Radioactive iodine treatment for Graves' hyperthyroidism: incidence of Graves orbitopathy.

PURPOSE: There are limited recent data on the effect of radioactive iodine (RAI) for Graves' disease on Graves' orbitopathy (GO) development or reactivation. This audit investigates the GO incidence in patients with Graves' disease after RAI treatment, and explores risk factors present, and steroid prophylaxis use. METHODS: A retrospective audit of Graves' disease patients treated with RAI over a 5-year period. Data collected: smoking status, thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor antibody (TRAb) status, GO history, Graves' disease duration, eye features pre- and post-treatment, prophylactic corticosteroids, RAI dose given, post-RAI thyroid status, duration until hypothyroid. RESULTS: One hundred one patients were included, with a median Graves' disease duration 36 months. 34/101 (33.7%) were active/ex-smokers, 86/101 (85.1%) were TRAb-positive, 11/101 (10.9%) had a GO history; 32 (31.7%) had eye features present. Median RAI dose given was 596MBq. 8/101 (7.9%) patients received prophylactic corticosteroid; 89/101 (88.1%) achieved hypothyroid state in the year after RAI. GO developed in 5/101 (5.0%), of which 4/5 (80%) were de novo in high-risk individuals who did not receive steroids. One was a GO reactivation despite steroids. Two required intravenous steroids with/without orbital radiotherapy, one completed oral steroid taper; the remainder were treated conservatively. CONCLUSION: Our cohort had a lower GO incidence in patients with Graves' disease receiving RAI, with majority arising de novo . It is essential that all patients are assessed for Graves orbitopathy risk factors and counselled adequately prior to RAI. The decision to initiate steroids should be undertaken in a multi-disciplinary setting involving endocrinologists and ophthalmologists.

Unwrapped hydroxyapatite orbital implants: our experience in 347 cases.

OBJECTIVES: To report the results of a large case series of enucleations with primary insertion of an unwrapped hydroxyapatite (HA) orbital implant. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed consecutive enucleations with primary orbital (HA) implant insertion performed at the Scottish Ocular Oncology Service, Glasgow between 1990 and 2014. The unwrapped hydroxyapatite orbital implant was placed in the posterior portion of the socket and recti muscles sutured end-to-end over the implant. RESULTS: Out of 347 consecutive enucleations, the indication for enucleation was tumour-related pathology in 59.7% and painful blind eye in 40.3%. Majority (70%) received an implant of 22-mm diameter. At an average follow-up of 3.5 years, complications included post-enucleation socket syndrome (11.5%), chronic discharge (9.2%), chronic pain (4.3%), recurrent conjunctival infection (2.3%),conjunctival cysts (2%), contracted socket (1.4%), implant exposure (1.2%), haematoma (0.6%) and ill-fitting prosthesis (0.6%). Implant exposure (1.2%, n = 4) occurred at a mean of 4.5 months post surgery and was managed by temporalis fascia graft (n = 1), tarsoconjunctival flap (n = 1), implant removal (n = 1) and observation (n = 1). Overall, 9.8% of patients needed further surgery including lower lid tightening (4.3%), ptosis repair (2.3%), conjunctival cyst excision (1.2%), fornix reconstruction (1.2%), graft/flap for exposure (0.6%) and implant removal (0.3%). CONCLUSIONS: A low rate of implant exposure indicates that absence of wrapping material around hydroxyapatite orbital implants does not compromise surgical outcomes and has the added benefit of reduced surgical time and avoidance of complications from wrapping materials. Posterior implant placement and end-to-end recti suturing contribute to the success of the procedure.

Uveal melanoma-associated survival in Scotland.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: The Scottish Ocular Oncology Service (SOOS) manages all patients with uveal melanoma (UM) in Scotland. Our aim was to determine the long-term all-cause and cause-specific survival of patients with UM, irrespective of treatment modality. SUBJECTS/METHODS: A retrospective single-centre cohort study including all patients diagnosed with UM by the SOOS between 1/1/1998 and 31/12/2002. Data from the SOOS database were correlated with death records held by National Records of Scotland, which provided date, and all listed causes, of death for all deceased patients. RESULTS: Two hundred and eighteen patients were newly diagnosed with UM between 1/1/1998 and 31/12/2002. One hundred and fifteen (52.8%) were female. The mean (median) age at diagnosis was 63(65) years (range: 16-89). Of 179 choroidal melanomas, melanoma-specific survival was 92.3%, 87.4% and 83.8% at 5, 10 and 15 years, respectively. Cancer-specific survival was 85.8%, 71.8% and 62.3%. All-cause survival was 81.6% (146/179), 62.0% (111/179) and 46.7% (computed, fraction inexpressible). Of 26 ciliary body melanomas, melanoma-specific survival was 87.2%, 81.3% and 81.3% at 5, 10 and 15 years. Cancer-specific survival was 62.9%, 40.6% and 40.6%. All-cause survival was 61.5% (16/26), 38.5% (10/26) and 26.9% (7/26). Of 13 iris melanomas, at all three timepoints (5/10/15 years), melanoma-specific survival was 100%, cancer-specific survival was 92.3%, and all-cause survival was 76.9% (10/13). CONCLUSIONS: Correlation of SOOS and national records survival data confirms 15-year melanoma-specific survival of 83.8%, 81.3% and 100% for choroidal, ciliary body and iris melanomas, respectively. We can now provide accurate survival data to our patients in Scotland.