Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 20
Filtrar
1.
Eur Urol Open Sci ; 50: 10-16, 2023 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37101771

RESUMEN

Background: Several reports are available regarding the treatment decision regret of patients receiving conventional treatments for localized prostate cancer (PCa); yet data on patients undergoing focal therapy (FT) are sparse. Objective: To evaluate the treatment decision satisfaction and regret among patients who underwent FT for PCa with high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) or cryoablation (CRYO). Design setting and participants: We identified consecutive patients who underwent HIFU or CRYO FT as the primary treatment for localized PCa at three US institutions. A survey with validated questionnaires, including the five-question Decision Regret Scale (DRS), International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), and International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5), was mailed to the patients. The regret score was calculated based on the five items of the DRS, and regret was defined as a DRS score of >25. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Multivariable logistic regression models were applied to assess the predictors of treatment decision regret. Results and limitations: Of 236 patients, 143 (61%) responded to the survey. Baseline characteristics were similar between responders and nonresponders. During a median (interquartile range) follow-up of 43 (26-68) mo, the treatment decision regret rate was 19.6%. On a multivariable analysis, higher prostate-specific antigen (PSA) at nadir after FT (odds ratio [OR] 1.48, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1-2, p = 0.009), presence of PCa on follow-up biopsy (OR 3.98, 95% CI 1.5-10.6, p = 0.006), higher post-FT IPSS (OR 1.18, 95% CI 1.01-1.37, p = 0.03), and newly diagnosed impotence (OR 6.67, 95% CI 1.57-27, p = 0.03) were independent predictors of treatment regret. The type of energy treatment (HIFU/CRYO) was not a predictor of regret/satisfaction. Limitations include retrospective abstraction. Conclusions: FT for localized PCa is well accepted by the patients, with a low regret rate. Higher PSA at nadir, presence of cancer on follow-up biopsy, bothersome postoperative urinary symptoms, and impotence after FT were independent predictors of treatment decision regret. Patient summary: In this report, we looked at the factors affecting satisfaction and regret in patients with prostate cancer undergoing focal therapy. We found that focal therapy is well accepted by the patients, while presence of cancer on follow-up biopsy as well as bothersome urinary symptoms and sexual dysfunction can predict treatment decision regret.

5.
Cancers (Basel) ; 13(6)2021 Mar 22.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33810065

RESUMEN

In this review, we evaluated literature regarding different modalities for multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and mpMRI-targeted biopsy (TB) for the detection of prostate cancer (PCa). We identified studies evaluating systematic biopsy (SB) and TB in the same patient, thereby allowing each patient to serve as their own control. Although the evidence supports the accuracy of TB, there is still a proportion of clinically significant PCa (csPCa) that is detected only in SB, indicating the importance of maintaining SB in the diagnostic pathway, albeit with additional cost and morbidity. There is a growing subset of data which supports the role of TB alone, which may allow for increased efficiency and decreased complications. We also compared the literature on transrectal (TR) vs. transperineal (TP) TB. Although further high-level evidence is necessary, current evidence supports similar csPCa detection rate for both approaches. We also evaluated various TB techniques such as cognitive fusion biopsy (COG-TB) and in-bore biopsy (IB-TB). COG-TB has comparable detection rates to software fusion, but is operator-dependent and may have reduced accuracy for smaller lesions. IB-TB may allow for greater precision as lesions are directly targeted; however, this is costly and time-consuming, and does not account for MRI-invisible lesions.

7.
J Urol ; 206(2): 289-297, 2021 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33818141

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: We evaluated the prostate cancer and clinically significant prostate cancer detection on systematic biopsy (SB), target biopsy (TB) alone and combined SB and TB in men with Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System™ (PI-RADS™) 5 lesion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From a prospectively maintained prostate biopsy database, we identified consecutive patients with PI-RADS 5 lesion on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging. The patients underwent multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging followed by transrectal TB of PI-RADS 5 lesion and 12-core SB. The prostate cancer and clinically significant prostate cancer (Grade Group, GG ≥2) detection on SB, TB and SB+TB were determined for all men and accordingly to prostate specific antigen density. Statistic significant was set a p <0.05. RESULTS: Overall, 112 patients met inclusion criteria. The detection rate of prostate cancer for SB, TB and SB+TB was 89%, 93% and 95%, respectively, and for clinically significant prostate cancer it was 72%, 81% and 85%, respectively. SB added 2% prostate cancer and 4% clinically significant prostate cancer detection to TB. A total of 78 patients had prostate specific antigen density >0.15 ng/ml2, and the detection rate of PCa for SB, TB and SB+TB was 92%, 97% and 97%, respectively, and for clinically significant prostate cancer it was 79%, 91% and 95%, respectively. In this population, if SB was omitted, 0 prostate cancer and only 4% (3) of clinically significant prostate cancer would be missed. The clinically significant prostate cancer detection rate improved with increased prostate specific antigen density for SB (p=0.01), TB (p <0.0001) and combined SB+TB (p=0.002). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with PI-RADS 5 on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and prostate specific antigen density >0.15 ng/ml2, SB marginally increases clinically significant prostate cancer detection, but not overall prostate cancer detection in comparison to TB alone. Systematic biopsy did not affect patients' management and can be omitted on this population.


Asunto(s)
Biopsia Guiada por Imagen , Imágenes de Resonancia Magnética Multiparamétrica , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangre , Próstata/patología , Neoplasias de la Próstata , Anciano , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico , Procedimientos Innecesarios
8.
Curr Urol Rep ; 22(4): 27, 2021 Mar 22.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33748877

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The goal of this study is to review recent findings and evaluate the utility of MRI transrectal ultrasound fusion biopsy (FBx) techniques and discuss future directions. RECENT FINDINGS: FBx detects significantly higher rates of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) than ultrasound-guided systematic prostate biopsy (SBx), particularly in repeat biopsy settings. FBx has also been shown to detect significantly lower rates of clinically insignificant prostate cancer. In addition, a dedicated prostate MRI can assist in more accurately predicting the Gleason score and provide further information regarding the index cancer location, prostate volume, and clinical stage. The ability to accurately evaluate specific lesions is vital to both focal therapy and active surveillance, for treatment selection, planning, and adequate follow-up. FBx has been demonstrated in multiple high-quality studies to have improved performance in diagnosis of csPCa compared to SBx. The combination of FBx with novel technologies including radiomics, prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA PET), and high-resolution micro-ultrasound may have the potential to further enhance this performance.


Asunto(s)
Biopsia Guiada por Imagen/métodos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética Intervencional , Masculino , Imagen Multimodal , Clasificación del Tumor , Ultrasonografía Intervencional
9.
Curr Opin Urol ; 30(6): 754-781, 2020 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32941257

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To systematically review the current literature to assess the role of radiomics in the detection and evaluation of prostate cancer (PCa). RECENT FINDINGS: Radiomics involves the high-throughput extraction of radiologic features from clinical imaging, using a panel of sophisticated data-characterization algorithms to make an objective and quantitative determination of diagnoses and clinical characteristics. Radiomics evaluation of existing clinical images would increase their clinical value in many cancer management pathways, including PCa. However, a consensus on the implementation of radiomics has not been established across different sites, delaying its implementation in clinical practice. There are many potential advantages to radiomics. The ability to extract features from existing clinical imaging is one such advantage. A second is the empiric nature of the analysis. The third lies in the application of new technologies, such as machine learning, to be able to evaluate large quantities of data to make clinical conclusions. In this systematic review, we identify publications regarding the role of radiomics in PCa detection and evaluation. Many of these studies noted that radiomics, when incorporated into predictive models, had an advantageous impact on detection of PCa, clinically significant PCa, and extracapsular extension. This may assist in individualized decision making not only for diagnosis of PCa, but also for surveillance and surgical planning. With additional validation in large sample sizes, and randomized, multicenter studies using a consensus driven methodology, radiomics has the potential to alter the landscape of PCa detection and management, necessitating further prospective randomized investigation. SUMMARY: Radiomics is a promising new field, allowing for high-throughput analysis of imaging features for PCa detection and evaluation. These features can be extracted from existing data; therefore, the potential for future study is immense.


Asunto(s)
Genómica de Imágenes , Imágenes de Resonancia Magnética Multiparamétrica , Neoplasias de la Próstata , Algoritmos , Humanos , Aprendizaje Automático , Masculino , Imágenes de Resonancia Magnética Multiparamétrica/métodos , Invasividad Neoplásica/diagnóstico por imagen , Nomogramas , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de la Próstata/genética
11.
Int Urol Nephrol ; 52(4): 633-638, 2020 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31807974

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Currently, there is a dearth of data concerning the impact of hypogonadism on prostate cancer detection by imaging. In this study, we evaluated the performance of multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) and mpMRI-TRUS fusion biopsy in hypogonadal patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Clinical and pathologic data from a prospectively maintained, single-institution database of patients who underwent 3T mpMRI and fusion biopsy between 2007 and 2016 were analyzed. Hypogonadism was defined by an institutional cutoff of serum testosterone ≤ 180 ng/dL; T2, DWI, and DCE scores were calculated from mpMRI. Cancer detection rates were compared by Chi-square tests. Multivariate logistic regression was undertaken to evaluate the impact of hypogonadism on clinically significant cancer detection by systematic and fusion biopsy. RESULTS: We included 522 patients in our study who had total testosterone levels measured within 90 days of mpMRI. Of these, 49 (9.4%) were hypogonadal. Median total testosterone was 148 ng/dL (IQR 41) in the hypogonadal group, and 304 ng/dL (IQR 132) in the normogonadal group (p < 0.001). Imaging results were comparable between the hypo and normogonadal groups. In the hypogonadal group, systematic biopsy detected clinically significant cancer in 28.6% of patients compared to 40.8% with fusion biopsy. In the normogonadal cohort, systematic and fusion biopsy detected 37.3% and 43.2% CS cancer, respectively. In the hypogonadal cohort, fusion biopsy detected 12.2% more CS cancers compared to systematic biopsy, while it detected only 5.9% more in the normogonadal cohort. On multivariate analysis, hypogonadism was found to be an independent predictor of decreased CS cancer detection on systematic (p = 0.048), but not on fusion biopsy (p = 0.170). CONCLUSIONS: Hypogonadism is an independent predictor of lower CS cancer detection on systematic biopsy. However, it fails to significantly impact CS detection on fusion biopsy with comparable cancer detection rates in both groups. Patients with hypogonadism may benefit more from fusion biopsy than normogonadal patients.


Asunto(s)
Biopsia por Aspiración con Aguja Fina Guiada por Ultrasonido Endoscópico/métodos , Hipogonadismo/diagnóstico por imagen , Imágenes de Resonancia Magnética Multiparamétrica , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico , Testosterona/sangre , Anciano , Humanos , Hipogonadismo/sangre , Hipogonadismo/complicaciones , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen , Próstata/patología , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangre , Neoplasias de la Próstata/sangre , Neoplasias de la Próstata/complicaciones , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen
12.
Int Urol Nephrol ; 51(8): 1349-1355, 2019 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31098818

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Index tumor volume (ITV) measured on radical prostatectomy (RP) specimens has been shown to be associated with adverse pathologic and oncologic outcomes. We evaluate the value of ITV calculated from prostate multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) in predicting adverse clinical and pathologic outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from a prospectively maintained, single-institution database were analyzed for patients who underwent mpMRI prior to RP (2007-2016). Index tumor was defined as a T2-visible lesion with the longest diameter. Adverse pathologic outcomes were extraprostatic extension (EPE), lymph node invasion (LNI), seminal vesicle invasion (SVI), and positive margins (PM). Logistic and Cox proportional hazard regression were used to assess associations with adverse pathology and biochemical recurrence (BCR), respectively. RESULTS: Of the 455 patients included, EPE, LNI, SVI and PM were present in 23.5%, 6.2%, 5.5% and 15.7% patients, respectively. Patients with adverse pathologic outcomes had larger median ITV. ITV was found to be an independent predictor of EPE (OR 1.22, p = 0.010), LNI (OR 1.39, p = 0.001), and SVI (OR 1.28, p = 0.009), but not PM (OR 1.03, p = 0.522). Combination of ITV and PSA was found to have predictive ability comparable to that of modified Partin tables (EPE:ITV + PSAAUC = 0.71 vs. PartinAUC = 0.71; LNI:ITV + PSAAUC = 0.92 vs. PartinAUC = 0.90, SVI:ITV + PSAAUC = 0.78 vs. PartinAUC = 0.82). 5 year BCR-free survival (median follow-up 24.9 months) was higher for patients with ITV < 2 cc (84.1% vs. 58.5%, p = 0.001). However, ITV was not found to be an independent predictor of BCR (HR 1.69, p = 0.130). CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate that ITV measured on mpMRI is a predictor of adverse pathologic and clinical outcomes and can aid in preoperative risk assessment.


Asunto(s)
Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Prostatectomía , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Carga Tumoral , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias de la Próstata/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
13.
Urol Oncol ; 37(3): 182.e1-182.e8, 2019 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30522903

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Focal therapy (FT) for localized prostate cancer (CaP) has been shown to have encouraging short-term oncological outcomes, excellent preservation of functional outcomes and is increasing in popularity in urologic community. We aim to evaluate the preferences and practice trends among urologists regarding this treatment strategy. METHODS: A 20 item online questionnaire was designed to collect information on urologists' views and use of FT. The survey was sent to the members of the Endourological Society and the American Urological Association. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was done to determine predictors for utilization of FT. RESULTS: A total of 425 responses were received [American Urological Association: 319, Endourological Society: 106]. Mean age of respondents was 53(SD: 11.3) years. Although half of the respondents (50.8%) believed FT to be moderate to extremely beneficial in the treatment of CaP, only 24.2% (103) of the respondents currently utilize FT in their practice. Respondents who were fellowship trained in urologic oncology were more likely to consider FT to be at least moderately beneficial (P < 0.001). Surgeon's experience (greater than 15 years in urology practice) (P = 0.025) and seeing more than 10 patients with new CaP diagnosis per month (P = 0.002) were independent predictors of FT utilization for localized CaP. While the most common setting for utilization of FT was in patients with unilateral intermediate-risk (72.8%) CaP, a small percentage of respondents also used FT for patients with unilateral high-risk CaP and bilateral intermediate risk (21.4% and 10.7%, respectively). Most common reasons for not using FT were the lack of belief in 'index lesion theory' (63.2%), lack of experience (41.3%), lack of belief in FT's efficacy (41.1%), lack of infrastructure (35.8%), difficult salvage treatment in cases of recurrence (22.7%) and high cost (21.8%). About 57.6% would use FT more often in an office or outpatient setting if they had access to reliable and cost-effective options. CONCLUSIONS: Only a quarter of our respondents utilize FT in their practice with surgeon's experience being the important independent predictor for using FT. Majority of respondents though consider FT to be beneficial in CaP management, would use it more often if provided more reliable and cost-effective options. Over time, experience and accessibility to reliable methods to perform FT may lead to further utilization of this novel treatment strategy.


Asunto(s)
Técnicas de Ablación/estadística & datos numéricos , Tratamientos Conservadores del Órgano/estadística & datos numéricos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Próstata/cirugía , Neoplasias de la Próstata/cirugía , Técnicas de Ablación/métodos , Técnicas de Ablación/tendencias , Adulto , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tratamientos Conservadores del Órgano/métodos , Tratamientos Conservadores del Órgano/tendencias , Selección de Paciente , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/tendencias , Encuestas y Cuestionarios/estadística & datos numéricos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos , Urólogos/estadística & datos numéricos , Urólogos/tendencias , Urología/tendencias
14.
J Magn Reson Imaging ; 48(5): 1326-1335, 2018 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29603833

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System v. 2 (PI-RADSv2) provides standardized nomenclature for interpretation of prostate multiparametric MRI (mpMRI). Inclusion of additional features for categorization may provide benefit to stratification of disease. PURPOSE: To prospectively compare PI-RADSv2 to a qualitative in-house system for detecting prostate cancer on mpMRI. STUDY TYPE: Prospective. POPULATION: In all, 338 patients who underwent mpMRI May 2015-May 2016, with subsequent MRI/transrectal ultrasound fusion-guided biopsy. FIELD STRENGTH: 3T mpMRI (T2 W, diffusion-weighted [DW], apparent diffusion coefficient [ADC] map, b-2000 DWI acquisition, and dynamic contrast-enhanced [DCE] MRI). ASSESSMENT: One genitourinary radiologist prospectively read mpMRIs using both in-house and PI-RADSv2 5-category systems. STATISTICAL TEST: In lesion-based analysis, overall and clinically significant (CS) tumor detection rates (TDR) were calculated for all PI-RADSv2 and in-house categories. The ability of each scoring system to detect cancer was assessed by area under receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC). Within each PI-RADSv2 category, lesions were further stratified by their in-house categories to determine if TDRs can be increased by combining features of both systems. RESULTS: In 338 patients (median prostate-specific antigen [PSA] 6.5 [0.6-113.6] ng/mL; age 64 [44-84] years), 733 lesions were identified (47% tumor-positive). Predictive abilities of both systems were comparable for all (AUC 76-78%) and CS cancers (AUCs 79%). The in-house system had higher overall and CS TDRs than PI-RADSv2 for categories 3 and 4 (P < 0.01 for both), with the greatest difference between the scoring systems seen in lesions scored category 4 (CS TDRs: in-house 65%, PI-RADSv2 22.1%). For lesions categorized as PI-RADSv2 = 4, characterization of suspicious/indeterminate extraprostatic extension (EPE) and equivocal findings across all mpMRI sequences contributed to significantly different TDRs for both systems (TDR range 19-75%, P < 0.05). DATA CONCLUSION: PI-RADSv2 behaves similarly to an existing validated system that relies on the number of sequences on which a lesion is seen. This prospective evaluation suggests that sequence positivity and suspicion of EPE can enhance PI-RADSv2 category 4 cancer detection. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 1 Technical Efficacy: Stage 3 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2018;47:1326-1335.


Asunto(s)
Diagnóstico por Computador/métodos , Imagen de Difusión por Resonancia Magnética , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen , Ultrasonografía , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Área Bajo la Curva , Biopsia , Medios de Contraste , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/métodos , Humanos , Biopsia Guiada por Imagen , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen , Antígeno Prostático Específico
15.
J Urol ; 199(4): 976-982, 2018 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29154904

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: We sought to determine whether saturation of the index lesion during magnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasound fusion guided biopsy would decrease the rate of pathological upgrading from biopsy to radical prostatectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed a prospectively maintained, single institution database for patients who underwent fusion and systematic biopsy followed by radical prostatectomy in 2010 to 2016. Index lesion was defined as the lesion with largest diameter on T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. In patients with a saturated index lesion transrectal fusion biopsy targets were obtained at 6 mm intervals along the long axis of the index lesion. In patients with a nonsaturated index lesion only 1 target was obtained from the lesion. Gleason 6, 7 and 8-10 were defined as low, intermediate and high risk, respectively. RESULTS: Included in the study were 208 consecutive patients, including 86 with a saturated and 122 with a nonsaturated lesion. Median patient age was 62.0 years (IQR 10.0) and median prostate specific antigen was 7.1 ng/ml (IQR 8.0). The median number of biopsy cores per index lesion was higher in the saturated lesion group (4 vs 2, p <0.001). The risk category upgrade rate from systematic only, fusion only, and combined fusion and systematic biopsy results to prostatectomy was 40.9%, 23.6% and 13.8%, respectively. The risk category upgrade from combined fusion and systematic biopsy results was lower in the saturated than in the nonsaturated lesion group (7% vs 18%, p = 0.021). There was no difference in the upgrade rate based on systematic biopsy between the 2 groups. However, fusion biopsy results were significantly less upgraded in the saturated lesion group (Gleason upgrade 20.9% vs 36.9%, p = 0.014 and risk category upgrade 14% vs 30.3%, p = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that saturation of the index lesion significantly decreases the risk of upgrading on radical prostatectomy by minimizing the impact of tumor heterogeneity.


Asunto(s)
Imagen por Resonancia Magnética Intervencional/métodos , Próstata/patología , Prostatectomía , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/métodos , Anciano , Biopsia con Aguja Gruesa/métodos , Humanos , Biopsia Guiada por Imagen/métodos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Clasificación del Tumor , Estudios Prospectivos , Próstata/cirugía , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangre , Neoplasias de la Próstata/sangre , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de la Próstata/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos
16.
Can J Urol ; 24(4): 8876-8882, 2017 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28832304

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Although prostate cancer is the most common non-cutaneous cancer in men, it is traditionally diagnosed with a non-targeted, systematic transrectal ultrasound prostate biopsy (TRUS-Bx). This technique has been demonstrated to both under-detect clinically significant (CS) cancer and over-detect clinically insignificant cancer, and performs poorly in patients with a prior negative biopsy. With recent advances in MRI technology, most prominently the advent of multiparametric MRI, MRI-targeted prostate biopsy (MRI-TB) has been gaining favor as a more accurate alternative to TRUS-Bx. In this review, we attempt to summarize the current literature on MRI-TB and to determine if there is evidence supporting the use of MRI-TB alone. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The literature was reviewed for articles pertaining to MRI-TB and its performance compared to systematic biopsy. RESULTS: Most studies support the increased sensitivity of MRI-TB (0.90, 95% CI 0.85-0.94) compared to TRUS-Bx (0.79, 95% CI 0.68-0.87) for the detection of CS prostate cancer, as MRI-TB can detect up to 30% more high risk and 17% fewer low risk cancers. MRI-TB also tends to perform better than TRUS-Bx in patients with prior negative biopsy, as TRUS-Bx may miss up to half of CS cancers detected by MRI-TB, and in those with lesions at atypical locations. However, as the technology for imaging and image-guided biopsies continues to develop, there is still a role for TRUS-Bx in the management of patients with prostate cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis of the literature suggests that although MRI-TB is superior to TRUS-Bx, there is still a role for traditional systematic biopsy.


Asunto(s)
Biopsia Guiada por Imagen/estadística & datos numéricos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Próstata/patología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Humanos , Masculino , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto
17.
Am Surg ; 82(2): 95-101, 2016 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26874129

RESUMEN

The ability to return to work (RTW) postinjury is one of the primary goals of rehabilitation. The modified Rankin Scale (mRS) is a validated simple scale used to assess the functional status of stroke patients during rehabilitation. We sought to determine the applicability of mRS in predicting RTW postinjury in a general trauma population. The trauma registry was queried for patients, aged 18 to 65 years, discharged from 2012 to 2013. A telephone interview for each patient included questions about employment status and physical ability to determine the mRS. Patients who had RTW postinjury were compared with those who had not (nRTW). Two hundred and thirty-four patients met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 171 (72.5%) patients RTW and 63 (26.7%) did nRTW. Patients who did nRTW were significantly older, had longer length of stay and higher rates of in-hospital complications. Multivariate analysis revealed that older patients were less likely to RTW (odds ratio = 0.961, P = 0.011) and patients with a modified Rankin score ≤2 were 15 times more likely to RTW (odds ratio = 14.932, P < 0.001). In conclusion, an mRS ≤2 was independently associated with a high likelihood of returning to work postinjury. This is the first study that shows applicability of the mRS for predicting RTW postinjury in a trauma population.


Asunto(s)
Reinserción al Trabajo , Evaluación de Capacidad de Trabajo , Heridas y Lesiones/rehabilitación , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Oportunidad Relativa , Sistema de Registros , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto Joven
18.
Vascular ; 24(1): 3-8, 2016 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25617316

RESUMEN

Open surgical repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms remains associated with significant morbidity and mortality. We sought to analyse multicentre national data on early outcomes of open surgical thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Patients who underwent open repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm from 2005 to 2010 were identified from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. The primary endpoint was mortality at 30 days. Patient demographics, clinical variables, and intraoperative parameters were analysed by univariate and multivariate logistic regression methods to identify risk factors for mortality. Of the 682 elective repairs, 30-day outcomes of elective repairs were: 10.0% mortality, 21.6% surgical complications, 42.2% pulmonary complications, 17.2% renal complications, 12.9% cardiovascular complications, 19.2% septic complications, and 6.6% wound complications. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that age, ASA-class IV, dependent functional status prior to surgery, and operation time are independent risk factors for mortality. Our study found a higher rate of mortality nationwide, as compared to several previous single center studies.


Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Torácica/cirugía , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Aneurisma de la Aorta Torácica/diagnóstico , Aneurisma de la Aorta Torácica/mortalidad , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/mortalidad , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Bases de Datos Factuales , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Oportunidad Relativa , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/mortalidad , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos
19.
ANZ J Surg ; 86(1-2): 21-6, 2016.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26178013

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Emergency department thoracotomy (EDT) is a formidable and dramatic last attempt by the trauma surgeon to save the life of a patient in extremis. The aim of this report is to provide a benchmark for comparison with past results by reviewing all available published data since the American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma review article in 2001, which reviewed literature from 1966 to 1999 regarding indications for and outcomes of EDT. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search in MEDLINE Library databases was performed for EDT. Data were extracted by three independent reviewers. RESULTS: We identified 37 papers with a total of 3466 patients. A total of 85.2% (1720 of the 2018) had penetrating trauma, 58.3% (372 of the 638) had cardiac injuries, 43.0% (251 of the 584) had thoracic injuries and 26.2% (143 of the 546) had abdominal injuries. The overall rate survival in this review was 8% (267 of the 3466, range 0-33.3%). Of 25 papers reporting cases of EDT for penetrating traumas, their survival rate was 9.8% (169 of the 1719, range 0-45.5); similarly, of 14 papers assessing EDT for blunt injuries, the survival rate was 5.2% (24 of the 460, range 0-12.2). Of 15 papers reporting neurological outcomes 84.6% (143 of the 169, range 50-100%) of patients returned to baseline. The survival outcome of EDT in US experience versus non-US experiences was 6.3% (164 of the 2612, range 0-14.9) versus 11.9% (89 of the 745, range 0-33.3) respectively. CONCLUSION: The authors intend this review to serve as a practical and prompt literature search tool for all surgeons who encounter resuscitative thoracotomy in their practice.


Asunto(s)
Toma de Decisiones Clínicas/métodos , Medicina de Emergencia/métodos , Toracotomía/métodos , Traumatismos Abdominales/cirugía , Adulto , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Evaluación del Resultado de la Atención al Paciente , Heridas no Penetrantes/cirugía , Heridas Penetrantes/cirugía
20.
Am J Surg ; 210(5): 852-8.e1, 2015 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26120026

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Toxic colitis (TC) is a potentially lethal complication of inflammatory bowel disease and infectious colitis. METHODS: The National Surgical Quality Improvement Project dataset was queried to identify emergent colectomy for a primary diagnosis of TC using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes. The study endpoints were 30-day mortality and 30-day morbidity. We performed multivariate logistic regression analyses to study factors associated with 30-day mortality. RESULTS: Of the 189 TC patients, mortality for colectomy was 26.5%, 42.3% experienced pulmonary complications, 20.6% experienced sepsis complications, 17.5% experienced cardiovascular complications, 12.7% experienced renal complications, and 14.8% experienced wound complications. On multivariate analysis, independent factors associated with mortality were age 70 to 80 years (odds ratio [OR] 3.5), age greater than 80 (OR 22.2), female sex (OR 4.1), uremia blood urea nitrogen greater than 40 (OR 4.1), coagulopathy international normalized ratio greater than 2 (OR 7.7), preoperative respiratory failure (OR 2.73), and preoperative steroid use (OR 3.9). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with TC are very ill. Poor outcome is associated with older age, female sex, preoperative azotemia, preoperative respiratory failure, and chronic steroid use. These factors will help acute care surgeons in preoperative risk assessment and could be an important addition to decision-making strategies.


Asunto(s)
Colectomía , Colitis/mortalidad , Colitis/cirugía , Sepsis/mortalidad , Sepsis/cirugía , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Azotemia/mortalidad , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Glucocorticoides/efectos adversos , Humanos , Relación Normalizada Internacional , Leucocitosis/mortalidad , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Insuficiencia Respiratoria/mortalidad , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA