Iatrogenic Atrial Septal Defect Closure Through the Steerable Guide Catheter: Description of Technique and Single-Center Experience.

OBJECTIVES: To introduce a novel method of direct iatrogenic atrial septal defect (iASD) closure through the MitraClip steerable guide catheter (SGC). BACKGROUND: MitraClip implantation requires transseptal puncture and the creation of an iASD. There are relatively rare instances, such as hemodynamically significant shunting or concerns for embolus, where iASD must be closed during index procedure. In these instances, it may be beneficial to not give up access to left atrium. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all iASD closures during MitraClip implantation at our institution from 2015 to 2020. Cases where an ASD occluder was deployed directly through SGC were included. RESULTS: Eleven patients had immediate iASD closure through the SGC. Indications for using this method included concern for paradoxical embolus, large defect size and/or significant shunting. Closure device sizes ranged from 8 to 22 mm. Mean time from removal of clip delivery system to occlusion of iASD was 14.6 minutes. There were no procedural complications related to iASD closure using this method. CONCLUSION: Closure of iASD intra-procedurally directly through transseptal guide sheath via the method described was safe and allowed for continuous left atrium access.

MitraClip Implantation Guided by Volumetric Intracardiac Echocardiography: Technique and Feasibility in Patients Intolerant to Transesophageal Echocardiography.

Transesophageal echo (TEE) guidance is essential for successful MitraClip implantation. In patients intolerant to TEE, options are limited. Three patients, with contraindications to TEE, underwent MitraClip implantation using volumetric intracardiac echo (vICE). All patients had severe symptomatic degenerative mitral regurgitation (MR) and had successful implantation of at least one clip with reduction of MR to ≤2+ maintained at 30d follow-up. All patients had improvement in functional status without any adverse clinical, clip, or vICE related events. We discuss in detail the technical considerations and limitations to performing the MitraClip procedure with vICE guidance.

Adjunctive use of fluoroscopy during MitraClip implantation reduces procedural complexity: The parallax technique.

BACKGROUND: During MitraClip implantation sub-valvular correction of trajectory and/or alignment may increase adverse clip or leaflet events. With systematic adjunctive use of fluoroscopy ("Parallax technique"), we aimed to assess parameters that minimize the need for corrective measures and help increase procedural efficiency. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 30 patients without (Fl-) and 39 patients utilizing adjunctive fluoroscopy (Fl+) during MitraClip implantation. After establishing trajectory and supra-valvular alignment, the Parallax technique was utilized. Trajectory and alignment are maintained during advancement. RESULTS: All patients had 3 or 4+ MR. There were no differences in baseline demographics. The average number of clips (Fl- vs Fl+) was 1.72 ± 0.8 vs 1.59 ± 0.5, p = .57. For the first clip, the need for sub-valvular alignment (80% vs. 36%, p = .0001), eversion with retraction back to left atrium (23% vs. 10%, p = .001) and the number of grasps (2.3 ± 1.2 vs 1.4 ± 0.9) was reduced. The time from transseptal puncture to first clip deployment (71 ± 21 vs 44 ± 16 min, p = .01) was reduced. Procedural success was achieved in all but one patient in the Fl- group (p = ns). There were no differences noted for in-hospital or 30-day outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Systematic use of a simple and easy to implement "Parallax technique" was associated with reduced need for sub-valvular manipulation and was associated with improved procedural times. Further larger scale studies are needed to assess the applicability of the technique.

Transjugular mitral valve repair with the MitraClip: A step-by-step guide.

The MitraClip procedure is carried out almost exclusively via the transfemoral approach. However, in some patients transfemoral delivery of MitraClip is not technically feasible (e.g., occluded inferior vena cava or tortuous/obstructive iliofemoral venous anatomy). The technical considerations and challenges of the MitraClip procedure are amplified when an alternate route is considered. We describe a successful case of MitraClip performed via the right internal jugular (IJ) approach in a patient with a flail A3 scallop and previous mitral valve repair. We reviewed prior cases in the literature and discuss step-by-step the pertinent clinical and technical considerations for performing this procedure via the transjugular route. In summary, the right IJ access site provides a reasonable alternative to perform the MitraClip procedure in cases where femoral access is contraindicated or prohibitive. A thorough understanding of the technical considerations is crucial in improving procedural success rates.

Transseptal access for left heart structural interventions in the setting of prior atrial septal defect closure.

A transseptal puncture is critical for "left-sided" structural heart interventions. Procedures such as transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (MitraClip) and left atrial appendage (LAA) closure (Watchman) require precise puncture of the interatrial septum (IAS), and the presence of a prior atrial septal defect (ASD) closure device poses a challenge. We aim to present a successfully completed case of MitraClip and Watchman in the presence of ASD closure device in two different patients. A review of the literature will be reported, and pertinent clinical and technical considerations will be discussed in depth to achieve procedural success. In summary, transseptal puncture for left heart structural interventions is feasible in the presence of a prior ASD/patent foramen ovale closure device. A detailed understanding of the anatomical considerations as well as the use of multimodality imaging to evaluate the IAS will aid in improving procedural success rates.

Watchman Occlusion in Long-Standing Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: Larger Left Atrial Appendages With Greater Residual Leak.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to compare patients with and without long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation (LSPAF) undergoing Watchman left atrial appendage (LAA) occlusion. BACKGROUND: An increased burden of atrial fibrillation is associated with progressive left atrial remodeling and enlargement. METHODS: Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) measures of LAA ostial diameter and depth, device compression, and residual leak were evaluated in 101 consecutive Watchman cases. The patients were categorized into LSPAF (n = 48) or non-LSPAF (n = 53) groups and compared. RESULTS: The average LAA ostial diameter for LSPAF versus non-LSPAF by TEE omniplane at 0° was 21.1 ± 4.1 mm versus 18.2 ± 3.6 mm (p = 0.0002); at 45° was 18.7 ± 3.4 mm versus 16.3 ± 3.1 mm (p = 0.0004); at 90° was 19.6 ± 3.8 mm versus 16.2 ± 3.4 mm (p = 0.00001); and at 135° was 21.0 ± 4.1 mm versus 18.0 ± 4.1 mm (p = 0.0005). The average LAA depth for LSPAF versus non-LSPAF by TEE at 0° was 28.1 ± 6.4 mm versus 25.2 ± 4.9 mm (p = 0.02); at 45° was 27.9 ± 5.8 mm versus 25.1 ± 4.3 mm (p = 0.007); at 90° was 27.2 ± 5.2 mm versus 22.8 ± 3.7 mm (p = 0.0001); and at 135° was 25.6 ± 5.4 mm versus 21.5 ± 3.8 mm (p = 0.0001). In successfully treated patients, 77% of the LSPAF group received larger device (27, 30, or 33 mm) implants versus only 46% in the non-LSPAF group (p = 0.003). While both groups had similar rates of moderate (3 to 5 mm) leaks at implant (2% vs. 0%; p = 0.14), 27% of the LSPAF vs. 4% of the non-LSPAF group had moderate leaks (p = 0.04) on 6-week follow-up TEE. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with LSPAF have significantly larger LAA sizes, require larger devices, and have more residual leak on follow-up TEE. LSPAF may represent a higher risk group that warrants more stringent long-term follow-up.

Usable implantation depth for watchman left atrial appendage occlusion is greater with appendage angiography than transesophageal echocardiography.

OBJECTIVES: To compare left atrial appendage (LAA) angiography to transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) for assessing usable LAA depth. BACKGROUND: TEE is typically employed for procedural measurement of LAA ostial diameter and depth. Since angiography enhances distal LAA anatomy, we sought to compare angiography to TEE for determining usable LAA depth. METHODS: Seventy five Watchman device cases were retrospectively evaluated. Two independent cardiologists measured intraoperative LAA ostial diameter and depth at standard 0°, 45°, 90°, and 135° TEE omniplane views and in the right anterior oblique (RAO) 30°, caudal (CAUD) 30° angiographic view. RESULTS: The average age and CHA2 DS2 VASc score were 74 (±7.2) years and 4.6 (±1.3), respectively. The average ostial diameter and depth (mm) by TEE were 0°: 19.6 and 26.5; 45°: 17.5 and 26.6; 90°: 18.3 and 25.1; 135°: 19.5 and 23.3. The ostial diameter and depth (mm) by RAO 30° CAUD 30° angiography were 21.1 and 29.7. This angiographic view corresponds to a TEE view between 90° and 135°. In comparison to angiography, TEE 90° underestimated the LAA ostial diameter by 2.9 ± 3.7 mm (P < 0.001) and by 1.9 ± 4.0 mm at TEE 135° (P < 0.01); Pearson's r 0.53 angiography/TEE 90° and 0.50 angiography/TEE 135°. More importantly, TEE 90° underestimated the true usable LAA depth by 5.4 ± 5.8 mm (P < 0.001) and by 7.3 ± 6.1 mm at TEE 135° (P < 0.001); Pearson's r 0.39 angiography/TEE 90° and 0.30 angiography/TEE 135°. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to TEE, LAA angiography provides additional depth information and may be particularly valuable when patients have insufficient depth for Watchman by TEE measures.

Intraprocedural direct left atrial and wedge pressure correlation during transcatheter mitral valve repair: Results from a single center registry.

OBJECTIVES: This study investigates the correlation of occlusive wedge pressure (WP) with direct left atrial (LA) pressure in patients with severe mitral regurgitation (MR) undergoing transcatheter mitral valve repair (TMVr) with MitraClip. BACKGROUND: There is interest in acquiring objective hemodynamic parameters for intraprocedural guidance in patients undergoing MitraClip. METHODS: The study included 94 patients with severe MR at prohibitive surgical risk who underwent MitraClip at the University of California Davis Medical Center between 2014 and 2016. RESULTS: An average of 1.8 ± 0.7 clips were used to achieve MR grade of 2+ or less in 99% of patients. Correlation analysis of all (n = 236) pre-clip, inter-clip, and final-clip WP and LA pressures yielded a Pearson's R (r) of 0.85 and 0.79 for mean WP vs mean LA and WP V vs LA V, respectively. Median LA V to mean LA ratio (LAV:mLA) was 1.75 (IQR 1.5-1.9). 79% (n = 74) of patients had LAV:mLA ratio ≥ 1.5 with associated WP V vs LA V correlation (r) of 0.83. In patients with LAV:mLA ratio < 1.5, the correlation (r) was 0.69. Baseline characteristics were not significantly different between patients with LAV:mLA ratio ≥ 1.5 and patients with LAV:mLA ratio < 1.5. Post-procedure, median LA V: mean LA ratio decreased from 1.75 to 1.4, P = 0.0001. CONCLUSIONS: Correlation between WP and direct LA pressure in patients with severe MR undergoing Mitraclip is modest. Caution is advised when using WP to approximate LA pressure intraprocedurally, especially in patients with baseline low LAV:mLA ratios.

Initial clinical experience with the FlexPoint Steerable Transseptal Needle in left-sided structural heart procedures.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study is to describe the initial clinical experience with a steerable transseptal needle (STSN) for left-sided structural heart procedures. BACKGROUND: Targeted transseptal (TS) puncture is required for many structural heart procedures, and the use of a steerable needle has not previously been described. METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing structural heart interventions with targeted TS puncture under transesophageal echocardiographic (TEE) and fluoroscopic guidance were studied. The STSN was used in all patients with a standard commercial TS sheath. Deflection of the needle was performed "real time" to achieve localization of the TS puncture site. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients underwent STSN puncture of the interatrial septum. In all cases, the needle could be deflected in vivo to achieve optimal tenting and localization of the puncture site without having to remove or reshape the needle. The needle was deflected to match a wide range of right atrial diameters (width 4.3 ± 0.9 cm and length 6.0 ± 0.9 cm in the 4-chamber view). In two patients with prior mitral valve surgery and a fibrotic septum, assisted crossing was achieved using the piercing stylet in one patient, and Bovie energy in the other. There were no procedural complications, and all patients had successful completion of the intended structural heart procedure. CONCLUSIONS: The STSN needle can be used to target the intended puncture location on the interatrial septum with real-time adjustable deflection without the need to remove and reshape the needle. In all cases crossing was successful and there were no complications.

Renal frame count and renal blush grade: quantitative measures that predict the success of renal stenting in hypertensive patients with renal artery stenosis.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to identify angiographic parameters of favorable clinical response to renal artery stenting. BACKGROUND: Stenting improves blood pressure (BP) control in patients with renal artery stenosis (RAS), but markers predicting a favorable clinical response are limited. METHODS: Renal perfusion was quantified in hypertensive patients (BP >or=140/90 mm Hg) without RAS by determining renal frame count (RFC) (angiographic frames [30 frames/s] for contrast to reach distal renal parenchyma after initial renal artery opacification) and renal blush grade (RBG) (0: none, 1: minimal, 2: normal, 3: hyperemic parenchymal blush). It was hypothesized that stenting unilateral RAS in hypertensive patients would result in decreased RFC and increased RBG, which might predict BP reduction. RESULTS: The RFC in 17 consecutive hypertensive patients without RAS (control group) (64.4 +/- 14.2 years, 12 male, 22 kidneys) was 20.1 +/- 5.4, whereas RBG was 2.33 +/- 0.66. In 24 consecutive hypertensive patients with unilateral RAS (study group) (72.7 +/- 11.3 years, 8 male), reduced RFC (26.6 +/- 9.1 to 21.4 +/- 6.7, p < 0.001) and increased RBG (1.63 +/- 0.71 to 2.13 +/- 0.85, p = 0.03) were observed after renal stenting. At 6 months, reduced BP (systolic BP 150.6 +/- 15.6 mm Hg to 128.6 +/- 15.5 mm Hg, p < 0.001; diastolic BP 77.2 +/- 15.6 mm Hg to 68.3 +/- 10.4 mm Hg, p = 0.022) without change in number of hypertensive medications was observed. Clinical responders (systolic BP reduction >15 mm Hg) had a greater decrease in RFC (7.7 +/- 4.6 vs. 1.7 +/- 5.1, p = 0.009) and 78.6% of patients with >4 RFC decrease were responders (p = 0.024). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that quantitative indices of renal perfusion (RFC and RBG) are impaired in patients with RAS and improve after stenting, and that RFC reduction is associated with BP reduction.