RESUMEN
This explorative prospective observational pilot study investigated if suggested risk factors, rectal cancer and lung metastases, could add to a relevant detection rate of asymptomatic brain metastases (BM) from colorectal cancer (CRC). Secondary, prognostic biological aspects were investigated by translational analysis of plasma samples. The study enrolled patients with rectal cancer and lung metastases. At inclusion, patients underwent a standard MRI scan of the brain. Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) level was measured by a direct fluorescence assay (DFA), and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) by ddPCR. BM was detected in one of twenty-nine included patients. Patients had higher cfDNA levels than healthy subjects (p < 0.01). Patients with the primary tumor in situ had higher cfDNA levels than those with resected primary tumor (p < 0.01). Patients with liver involvement had higher cfDNA levels (p = 0.12) and circulating tumor DNA levels (p = 0.01) than those without liver involvement. In conclusion, the modest incidence of BM does not justify routine MRI of the brain in this selected population. cfDNA by DFA could be a valuable tool when planning treatment and follow-up for CRC patients. Future studies should focus on identifying further characteristics and biomarkers associated with a high risk of BM, enhancing the possibility for early intervention.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Encefálicas , Ácidos Nucleicos Libres de Células , ADN Tumoral Circulante , Neoplasias Colorrectales , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Neoplasias del Recto , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/genética , Neoplasias Encefálicas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Encefálicas/genética , Biomarcadores de Tumor/genética , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Patients with detectable ctDNA after radical-intent treatment of metastatic spread from colorectal cancer (mCRC) have a very high risk of recurrence, which may be prevented with intensified adjuvant chemotherapy (aCTh). In the OPTIMISE study, we investigate ctDNA-guided aCTh after radical-intent treatment of mCRC. Here we present results from the preplanned interim analysis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study is an open-label 1:1 randomized clinical trial comparing ctDNA-guided aCTh against standard of care (SOC), with a run-in phase investigating feasibility measures. Key inclusion criteria; radical-intent treatment for mCRC and clinically eligible for triple-agent chemotherapy. Patients underwent a PET-CT scan before randomization. ctDNA analyses of plasma samples were done by ddPCR, detecting CRC-specific mutations and methylation of the NPY gene. In the ctDNA-guided arm, ctDNA positivity led to an escalation strategy with triple-agent chemotherapy, and conversely ctDNA negativity led to a de-escalation strategy by shared-decision making. Patients randomized to the standard arm were treated according to SOC. Feasibility measures for the run-in phase were; the inclusion of 30 patients over 12 months in two Danish hospitals, compliance with randomization >80%, rate of PET-CT-positive findings <20%, and eligibility for triple-agent chemotherapy >80%. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients were included. The rate of PET-CT-positive cases was 22% (n = 7/32). Ninety-seven percent of the patients were randomized. Fourteen patients were randomly assigned to SOC and sixteen to ctDNA-guided adjuvant treatment and follow-up. All analyses of baseline plasma samples in the ctDNA-guided arm passed the quality control, and 19% were ctDNA positive. The median time to result was three working days. All ctDNA-positive patients were eligible for triple-agent chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: The study was proven to be feasible and continues in the planned large-scale phase II trial. Results from the OPTIMISE study will potentially optimize the adjuvant treatment of patients undergoing radical-intent treatment of mCRC, thereby improving survival and reducing chemotherapy-related toxicity.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales , Humanos , Neoplasias Colorrectales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/genética , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Tomografía Computarizada por Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones , Biomarcadores de Tumor/genética , Hormona AdrenocorticotrópicaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Both quantitative and molecular changes in ctDNA can hold important information when treating metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), but its clinical utility is yet to be established. Before conducting a large-scale randomized trial, it is essential to test feasibility. This study investigates whether ctDNA is feasible for detecting patients who will benefit from treatment with epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors and the prognostic value of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) response. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with mCRC, who were considered for systemic palliative treatment and were eligible for ctDNA analysis. Mutational testing on cell-free DNA (cfDNA) was done by ddPCR. ctDNA response from baseline to the third treatment cycle was evaluated in patients with detectable ctDNA at baseline. ctDNA maximum response was defined as undetectable ctDNA at the third treatment cycle, ctDNA partial response as any decrease in the ctDNA level, and ctDNA progression as any increase in the ctDNA level. RESULTS: Forty-nine patients were included. The time to test results for mutational testing on cfDNA was significantly shorter than on tumor tissue (p < .001). Progression-free survival were 11.2 months (reference group), 7.5 months (HR = 10.7, p= .02), and 4.6 months (HR = 11.4, p= .02) in patients with ctDNA maximum response, partial response, and progression, respectively. Overall survival was 31.2 months (reference group), 15.2 months (HR = 4.1, p= .03), and 9.0 months (HR = 2.6, p= .03) in patients with ctDNA maximum response, partial response, and progression, respectively. CONCLUSION: Pretreatment mutational testing on cfDNA in daily clinic is feasible and can be applied in randomized clinical trials evaluating the clinical utility of ctDNA. Early dynamics in ctDNA during systemic treatment hold prognostic value.
Asunto(s)
ADN Tumoral Circulante , Neoplasias Colorrectales , Humanos , Estudios de Factibilidad , Neoplasias Colorrectales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/genética , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Pronóstico , ADN Tumoral Circulante/genética , Mutación , Biomarcadores de Tumor/genéticaRESUMEN
Interest in the measurement of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in colorectal cancer (CRC) has increased during the past decade. The analysis of quantitative ctDNA changes as a general response evaluation criterion during systemic treatment is a scientific approach with high clinical potential, and results can be transferred to a pan-cancer concept if relevantly investigated. The purpose of this overview is to discuss the current evidence for ctDNA as a marker of response in metastatic CRC (mCRC) and to propose criteria for definitions of response to systemic therapies applicable in prospective clinical trials. We discuss the literature, which supports a new definition of ctDNA Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. Finally, we discuss the challenges in preparations of the optimal trial design to establish the true clinical utility of ctDNA.
RESUMEN
Purpose: Chemoradiation therapy is the primary treatment for anal cancer. Radiation therapy (RT) can weaken the pelvic bone structure, but the risk of pelvic insufficiency fractures (PIFs) and derived pain in anal cancer is not yet established. We determined the frequency of symptomatic PIFs after RT for anal cancer and related this to radiation dose to specific pelvic bone substructures. Methods and Materials: In a prospective setting, patients treated with RT for anal cancer had magnetic resonance imaging 1 year after RT. PIFs were mapped to 17 different bone sites, and we constructed a guideline for detailed delineation of pelvic bone substructures. Patients were interviewed regarding pain and scored according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Effects. Dose-volume relationships for specific pelvic bone substructures and PIFs were determined for V20 to V40 Gy mean and maximum doses. Results: Twenty-seven patients were included, and 51.9% had PIFs primarily located in the alae of the sacral bone. Patients with PIFs had significantly more pelvic pain (86% vs 23%, P = .001) and 43% had grade 2 bone pain. Dose-volume parameters for sacral bone and sacral alae were significantly higher in patients with PIFs (P < .05). V30 Gy (%) for sacral bone and alae implied an area under the curve of 0.764 and 0.758, respectively, in receiver operating characteristic analyses. Conclusions: We observed a high risk of PIFs in patients treated with RT for anal cancer 1 year after treatment. A significant proportion had pain in the sites where PIFs were most frequently found. Radiation dose to pelvic bone substructures revealed relation to risk of PIFs and can be used for plan optimization in future clinical trials.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Patient-reported outcome (PRO) and National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) data for patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (SCCA) treated with modern radiation therapy (RT) are lacking. The primary aim of this study was to report bowel and bladder PRO and NCI-CTCAE for patients with SCCA 1 year after RT. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From 2015 to 2020, we included patients in a prospective Danish national study. Data were collected before treatment (PT) and 1 year after treatment (1Y) using NCI-CTCAE version 4.0, as well as European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaires C30 and CR29. We evaluated the combined PRO scores according to the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer scoring guidelines, and classified changes according to score difference from PT to 1Y as no change (0-5), minor (5-10), moderate (11-20), and major (>20). Raw scores were reported as frequencies of each of the scores: Not at all, a little, quite a bit, and very much. RESULTS: Of the 270 patients, 81% had complete data sets, including PT and 1Y answers. Functional mean scores were equal to a matched normal population cohort at PT and 1Y. From PT to 1Y, C30 scores were stable despite minor improvements in global health status/quality of life (7.3), emotional functioning (9.3), insomnia (8.0), and appetite loss (7.8). For questionnaire CR29, bowel and bladder symptoms and sore skin improved with minor change (6.2), and buttocks, anal, or rectal pain improved with moderate change (18.3). Flatulence worsened moderately (12.6), and fecal incontinence had minor worsening (7.8). Agreement between PROs and NCI-CTCAE was generally only fair to moderate, especially for quantitative symptoms, such as pain (κ = 0.25). CONCLUSIONS: For patients with SCCA who underwent definitive RT, only a few patients had high scores (indicating quite a bit or very much frequency of bother) regarding bowel and bladder symptoms.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Ano , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas , Humanos , Calidad de Vida , Canal Anal , Estudios Prospectivos , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/terapia , Quimioradioterapia/efectos adversos , Neoplasias del Ano/terapia , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Dolor/etiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Anal cancer is a rare cancer with rising incidence. Despite the relatively good outcomes conferred by state-of-the-art chemoradiotherapy, further improving disease control and reducing toxicity has proven challenging. Developing and validating prognostic models using routinely collected data may provide new insights for treatment development and selection. However, due to the rarity of the cancer, it can be difficult to obtain sufficient data, especially from single centres, to develop and validate robust models. Moreover, multi-centre model development is hampered by ethical barriers and data protection regulations that often limit accessibility to patient data. Distributed (or federated) learning allows models to be developed using data from multiple centres without any individual-level patient data leaving the originating centre, therefore preserving patient data privacy. This work builds on the proof-of-concept three-centre atomCAT1 study and describes the protocol for the multi-centre atomCAT2 study, which aims to develop and validate robust prognostic models for three clinically important outcomes in anal cancer following chemoradiotherapy. METHODS: This is a retrospective multi-centre cohort study, investigating overall survival, locoregional control and freedom from distant metastasis after primary chemoradiotherapy for anal squamous cell carcinoma. Patient data will be extracted and organised at each participating radiotherapy centre (n = 18). Candidate prognostic factors have been identified through literature review and expert opinion. Summary statistics will be calculated and exchanged between centres prior to modelling. The primary analysis will involve developing and validating Cox proportional hazards models across centres for each outcome through distributed learning. Outcomes at specific timepoints of interest and factor effect estimates will be reported, allowing for outcome prediction for future patients. DISCUSSION: The atomCAT2 study will analyse one of the largest available cross-institutional cohorts of patients with anal cancer treated with chemoradiotherapy. The analysis aims to provide information on current international clinical practice outcomes and may aid the personalisation and design of future anal cancer clinical trials through contributing to a better understanding of patient risk stratification.
RESUMEN
Background: The watch and wait (W&W) strategy is proposed for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) achieving clinical complete response (cCR) after neoadjuvant radiotherapy. cCR is only in partial concordance with pathological complete response (pCR) due to persisting viable tumour cells. The aim was to investigate circulating-free-deoxyribonucleic-acid (cfDNA) as a biomarker for prediction of pCR. Materials and methods: Patients treated with neoadjuvant radiotherapy for LARC, were included in a prospective biomarker study in Aarhus, Denmark from 2017 to 2020. Plasma cfDNA levels were analysed by a direct fluorescent assay (DFA). Surgical specimens were reviewed by pathologists to categorize response to cytotoxic therapy. Results: In total, 76 patients were included with plasma available at baseline (n = 70), mid therapy (n = 50), and end of therapy (n = 54). Higher cfDNA levels were observed in LARC patients compared with healthy subjects (p < 0.01). By ROC analysis (AUC: 0.87 (95% CI, 0.81-0.92)) the optimal cut-off was 0.71 ng/µL for differentiation between healthy subjects and LARC patients. Thirteen patients obtained pCR with a median cfDNA level of 0.57 ng/µL at end of therapy. Patients with cfDNA levels at end of therapy below the cut-off (p < 0.02) and 'cfDNA responders' with descending levels greater than the 75th percentile during therapy had a significantly higher chance of pCR (p < 0.01). Conclusion: This hypothesis generating study indicates that low cfDNA levels at end of treatment or ´cfDNA responders might be associated with pCR. Quantification of cfDNA by the rapid and feasible DFA analysis could potentially facilitate personalized follow-up as a complementary tool to identify candidates for a W&W strategy.
RESUMEN
Squamous-cell carcinoma of the anus (ASCC) is a rare disease. Barriers have been encountered to conduct clinical and translational research in this setting. Despite this, ASCC has been a prime example of collaboration amongst researchers. We performed a bibliometric analysis of ASCC-related literature of the last 20 years, exploring common patterns in research, tracking collaboration and identifying gaps. The electronic Scopus database was searched using the keywords "anal cancer", to include manuscripts published in English, between 2000 and 2020. Data analysis was performed using R-Studio 0.98.1091 software. A machine-learning bibliometric method was applied. The bibliometrix R package was used. A total of 2322 scientific documents was found. The average annual growth rate in publication was around 40% during 2000-2020. The five most productive countries were United States of America (USA), United Kingdom (UK), France, Italy and Australia. The USA and UK had the greatest link strength of international collaboration (22.6% and 19.0%). Two main clusters of keywords for published research were identified: (a) prevention and screening and (b) overall management. Emerging topics included imaging, biomarkers and patient-reported outcomes. Further efforts are required to increase collaboration and funding to sustain future research in the setting of ASCC.
RESUMEN
Evidence from studies which combined 2D-3D external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) ± chemotherapy with 2D brachytherapy (BT) for anal cancer suggest favorable outcomes when compared with chemo-EBRT alone. Further improvement of results can be expected in the era of intensity modulated EBRT and MRI-guided adaptive BT. Despite this, BT is not discussed as a therapeutic option in the prominent international guidelines and its use remains limited to selected institutions. Special skills, complexity, equipment, cost and reimbursement policies have been highlighted as barriers for its wider implementation. However, these factors are relevant for modern radiotherapy in general. Therefore, it can be argued that the role of BT as a component of chemoradiation should be redefined. We describe the historical evolution and current role of BT boost for anal cancer and outline its potential in the context of combined intensity modulated EBRT, chemotherapy and MRI-guided adaptive BT.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Ano , Braquiterapia , Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada , Radón , Neoplasias del Ano/patología , Neoplasias del Ano/radioterapia , Braquiterapia/métodos , Humanos , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Dosificación Radioterapéutica , Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada/métodos , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
Treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is focused on prolonging survival and maintaining quality of life. It is important to establish prognostic and predictive markers to avoid extended, ineffective treatment. The aim of the present study was, by a novel approach, to analyze the association between cell-free (cf)DNA levels and outcome in patients receiving systemic therapy for incurable mCRC. The study was a prospective non-interventional biomarker study for patients receiving standard of systemic treatment for mCRC. Patients with mCRC, who, according to standard guidelines, were considered for treatment with EGFR inhibitors, were included. The cfDNA levels in consecutive plasma samples were measured by a direct fluorescence assay. The study included 47 patients. Blood samples were available at baseline (n=47); prior to the third treatment cycle (n=31); the first (n=33), second (n=22) and third response evaluation during treatment (n=17); and at progression (n=22). The disease control rate was 42 and 91% in patients with high (≥75th percentile of baseline cfDNA levels) and low cfDNA levels (<75th percentile of baseline cfDNA levels), respectively (P<0.001). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.8 and 8.5 months in patients with high and low cfDNA levels, respectively (hazard ratio=3.03, 95% CI 1.46-6.29, P<0.01). Median overall survival (OS) was 5.0 and 26.6 months in patients with high and low cfDNA levels, respectively (hazard ratio=3.48, 95% CI 1.44-8.44, P<0.01). In the multivariate analysis, baseline cfDNA levels remained a significant predictor of PFS and OS. In conclusion, cfDNA is a promising prognostic tool in the personalized treatment of mCRC. cfDNA levels were estimated by a simple, rapid and inexpensive method (OPTIPAL II: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier no. NCT03750175; registered November 21, 2018).
RESUMEN
Anal cancer is a relatively rare, mostly HPV-related cancer. The curative treatment consists of concurrent chemoradiation delivered with modern radiotherapy techniques. The prognosis for most patients with early localized disease is very favourable; however patients with locally advanced disease and/or HPV negative tumours are at higher risk of locoregional and distant treatment failure. Tailored approaches are presently being investigated to determine the most suitable regimen in terms of radiotherapy dose prescription, target volume selection, normal tissue avoidance, and combination therapy. Metastatic anal cancer is treated with chemotherapy aiming at prolonged survival. The role of immune therapy in the clinical setting is being investigated. There is little knowledge on the biology of anal cancer, and an urgent need for more clinical and translational research dedicated to this disease. In this article, the evidence-base for the current treatment is briefly reviewed, and perspectives on future research needs are high-lighted.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Ano , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas , Canal Anal , Neoplasias del Ano/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/tratamiento farmacológico , Quimioradioterapia , Humanos , PronósticoRESUMEN
Locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (LASCCA) has a poor prognosis with a high risk of treatment failure calling for intensified therapy. We present the long-term follow-up of a nationwide cohort of LASCCA treated with intensified induction chemotherapy (ICT). The study included patients with LASCCA (T3-4N0 or T1-4N+) treated with at least one cycle of ICT (cisplatin, ifosfamide, leucoverin, and 5-flourouracil) between 1998-2018. Data were retrospectively collected from medical records, and statistics were performed in STATA 16.1. In total, 166 patients with LASCCA were identified. Following ICT, 157 patients (95%) received primary curative treatment with either radiotherapy (70%), chemoradiotherapy (27%), or abdominal perineal resection (3%). The overall local tumor response rate after ICT was 76% with 20 (13%) achieving complete local tumor response. After the primary treatment, 123 patients (79%) obtained complete response, and 27 underwent salvage surgery due to persistent disease. The median follow-up time was 6 years, local and distant failure rates 22% and 13%, respectively. The 3- and 5-year disease-free survival rates were 70% and 67%, and the 3- and 5-year overall survival rates were 76% and 70%, respectively. Intensified ICT regimen could be a supplementary treatment option in the most advanced cases of LASCCA. Prospective randomized trials are needed to investigate this approach further.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: First-line platinum-based therapy for advanced squamous cell carcinomas of the anal canal (SCCA) implies a risk of substantial side effects, and data on second-line treatment options are limited. Paclitaxel and Capecitabine are a well-known regimen with a moderate toxicity profile, but its efficacy has not been evaluated. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study using Danish Hospital Registers of patients treated with Paclitaxel and Capecitabine for inoperable, recurrent, or advanced metastatic SCCA in Denmark, between January 2000 and July 2018. RESULTS: A total of 52 patients met the eligibility criteria. Median age was 60.7 years (range 42-83). Efficacy was observed, with an overall response rate in patients receiving first-line (N = 28) and second-line (N = 23) Paclitaxel and Capecitabine of 39.3% (2 with complete responses) and 17.4%, respectively. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.5 months (95% CI 3.3-5.9) and 3.8 months (95% CI 2.4-5.5) with OS of 6.7 months (95% CI 5.9-8.5) and 5.9 months (95% CI 3.9-14), respectively. Performance status ≥2 and neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio ≥4 were significantly associated with a short PFS. CONCLUSION: This study recognizes Paclitaxel and Capecitabine as a potential regimen for advanced SCCA, when recommended first-line therapy is not feasible or as a potential second-line treatment after failure of platinum-based chemotherapy.