Comparison of rhG--CSF primed bone marrow and blood stem cell autografts: an analysis of engraftment in malignant lymphomas and solid tumours.

Many studies have documented faster engraftment after transplantation with peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) compared to bone marrow (BM) stem cells. Most comparisons, however, have been between unprimed BM and primed PBSC. We have collected engraftment data on 39 patients from 4 Danish centres and compared G-CSF primed BM with G-CSF primed PBSC in malignant lymphoma and solid tumours. In the lymphoma group 6 BM transplants were compared with 8 PBSC transplants, whereas in the testicular cancer group 16 BM transplants were compared with 9 PBSC transplants. In the lymphoma group, the time to platelet engraftment (platelets >20x10(9)/l unsupported) was median 15 d in PBSC transplants and median 34 d in BM transplants (p=0.003). In the solid tumour patients the difference in time to platelet engraftment was 11 and 18 d in PBSC and BM transplants, respectively (p<0.0001). In an attempt to explain this difference we performed CD34+ subset analysis of BM and PBSC. This analysis revealed a higher content of lineage restricted cells (CD34+CD61+ and CD34+GlyA+) in PBSC compared to BM. In conclusion, G-CSF mobilized PBSC seems to result in faster engraftment than G-CSF primed BM, which could be explained by an increased number of lineage specific progenitors in PBSC compared to BM.

Current status of epirubicin (Farmorubicin) in the treatment of solid tumours.

Epirubicin (Farmorubicin) is a drug of significant interest in the treatment of a variety of solid tumours and a comprehensive review of reported investigations is given. From experimental and clinical studies it appears that in general doxorubicin and epirubicin exhibit no qualitative, but only some quantitative, differences. Thus, the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics of the two drugs are essentially similar, as are the tumour spectrum and the level of their clinical efficacies. To achieve haematological equitoxicity of the two drugs the dose of epirubicin should be approximately 20% higher than that of doxorubicin, giving rise to a higher cumulative dose of epirubicin. On the other hand, epirubicin is significantly less cardiotoxic than doxorubicin. Thus, the recommended cumulative dose of doxorubicin is 500 mg/m2 and the corresponding figure for epirubicin is 1,000 mg/m2. For either drug a number of questions are still left open, the most important of which include the questions about optimal treatment schedules and the existence of a clinical relevant dose/efficacy relationship.