Association of health status and hospitalization risk for peripheral artery disease in the PORTRAIT registry.

BACKGROUND: Healthcare utilization for patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) is high, but stratifying patients' risk of hospitalization at initial evaluation is challenging. We examined the association between health status at PAD presentation and risk of (1) combined all-cause hospital admissions and emergency department (ED) visits and (2) all-cause hospital admissions. METHODS: Patients with claudication enrolled at US sites in the PORTRAIT registry were included. Health status was assessed using the Peripheral Artery Questionnaire (PAQ), a PAD-specific patient-reported outcome measure. Crude overall and cause-specific hospital admissions and ED visits were reported by PAQ overall summary score (PAQ-OS) ranges (0-24, 25-49, 50-74, and 75-100). Kaplan-Meier survival and unadjusted and adjusted Cox proportional hazards models examined the association between baseline PAQ scores and (1) combined all-cause hospital admissions or ED visits and (2) all-cause hospital admissions over 12 months. RESULTS: Of 796 patients, 349 (44%) had a hospital admission or ED visit over 12 months. Patients in the lowest (PAQ-OS = 0-24) versus the highest range (PAQ-OS = 75-100) had higher rates of 12-month (53.3% vs 22.4%) hospital admission and ED visits. In the adjusted model, each 10-point decrease in PAQ-OS was associated with a higher risk of all-cause hospital admission and ED visits (HR = 1.1, 95% CI 1.1-1.2, p < 0.0010) and all-cause hospital admission (HR = 1.1, 95% CI 1.1-1.2, p < 0.0010) at 12 months. CONCLUSION: PAD-specific health status is associated with an increased risk of healthcare utilization. Baseline health status may help stratify risk in patients with PAD, although replication and further validation of results are necessary.

Integration of Patient Reported Quality of Life Data into Risk Assessment in Heart Failure.

INTRODUCTION: Optimal management of outpatients with heart failure (HF) requires serially updating the estimates of their risk for adverse clinical outcomes to guide treatment. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are becoming increasingly used in clinical care. The purpose of this study was to determine whether inclusion of PROs can improve the risk prediction for HF hospitalization and death in ambulatory HF patients. METHODS: We included consecutive patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) seen in a HF clinic between 2015 and 2019 who completed PROs as part of routine care. Cox regression with a least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regularization and gradient boosting machine (GBM) analyses were used to estimate risk for a combined outcome of HF hospitalization, heart transplant, left ventricular assist device implantation or death. The performance of the prediction models was evaluated with the time-dependent concordance index (Cτ). RESULTS: Among 1165 patients with HFrEF (mean age 59.1±16.1, 68% male) the median follow-up was 487 days and among 456 patients with HFpEF (mean age: 64.2±16.0 years, 55% male) the median follow-up was 494 days. Gradient boosting regression that included PROs had the best prediction performance - Cτ 0.73 for patients with HFrEF and 0.74 in patients with HFpEF, and showed very good stratification of risk by time to event analysis by quintile of risk. The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire overall summary score (KCCQ-12 OSS), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) dimensions of Satisfaction with social roles and Physical function had high variable importance measure in the models. CONCLUSIONS: PROs improve risk prediction in both HFrEF and HFpEF, independent of traditional clinical factors. Routine assessment of PROs and leveraging the comprehensive data in the electronic health record in routine clinical care could help more accurately assess risk and support the intensification of treatment in patients with HF.

Expanding revascularization trials to women and underserved minorities and shifting to patient-centered outcomes: RECHARGE trials program.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: We review the limited available evidence informing coronary revascularization decisions in women and minorities, and introduce the RECHARGE trial program, which consists of two separate but integrated parallel multicenter, randomized trials comparing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), one exclusively enrolling women (RECHARGE:Women) and one exclusively enrolling Black or Hispanic patients (RECHARGE:Minorities). RECENT FINDINGS: The extensive evidence base supporting coronary revascularization suffers from under-representation of women, minorities and minoritized populations, and the use of heterogeneous primary composite outcomes whose components have varying strengths of association with prognosis and quality-of-life (QOL). In RECHARGE, participants will be followed for up to 10 years, with QOL assessments at baseline, 30 days, 3 months, every 6 months for 3 years, and annually thereafter. The primary endpoint is the hierarchical composite of time to all-cause mortality, time-averaged change from baseline in the physical component of the SF-12v2 physical summary score, and time-averaged change from baseline in the mental component of the SF12v2 summary score, evaluated using a win ratio. Independently adjudicated major adverse cardiovascular and noncardiovascular events and disease-specific QoL will be secondary endpoints. SUMMARY: The RECHARGE trials are the first revascularization trials to enroll exclusively women and minority patients and to use patient-centered outcomes as their primary outcome.

Effect of Aficamten on Health Status Outcomes in Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: Results from SEQUOIA-HCM.

BACKGROUND: A primary goal in treating obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (oHCM) is to improve patients' health status: their symptoms, function, and quality of life. The health status benefits of aficamten, a novel cardiac myosin inhibitor, have not been comprehensively described. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine the effect of aficamten on patient-reported health status, including symptoms of fatigue, shortness of breath, chest pain, physical and social limitations, and quality of life. METHODS: SEQUOIA-HCM (Phase 3 Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Aficamten Compared to Placebo in Adults With Symptomatic oHCM) randomized symptomatic adults with oHCM to 24 weeks of aficamten (n = 142) or placebo (n = 140), followed by a 4-week washout. The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) and Seattle Angina Questionnaire 7-item (SAQ7) were serially administered. Changes in mean KCCQ-Overall Summary Score (KCCQ-OSS) and SAQ7-Summary Score (SAQ7-SS) from baseline to 24 weeks and following treatment withdrawal were compared using linear regression adjusted for baseline scores and randomization strata. Proportions of patients with clinically important changes were compared. RESULTS: Among 282 participants, the mean age was 59 ± 13 years, 115 (41%) were female, and 223 (79%) were White. Baseline KCCQ-OSS (69.3 ± 20.1 vs 67.3 ± 18.8) and SAQ7-SS (72.0 ± 21.0 vs 72.4 ± 18.3) were similar between aficamten and placebo groups. Treatment with aficamten, compared with placebo, improved both the mean KCCQ-OSS (13.3 ± 16.3 vs 6.1 ± 12.6; mean difference: 7.9; 95% CI: 4.8-11.0; P < 0.001) and SAQ7-SS (11.6 ± 17.4 vs 3.8 ± 14.4; mean difference: 7.8; 95% CI: 4.7-11.0; P < 0.001) at 24 weeks, with benefits emerging within 4 weeks. No heterogeneity in treatment effect was found across subgroups. A much larger proportion of participants experienced a very large health status improvement (≥20 points) with aficamten vs placebo (KCCQ-OSS: 29.7% vs 12.4%, number needed to treat: 5.8; SAQ7-SS: 31.2% vs 13.9%, number needed to treat: 5.8). Participants' health status worsened significantly more after withdrawal from aficamten than placebo (KCCQ-OSS: -16.2 ± 19.0 vs -3.0 ± 9.6; P < 0.001; SAQ7-SS: -17.4 ± 21.4 vs -2.5 ± 13.3), further confirming a causal effect of aficamten. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with symptomatic oHCM, treatment with aficamten resulted in markedly improved health status, including significant improvement in chest pain-related health status, than placebo. (Phase 3 Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Aficamten Compared to Placebo in Adults With Symptomatic oHCM [SEQUOIA-HCM]; NCT05186818).

Developing an Individualized Patient Decision Aid for Chronic Coronary Disease Based on the ISCHEMIA Trial: A Mixed-Methods Study.

BACKGROUND: Pursuing initial invasive or conservative management of chronic coronary disease (CCD) is a preference-sensitive decision that should include shared decision-making. Communicating the benefits of either approach is challenging, as individual patients rarely achieve the population-averaged outcomes reported in clinical trials. Our objective was to develop a patient decision aid (PDA) with patient-specific estimates of outcomes for initial invasive versus conservative management of CCD, based on the ISCHEMIA trial (International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness With Medical and Invasive Approaches). METHODS: This was a multiphase mixed-methods study using focus groups of outpatients with CCD, caregivers, clinicians, and researchers. Focus groups were held in Kansas City, MO and New York City, NY between September 2021 and June 2022. Patients with CCD were included if they had a positive stress test within 1 year. Phase 1 focused on patient priorities for outcomes to guide treatment decisions. Phase 2 involved PDA development and refinement. Phase 3 involved further refinement and member checking. Key themes involving shared decision-making and treatment preferences were elicited from focus groups using a deductive approach to develop a PDA representing the outcomes most important to patients. RESULTS: Of 46 patient and caregiver participants, the mean age was 63.5 years, 53% were female, 61% were White, 24% were Black, and 9% were Hispanic. When deciding between treatments, participants valued shared decision-making but generally deferred decisions to clinicians. The outcomes most important to participants were survival and quality of life, followed by physical functioning and symptoms. To represent these outcomes, participants favored simple visualizations, such as a speedometer or health meter. When deciding between treatment options, participants preferred to use the PDA collaboratively with a clinician instead of as a stand-alone tool. CONCLUSIONS: Our novel, patient-centered approach to developing a PDA for CCD with patient-specific outcomes has the potential to rapidly translate clinical trial results to individual patients and support shared decision-making.

International Variation in Health Status Benefits in Patients Undergoing Initial Invasive Versus Conservative Management for Chronic Coronary Disease: Insights From the ISCHEMIA Trial.

BACKGROUND: The ISCHEMIA trial (International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness with Medical and Invasive Approaches) demonstrated greater health status benefits with an initial invasive strategy, as compared with a conservative one, for patients with chronic coronary disease and moderate or severe ischemia. Whether these benefits vary globally is important to understand to support global adoption of the results. METHODS: We analyzed participants' disease-specific health status using the validated 7-item Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ: >5-point differences are clinically important) at baseline and over 1-year follow-up across 37 countries in 6 international regions. The average effect of initial invasive versus conservative strategies on 1-year SAQ scores was estimated using Bayesian proportional odds regression and compared across regions. RESULTS: Considerable regional variation in baseline health status was observed among 4617 participants (mean age=64.4±9.5 years, 24% women), with the mean SAQ summary scores of 67.4±19.5 in Eastern Europe participants (17% of the total), 71.4±15.4 in Asia-Pacific (18%), 74.9±16.7 in Central and South America (10%), 75.5±19.5 in Western Europe (26%), and 78.6±19.2 in North America (28%). One-year improvements in SAQ scores were greater in regions with lower baseline scores with initial invasive management (17.7±20.9 in Eastern Europe and 11.4±19.3 in North America), but similar in the conservative arm. Adjusting for baseline SAQ scores, similar health status benefits of an initial invasive strategy on 1-year SAQ scores were observed (ranging from 2.38 points [95% CI, 0.04-4.50] in North America to 4.66 points [95% CI, 2.46-6.94] in Eastern Europe), with an 88.3% probability that the difference in benefit across regions was <5 points. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with chronic coronary disease and moderate or severe ischemia, initial invasive management was associated with a consistent health status benefit across regions, with modest regional variability, supporting the international generalizability of health status benefits from invasive management of chronic coronary disease. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT01471522.

Association of social support and health status outcomes in peripheral artery disease.

OBJECTIVE: A critical goal in the care of patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) is to optimize their health status; that is, their symptoms, function, and quality of life. Social support has been proposed to be a predictor of disease-specific health status in patients with PAD. However, the prevalence of low perceived social support, the association with health status outcomes, and the interaction with other biopsychosocial variables, is unknown. Our aim was to assess the association of baseline perceived social support with health status at 12 months in patients with PAD. METHODS: The Patient-Centered Outcomes Related Treatment Practices in Peripheral Arterial Disease: Investigating Trajectories (PORTRAIT) registry, which enrolled patients with PAD in the United States, the Netherlands, and Australia from 2011 to 2015, was used. Perceived social support was assessed at baseline with the Enhancing Recovery in Coronary Heart Disease Patients (ENRICHD) Social Support Inventory (ESSI), and disease-specific (Peripheral Artery Disease Questionnaire [PAQ]) and generic health status (Euro-Quality of Life Visual Analog Scale [VAS] and EQ-5D-3L Index) questionnaires were assessed at baseline and 12 months. Low social support was defined as a score of ≤3 on two items and an ESSI score of ≤18. A hierarchical mixed level linear regression model adjusting for biopsychosocial variables was used to assess the association between low perceived social support and the ESSI score with health status at 12 months. RESULTS: A total of 949 patients were included (mean age, 67.64 ± 9.32 years; 37.9% female), with low social support being present in 18.2%. Patients with low social support were more likely to not be married or to be living alone (50.0% vs 77.5%; P < .001); have more financial constraints; have more depressive, stress, and anxiety symptoms; and have lower disease-specific and generic health status at baseline and at 12 months. In the unadjusted model, low social support was associated with a -7.02 (95% confidence interval [CI], -10.97 to -3.07) point reduction in the PAQ, -7.43 (95% CI, -10.33 to -4.54) in the VAS, and -0.06 (95% CI, -0.09 to -0.03) in the EQ-5D-3L Index. Adjusting for biopsychosocial factors minimally attenuated these associations (PAQ: -6.52; 95% CI, -10.55 to -2.49; P = .002; VAS: -5.39; 95% CI, 8.36 to -2.42; P < .001; EQ-5D-3L Index: -0.04; 95% CI, -0.07 to 0.01; P = .022). The ESSI per-point score was associated with a decrease of 0.51 (95% CI, 0.18-0.85; P = .003) in PAQ and 0.46 (95% CI, 0.12-0.61; P = .004) in the VAS. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with PAD, low social support was frequent and associated with a lower health status at 1 year independent of other biopsychosocial variables. Improving social support could improve health status and outcomes in PAD.

Atherosclerosis quantification and cardiovascular risk: the ISCHEMIA trial.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The aim of this study was to determine the prognostic value of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA)-derived atherosclerotic plaque analysis in ISCHEMIA. METHODS: Atherosclerosis imaging quantitative computed tomography (AI-QCT) was performed on all available baseline CCTAs to quantify plaque volume, composition, and distribution. Multivariable Cox regression was used to examine the association between baseline risk factors (age, sex, smoking, diabetes, hypertension, ejection fraction, prior coronary disease, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and statin use), number of diseased vessels, atherosclerotic plaque characteristics determined by AI-QCT, and a composite primary outcome of cardiovascular death or myocardial infarction over a median follow-up of 3.3 (interquartile range 2.2-4.4) years. The predictive value of plaque quantification over risk factors was compared in an area under the curve (AUC) analysis. RESULTS: Analysable CCTA data were available from 3711 participants (mean age 64 years, 21% female, 79% multivessel coronary artery disease). Amongst the AI-QCT variables, total plaque volume was most strongly associated with the primary outcome (adjusted hazard ratio 1.56, 95% confidence interval 1.25-1.97 per interquartile range increase [559 mm3]; P = .001). The addition of AI-QCT plaque quantification and characterization to baseline risk factors improved the model's predictive value for the primary outcome at 6 months (AUC 0.688 vs. 0.637; P = .006), at 2 years (AUC 0.660 vs. 0.617; P = .003), and at 4 years of follow-up (AUC 0.654 vs. 0.608; P = .002). The findings were similar for the other reported outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: In ISCHEMIA, total plaque volume was associated with cardiovascular death or myocardial infarction. In this highly diseased, high-risk population, enhanced assessment of atherosclerotic burden using AI-QCT-derived measures of plaque volume and composition modestly improved event prediction.

Optimal Medical Therapy and Outcomes Among Patients With Chronic Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction.

BACKGROUND: Optimal medical therapy (OMT) scoring may stratify clinical risk in real-world chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) by integrating use and dosing of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) for HFrEF. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to characterize patients and associated long-term clinical outcomes by OMT score-derived treatment groups. METHODS: CHAMP-HF (Change the Management of Patients with Heart Failure) included U.S. outpatients with chronic HFrEF receiving ≥1 GDMT. OMT subgroups were defined as suboptimal (score <3), acceptable (score = 3), and optimal (score ≥4) by baseline use and dose of GDMT, as proposed by the HF Collaboratory consortium. Cox proportional hazard analyses were used to assess for all-cause and cardiovascular death across subgroups, after adjusting for demographic and clinical covariates. RESULTS: The authors studied 4,582 participants enrolled in CHAMP-HF with available 2-year follow-up. Median age was 68 years, 1,327 (29%) were women, and 2,842 (62%) were White, non-Hispanic. Median OMT score across the population was 4 (Q1-Q3: 2-5), and 1,628 (35%) had suboptimal, 665 (14%) had acceptable, and 2,289 (50%) had optimal therapy. Participants with optimal treatment were younger, had higher annual household income, and were enrolled from practices with dedicated HF clinics (all P < 0.001) than participants with acceptable or suboptimal treatment. Participants with optimal treatment had lower all-cause death (adjusted HR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.64-0.92) and cardiovascular death (adjusted HR: 0.79; 95% CI: 0.65-0.96) than those with suboptimal treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Across a large cohort of chronic ambulatory HFrEF, OMT scores stratified risk of all-cause and cardiovascular death.

Discordant Treatment Goals for Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Clinical Trials Metrics.

BACKGROUND: Most clinical trials define successful atrial fibrillation (AF) treatment as no AF episodes longer than 30 seconds. Yet, there has been minimal study of how patients define successful treatment and whether their perspectives align with trial outcomes. OBJECTIVES: Survey patients with AF to identify: 1) what aspect of AF is most important to address (frequency, duration, or severity of AF episodes); 2) what AF burden would be considered acceptable to consider treatment successful; and 3) to establish patient preferences for successful treatment thresholds for a validated patient-reported outcome (PRO) score. METHODS: We surveyed patients receiving active care for AF at a single tertiary care center modeled after the Toronto AF Severity Scale (AFSS). The survey consisted of current and "successful treatment" AF frequency, burden, and symptom domains; and baseline socioeconomic information. RESULTS: Of 7,000 invitations, 852 individuals completed the survey (12% response) with a mean age of 65 ± 13 years, 36.5% were female, and they had a mean CHA2DS2-VAsc score of 2.9 ± 1.9. Overall, 114 (13%) selected a decrease in AF episode duration as their top treatment priority, 505 (59%) episode frequency, and 230 (27%) episode severity. Overall, 207 (24%) patients would only consider a treatment successful if they never had AF again, whereas 645 (76%) patients considered success to be fewer AF episodes. A total of 341 (40%) patients would only consider a treatment successful if AF episodes lasted less than a few minutes, whereas 509 (60%) patients would accept AF episodes lasting >30 minutes. An AFSS symptom score ≤5 was considered a good outcome by 80% of respondents. CONCLUSIONS: Patients prioritize decreased AF frequency over improvements in severity or duration, and an AFSS ≤5 would be a reasonable outcome of AF treatment. Most patients would consider treatment successful if they had more than 1 AF episode lasting longer than 30 seconds. Future clinical trial design should consider patients' perspectives when designing outcomes.

Burden of Heart Failure in Patients With Tricuspid Regurgitation and Effect of Transcatheter Repair on Different Subdimensions of Quality of Life.

BACKGROUND: Right-sided heart failure (HF) due to severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is associated with reduced quality of life (QoL). Here, we analyzed the impact of TR on specific QoL dimensions and the effect of transcatheter tricuspid valve intervention (TTVI) on individual QoL items. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this study, we included 174 patients with HF (49% women; median age, 79 years; 97% New York Heart Association ≥3) with baseline QoL assessment undergoing TTVI by transcatheter edge-to-edge-repair at our center between April 2016 and March 2022. QoL was assessed by the standardized Minnesota Living With HF Questionnaire. QoL change after TTVI and correlation to functional end points were analyzed. In addition, all QoL domains and the 21 individual items of the Minnesota Living With HF Questionnaire were analyzed. TTVI significantly reduced TR (TR ≥3: baseline 95%, 1-year-follow-up 7%; P<0.001). Total Minnesota Living with HF Questionnaire score improved from 37 (interquartile range, 26-50) points to 31 (interquartile range, 17-42) points (median follow-up-interval, 355 days; P<0.001). QoL improvement was associated with positive New York Heart Association class, 6-minute walking distance, and actigraphy changes (all P<0.05). The detailed analysis revealed that all items of the physical-related QoL dimension were impaired at baseline and strongly improved after TTVI. In contrast, the emotional and "social" Minnesota Living With HF Questionnaire dimensions were largely unaffected at baseline, yet specific items improved with TTVI. CONCLUSIONS: In this single-center study, we delineate the QoL-associated disease burden of TR and identify specific QoL items that improved after TTVI. Our findings support TTVI in patients with reduced QoL and may add to the development of specific tools assessing the functional status of an increasing patient population undergoing TTVI.

Use of Calcium Modification During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention After Introduction of Coronary Intravascular Lithotripsy.

Background: Calcified coronary lesions are a challenge for percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs). Coronary intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) is a novel calcium modification technology approved for commercial use in February 2021, but little is known about its uptake in US clinical practice. Methods: We described trends in use of calcium modification strategies, variation in use across hospitals, and predictors of calcium modification and IVL use in PCI. We included National Cardiovascular Data Registry CathPCI Registry patients who underwent PCI between April 1, 2018, and December 31, 2022. We examined trends and hospital variation in calcium modification and IVL use. We used multivariate hierarchical logistic regression to identify predictors of calcium modification and IVL use at hospitals in 2022. Results: Of 2,733,494 PCIs across 1676 hospitals over 4.75 years, 11.4% were performed with calcium modification. Coronary IVL use increased rapidly from 0% of PCIs in Q4 2020 to 7.8% of PCIs in Q4 2022, which was accompanied by an overall increase in use of all calcium modification strategies (11.1%-16.0%) during this period with a slight corresponding decrease in coronary atherectomy use (5.4%-4.4%). In 2022, there was wide variation in IVL use across hospitals (median, 3.86%; IQR, 0%-8.19%), with IVL being the most common calcium modification strategy in 48% of hospitals. The treating hospital was the strongest predictor of calcium modification (median odds ratio [OR], 2.49; 95% CI, 2.40-2.57) and IVL use (median OR, 2.89; 95% CI, 2.74-3.04). Conclusions: IVL has rapidly changed the landscape of calcium modification use for PCI, although there remains wide variation across hospitals.

Association of Baseline Tricuspid Regurgitation With Health Status and Clinical Outcomes After TAVR and Mitral TEER.

BACKGROUND: Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is associated with worse clinical outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (M-TEER), but little is known about its association with health status outcomes. OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to explore, using the Society of Thoracic Surgeons and American College of Cardiology TVT (Transcatheter Valve Therapy) Registry, the association between baseline TR and health status after TAVR and M-TEER and to determine if baseline TR was associated with clinical endpoints. METHODS: Health status was assessed using Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire overall summary (KCCQ-OS) score in patients enrolled in the TVT Registry who underwent isolated TAVR or M-TEER between January 2019 and June 2021. The association among baseline TR and KCCQ-OS score, being alive and well, and clinical outcomes was examined. RESULTS: In total, 130,097 TAVR patients (13.1% with moderate TR, 2.3% with severe TR) and 19,593 M-TEER patients (33.2% with moderate TR, 14.7% with severe TR) were included. Mean KCCQ-OS scores were lower with severe vs moderate vs none to mild TR at baseline prior to TAVR (39.4 ± 24.2 vs 45.2 ± 24.7 vs 51.3 ± 25.3; P < 0.01) or M-TEER (38.1 ± 23.9 vs 41.9 ± 24.7 vs 45.4 ± 25.2; P < 0.01) and similarly at 30 days and 1 year. The odds of being alive and well at 1 year were lower with moderate or severe TR before TAVR (adjusted OR: 0.79 [95% CI: 0.74-0.85] and adjusted OR: 0.81 [95% CI: 0.70-0.94], respectively) and severe TR before M-TEER (adjusted OR: 0.53; 95% CI: 0.40-0.71). Furthermore, moderate or severe TR before TAVR was associated with higher 1-year mortality and readmission, whereas moderate or severe TR before M-TEER was associated with higher 1-year mortality. CONCLUSIONS: In a large cohort of U.S. patients who underwent TAVR or M-TEER, greater baseline TR was associated with worse health status and clinical outcomes. Understanding adverse outcomes of TR in patients with coexisting valvular abnormalities is important, especially with rapidly evolving transcatheter tricuspid valve interventions.

Dosing and Safety Profile of Aficamten in Symptomatic Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: Results From SEQUOIA-HCM.

BACKGROUND: Aficamten, a novel cardiac myosin inhibitor, reversibly reduces cardiac hypercontractility in obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. We present a prespecified analysis of the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety of aficamten in SEQUOIA-HCM (Safety, Efficacy, and Quantitative Understanding of Obstruction Impact of Aficamten in HCM). METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 282 patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy were randomized 1:1 to daily aficamten (5-20 mg) or placebo between February 1, 2022, and May 15, 2023. Aficamten dosing targeted the lowest effective dose for achieving site-interpreted Valsalva left ventricular outflow tract gradient <30 mm Hg with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥50%. End points were evaluated during titration (day 1 to week 8), maintenance (weeks 8-24), and washout (weeks 24-28), and included major adverse cardiac events, new-onset atrial fibrillation, implantable cardioverter-defibrillator discharges, LVEF <50%, and treatment-emergent adverse events. At week 8, 3.6%, 12.9%, 35%, and 48.6% of patients achieved 5-, 10-, 15-, and 20-mg doses, respectively. Baseline characteristics were similar across groups. Aficamten concentration increased by dose and remained stable during maintenance. During the treatment period, LVEF decreased by -0.9% (95% CI, -1.3 to -0.6) per 100 ng/mL aficamten exposure. Seven (4.9%) patients taking aficamten underwent per-protocol dose reduction for site-interpreted LVEF <50%. There were no treatment interruptions or heart failure worsening for LVEF <50%. No major adverse cardiovascular events were associated with aficamten, and treatment-emergent adverse events were similar between treatment groups, including atrial fibrillation. CONCLUSIONS: A site-based dosing algorithm targeting the lowest effective aficamten dose reduced left ventricular outflow tract gradient with a favorable safety profile throughout SEQUOIA-HCM. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique Identifier: NCT05186818.

Association of Medication Adherence and Health Status in Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction: Insights From the CHAMP-HF Registry.

BACKGROUND: The foundation for managing heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is adherence to guideline-directed medical therapy. Finding an association between medication adherence and patients' health status (their symptoms, function, and quality of life) can be used to underscore its importance to patients. METHODS: The association of self-reported medication adherence in US outpatients with HFrEF enrolled in the Change the Management of Patients with Heart Failure registry from 2015 to 2017 was compared with their health status at baseline and 12 months later. A secondary analysis of changes in adherence between baseline and 6 months with 6-month health status was also performed. Medication adherence was assessed with the self-reported 4-item Morisky-Green-Levine Medication Adherence Scale, with scores ≥1 classified as nonadherent. The primary health status outcome was the disease-specific 12-item Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Overall Summary Score (KCCQ-OS; range, 0-100; higher is better). Robust linear regression models adjusted for confounders were used. RESULTS: After excluding those who died (n=316) or did not provide 12-month KCCQ (n=1285), 3495 outpatients with HFrEF were included, of whom 1108 (31.7%) reported being nonadherent. Nonadherent participants were younger, had significantly worse baseline health status (-5.83-point difference; P<0.001), and showed less improvement at 12 months (-1.7-point difference in mean change; P=0.017) than adherent participants. Among nonadherent patients at baseline, those whose adherence improved trended toward greater 6-month health status improvements than those remaining nonadherent (fully adjusted difference of 2.52 points; P=0.054). CONCLUSIONS: In HFrEF, medication nonadherence was associated with worse health status and less improvement over the following year. Improvements in adherence were associated with better health status than remaining nonadherent, underscoring the importance of supporting adherence with guideline-directed medical therapy in patients with HFrEF.

Association of Patient Reported Outcomes With Caregiver Burden in Older Patients With Advanced Heart Failure: Insights From the SUSTAIN-IT Study.

BACKGROUND: Caregivers of patients with advanced heart failure may experience burden in providing care, but whether changes in patient health status are associated with caregiver burden is unknown. METHODS: This observational study included older patients (60-80 years old) receiving advanced surgical heart failure therapies and their caregivers at 13 US sites. Patient health status was assessed using the 12-item Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (range, 0-100; higher scores are better). Caregiver burden was assessed using the Oberst Caregiving Burden Scale, which measures time on task (OCBS-time) and task difficulty (OCBS-difficulty; range, 1-5; lower scores are better). Measurements occurred before surgery and 12 months after in 3 advanced heart failure cohorts: patients receiving long-term left ventricular assist device support; heart transplantation with pretransplant left ventricular assist device support; and heart transplantation without pretransplant left ventricular assist device support. Multivariable linear regression was used to identify predictors of change in OCBS-time and OCBS-difficulty at 12 months. RESULTS: Of 162 caregivers, the mean age was 61.0±9.4 years, 139 (86%) were female, and 140 (86%) were the patient's spouse. At 12 months, 99 (61.1%) caregivers experienced improved OCBS-time, and 61 (37.7%) experienced improved OCBS-difficulty (versus no change or worse OCBS). A 10-point higher baseline 12-item Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire predicted lower 12-month OCBS-time (ß=-0.09 [95% CI, -0.14 to -0.03]; P<0.001) and OCBS-difficulty (ß=-0.08 [95% CI, -0.12 to -0.05]; P<0.001). Each 10-point improvement in the 12-item Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire predicted lower 12-month OCBS-time (ß=-0.07 [95% CI, -0.12 to -0.03]; P=0.002) and OCBS-difficulty (ß=-0.09 [95% CI, -0.12 to -0.06]; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Among survivors at 12 months, baseline and change in patient health status were associated with subsequent caregiver time on task and task difficulty in dyads receiving advanced heart failure surgical therapies, highlighting the potential for serial 12-item Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire assessments to identify caregivers at risk of increased burden. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; unique identifier: NCT02568930.

Generalizable Approach to Quantifying Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy.

BACKGROUND: Quantifying guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) intensity is foundational for improving heart failure (HF) care. Existing measures discount dose intensity or use inconsistent weighting. METHODS: The Kansas City Medical Optimization (KCMO) score is the average of total daily to target dose percentages for eligible GDMT, reflecting the percentage of optimal GDMT prescribed (range, 0-100). In Change the Management of Patients With HF, we computed KCMO, HF collaboratory (0-7), and modified HF Collaboratory (0-100) scores for each patient at baseline and for 1-year change in established GDMT at the time (mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, ß-blocker, ACE [angiotensin-converting enzyme] inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker/angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor). We compared baseline and 1-year change distributions and the coefficient of variation (SD/mean) across scores. RESULTS: Among 4532 patients at baseline, mean KCMO, HF collaboratory, and modified HF Collaboratory scores were 38.8 (SD, 25.7), 3.4 (1.7), and 42.2 (22.2), respectively. The mean 1-year change (n=4061) for KCMO was -1.94 (17.8); HF collaborator, -0.11 (1.32); and modified HF Collaboratory, -1.35 (19.8). KCMO had the highest coefficient of variation (0.66), indicating greater variability around the mean than the HF collaboratory (0.49) and modified HF Collaboratory (0.53) scores, reflecting higher resolution of the variability in GDMT intensity across patients. CONCLUSIONS: KCMO measures GDMT intensity by incorporating dosing and treatment eligibility, provides more granularity than existing methods, is easily interpretable (percentage of ideal GDMT), and can be adapted as performance measures evolve. Further study of its association with outcomes and its usefulness for quality assessment and improvement is needed.