Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Urology ; 174: 48-51, 2023 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36610689

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To describe temporal utilization and reimbursement trends of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) and ureteroscopy (URS) with laser lithotripsy. METHODS: The Medicare Provider Utilization and Payment Database was queried for all ESWL and URS performed between 2013 and 2020 using Current Procedural Terminology codes: ESWL - 50590; URS - 52352, 52353, 52356. Cases that lacked rural or urban identification codes were excluded. A total of 347,174 ESWL and 401,899 URS cases were identified. Linear regression was performed with statistical significance set to 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: There was a significant upward trend for URS utilization over the study period (R2 = 0.91, P <.001), but there was not a significant trend for ESWL utilization. In 2013, ESWL was used more frequently than URS, but by 2016, URS was used more frequently than ESWL. From 2013 to 2019, URS utilization increased by 241% and 168% by urban and rural urologists, respectively. URS was also associated with a slight increase in physician reimbursement over time (R2 = 0.87, P <.001), whereas there was no association between ESWL and physician reimbursement. For URS, rural and urban urologists were reimbursed an average of $312.07 (standard deviation [SD] $14.03) and $404.86 (SD $21.96), respectively. For ESWL, rural and urban urologists were reimbursed an average of $456.22 (SD $5.74) and $562.66 (SD $16.68), respectively. CONCLUSION: According to the Medicare database, URS has surpassed ESWL in utilization, especially by urban urologists. Physician reimbursement for ESWL remained higher than URS reimbursement, though URS reimbursement increased slightly in recent years.


Asunto(s)
Litotripsia por Láser , Litotricia , Cálculos Ureterales , Anciano , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Ureteroscopía , Cálculos Ureterales/terapia , Medicare , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Urology ; 162: 99-104, 2022 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34757050

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether urology residency programs publish information about lactation accommodations online. Although residencies are required to provide lactation accommodations, there is limited data on whether programs disclose this information. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Webpages of U.S. urology residency programs were assessed for presence of information about lactation accommodations. Program characteristics were noted, as were mentions of resident wellness and diversity. Associations between program characteristics and published lactation accommodations were determined by univariate analysis and development of a multivariate logistic regression model. RESULTS: Of 145 urology residency programs, 72.4% included information about lactation accommodations anywhere on the institution's website There was great variability in ease of accessing information and of quality of information available. Information was most commonly on graduate medical education websites (28.3%) followed by human resources (24.1%), press releases (7.6%), or other sections (11.0%), and least likely to be found on urology residency websites (1.4%). Programs with lactation accommodations anywhere on the institution website were more likely to be larger (P < 0.001), university-based (P < 0.01), and to publish information about resident wellness (P < 0.001), or diversity and inclusion (P < 0.01). On multivariate analysis, only university-based setting and presence of wellness information were predictors of availability of lactation accommodation information. CONCLUSION: Lactation accommodation information is usually not available on urology residency websites and most online information is found elsewhere. Predictors of publishing lactation accommodation information were university-based setting and information about resident wellness. Efforts to recruit and retain female urologists should include making this information more easily accessible.


Asunto(s)
Internado y Residencia , Urología , Acceso a la Información , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina , Femenino , Humanos , Lactancia
3.
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr ; 60(1): 36-41, 2015 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25199036

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Transition may be associated with poor health outcomes, but limited data exist regarding inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Acquisition of self-management skills is believed to be important to this process. IBD-specific checklists of such skills have been developed to aid in transition, but none has been well studied or validated. This study aimed to describe self-assessment ability to perform tasks on one of these checklists and to explore the relation between patient age and disease duration. METHODS: Patients ages 10 to 21 years with IBD were recruited. An iPad survey queried the patients for self-assessment of ability to perform specific self-management tasks. Task categories included basic knowledge of IBD, doctor visits, medications and other treatments, and disease management. Associations with age and disease duration were tested with Spearman rank correlation. RESULTS: A total of 67 patients (31 boys) with Crohn disease (n = 40), ulcerative colitis (n = 25), and indeterminate colitis (n = 2) participated in the study. Mean patient age was 15.8 ±â€Š2.5 years, with median disease duration of 5 years (2 months-14 years). The proportion of patients who self-reported ability to complete a task without help increased with age for most tasks, including "telling others my diagnosis" (ρ = 0.43, P = 0.003), "telling medical staff I do not like or am having trouble following a treatment" (ρ = 0.37, P = 0.003), and "naming my medications" (ρ = 0.28, P = 0.02). No task significantly improved with disease duration. CONCLUSIONS: Self-assessment of ability to perform some key tasks of transition appears to improve with age, but not with disease duration. More important, communication with the medical team did not improve with age, despite being of critical importance to functioning within an adult care model.


Asunto(s)
Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/terapia , Cooperación del Paciente , Autocuidado , Transición a la Atención de Adultos , Adolescente , Adulto , Lista de Verificación , Niño , Colitis/terapia , Colitis Ulcerosa/terapia , Terapia Combinada , Enfermedad de Crohn/terapia , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Internet , Masculino , Michigan , Servicio Ambulatorio en Hospital , Adulto Joven
4.
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr ; 57(1): 35-8, 2013 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23459317

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Infliximab is used increasingly to treat inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Infliximab is supplied in 100-mg vials. Doses that are typically calculated as 5 mg · kg⁻¹ · dose⁻¹ are commonly rounded up or down to the nearest 100 mg. Variation in dosing practices is unknown. Underdosing based on weight may increase the risk for disease exacerbation, whereas overimmune suppression could increase the risk of infection. Children may be at greater risk from dosage rounding. We aimed to characterize infliximab dosing practices, the use of corticosteroid premedication, and duration of infusions among pediatric practitioners participating in the ImproveCareNow Network, a national collaboration to improve IBD care and outcomes. METHODS: A national survey of infliximab dosing practices was sent to 279 pediatric IBD practitioners from March to December 2011. Double data reconciliation, t test, and χ² analyses were performed. RESULTS: The response rate was 74% (N = 207). Thirty-eight percent (78/207) indicated that their practice has no uniform approach to the rounding of doses. Of 114 respondents indicating a uniform approach to rounding doses, 43% always round up to the nearest 100 mg, 33% always round up or down to the nearest 100 mg, and 14% never round doses. In addition, 28% of respondents always premedicate with corticosteroids and 12% never premedicate. Of respondents indicating "it depends," 95% premedicate if there has been a previous infusion reaction, 46% if there has been a prolonged lapse between treatment doses, 40% if antibodies to infliximab are present, and 11% if giving infliximab monotherapy. The duration of infusions is most often 2 hours, but varies between 1 and 4 hours. CONCLUSIONS: Wide variation exists in the practice of infliximab administration in pediatric IBD. The effect of these variations on outcomes is unknown.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales/administración & dosificación , Fármacos Gastrointestinales/administración & dosificación , Inmunosupresores/administración & dosificación , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/tratamiento farmacológico , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Adolescente , Corticoesteroides/uso terapéutico , Antiinflamatorios/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/efectos adversos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Niño , Cálculo de Dosificación de Drogas , Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas/complicaciones , Fármacos Gastrointestinales/efectos adversos , Fármacos Gastrointestinales/uso terapéutico , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Humanos , Inmunosupresores/efectos adversos , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/complicaciones , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/inmunología , Infliximab , Infusiones Intravenosas , Londres , Premedicación , Estados Unidos , Agencias Voluntarias de Salud
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA