Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
1.
JAMA ; 2024 Sep 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39259553
2.
Ann Hematol ; 2024 Sep 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39227452

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Patients with triple-class refractory (TCR) multiple myeloma (MM) often need cytoreductive chemotherapy for rapid disease control. Bendamustine is an outpatient-administered, bifunctional alkylator and isatuximab is an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody with unique cytotoxicity characteristics. We hypothesized that isatuximab-bendamustine-prednisone would be well-tolerated regimen in TCR MM, and conducted single-center, phase Ib, investigator-initiated study. PATIENTS/METHODS: Patients had TCR MM and last daratumumab exposure ≥ 6 weeks. This study was conducted as a 3 + 3 design to establish the maximally tolerated dose (MTD) and/or recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). Isatuximab 10 mg/kg IV was administered weekly (cycle 1), and every 2 weeks thereafter. Bendamustine was administered on days 1 and 2 at 3 dose levels (DL): 50, 75, and 100 mg/m2. Methylprednisolone was administered as 125 mg on day 1 and prednisone 60 mg days 2-4. Common definitions were used for DLTs, adverse events (CTCAE v 5.0), and disease response. RESULTS: Fifteen patients were treated (3 DL1, 6 DL2, 6 DL3). Median age was 71, 53% had high-risk cytogenetics, and 34% had prior BCMA-targeting therapy. One DLT was observed at DL2 (Grade 3 thrombocytopenia plus bleeding). There were no Grade 5 treatment-related AEs. The MTD was not reached. The overall response rate was 20% (3/15) including one stringent complete response. The median PFS was 2.5 months (95% CI 0.9-4.1 months). CONCLUSION: We demonstrated the safety and tolerability of isatuximab-bendamustine-prednisone. Toxicities were mild and manageable with limited intervention. The study was discontinued due to slow accrual. However, we observed responses even among highly refractory patients. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered on clinicaltrials.gov as NCT04083898 on 9/6/2019.

3.
Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk ; 23(11): 825-828, 2023 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37543510

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Multiple myeloma (MM), as well as some treatments for MM, increase the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Prior literature suggests carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (KRd) may have a higher incidence of thromboembolic events compared with bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (VRd). We aimed to evaluate VTE risk with KRd induction compared to VRd at a large academic medical center in the United States. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients with newly diagnosed MM presenting at a single institution. Patients were followed for objectively diagnosed VTE events for 6 months following the start of induction therapy. RESULTS: A total of 209 patients were included, with 69 (33%) receiving KRd and 140 (67%) receiving VRd. Overall, 18 patients (9%) had a VTE event, with 5 (7%) in the KRd cohort and 13 (9%) in the VRd cohort (P = .80). Treatment with KRd was not associated with an increased risk of VTE compared to VRd (HR 0.74; 95% CI 0.26-2.08; P = .57). CONCLUSION: In this cohort, KRd was not associated with an increase in VTE risk compared to VRd, contrary to prior literature.


Asunto(s)
Mieloma Múltiple , Tromboembolia Venosa , Humanos , Mieloma Múltiple/complicaciones , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Lenalidomida/efectos adversos , Bortezomib/efectos adversos , Tromboembolia Venosa/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Dexametasona/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos
4.
JAMA Oncol ; 9(10): 1467, 2023 Oct 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37535384
5.
Blood Adv ; 7(16): 4528-4538, 2023 08 22.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37026796

RESUMEN

Checkpoint inhibitor (CPI) therapy with anti-PD-1 antibodies has been associated with mixed outcomes in small cohorts of patients with relapsed aggressive B-cell lymphomas after CAR-T failure. To define CPI therapy efficacy more definitively in this population, we retrospectively evaluated clinical outcomes in a large cohort of 96 patients with aggressive B-cell lymphomas receiving CPI therapy after CAR-T failure across 15 US academic centers. Most patients (53%) had diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, were treated with axicabtagene ciloleucel (53%), relapsed early (≤180 days) after CAR-T (83%), and received pembrolizumab (49%) or nivolumab (43%). CPI therapy was associated with an overall response rate of 19% and a complete response rate of 10%. Median duration of response was 221 days. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 54 and 159 days, respectively. Outcomes to CPI therapy were significantly improved in patients with primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma. PFS (128 vs 51 days) and OS (387 vs 131 days) were significantly longer in patients with late (>180 days) vs early (≤180 days) relapse after CAR-T. Grade ≥3 adverse events occurred in 19% of patients treated with CPI. Most patients (83%) died, commonly because of progressive disease. Only 5% had durable responses to CPI therapy. In the largest cohort of patients with aggressive B-cell lymphoma treated with CPI therapy after CAR-T relapse, our results reveal poor outcomes, particularly among those relapsing early after CAR-T. In conclusion, CPI therapy is not an effective salvage strategy for most patients after CAR-T, where alternative approaches are needed to improve post-CAR-T outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Linfoma de Células B Grandes Difuso , Receptores Quiméricos de Antígenos , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Linfoma de Células B Grandes Difuso/tratamiento farmacológico , Inmunoterapia Adoptiva/métodos
6.
JCO Precis Oncol ; 7: e2200559, 2023 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37079859

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Persistent molecular disease (PMD) after induction chemotherapy predicts relapse in AML. In this study, we used whole-exome sequencing (WES) and targeted error-corrected sequencing to assess the frequency and mutational patterns of PMD in 30 patients with AML. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study cohort included 30 patients with adult AML younger than 65 years who were uniformly treated with standard induction chemotherapy. Tumor/normal WES was performed for all patients at presentation. PMD analysis was evaluated in bone marrow samples obtained during clinicopathologic remission using repeat WES and analysis of patient-specific mutations and error-corrected sequencing of 40 recurrently mutated AML genes (MyeloSeq). RESULTS: WES for patient-specific mutations detected PMD in 63% of patients (19/30) using a minimum variant allele fraction (VAF) of 2.5%. In comparison, MyeloSeq identified persistent mutations above 0.1% VAF in 77% of patients (23/30). PMD was usually present at relatively high levels (>2.5% VAFs), such that WES and MyeloSeq agreed for 73% of patients despite differences in detection limits. Mutations in DNMT3A, ASXL1, and TET2 (ie, DTA mutations) were persistent in 16 of 17 patients, but WES also detected non-DTA mutations in 14 of these patients, which for some patients distinguished residual AML cells from clonal hematopoiesis. Surprisingly, MyeloSeq detected additional variants not identified at presentation in 73% of patients that were consistent with new clonal cell populations after chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: PMD and clonal hematopoiesis are both common in patients with AML in first remission. These findings demonstrate the importance of baseline testing for accurate interpretation of mutation-based tumor monitoring assays for patients with AML and highlight the need for clinical trials to determine whether these complex mutation patterns correlate with clinical outcomes in AML.


Asunto(s)
Leucemia Mieloide Aguda , Humanos , Adulto , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/genética , Exoma , Pronóstico , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/genética , Análisis de Secuencia de ADN
7.
Best Pract Res Clin Haematol ; 33(4): 101219, 2020 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33279175

RESUMEN

Bispecific antibodies are synthetic molecules designed to simultaneously bind two separate antigens. Given the recent success of blinatumomab in the treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia, there is growing interest in the use of bispecific antibodies as T-cell redirecting antibody for the treatment of cancer. In acute myeloid leukemia (AML), CD123 (also known as the interleukin receptor 3 alpha subunit) has emerged as a promising therapeutic target for bispecific antibodies. Prior attempts to target CD123 with unconjugated antibodies and antibody-drug conjugates have been mixed. However, available data from CD123-directed bispecific antibodies currently in clinical trials have been encouraging. In this review, we discuss the biology of CD123 and prior attempts to target this cell surface marker as part of anti-leukemic therapy. We then summarize and discuss the five CD123-directed bispecific antibodies currently in clinical trials for treatment of AML and provide practical insights regarding the use of these agents.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Biespecíficos/uso terapéutico , Antineoplásicos Inmunológicos/uso terapéutico , Inmunoconjugados/uso terapéutico , Subunidad alfa del Receptor de Interleucina-3/antagonistas & inhibidores , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/tratamiento farmacológico , Proteínas de Neoplasias/antagonistas & inhibidores , Humanos , Subunidad alfa del Receptor de Interleucina-3/inmunología , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/inmunología , Proteínas de Neoplasias/inmunología , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras/tratamiento farmacológico , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras/inmunología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA