The Pediatric Bougie for the First Tracheal Intubation Attempt in Critically Ill Children.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Bougie use during emergency tracheal intubation has not been well studied in children. METHODS: This was a 10-year observational study of pediatric intubations (<18 years of age) in the emergency department (ED) of an academic institution. Bougie training and use are standard in our ED, including for emergency medicine residents. Study data were collected by a combination of charts and video reviews. We compare first-attempt intubation success and procedural complications between pediatric patients with and without bougie use during tracheal intubation in the ED. In addition, we evaluate the independent association of bougie use with first-attempt intubation success using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: We collected data on intubation success and bougie use for 195 pediatric patients over more than 10 years. On the first tracheal intubation attempt, a pediatric bougie was used in 126 patients (65%). Median patient age was 5 years (interquartile range 1.7 to 9) in the bougie group and 1.7 years (interquartile range 0.2 to 5) in the no bougie group. Intubation was successful on the first attempt in 72% of intubations with a bougie versus 78% without a bougie (absolute difference -6%, 95% confidence interval [CI] -19 to 6%); the adjusted odds of first-attempt success with a bougie were 0.54 (95% CI 0.24 to 1.19). A procedural complication occurred for 38% of patients in the bougie group versus 51% in the no bougie group (-13%, 95% CI -27% to 2%). Two neonates, one in each group, experienced a potential injury to the airway or lower respiratory tract. CONCLUSION: In an academic ED where the bougie is commonly used, bougie use in children was not associated with procedural success or complications. Our study suggests that a randomized clinical trial is needed to determine the effect of bougie use during emergency pediatric intubation.

Adjunct Devices for the Pediatric Difficult Airway: A Case Report.

This is a case report of a pediatric patient with a difficult airway, in which several airway adjuncts were used simultaneously to successfully provide adequate oxygenation and ventilation during cardiac arrest. Difficult airways are low-incidence, high-risk emergencies in children, and airway adjuncts may be used infrequently, let alone in combination. Included in the discussion of this case are a description of each airway adjunct and a discussion of the process needed to incorporate airway adjuncts safely and effectively into patient care.

Cardiac Emergencies in Kids.

Encountering a child with congenital heart disease after surgical palliation in the emergency department, specifically the single-ventricle or ventricular assist device, without a basic familiarity of these surgeries can be extremely anxiety provoking. Knowing what common conditions or complications may cause these children to visit the emergency department and how to stabilize will improve the chance for survival and is the premise for this article, regardless of practice setting.

An unusual case of epistaxis in a four month old.

Epistaxis is a routine complaint in Emergency Medicine and presents most commonly in adults and children and its incidence increases with age. It is rare in infants and neonates. We discuss a case of epistaxis in a four-month-old male who presented to a critical access hospital. What initially appeared to be routine brisk epistaxis was later discovered to be a large, complex, epiglottic hemangioma. The patient was stabilized using topical tranexamic acid, nasal packing with ketamine sedation, and sent to a tertiary care center for definitive management. He required advanced airway management in the OR for definitive airway management for airway-obstructing hemangioma excision.

Spectrum and frequency of critical procedures performed at a Level I adult and pediatric trauma center.

OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of this study was to provide physician-level data about the frequency of critical procedures at a combined adult and pediatric Level I trauma center, high-acuity, high-volume academic ED. The inspiration for this study question came from a previous study by Mittiga et al. (2013) describing pediatric critical procedure data at a similar high-acuity, high-volume, pediatric-only academic ED. Our secondary objective is to compare our pediatric level procedural spectrum and frequency with those published by Mittiga et al. (2013). METHODS: This prospective observational study occurred over eleven consecutive months at an urban, Level I combined adult/pediatric trauma center with 96,000 annual visits (8500 pediatric). We recorded only procedures performed in the resuscitation bays. All data analysis is descriptive. RESULTS: Over eleven months, data on 3891 resuscitations were collected (3686 adults and 205 children); 38 faculty physicians supervised 1838 total critical procedures, 64 on children. The mean number of critical procedures per physician per month was 4.42 (0.15 on children). Additionally, ultrasound for intravenous access, extended focused assessment with sonography for trauma (e-FAST), or cardiac ultrasound were performed in 3862 resuscitations (178 pediatric). CONCLUSIONS: Emergency medicine faculty physicians at a combined Level I adult and pediatric trauma center performed and/or supervised 4.4 total (0.15 pediatric) critical procedures per month per faculty which is nearly 6 times more critical procedures monthly than faculty at a similar volume pediatric-only trauma center. However, fewer critical procedures were performed on children at the combined facility.

The Use, Safety, and Efficacy of Olanzapine in a Level I Pediatric Trauma Center Emergency Department Over a 10-Year Period.

OBJECTIVES: Olanzapine is a second-generation antipsychotic increasingly used in emergency medicine for many indications. Literature on its use in children is sparse. Our objectives were to describe the use, safety, and efficacy of olanzapine in pediatric emergency patients. METHODS: A structured chart review was performed of patients 18 years old or younger receiving olanzapine from 2007 to 2016 in the emergency department of a pediatric level I trauma center. RESULTS: A total of 285 children received olanzapine. Mean age was 16.4 years (range, 9-18 years); 121 were male (42.8%). Primary indications for olanzapine included agitation (n = 166, 58.3%), headache (n = 58, 20.4%), nausea/vomiting/abdominal pain (n = 37, 12.5%), unspecified pain (n = 20, 7%), and other (n = 4, 1.4%). Route of olanzapine administration was intramuscular (n = 160, 56%; median dose, 10 mg; range, 2.5-20), intravenous (n = 101, 36%; median dose, 5 mg; range, 1.25-5), and oral (n = 24, 8%; median dose, 10 mg; range, 5-10). For agitated patients, 28 (17%) received another sedative within 1 hour. For headache patients, 5 (8.6%) received another analgesic. For gastrointestinal complaints, 5 patients (13.5%) received another analgesic/antiemetic. Adverse respiratory events were hypoxia (pulse oximetry reading, in percentage, <92%; n = 7, 2.4%), supplemental oxygen placement (n = 9, 3.2%), and intubation (n = 2, 0.7%). No patient died or had a dysrhythmia. One patient experienced dystonia. CONCLUSIONS: Olanzapine seems safe when used for a variety of conditions in pediatric emergency patients. It may be effective for acute agitation, primary headache, and gastrointestinal complaints.

Emergency Care of Pediatric Burns.

Although the overall incidence of and mortality rate associated with burn injury have decreased in recent decades, burns remain a significant source of morbidity and mortality in children. Children with major burns require emergent resuscitation. Resuscitation is similar to that for adults, including pain control, airway management, and administration of intravenous fluid. However, in pediatrics, fluid resuscitation is needed for burns greater than or equal to 15% of total body surface area (TBSA) compared with burns greater than or equal to 20% TBSA for adults. Unique to pediatrics is the additional assessment for non-accidental injury and accurate calculation of the percentage of total burned surface area (TBSA) in children with changing body proportions are crucial to determine resuscitation parameters, prognosis, and disposition.

A Survey of Graduates of Combined Emergency Medicine-Pediatrics Residency Programs: An Update.

BACKGROUND: In 1998, emergency medicine-pediatrics (EM-PEDS) graduates were no longer eligible for the pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) sub-board certification examination. There is a paucity of guidance regarding the various training options for medical students who are interested in PEM. OBJECTIVES: We sought to to determine attitudes and personal satisfaction of graduates from EM-PEDS combined training programs. METHODS: We surveyed 71 graduates from three EM-PEDS residences in the United States. RESULTS: All respondents consider their combined training to be an asset when seeking a job, 92% find it to be an asset to their career, and 88% think it provided added flexibility to job searches. The most commonly reported shortcoming was their ineligibility for the PEM sub-board certification. The lack of this designation was perceived to be a detriment to securing academic positions in dedicated children's hospitals. When surveyed regarding which training offers the better skill set for the practice of PEM, 90% (44/49) stated combined EM-PEDS training. When asked which training track gives them the better professional advancement in PEM, 52% (23/44) chose combined EM-PEDS residency, 27% (12/44) chose a pediatrics residency followed by a PEM fellowship, and 25% (11/44) chose an EM residency then a PEM fellowship. No EM-PEDS respondents considered PEM fellowship training after the completion of the dual training program. CONCLUSION: EM-PEDS graduates found combined training to be an asset in their career. They felt that it provided flexibility in job searches, and that it was ideal training for the skill set required for the practice of PEM. EM-PEDS graduates' practices varied, including mixed settings, free-standing children's hospitals, and community emergency departments.

Use of a Supraglottic Airway to Relieve Ventilation-Impeding Gastric Insufflation During Emergency Airway Management in an Infant.

Positive-pressure bag-valve-mask ventilation during emergency airway management often results in significant gastric insufflation, which may impede adequate ventilation and oxygenation. Current-generation supraglottic airways have beneficial features, such as channels for gastric decompression while ventilation is ongoing. A 5-week-old female infant required resuscitation for hypoxemic respiratory failure caused by rhinovirus with pneumonia. Bag-valve-mask ventilation led to gastric insufflation that compromised ventilation, thereby interfering with intubation because of precipitous oxygen desaturation during laryngoscopy. A current-generation supraglottic airway (LMA Supreme; Teleflex Inc, Morrisville, NC) was used to facilitate gastric decompression while ventilation and oxygenation was ongoing. After gastric decompression, ventilation was markedly improved and the pulse oxygen saturation improved to 100%. Intubation was successful on the next attempt, without oxygen desaturation. Current-generation supraglottic airways have 3 distinct advantages compared with first-generation supraglottic airways, which make them better devices for emergency airway management: gastric decompression ports, conduits for intubation, and higher oropharyngeal leak pressures.

The Critically Ill Infant with Congenital Heart Disease.

This article presents an approach for identification of infants with congenital heart disorders. These disorders are difficult to diagnose because of the complexity and variety of cardiac malformations; additionally presentation can be complicated by age-dependent physiology. By compiling data from the history and the physical examination, the emergency physician can identify lesion category and initiate stabilization procedures. Critical congenital cardiac lesions can be classified as left-sided obstructive ductal dependent, right-sided obstructive ductal dependent, and shunting or mixing. The simplified approach categorizes infants with these lesions respectively as "pink," "blue," or "gray." The emergency provider can provide life-saving stabilization until specialized care can be obtained.

Emergent diagnostic testing for pediatric nonfebrile seizures.

BACKGROUND: Guidelines from the American Academy of Neurology recommend laboratory studies or computed tomography (CT) for children who experience a nonfebrile seizure if anything in their history suggests a clinically significant abnormality. OBJECTIVE: To ascertain if any patient or seizure characteristics are associated with a greater likelihood that laboratory studies or CT scan will yield clinically significant results. METHODS: This retrospective case series reviewed 93 children with nonfebrile seizure, who were evaluated in an urban pediatric emergency department (ED) between July 2007 and June 2011. RESULTS: Laboratory studies were performed in 87% of the study group; 7% of those tests gave clinically significant results. Computed tomographic scans were obtained in 35% of our patients; 9% showed clinically significant findings. Presence of an active seizure in the ED or a first nonfebrile seizure had an 8% and 11% difference, respectively, for clinically significant laboratory abnormality. Children younger than 2 years showed a 7% difference of clinically significant laboratory abnormality. CONCLUSION: This study did not identify statistically significant predictors of laboratory or CT abnormalities for children with nonfebrile seizure presenting to the ED. Age less than 2years, having an active seizure in the ED, and experiencing a first-time seizure showed a trend toward an increased yield of laboratory testing. In accordance with the American Academy of Neurology guidelines, we conclude that the history of a child's present illness preceding the nonfebrile seizure, not characteristics of the seizure, should be used to determine the need for further testing.