deficiencies were more prevalent in male children (0.4% vs. 0.1%). CONCLUSIONS: Our study provides updated prevalence estimates for structural defects, including rare defects, among children with Down syndrome using one of the largest and most recent cohorts to date. These data may aid clinical care and surveillance.


Asunto(s)
Síndrome de Down , Niño , Síndrome de Down/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Nacimiento Vivo/epidemiología , Masculino , Edad Materna , Vigilancia de la Población , Embarazo , Prevalencia
2.
Birth Defects Res ; 111(18): 1436-1447, 2019 11 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31642616

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: In this report, the National Birth Defects Prevention Network (NBDPN) examines and compares gastroschisis and omphalocele for a recent 5-year birth cohort using data from 30 population-based birth defect surveillance programs in the United States. METHODS: As a special call for data for the 2019 NBDPN Annual Report, state programs reported expanded data on gastroschisis and omphalocele for birth years 2012-2016. We estimated the overall prevalence (per 10,000 live births) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for each defect as well as by maternal race/ethnicity, maternal age, infant sex, and case ascertainment methodology utilized by the program (active vs. passive). We also compared distribution of cases by maternal and infant factors and presence/absence of other birth defects. RESULTS: The overall prevalence estimates (per 10,000 live births) were 4.3 (95% CI: 4.1-4.4) for gastroschisis and 2.1 (95% CI: 2.0-2.2) for omphalocele. Gastroschisis was more frequent among young mothers (<25 years) and omphalocele more common among older mothers (>40 years). Mothers of infants with gastroschisis were more likely to be underweight/normal weight prior to pregnancy and mothers of infants with omphalocele more likely to be overweight/obese. Omphalocele was twice as likely as gastroschisis to co-occur with other birth defects. CONCLUSIONS: This report highlights important differences between gastroschisis and omphalocele. These differences indicate the importance of distinguishing between these defects in epidemiologic assessments. The report also provides additional data on co-occurrence of gastroschisis and omphalocele with other birth defects. This information can provide a basis for future research to better understand these defects.


Asunto(s)
Anomalías Congénitas/etnología , Anomalías Congénitas/epidemiología , Anomalías del Sistema Digestivo/epidemiología , Pared Abdominal/fisiopatología , Anomalías Múltiples/epidemiología , Adulto , Anomalías del Sistema Digestivo/etnología , Femenino , Gastrosquisis/epidemiología , Hernia Umbilical/epidemiología , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Nacimiento Vivo , Masculino , Edad Materna , Persona de Mediana Edad , Madres , Vigilancia de la Población/métodos , Embarazo , Prevalencia , Grupos Raciales , Sistema de Registros , Factores de Riesgo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Estados Unidos/etnología
3.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 68(2): 31-36, 2019 Jan 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30653484

RESUMEN

Prevalence of gastroschisis, a serious birth defect of the abdominal wall resulting in some of the abdominal contents extending outside the body at birth, has been increasing worldwide (1,2). Gastroschisis requires surgical repair after birth and is associated with digestive and feeding complications during infancy, which can affect development. Recent data from 14 U.S. states indicated an increasing prevalence of gastroschisis from 1995 to 2012 (1). Young maternal age has been strongly associated with gastroschisis, but research suggests that risk factors such as smoking, genitourinary infections, and prescription opioid use also might be associated (3-5). Data from 20 population-based state surveillance programs were pooled and analyzed to assess age-specific gastroschisis prevalence during two 5-year periods, 2006-2010 and 2011-2015, and an ecologic approach was used to compare annual gastroschisis prevalence by annual opioid prescription rate categories. Gastroschisis prevalence increased only slightly (10%) from 2006-2010 to 2011-2015 (prevalence ratio = 1.1, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.0-1.1), with the highest prevalence among mothers aged <20 years. During 2006-2015, the prevalence of gastroschisis was 1.6 times higher in counties with high opioid prescription rates (5.1 per 10,000 live births; CI = 4.9-5.3) and 1.4 times higher where opioid prescription rates were medium (4.6 per 10,000 live births; CI = 4.4-4.8) compared with areas with low prescription rates (3.2 per 10,000 live births; CI = 3.1-3.4). Public health research is needed to understand factors contributing to the association between young maternal age and gastroschisis and assess the effect of prescription opioid use during pregnancy on this pregnancy outcome.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Fenómenos Ecológicos y Ambientales , Gastrosquisis/epidemiología , Adulto , Distribución por Edad , Analgésicos Opioides/efectos adversos , Etnicidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Gastrosquisis/etnología , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Madres/estadística & datos numéricos , Embarazo , Efectos Tardíos de la Exposición Prenatal , Prevalencia , Grupos Raciales/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de Riesgo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
4.
J Am Coll Health ; 67(2): 132-143, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29652614

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Although two-thirds of graduating high school seniors attend college or university in the U.S., there is a paucity of national or state specific research regarding SRH services available on or near college and university campuses. METHODS: A review of websites for all colleges and universities in Georgia was conducted to evaluate sexual health services available on campuses and evidence of referral to community providers. RESULTS: Of 96 colleges in Georgia, 44 had campus-located health centers, with only 3 at two-year colleges. Overall SRH service provision was low, with great variation between colleges. Distances between colleges and Title X clinics ranged from 0.33 to 35.45 miles. CONCLUSIONS: Many students lack access to campus health centers, and information on college websites regarding SRH service availability and referrals differs dramatically between campuses. In the absence of robust campus-located services, schools should highlight where students can obtain comprehensive SRH care in the community.


Asunto(s)
Internet , Servicios de Salud Reproductiva/organización & administración , Servicios de Salud Reproductiva/estadística & datos numéricos , Conducta Sexual/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicios de Salud para Estudiantes/organización & administración , Servicios de Salud para Estudiantes/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudiantes/estadística & datos numéricos , Universidades/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Femenino , Georgia , Humanos , Masculino , Estados Unidos , Adulto Joven
5.
Birth Defects Res ; 110(19): 1478-1486, 2018 11 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30444307

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: In this data brief, we examine major eye and ear anomalies (anophthalmia/microphthalmia, anotia/microtia, and congenital cataract) for a recent 5-year birth cohort using data from 30 population-based birth defects surveillance programs in the United States. METHODS: As a special call for data for the 2018 NBDPN Annual Report, state programs reported expanded data on eye/ear anomalies for birth years 2011-2015. We calculated the combined overall prevalence (per 10,000 live births) and 95% confidence intervals (CI), for the three anomalies as well as by maternal age, maternal race/ethnicity, infant sex, laterality, presence/absence of other major birth defects, and case ascertainment methodology utilized by the program (active vs. passive). RESULTS: The overall prevalence estimate (per 10,000 live births) was 1.5 (95% CI: 1.4-1.5) for anophthalmia/microphthalmia, 1.5 (95% CI: 1.4-1.6) for congenital cataract, and 1.8 (95% CI: 1.7-1.8) for anotia/microtia. Congenital cataract prevalence varied little by maternal race/ethnicity, infant sex, or case ascertainment methodology; prevalence differences were more apparent across strata for anophthalmia/microphthalmia and anotia/microtia. Prevalence among active vs. passive ascertainment programs was 50% higher for anophthalmia/microphthalmia (1.9 vs. 1.2) and two-fold higher for anotia/microtia (2.6 vs. 1.2). Anophthalmia/microphthalmia was more likely than other conditions to co-occur with other birth defects. All conditions were more frequent among older mothers (40+ years). CONCLUSIONS: This data brief provides recent prevalence estimates for anophthalmia/microphthalmia, congenital cataract, and anotia/microtia that address a data gap by examining pooled data from 30 population-based surveillance systems, covering a five-year birth cohort of about 12.4 million births.


Asunto(s)
Anoftalmos/epidemiología , Microtia Congénita/epidemiología , Microftalmía/epidemiología , Adulto , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Catarata/epidemiología , Anomalías Congénitas/epidemiología , Oído/anomalías , Anomalías del Ojo , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Edad Materna , Madres , Oportunidad Relativa , Vigilancia de la Población/métodos , Embarazo , Prevalencia , Sistema de Registros , Factores de Riesgo , Estados Unidos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA