Sorafenib in combination with docetaxel as first-line therapy for HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer: Final results of the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase II MADONNA study.

BACKGROUND: This multicenter, double-blind phase II study assessed the antitumor activity and toxicity profile of docetaxel with the antiangiogenic multikinase inhibitor sorafenib or matching placebo as a first-line treatment in patients with metastatic or locally advanced HER2-negative breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive docetaxel 100 mg/m2 on day 1 every 3 weeks in combination with sorafenib 400 mg bid or placebo on days 2-18 of each cycle until tumor progression, or unacceptable toxicity. Sorafenib/placebo could be continued at the investigator's discretion if docetaxel was stopped due to toxicity. Primary endpoint was progression free survival (PFS). RESULTS: From October 2008 to December 2013, 102 patients were randomized; 98 patients were evaluable. The trial was prematurely terminated due to slow accrual. Due to increased toxicity the dose of docetaxel was reduced to 75 mg/m2 and an increasing sorafenib dosing schedule was implemented as part of a protocol amendment. The addition of sorafenib to docetaxel did not improve PFS (8.2 vs. 7.3 months for docetaxel/placebo; HR 0.84, log rank p = 0.43), but led to higher rates of early treatment discontinuation. There were no statistically significant differences between sorafenib dosing schedules. CONCLUSIONS: Addition of sorafenib to taxane-based first-line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer failed to improve PFS and resulted in increased toxicity.

Gemcitabine combined with the monoclonal antibody nimotuzumab is an active first-line regimen in KRAS wildtype patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer: a multicenter, randomized phase IIb study.

BACKGROUND: This randomized study was designed to investigate the superiority of gemcitabine (gem) plus nimotuzumab (nimo), an anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody, compared with gem plus placebo as first-line therapy in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with previously untreated, unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer were randomly assigned to receive gem: 1000 mg/m2, 30-min i.v. once weekly (d1, 8, 15; q29) and nimo: fixed dose of 400 mg once weekly as a 30-min infusion, or gem plus placebo, until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end point was overall survival (OS), secondary end points included time to progression, overall response rate, safety and quality of life. RESULTS: A total of 192 patients were randomized, with 186 of them being assessable for efficacy and safety (average age 63.6 years). One-year OS/progression-free survival (PFS) was 34%/22% for gem plus nimo compared with 19%/10% for gem plus placebo (HR = 0.69; P = 0.03/HR = 0.68; P = 0.02). Median OS/PFS was 8.6/5.1 months for gem plus nimo versus 6.0/3.4 mo in the gem plus placebo group (HR = 0.69; P = 0.0341/HR = 0.68; P = 0.0163), with very few grade 3/4 toxicities. KRAS wildtype patients experienced a significantly better OS than those with KRAS mutations (11.6 versus 5.6 months, P = 0.03). CONCLUSION: This randomized study showed that nimo in combination with gem is safe and well tolerated. The 1-year OS and PFS rates for the entire population were significantly improved. Especially, those patients with KRAS wildtype seem to benefit. The study was registered as protocol ID OSAG101-PCS07, NCT00561990 and EudraCT 2007-000338-38.

Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy with oxaliplatin in colorectal peritoneal metastasis.

AIM: Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) is an experimental drug delivery method that applies chemotherapy into the abdominal cavity as an aerosol under pressure. We present the first results obtained with PIPAC in colorectal peritoneal metastasis (CPM). METHOD: This is a retrospective analysis. PIPAC was applied in 17 consecutive patients with pretreated CPM. All patients had previously undergone surgery, and 16 had undergone previous lines of systemic chemotherapy (median, two lines). The mean peritoneal metastasis index (peritoneal cancer index) was 16 ± 10. Forty-eight applications of PIPAC with oxaliplatin (92 mg/m2 ) were given every 6 weeks at 37 °C and 12 mmHg for 30 min. The outcome criteria were microscopic pathological response, survival and adverse events according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0. RESULTS: Forty-eight PIPAC administrations were performed with no intra-operative complications. The mean number of PIPAC administrations per patient was 2.8 (minimum one, maximum six). Postoperative adverse events (CTCAE level 3) were observed in four patients (23%), no CTCAE level-4 adverse events were reported. The hospital mortality was zero. Objective tumour responses were observed in 12/17 patients (71%), and the overall responses were as follows: complete pathological response (seven patients), major response (four patients), partial response (one patient), no response (two patients) and not eligible (three patients). The mean survival after first PIPAC was 15.7 months. CONCLUSION: Repeated PIPAC with oxaliplatin can induce the regression of pretreated CPM. The toxicity appears to be low. These preliminary results are encouraging and justify prospective clinical studies.

Regorafenib in combination with FOLFOX or FOLFIRI as first- or second-line treatment of colorectal cancer: results of a multicenter, phase Ib study.

BACKGROUND: Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is commonly treated with 5-fluorouracil, folinic acid, and oxaliplatin or irinotecan. The multitargeted kinase inhibitor, regorafenib, was combined with chemotherapy as first- or second-line treatment of mCRC to assess safety and pharmacokinetics (primary objectives) and tumor response (secondary objective). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-five patients were treated every 2 weeks with 5-fluorouracil 400 mg/m(2) bolus then 2400 mg/m(2) over 46 h, folinic acid 400 mg/m(2), and either oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2) or irinotecan 180 mg/m(2). On days 4-10, patients received regorafenib 160 mg orally once daily. RESULTS: The median duration of treatment was 108 (range 2-345 days). Treatment was stopped for adverse events or death (17 patients), disease progression (11 patients), and consent withdrawal or investigator decision (11 patients). Six patients remained on regorafenib at data cutoff (two without chemotherapy). Drug-related adverse events occurred in 44 patients [grade ≥ 3 in 32 patients: mostly neutropenia (17 patients) and leukopenia, hand-foot skin reaction, and hypophosphatemia (four patients each)]. Thirty-three patients achieved disease control (partial response or stable disease) for a median of 126 (range 42-281 days). CONCLUSION: Regorafenib had acceptable tolerability in combination with chemotherapy, with increased exposure of irinotecan and SN-38 but no significant effect on 5-fluorouracil or oxaliplatin pharmacokinetics.

A randomised phase II trial of the Polo-like kinase inhibitor BI 2536 in chemo-naïve patients with unresectable exocrine adenocarcinoma of the pancreas - a study within the Central European Society Anticancer Drug Research (CESAR) collaborative network.

BACKGROUND: BI 2536, a novel Polo-like kinase 1 inhibitor, was assessed in patients with unresectable advanced exocrine adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. METHODS: The study employed a two-stage design. Randomised first-line patients received BI 2536 200 mg on day 1 (n=43) or 60 mg on days 1-3 (n=43) every 21 days. Recruitment of second-line patients was planned for a second stage dependent on an interim analysis demonstrating ≥ 2 responses in the first 18 evaluable patients following 12 weeks of treatment and/or tumour control ≥ 12 weeks in 5 patients per schedule. Primary end point was objective response rate (ORR). RESULTS: By independent review, ORR was 2.3% (all partial) and 24.4% had stable disease as confirmed best response. The second stage was not initiated. Median overall and progression-free survivals were 149 (95% confidence interval (CI), 91-307) and 46 days (95% CI, 44-56). Most common drug-related adverse events were neutropenia (37.2%), leukopenia (29.1%), fatigue (29.1%) and nausea (22.1%); most common grade 3/4-related events were neutropenia (36.0%), leukopenia (27.9%) and thrombocytopenia (8.1%). CONCLUSION: Given the low ORR and poor survival, further development of BI 2536 monotherapy is not warranted in this population.

Regorafenib (BAY 73-4506) in advanced colorectal cancer: a phase I study.

BACKGROUND: In a phase I dose-escalation study, regorafenib demonstrated tolerability and antitumour activity in solid tumour patients. The study was expanded to focus on patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). METHODS: Patients received oral regorafenib 60-220 mg daily (160 mg daily in the extension cohort) in cycles of 21 days on, 7 days off treatment. Assessments included toxicity, response, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients with heavily pretreated CRC (median 4 prior lines of therapy, range 0-7) were enrolled in the dose-escalation and extension phases; 26 patients received regorafenib 160 mg daily. Median treatment duration was 53 days (range 7-280 days). The most common treatment-related toxicities included hand-foot skin reaction, fatigue, voice change and rash. Twenty-seven patients were evaluable for response: 1 achieved partial response and 19 had stable disease. Median progression-free survival was 107 days (95% CI, 66-161). At steady state, regorafenib and its active metabolites had similar systemic exposure. Pharmacodynamic assessment indicated decreased tumour perfusion in most patients. CONCLUSION: Regorafenib showed tolerability and antitumour activity in patients with metastatic CRC. This expanded-cohort phase I study provided the foundation for further clinical trials of regorafenib in this patient population.

Phase IB study of sorafenib in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin in patients with refractory solid tumors.

PURPOSE: Sorafenib (BAY 43-9006), a multikinase inhibitor, has been shown to inhibit tumor growth and tumor angiogenesis by targeting Raf kinase, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor, and platelet-derived growth factor receptor. This study investigated the safety, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary efficacy of sorafenib in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin. METHODS: Patients with advanced solid tumors were treated with 75 mg/m(2) cisplatin on day 1 and 1,250 mg/m(2) gemcitabine on days 1 and 8 of each 21-day cycle. On day 5 of cycle 1, sorafenib 400 mg twice daily was started and continued throughout the complete treatment cycles without interruption. RESULTS: Nineteen patients were valid for safety analysis. The most frequent toxicities related to the cytotoxic agents were hematological disorders. Sorafenib-related toxicities were skin-related, gastrointestinal, and constitutional symptoms. No clinically relevant pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction between sorafenib, cisplatin, and gemcitabine was detected. AUC(0-72) and C (max) of total and unbound platinum were only marginally changed by concomitant sorafenib. Concomitant sorafenib increased mean AUC and C (max) of gemcitabine by 12 and 21%. CONCLUSIONS: Sorafenib as continuous oral treatment in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin demonstrated an acceptable safety profile. No clinically relevant pharmacokinetic interaction was detected. Preliminary antitumor activity, pharmacokinetic, and safety data support the recommendation of 400 mg sorafenib twice daily in combination with cisplatin and gemcitabine to be further evaluated in clinical studies.

Integrating bevacizumab, everolimus, and lapatinib into current neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimen for primary breast cancer. Safety results of the GeparQuinto trial.

BACKGROUND: Safety data for combining bevacizumab, everolimus, or lapatinib with anthracycline- and taxane-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer are limited. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The neoadjuvant GeparQuinto trial investigates the addition of (i) bevacizumab to four cycles epirubicin/cyclophosphamide (EC) followed by four cycles docetaxel (Taxotere) in patients with human epithelial growth factor receptor (HER)2-negative tumors, (ii) everolimus to weekly paclitaxel in patients with HER2-negative tumors not responding to EC ± bevacizumab, and (iii) lapatinib instead of trastuzumab to EC-docetaxel in patients with HER2-positive tumors to improve the rate of pathological complete response. Tolerable dose, need for supportive treatments, and early signals for toxic effect were evaluated in a planned safety analysis of 270 patients. RESULTS: Treatment with chemotherapy plus bevacizumab, everolimus, or lapatinib was discontinued in 23.0%, 25.8%, and 34.5% compared with chemotherapy alone or plus trastuzumab in 19.4%, 24.1%, 3.2%, respectively. More leukopenia, infections, mucositis, and hypertension but less edema was observed by adding bevacizumab; a trend toward more thrombocytopenia, leukopenia, skin changes, and hyperlipidemia by adding everolimus; and more diarrhea, skin changes, and hot flushes but no cardiac events by substituting trastuzumab by lapatinib. CONCLUSIONS: Adding bevacizumab and everolimus to chemotherapy appeared feasible. Lapatinib at 1250 mg resulted in an increased rate of treatment discontinuations and was subsequently dose reduced to 1000 mg.

Antiretroviral activity of two polyisoprenylated acylphloroglucinols, 7-epi-nemorosone and plukenetione A, isolated from Caribbean propolis.

OBJECTIVES: Polyisoprenylated acylphloroglucinols have recently emerged as antitumoral agents. This study aims at elucidating the antiretroviral activity of two such compounds which were isolated from Caribbean propolis: 7-epi-nemorosone and plukenetione A, the structure of which is based on an adamantane moiety. Plukenetione A is for the first time shown to have antiretroviral activity. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The isolation of both small molecules was carried out using RP-HPLC. Their antiretroviral activity was studied based on lentiviral particles produced in HEK293T cells from the SIV-based vector VLDBH; their cytotoxicity was monitored by MTT proliferation assay. The antiviral activity of 7-epi-nemorosone was studied in CEMx174-SEAP infected with the HIV-1-strain pNL4.3wt. Reverse transcriptase inhibition was determined by a standard two-step RT-PCR using MMLV RT. RESULTS: 7-epi-nemorosone and plukenetione A were found to be potent antilentiviral agents in the employed system, inhibiting viral infection at concentrations below 1 µM/2 µM, respectively. Whereas 7-epi-nemorosone was not able to inhibit the reverse transcriptase in vitro (IC50 > 25 µM), plukenetione A effectively inhibited its enzymatic activity at an IC50 of 1.75 µM. CONCLUSIONS: Despite 7-epi-nemorosone and plukenetione A sharing some structural core elements, the mechanism of action involved in their antiretroviral activity seems to be different. We propose that 7-epi-nemorosone inhibits the viral replication by interrupting the Akt/PKB signaling cascade, as was demonstrated previously in various cell lines. Since plukenetione A effectively inhibits the enzymatic activity of MMLV reverse transcriptase at concentrations that show antilentiviral activity, we suggest that this small molecule acts by interfering with the enzyme's catalytic site.

Combination of sorafenib and doxorubicin in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: results from a phase I extension trial.

Sorafenib, an oral multikinase inhibitor, shows efficacy in renal cell and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and is well tolerated when combined with doxorubicin in other solid tumours. Eighteen patients with inoperable HCC received doxorubicin 60 mg/m(2) IV for up to six 3-week cycles. Sorafenib 400mg bid was administered continuously starting day 4. Patients discontinuing doxorubicin were eligible for sorafenib monotherapy. The most frequent grade 3-4 drug-related adverse events were neutropaenia (61%), leukopaenia (45%) and diarrhoea (17%, grade 3). Seven of eight patients who completed six cycles of doxorubicin continued treatment with sorafenib for at least 3 months. Doxorubicin moderately increased AUC (21%) and C(max) (33%) when administered with sorafenib. The disease control rate for 16 evaluable patients was 69%. Sorafenib plus doxorubicin appears to be well tolerated and more effective in the treatment of HCC than doxorubicin alone. Follow-up with single-agent sorafenib in these patients also appears to be well tolerated.

Phase I dose escalation study of telatinib (BAY 57-9352) in patients with advanced solid tumours.

Telatinib (BAY 57-9352) is an orally available, small-molecule inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptors 2 and 3 (VEGFR-2/-3) and platelet-derived growth factor receptor beta tyrosine kinases. In this multicentre phase I dose escalation study, 71 patients with refractory solid tumours were enroled into 14 days on/7 days off (noncontinuous dosing) or continuous dosing groups to receive telatinib two times daily (BID). Hypertension (23%) and diarrhoea (7%) were the most frequent study drug-related adverse events of CTC grade 3. The maximum-tolerated dose was not reached up to a dose of 1500 mg BID continuous dosing. Telatinib was rapidly absorbed with median t(max) of 3 hours or less. Geometric mean C(max) and AUC(0-12) increased in a less than dose-proportional manner and plateaued in the 900-1500 mg BID dose range. Two renal cell carcinoma patients reached a partial response. Tumour blood flow measured by contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and sVEGFR-2 plasma levels decreased with increasing AUC(0-12) of telatinib. Telatinib is safe and well tolerated up to a dose of 1500 mg BID continuous dosing. Based on pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic criteria, 900 mg telatinib BID continuously administered was selected as the recommended phase II dose.

[Carcinoma of unknown primary site (CUP syndrome)]. / Metastasen eines unbekannten Primärtumors.

Despite the growing array of sophisticated diagnostic tools for establishing a diagnosis of human neoplasia, 2-6% of all cancer patients still present metastatic cancer of which detailed investigations fail to identify the primary anatomic site. The site is found in less than 25% of patients before death and frequently goes undiscovered at post-mortem examination. At the time of first diagnosis with carcinoma of unknown primary site, usually more than 80% of patients present with dissemination. Prognosis depends on the site(s) involved and is unaffected by whether the primary site is ever found. Node dissection may be curative for patients with metastases to peripheral lymph nodes. Objective long-term response is possible in combination with chemotherapy in patients with small-cell malignancies, peritoneal carcinomatosis (in women), or poorly differentiated carcinomas involving external lymph nodes, mediastinum, or retroperitoneum but without metastases to viscera or bone. Toxic therapies are recommended only for palliation of symptoms and maintaining quality of life support in patients with good functional status. Patients should be encouraged to participate in clinical trials for novel therapies.