Immunogenicity and safety of a live attenuated varicella vaccine co-administered with inactive hepatitis A vaccine: A phase 4, single-center, randomized, controlled trial.

Co-administration of vaccines can facilitate the introduction of new vaccines in immunization schedules. This study aimed to evaluate the immunogenicity and safety of co-administration with live attenuated varicella vaccine (VarV) and inactivated hepatitis A vaccine (HepA) among children aged 12 ~ 15 months. In this phase 4 clinical trial, 450 children were randomized with a ratio of 1:1 to receive VarV and Hep A simultaneously (Group A) or separately (Group B). The primary endpoints were the seroconversion rate of anti-varicella-zoster virus (VZV) antibodies 42 days after vaccination of VarV and the seroconversion rate of anti-Hepatitis A virus (HAV) antibodies 30 days after two-dose vaccination of HepA. After full immunization, the seroconversion rates of anti-VZV antibodies were 91.79% in Group A and 92.15% in Group B; the geometric mean titers (GMTs) were 11.80 and 12.19, respectively. The seroconversion rates of anti-HAV antibodies were 99.48% in Group A and 100.0% in Group B; the geometric mean concentrations (GMCs) reached 9499.11 and 9528.36 mIU/ml, respectively. The lower limits of the 95% CI for the seroconversion difference of anti-VZV antibodies and anti-HAV antibodies were -5.86% and -2.90%, which greater than the predefined non-inferiority margin (-10%). The incidence rate of adverse reactions in Group A was lower than Group B (9.33% vs 16.22%), and only one serious adverse event was reported in Group B, which was unrelated to the study vaccine. In conclusion, the co-administration of VarV with HepA has non-inferior immunogenicity and safety profiles were quite comparable with the separate administration of both vaccines.Trial registration number: NCT05526820 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Prevalence of doravirine cross-resistance in HIV-infected adults who failed first-line ART in China, 2014-18.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the prevalence and characteristics of doravirine resistance and cross-resistance in patients who failed first-line ART in China. METHODS: From 2014 to 2108, 4132 patients from five provinces were tested for drug resistance by genotypic resistance testing. Drug resistance mutations were assessed using the Stanford HIVdb algorithm Version 9.0. Sequences classified as having low-level, intermediate and high-level resistance were defined as having drug resistance. RESULTS: Overall, the prevalence of doravirine and other NNRTIs cross-resistance was 69.5%, with intermediate and high-level resistance accounting for 56.4%. Doravirine resistance highly correlated with efavirenz (r = 0.720) and nevirapine (r = 0.721) resistance and moderately correlated with etravirine (r = 0.637) and rilpivirine (r = 0.692) resistance. The most frequent doravirine-associated resistance mutations were V106M (8.7%), K101E (6.8%) and P225H (5.1%). High-level resistance was mainly due to Y188L (3.2%) and M230L (2.7%). There were significant differences between genotypes and provinces. Compared with CRF01_AE, CRF07_BC (OR = 0.595, 95% CI = 0.546-0.648) and CRF08_BC (OR = 0.467, 95% CI = 0.407-0.536) were associated with lower risks of doravirine resistance. Conversely, genotype A (OR = 3.003, 95% CI = 1.806-4.991) and genotype B (OR = 1.250, 95% CI = 1.021-1.531) were associated with higher risks of doravirine resistance. The risk of doravirine resistance was significantly lower in Xinjiang compared with other provinces. CONCLUSIONS: In China, the prevalence of doravirine cross-resistance among patients who have failed first-line ART is high. Therefore, doravirine should not be used blindly without genotypic resistance testing and is not recommended for people who have failed first-line NNRTI-based ART.