RESUMEN
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is a complex pulmonary condition characterized by chronic airflow limitation. Within the spectrum of COPD, distinct overlap conditions exist, including Asthma-COPD Overlap (ACO), COPD-Obstructive Sleep Apnea (COPD-OSA), Combined Pulmonary Fibrosis and Emphysema (CPFE), and Bronchiectasis-COPD Overlap (BCO). This review provides a comprehensive overview of the clinical and therapeutic implications of these conditions, highlighting the differences in complications compared with COPD alone in addition to the diagnostic challenges of identifying these conditions. Therapeutically tailored approaches are necessary for COPD overlap conditions considering the unique complications that may arise. Optimal pharmacological management, disease-specific interventions, and comprehensive patient-centered care are crucial components of treatment strategies. This review provides insights for healthcare professionals by enhancing their understanding and management of these conditions. This emphasizes the importance of accurate diagnosis and individualized treatment plans, considering the specific complications associated with each COPD overlap condition.
RESUMEN
Objectives:The aim of the study was to examine the incidence, baseline characteristics, and outcomes of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy admissions in individuals who developed acute respiratory failure (ARF). The study utilized the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database for the years 2017 to 2020. Methods: The study identified CAR-T cell therapy hospitalizations through the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Procedure Coding System (ICD-10-PCS) codes. Patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF) were further classified using specific International Classification of Disease, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) codes. Descriptive statistics were performed to analyze baseline characteristics, comorbidities, complications, and outcomes. Results: Analysis of the NIS Database identified 5545 CAR-T therapy admissions between 2017 and 2020, revealing a rising trend over time. In our study, we found that hypertension (39%), dyslipidemia (21.7%), and venous thromboembolism (13%) were the most frequently observed comorbidities in CAR-T cell therapy admissions. Acute respiratory failure (ARF) was reported in 7.1% of admissions, and they had higher all-cause in-hospital mortality than CAR-T cell therapy admissions without ARF (32.9% vs 1.3%, P < 0.001). ARF admissions that required invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) also had higher all-cause in-hospital mortality compared to admissions not requiring IMV (48.9% vs 11.8%, P = 0.001). There was no difference in the mortality rate among admissions with non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma, Multiple Myeloma, and Leukemia that utilized CAR-T therapy. Conclusions: In this largest study to date, we illuminate the incidence and outcomes of CAR-T cell therapy admissions with ARF. Higher mortality rates were observed in CAR-T cell therapy admissions with ARF. The study emphasizes the crucial role of interdisciplinary collaboration in CAR-T patient management and calls for additional research to clarify ARF's etiology and inform effective management strategies.
Asunto(s)
Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Inmunoterapia Adoptiva , Insuficiencia Respiratoria , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Inmunoterapia Adoptiva/efectos adversos , Insuficiencia Respiratoria/terapia , Insuficiencia Respiratoria/etiología , Anciano , Receptores Quiméricos de Antígenos , Adulto , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Incidencia , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Enfermedad Aguda , Comorbilidad , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Several neurological complications have been reported with COVID-19, including Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS). We looked at incidence, baseline characteristics, and in-hospital outcomes of COVID-19-associated GBS in the United States. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis using the US National Inpatient Sample database to identify hospitalizations for COVID-19 and GBS, using International Classification of Disease, 10th Revision, codes G610 and G650 for GBS and U071 for COVID-19. The codes used in this study are listed in Supplemental Digital Content 1 (see e Appendix, http://links.lww.com/JCND/A69). RESULTS: In total, 13,705 GBS admissions were recorded nationwide in 2020; of these, 1155 (8.43%) were associated with COVID-19. The frequency of GBS in COVID-19 admissions was 0.07%, compared with 0.08% in non-COVID-19 admissions (P = 0.8166). COVID-19 cohort with GBS had higher utilization of invasive mechanical ventilation (20.8% vs. 11.8%, P < 0.001) in comparison with COVID-19 cohort without GBS. GBS admissions with COVID-19 exhibited significantly higher inpatient mortality (12.2% vs. 3%, P < 0.001) compared with GBS admissions without COVID-19. INTERPRETATION: Our findings underscore GBS as a rare yet severe complication of COVID-19, highlighting a significant difference in mortality when compared with GBS not associated with COVID-19.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Síndrome de Guillain-Barré , Hospitalización , Humanos , Síndrome de Guillain-Barré/epidemiología , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/complicaciones , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Anciano , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Incidencia , SARS-CoV-2 , Respiración Artificial/estadística & datos numéricos , Mortalidad HospitalariaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Prognostic factors reliably predicting outcomes for critically ill adolescent and young adult (AYA) patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) are lacking. We assessed transplant and intensive care unit (ICU)-related factors impacting patient outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: AYA patients who underwent allo-HSCT and required ICU admission at a Tertiary care Centre, during the period of 2003-2013, were included in this retrospective review. This was a non-interventional study. Only outcomes after the first allo-HSCT and index ICU admissions were analyzed. Disease-, transplant-, and ICU-related variables were analyzed to identify risk factors predictive of survival. RESULTS: Overall, 152 patients were included (males, 60.5%); median age at transplantation was 24 years (interquartile range [IQR] 18-32.5); median age at admission to the ICU was 25.8 years (IQR 19-34). Eighty-four percent underwent transplantation for a hematological malignancy; 129 (85%) received myeloablative conditioning. Seventy-one percent of ICU admissions occurred within the first year after allo-HSCT. ICU admission was primarily due to respiratory failure (47.3%) and sepsis (43.4%). One hundred and three patients (68%) died within 28 days of ICU admission. The 1- and 5-year overall survival rates were 19% and 17%, respectively. Main causes for ICU-related death were refractory septic shock with multiorgan failure (n = 49, 32%) and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) (n = 39, 26%). Univariate analysis showed that ICU mortality was associated with an Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score >20, a sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA score) > 12, a high lactate level, anemia, thrombocytopenia, leukopenia, hyperbilirubinemia, a high international normalized ratio (INR) and acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). Multivariate analysis identified thrombocytopenia, high INR, and acute GVHD as independent predictors of mortality. CONCLUSIONS: In AYA allo-HSCT patients admitted to the ICU, mortality remains high. Higher SOFA and APACHE scores, the need for organ support, thrombocytopenia, coagulopathy, and acute GVHD predict poor outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Injerto contra Huésped , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas , Trombocitopenia , Masculino , Humanos , Adolescente , Adulto Joven , Adulto , Cuidados Críticos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/efectos adversos , Enfermedad Injerto contra Huésped/etiología , Trombocitopenia/etiologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to estimate the predictors, associations, and outcomes of COVID-19-associated pulmonary disease (CAPA) in the United States. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was performed by using the National Inpatient Sample Database 2020 to identify coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and CAPA hospitalizations. Baseline variables and outcomes were compared between COVID-19 hospitalizations without aspergillosis and those with aspergillosis. These variables were then used to perform an adjusted analysis for obtaining predictors and factors associated with CAPA and its inhospital mortality. RESULTS: Of the 1,020,880 hospitalizations identified with the principal diagnosis of COVID-19, CAPA was identified in 1510 (0.1%) hospitalizations. The CAPA cohort consisted of a higher proportion of males (58%) as well as racial and ethnic minorities (Hispanics, Blacks, and others [including Asian or Pacific islanders, native Americans]). Inhospital mortality was significantly higher (47.35% vs. 10.87%, P < 0.001), the average length of stay was longer (27.61 vs. 7.29 days, P < 0.001), and the mean cost per hospitalization was higher ($121,560 vs. $18,423, P < 0.001) in the CAPA group compared to COVID-19 without aspergillosis. History of solid organ transplant, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and venous thromboembolism were associated with higher odds of CAPA among other factors. The use of invasive mechanical ventilation (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 6.24, P < 0.001), acute kidney injury (aOR 2.02, P = 0.028), and septic shock (aOR 2.07, P = 0.018) were associated with higher inhospital mortality in the CAPA cohort. CONCLUSION: While CAPA is an infrequent complication during hospitalizations for COVID-19, it significantly increases all-cause mortality, prolongs hospital stays, and leads to higher hospital expenses compared to COVID-19 cases without aspergillosis.
RESUMEN
Objective: Critically ill patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) due to viral infection are at risk for secondary complications, including invasive aspergillosis. Our study aimed to characterize the clinical significance and outcome of Aspergillus species isolated from lower-respiratory-tract samples of critically ill OVID-19 patients at a single center. Design: We conducted a retrospective cohort study to evaluate the characteristics of patients with COVID-19 and aspergillus isolated from the lower respiratory tract and to identify predictors of outcomes in this population. Setting: The setting was a single-center hospital system within the metropolitan Detroit region. Results: The prevalence of Aspergillus isolated in hospitalized COVID-19 patients was 1.18% (30/2461 patients), and it was 4.6% in critically ill ICU patients with COVID-19. Probable COVID-19-associated invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (CAPA) was found in 21 critically ill patients, and 9 cases were classified as colonization. The in-hospital mortality of critically ill patients with CAPA and those with aspergillus colonization were high but not significantly different (76% vs. 67%, p = 1.00). Furthermore, the in-hospital mortality for ICU patients with or without Aspergillus isolated was not significantly different 73.3% vs. 64.5%, respectively (OR 1.53, CI 0.64-4.06, p = 0.43). In patients in whom Aspergillus was isolated, antifungal therapy (p = 0.035, OR 12.3, CI 1.74-252); vasopressors (0.016, OR 10.6, CI 1.75-81.8); and a higher mSOFA score (p = 0.043, OR 1.29 CI 1.03-1.72) were associated with a worse outcome. In a multivariable model adjusting for other significant variables, FiO2 was the only variable associated with in-hospital mortality in patients in whom Aspergillus was isolated (OR 1.07, 95% CI 1.01-1.27). Conclusions: The isolation of Aspergillus from lower-respiratory-tract samples of critically ill patients with COVID-19 is associated with high mortality. It is important to have a low threshold for superimposed infections such as CAPA in critically ill patients with COVID-19.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Aspergilosis Pulmonar Invasiva , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , Relevancia Clínica , Enfermedad Crítica , Estudios Retrospectivos , Aspergillus , Aspergilosis Pulmonar Invasiva/diagnósticoRESUMEN
Amyloidosis is a disease caused by misfolded proteins that deposit in the extracellular matrix as fibrils, resulting in the dysfunction of the involved organ. The lung is a common target of Amyloidosis, but pulmonary amyloidosis is uncommonly diagnosed since it is rarely symptomatic. Diagnosis of pulmonary amyloidosis is usually made in the setting of systemic amyloidosis, however in cases of localized pulmonary disease, surgical or transbronchial tissue biopsy might be indicated. Pulmonary amyloidosis can be present in a variety of discrete entities. Diffuse Alveolar septal amyloidosis is the most common type and is usually associated with systemic AL amyloidosis. Depending on the degree of the interstitial involvement, it may affect alveolar gas exchange and cause respiratory symptoms. Localized pulmonary Amyloidosis can present as Nodular, Cystic or Tracheobronchial Amyloidosis which may cause symptoms of airway obstruction and large airway stenosis. Pleural effusions, mediastinal lymphadenopathy and pulmonary hypertension has also been reported. Treatment of all types of pulmonary amyloidosis depends on the type of precursor protein, organ involvement and distribution of the disease. Most of the cases are asymptomatic and require only close monitoring. Diffuse alveolar septal amyloidosis treatment follows the treatment of underlying systemic amyloidosis. Tracheobronchial amyloidosis is usually treated with bronchoscopic interventions including debulking and stenting or with external beam radiation. Long-term prognosis of pulmonary amyloidosis usually depends on the type of lung involvement and other organ function.
Asunto(s)
Amiloidosis , Enfermedades Pulmonares , Humanos , Enfermedades Pulmonares/complicaciones , Enfermedades Pulmonares/terapia , Pulmón , Amiloidosis/complicaciones , Amiloidosis/diagnóstico , Amiloidosis/terapia , Pronóstico , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos XRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) is a well-established treatment for hematologic malignancies and certain autoimmune and congenital conditions. HSCT is associated with immunocompromise and increased risk of infections. This study assessed whether invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA) affects in-hospital mortality and 30-day readmission among HSCT patients. A secondary objective was to examine potential differences in complications between HSCT with and without IPA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study of a nationally representative cohort of hospital admissions was conducted, with data collected from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Nationwide Readmissions Database between 2013 and 2019. The International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision (ICD-10), and 9th revision (ICD-9) diagnostic codes were used to identify patients with IPA and HSCT. All adult patients ≥18 years were included in the study. RESULTS: There were 90,451 hospitalizations for HSCT from 2013 to 2019; 89,331 (98.8%) had HSCT without IPA, while 1092 (1.2%) hospitalizations had HSCT with IPA. The in-hospital mortality for HSCT-IPA was higher compared to HSCT without IPA (18.3% vs. 4.2%; p < 0.001). HSCT-IPA had a significantly higher 30-day readmission rate (36.2%) than that of HSCT without IPA (24.0%). HSCT-IPA also had a higher mean cost of admission ($303,437) than that of HSCT without IPA ($57,587).The HSCT-IPA group had higher multi-organ complications, including respiratory failure (51.3% vs. 13.5%, p < 0.001), sepsis (38.2% vs. 18.5%, p < 0.001), septic shock (16.1% vs. 5.1%, p < 0.001), need for mechanical ventilation (21.1% vs. 5.1% p < 0.001), non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (4.9% vs. 2.5%, p < 0.001), and intensive-care unit admission (21.8% vs. 6.1% p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: IPA is a rare but severe complication associated with HSCT, with higher in-hospital mortality, complications due to multi-organ failure, readmission rates, and cost of hospitalization when compared to HSCT without IPA.
Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas , Aspergilosis Pulmonar Invasiva , Adulto , Humanos , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/efectos adversos , Hospitalización , Aspergilosis Pulmonar Invasiva/epidemiología , Aspergilosis Pulmonar Invasiva/terapia , Aspergilosis Pulmonar Invasiva/etiología , Readmisión del Paciente , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , AdolescenteRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Polygenic risk scores (PRS) have become an increasingly popular approach to evaluate cancer susceptibility, but have not adequately represented Black populations in model development. METHODS: We used a previously published lung cancer PRS on the basis of 80 SNPs associated with lung cancer risk in the OncoArray cohort and validated in UK Biobank. The PRS was evaluated for association with lung cancer risk adjusting for age, sex, total pack-years, family history of lung cancer, history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and the top five principal components for genetic ancestry. RESULTS: Among the 80 PRS SNPs included in the score, 14 were significantly associated with lung cancer risk (P < 0.05) in INHALE White participants, while there were no significant SNPs among INHALE Black participants. After adjusting for covariates, the PRS was significantly associated with risk in Whites (continuous score P = 0.007), but not in Blacks (continuous score P = 0.88). The PRS remained a statistically significant predictor of lung cancer risk in Whites ineligible for lung cancer screening under current U.S. Preventive Services Task Force guidelines (P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Using a previously validated PRS, we did find some predictive ability for lung cancer in INHALE White participants beyond traditional risk factors. However, this effect was not observed in Black participants, indicating the need to develop and validate ancestry-specific lung cancer risk models. IMPACT: While a previously published lung cancer PRS was able to stratify White participants into different levels of risk, the model was not predictive in Blacks. Our findings highlight the need to develop and validate ancestry-specific lung cancer risk models.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Pulmonares , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/genética , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad , Detección Precoz del Cáncer , Blanco , Estudio de Asociación del Genoma Completo , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Major psychiatric disorders are associated with lower life expectancy primarily due to comorbid illnesses and suboptimal access to health care. Large-scale contemporary data in the United States on in-hospital mortality of patients with major psychiatric disorder and sepsis are lacking. OBJECTIVE: To describe the short-term outcomes of hospitalized patients with major psychiatric disorders and septic shock. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study using the National Inpatient Sample database from 2016 to 2019 to identify septic shock hospitalizations in patients with versus without major psychiatric disorder (defined as schizophrenia and affective disorders). Baseline variables and in-hospital mortality trends were compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS: Out of 1,653,255 hospitalizations with septic shock identified between 2016 and 2019, 16.2% had a diagnosis of major psychiatric disorder as defined above. After adjusting for various patient-level and hospital-level demographics and coexisting clinical conditions in a multivariable logistic regression, the odds of in-hospital mortality in patients with any major psychiatric disorder were 0.71 times that of those without a diagnosis of psychiatric illness (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.69-0.73; P < 0.001). Similarly, when the disorders were divided into 2 categories for subanalysis, those with schizophrenia had 38% lower odds of dying compared to those without schizophrenia (adjusted odds ratio, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.58-0.66; P < 0.001). Those with affective disorders had 25% lower odds of in-hospital mortality than those without a diagnosis of an affective disorder (adjusted odds ratio, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.73-0.77; P < 0.001). The adjusted mean length of stay for those diagnosed with major psychiatric disorder was 0.38 days longer than those without significant psychiatric illness (95% CI, 0.28-0.49; P < 0.001). On the other hand, the mean hospitalization charges were $10,516 less for patients with a major psychiatric disorder compared to those without (95% CI, -$11,830 to -$9,201; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Hospitalized patients with major psychiatric disorder and septic shock had lower risk of short-term mortality. Further studies are needed to examine the reasons behind this lower in-hospital mortality risk.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos Mentales , Choque Séptico , Humanos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Choque Séptico/epidemiología , Choque Séptico/terapia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Pacientes Internos , Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología , Trastornos Mentales/terapia , Modelos Logísticos , Mortalidad HospitalariaRESUMEN
Fusarium species manifests as an opportunistic infection with intrinsic resistance to most antifungals. We present a case of a 63-year-old male with myelodysplasia who received allogeneic stem cell transplantation and presented with endophthalmitis as the initial manifestation of invasive fusariosis that progressed to a fatal outcome despite combined intravitreal and systemic antifungal therapies. We urge clinicians to consider this complication of fusarium infection especially with the widespread use of antifungal prophylaxis that may incur selection of more resistant, invasive fungal species.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are the newest class of anticancer drugs. Pneumonitis is increasingly being recognized as a potential complication of these agents. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of patients who received ICIs at a comprehensive cancer center. We collected data on demographics, type of malignancy, type of ICI agent, incidence of pneumonitis up to 6 weeks after receiving ICI agent, clinical characteristics, and risk factors for overall survival in patients who develop pneumonitis. RESULTS: A total of 654 patients received ICIs during the study period. The most common type of cancer for which ICI was given was adenocarcinoma of the lung (29%), followed by renal cell cancer (12%) and squamous cell lung cancer (12%). Among the study patients, 41% received nivolumab and 32% received pembrolizumab. Other patients in the study received combination of ICIs or ICI plus chemotherapeutic agent, or were part of clinical trial involving ICI. Overall 42 (6.4%) patients developed pneumonitis within 6 weeks after the last dose of treatment of any ICI agent. Of these, 81% of patients had Grade ≥ 2 pneumonitis and 45% of these required hospital admission for pneumonitis, with 10% of them requiring admission to intensive care unit. Overall, patients who received pembrolizumab-containing regimen, had prior chemotherapy, or who never had cancer-related surgery had increased risk of death. CONCLUSION: Our large retrospective study shows real-life data of incidence of pneumonitis in patients who are treated with ICIs for cancer treatment. Our data indicate that the incidence of pneumonitis is overall lower than that reported previously with relatively good outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Neumonía , Humanos , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/efectos adversos , Incidencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neumonía/inducido químicamente , Neumonía/epidemiología , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
Introduction: Although there is evidence describing the immunomodulatory effects of macrolide antibiotics, there is little literature exploring the clinical effects these properties may have and their impact on measurable outcomes. Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine if empiric antimicrobial regimens containing azithromycin shorten time to shock resolution. Methods: A retrospective study was performed in adults with septic shock admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) of 3 university-affiliated, urban teaching hospitals between June 2012 and June 2016. Eligible patients with septic shock required treatment with norepinephrine as the first-line vasopressor for a minimum of 4 hours and received at least 48 hours of antimicrobial treatment from the time of shock onset. Propensity scores were utilized to match patients who received azithromycin to those who did not. Results: A total of 3116 patients met initial inclusion criteria. After propensity score matching, 258 patients were included, with 124 and 134 patients in the azithromycin and control groups, respectively. Median shock duration was similar in patients treated with or without azithromycin (45.6 hr vs 59.7 hr, P = .44). In-hospital mortality was also similar (37.9% vs 38.1%, P = .979). There were no significant differences in mechanical ventilation duration, ICU length of stay (LOS), or hospital LOS. Conclusions: In patients admitted to the ICU with septic shock, empiric azithromycin did not have a significant effect on shock duration, mechanical ventilation duration, ICU LOS, hospital LOS, or in-hospital mortality.
Asunto(s)
Antiinfecciosos , Choque Séptico , Adulto , Humanos , Choque Séptico/tratamiento farmacológico , Azitromicina/uso terapéutico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Antiinfecciosos/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
A 65-year-old woman presented to the Pulmonary Clinic for evaluation after Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT), which was obtained for assessment of a 12 mm right middle lobe solitary pulmonary nodule [...].
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Fluorodesoxiglucosa F18 , Anciano , COVID-19/prevención & control , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , Femenino , Humanos , Tomografía Computarizada por Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones , Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones/métodos , VacunaciónRESUMEN
Background: Currently there is no consensus on ideal teaching method to train novice trainees in EBUS. Simulation-based procedure training allows direct observation of trainees in a controlled environment without compromising patient safety. Objective: We wanted to develop a comprehensive assessment of endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) performance of pulmonary fellows and assess the impact of a multimodal simulation-based curriculum for EBUS-guided transbronchial needle aspiration. Methods: Pretest assessment of 11 novice pulmonary fellows was performed using a three-part assessment tool, measuring EBUS-related knowledge, self-confidence, and procedural skills. Knowledge was assessed by 20 multiple-choice questions. Self-confidence was measured using the previously validated EBUS-Subjective Assessment Tool. Procedural skills assessment was performed on Simbionix BRONCH Express simulator and was modeled on a previously validated EBUS-Skills and Task Assessment Tool (EBUS-STAT), to create a modified EBUS-STAT based on internal faculty input via the Delphi method. After baseline testing, fellows participated in a structured multimodal curriculum, which included simulator training, small-group didactics, and interactive problem-based learning sessions, followed by individual debriefing sessions. Posttest assessment using the same three-part assessment tool was performed after 3 months, and the results were compared to study the impact of the new curriculum. Results: The mean knowledge score improved significantly from baseline to posttest (52.7% vs. 67.7%; P = 0.002). The mean EBUS-Subjective Assessment Tool confidence scores (maximum score, 50) improved significantly from baseline to posttest (26 ± 7.6 vs. 35.2 ± 6.3 points; P < 0.001). The mean modified EBUS-STAT (maximum score, 105) improved significantly from baseline to posttest (44.8 ± 10.6 [42.7%] vs. 65.3 ± 11.4 [62.2%]; P < 0.001). There was a positive correlation (r = 0.81) between the experience of the test participants and the modified EBUS-STAT scores. Conclusion: This study suggests a multimodal simulation-based curriculum can significantly improve EBUS-guided transbronchial needle aspiration-related knowledge, self-confidence, and procedural skills among novice pulmonary fellows. A validation study is needed to determine if skills attained via a simulator can be replicated in a clinical setting.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Limited epidemiological data are available on changes in management, benefits, complications, and outcomes after open lung biopsy in patients with ARDS. METHODS: We performed a literature search of PubMed, Ovid, and Cochrane databases for articles from the inception of each database till November 2020 that provided outcomes of lung biopsy in ARDS patients. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients that had a change in management with alteration of treatment plan, after lung biopsy. Secondary outcomes included pathological diagnoses and complications related to the lung biopsy. Pooled proportions with a 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated for the prevalence of outcomes. RESULTS: After analysis of 22 articles from 1994 to 2018, a total of 851 ARDS patients (mean age 59.28 ± 7.41, males 56.4%) that were admitted to the ICU who underwent surgical lung biopsy for ARDS were included. Biopsy changed the management in 539 patients (pooled proportion 75%: 95% CI 64-84%). There were 394 deaths (pooled proportion 49%: 95% CI 41-58%). The most common pathologic diagnosis was diffuse alveolar damage that occurred in 30% (95% CI 19-41%), followed by interstitial lung disease in 10% (95% CI 3-19%), and viral infection in 9% (95% CI 4-16%). Complications occurred among 201 patients (pooled proportion 24%, 95% CI 17-31%). The most common type of complication was persistent air-leak among 115 patients (pooled estimate 13%, 95% CI 9-17%). CONCLUSION: Despite the high mortality risk associated with ARDS, lung biopsy changed management in about 3/4 of the patients. However, 1/4 of the patients had a complication due to lung biopsy. The risks from the procedure should be carefully weighed before proceeding with lung biopsy.
Asunto(s)
Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria , Anciano , Biopsia/efectos adversos , Biopsia/métodos , Humanos , Pulmón/patología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/epidemiología , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/terapia , TóraxRESUMEN
Introduction: Lung cancer screening criteria should select candidates with minimal cardiopulmonary comorbidities who are fit for curative lung cancer resection. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 728 patients with lung cancer for screening eligibility using the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) 2013 criteria (n = 370). If ineligible for screening, they were further assessed for eligibility using the USPSTF 2021 (n = 121) and National Comprehensive Cancer Network group 2 (NCCN gp 2) (n = 155). Comparisons of cardiopulmonary comorbidities between patients selected by the different lung cancer screening criteria were performed. Excluding missing data, a similar comparison was done between USPSTF 2013 (n = 283) and PLCOm2012 (risk threshold ≥1.51%) (n = 118). Results: Patients eligible for USPSTF 2021 and NCCN gp 2 had lower rates of airflow obstruction (forced expiratory volume in 1 s [FEV1]/forced vital capacity <0.7) compared with those in USPSTF 2013 (55.4% and 56.8% versus 70.5%). Both USPSTF 2021 and NCCN gp 2 groups had less severe airflow obstruction; only 11.6% and 12.9% of patients, respectively, had percent-predicted FEV1 less than 50% versus 20.3% in the USPSTF 2013 group. Comparing USPSTF 2013 and PLCOm2012 revealed no significant differences in age or the rate of airflow obstruction (p = 0.06 and p = 0.09 respectively). Nevertheless, rates of percent-predicted FEV1 less than 50% and diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide less than 50% were lower in the PLCOm2012 group compared with those in the USPSTF 2013 group (22.3% versus 10.2% and 32.6% versus 20.0%), respectively. Conclusions: The USPSTF 2021 qualifies an additional group of screening candidates who are healthier with better lung reserve, translating to better surgical candidacy but potentially more overdiagnosis. The PLCOm2012, with its better accuracy in selecting patients at risk of cancer, selects an older group with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease but with good lung reserve and potentially less overdiagnosis.