Bevacizumab Does Not Inhibit the Formation of Liver Vessels and Liver Regeneration Following Major Hepatectomy: A Large Animal Model Study.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Patients with unresectable liver colorectal cancer metastases are treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy often accompanied by biological therapy aimed at reducing the mass of metastases and thus increasing the chances of resectability. Bevacizumab comprises an anti-VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor) humanized IgG monoclonal antibody that is used for biological therapy purposes. It acts to inhibit angiogenesis, thereby slowing down the growth of metastases. Due to its being administered systematically, bevacizumab also exerts an effect on the surrounding healthy liver parenchyma and potentially limits the process of neovascularization and thus regeneration of the liver. Since the remnant liver volume forms an important factor in postoperative morbidity and mortality following a major hepatectomy, we decided to study the effect of bevacizumab on vascular and biliary microarchitecture in healthy liver parenchyma and its ability to regenerate following major hepatectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed an experiment employing a large animal model where a total of 16 piglets were divided into two groups (8 piglets in the control group and 8 piglets in the experimental group with bevacizumab). All the animals were subjected to major hepatectomy and the experimental group was given bevacizumab prior to hepatectomy. All the animals were sacrificed after 4 weeks. We performed biochemical analyses at regular time intervals during the follow-up period. Histological examination of the liver tissue was performed following sacrifice of the animals. RESULTS: No statistical difference was shown between groups in terms of the biochemical and immunohistochemical parameters. The histological examination of the regenerating liver tissue revealed the higher length density of sinusoids in the experimental group. CONCLUSION: Bevacizumab does not act to impair liver regeneration following hepatectomy.

Mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine carcinoma of gallbladder: case report.

BACKGROUND: Mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine tumors (MINEN) of the gallbladder are extremely rare; indeed, the English expert literature reports a mere handful of case reports and case series on this topic. According to the WHO classification of 2010, MINEN are considered to be tumors consisting of two major components, neuroendocrine and non-neuroendocrine, each of which hosts at least 30% of the total cellular population. To date, the etiology and pathogenesis of MINEN have not been precisely determined and the non-specific symptoms generally result in late diagnosis (mainly in the terminal stages of the condition) and contribute to the generally poor prognosis. As far as the management of the disease is concerned, radical surgery plays a crucial role; however, the significance of surgical debulking and biological therapy applying somatostatin analogues has not yet been determined. CASE PRESENTATION: A 56-year-old female was referred to our department for a rapidly progressing tumor in the subhepatic area along with the infiltration of S5 and S6 liver segments. With regard to preoperative findings, the tumor appeared as operable, although, during the surgery, an extensive involvement of the hepatoduodenal ligament by the tumor through the lymph nodes was revealed. Due to acute perioperative bleeding from the necrotic tumor, we decided to perform modified resection. Histologically, the tumor was confirmed as MINEN of gallbladder, where the neuroendocrine component was dominant over the non-neuroendocrine component. Six weeks after the discharge, the patient underwent a follow-up CT revealing large recurrence of the disease. Thereafter, the patient was started on systemic therapy with etoposide and carboplatin in combination with somatostatin analogues. Thirteen months after the surgery, the patient is in good clinical condition, and while a recently performed PET/MRI scan revealed a hepatic lesion and hilar lymphadenopathy in full regression, there was a spread of small peritoneal and pleural metastases. The patient remains in the follow-up care. CONCLUSIONS: The occurrence of mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasms is extremely rare. Radical surgery remains the only potentially effective approach to the cure of this disease. The role of biological therapy and debulking in the management of the disease has not yet been precisely defined. In our experience, both of these methods have the potential to positively influence overall survival rates and the postoperational quality of life of patients.