How power shapes behavior: Evidence from physicians.

Power-the asymmetric control of valued resources-affects most human interactions. Although power is challenging to study with real-world data, a distinctive dataset allowed us to do so within the critical context of doctor-patient relationships. Using 1.5 million quasi-random assignments in US military emergency departments, we examined how power differentials between doctor and patient (measured by using differences in military ranks) affect physician behavior. Our findings indicate that power confers nontrivial advantages: "High-power" patients (who outrank their physician) receive more resources and have better outcomes than equivalently ranked "low-power" patients. Patient promotions even increase physician effort. Furthermore, low-power patients suffer if their physician concurrently cares for a high-power patient. Doctor-patient concordance on race and sex also matters. Overall, power-driven variation in behavior can harm the most vulnerable populations in health care settings.

Decompressive Craniectomy After Traumatic Brain Injury: Incorporating Patient Preferences into Decision-Making.

BACKGROUND: Decompressive craniectomy (DC) is highly effective in relieving intracranial hypertension; however, patient selection, intracranial pressure threshold, timing, and long-term functional outcomes are all subject to controversy. Recently, recommendations were made to update the Brain Trauma Foundation guidelines in regards to the use of DC based on the DECRA (Decompressive Craniectomy in Patients with Severe Traumatic Brain Injury) and RESCUEicp (Trial of Decompressive Craniectomy for Traumatic Intracranial Hypertension) clinical trials. Neither the updated recommendations, nor the aforementioned trials, provide a method in incorporating individualized patient or surrogate decision-maker preferences into decision making. METHODS: In this manuscript, we aimed to redress the gap of not incorporating patient preferences in such value-laden decision making as in the case of DC for refractory post-traumatic intracranial hypertension. We proposed a decision aid based on principles of Decision Theory, and specifically of Expected Utility Theory. RESULTS: We showed that 1) early secondary DC as studied in DECRA, and based on the 1-year outcome data, is associated with decreased expected utility for all possible preference rankings of outcomes; and 2) recommending a late secondary DC versus tier-3 medical therapy, as studied in RESCUEicp, should be informed by individualized patient preference rankings of outcomes as elicited via shared decision-making. CONCLUSIONS: The 1-year outcomes from DECRA and RESCUEicp have served as the basis for updated guidelines. However, unaided interpretation of trial data may not be adequate for individualized decision-making; we suggest that the latter can be significantly supported by decision aids such as the one described here and based on expected utility theory.

Heuristics in the delivery room.

Clinical decisions made in the delivery setting are often made under high pressure and great uncertainty, and have serious consequences for mother and baby. Theories of decision-making suggest that individuals in such settings may resort to using heuristics, or simplified decision rules, to aid complex decision-making. This study investigates whether physicians' delivery mode decisions (i.e., when to perform a vaginal versus a cesarean delivery) are influenced by such a heuristic. Electronic health records spanning 86,000 deliveries suggest that if the prior patient had complications in one delivery mode, the physician will be more likely to switch to the other­and likely inappropriate­delivery mode for the subsequent patient, regardless of patient indications. There is evidence that this heuristic has small, suboptimal effects on patient health.

Peer-Led Self-Management of General Medical Conditions for Patients With Serious Mental Illnesses: A Randomized Trial.

OBJECTIVE: Individuals with serious mental illnesses have high rates of general medical comorbidity and challenges in managing these conditions. A growing workforce of certified peer specialists is available to help these individuals more effectively manage their health and health care. However, few studies have examined the effectiveness of peer-led programs for self-management of general medical conditions for this population. METHODS: This randomized study enrolled 400 participants with a serious mental illness and one or more chronic general medical conditions across three community mental health clinics. Participants were randomly assigned to the Health and Recovery Peer (HARP) program, a self-management program for general medical conditions led by certified peer specialists (N=198), or to usual care (N=202). Assessments were conducted at baseline and three and six months. RESULTS: At six months, participants in the intervention group demonstrated a significant differential improvement in the primary study outcome, health-related quality of life. Specifically, compared with the usual care group, intervention participants had greater improvement in the Short-Form Health Survey physical component summary (an increase of 2.7 versus 1.4 points, p=.046) and mental component summary (4.6 versus 2.5 points, p=.039). Significantly greater six-month improvements in mental health recovery were seen for the intervention group (p=.02), but no other between-group differences in secondary outcome measures were significant. CONCLUSIONS: The HARP program was associated with improved physical health- and mental health-related quality of life among individuals with serious mental illness and comorbid general medical conditions, suggesting the potential benefits of more widespread dissemination of peer-led disease self-management in this population.

Disentangling climate change effects on species interactions: effects of temperature, phenological shifts, and body size.

Climate-mediated shifts in species' phenologies are expected to alter species interactions, but predicting the consequences of this is difficult because phenological shifts may be driven by different climate factors that may or may not be correlated. Temperature could be an important factor determining effects of phenological shifts by altering species' growth rates and thereby the relative size ratios of interacting species. We tested this hypothesis by independently manipulating temperature and the relative hatching phenologies of two competing amphibian species. Relative shifts in hatching time generally altered the strength of competition, but the presence and magnitude of this effect was temperature dependent and joint effects of temperature and hatching phenology were non-additive. Species that hatched relatively early or late performed significantly better or worse, respectively, but only at higher temperatures and not at lower temperatures. As a consequence, climate-mediated shifts in hatching phenology or temperature resulted in stronger or weaker effects than expected when both factors acted in concert. Furthermore, consequences of phenological shifts were asymmetric; arriving relatively early had disproportional stronger (or weaker) effects than arriving relatively late, and this varied with species identity. However, consistent with recent theory, these seemingly idiosyncratic effects of phenological shifts could be explained by species-specific differences in growth rates across temperatures and concordant shifts in relative body size of interacting species. Our results emphasize the need to account for environmental conditions when predicting the effects of phenological shifts, and suggest that shifts in size-structured interactions can mediate the impact of climate change on natural communities.