Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros




Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Pediatr Blood Cancer ; 69(5): e29283, 2022 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34931750

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Acute chest syndrome (ACS) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in sickle cell patients, and it is often challenging to establish its diagnosis. PROCEDURE: This was a prospective observational study conducted in a pediatric emergency (PEM) department. We aimed to investigate the performance characteristics of point-of-care lung ultrasound (LUS) for diagnosing ACS in sickle cell children. LUS by trained PEM physicians was performed and interpreted as either positive or negative for consolidation. LUS results were compared to chest X-ray (CXR) and discharge diagnosis as reference standards. RESULTS: Four PEM physicians performed the LUS studies in 79 suspected ACS cases. The median age was 8 years (range 1-17 years). Fourteen cases (18%) received a diagnosis of ACS based on CXR and 21 (26.5%) had ACS discharge diagnosis. Comparing to CXR interpretation as the reference standard, LUS had a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI: 77%-100%), specificity of 68% (95% CI: 56%-79%), positive predictive value of 40% (95% CI: 24%-56%), and negative predictive value of 100% (95% CI: 92%-100%). Overall LUS accuracy was 73.42% (95% CI: 62%-83%). Using discharge diagnosis as the endpoint for both CXR and LUS, LUS had significantly higher sensitivity (100% vs. 62%, p = .0047) and lower specificity (76% vs.100%, p = .0002). LUS also had lower positive (60% vs.100%, p < .0001) and higher negative (100% vs.77%, p = .0025) predictive values. The overall accuracy was similar for both tests (82% vs. 88%, p = .2593). CONCLUSION: The high negative predictive value, with narrow CIs, makes LUS an excellent ruling-out tool for ACS.


Asunto(s)
Síndrome Torácico Agudo , Neumonía , Síndrome Torácico Agudo/diagnóstico por imagen , Síndrome Torácico Agudo/etiología , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Humanos , Lactante , Pulmón/diagnóstico por imagen , Neumonía/diagnóstico , Sistemas de Atención de Punto , Estudios Prospectivos , Radiografía Torácica/métodos , Ultrasonografía/métodos , Rayos X
2.
Crit Care Med ; 43(5): 947-53, 2015 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25654173

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: In 2012, a new acute respiratory distress syndrome definition was proposed for adult patients. It was later validated for infants and toddlers. Our objective was to evaluate the prevalence, outcomes, and risk factors associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome in children up to 15 years according to the Berlin definition. DESIGN: A prospective, multicenter observational study from March to September 2013. SETTING: Seventy-seven PICU beds in eight centers: two private hospitals and six public academic hospitals in Brazil. PATIENTS: All children aged 1 month to 15 years admitted to the participating PICUs in the study period. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: All children admitted to the PICUs were daily evaluated for the presence of acute respiratory distress syndrome according to the American-European Consensus Conference and Berlin definitions. Of the 562 patients included, acute respiratory distress syndrome developed in 57 patients (10%) and 58 patients (10.3%) according to the Berlin definition and the American-European Consensus Conference definition, respectively. Among patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome according to the Berlin definition, nine patients (16%) were mild, 21 (37%) were moderate, and 27 (47%) were severe. Compared with patients without acute respiratory distress syndrome, patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome had significantly higher severity scores, longer PICU and hospital length of stay, longer duration of mechanical ventilation, and higher mortality (p < 0.001). The presence of two or more comorbidities and admission for medical reasons were associated with development of acute respiratory distress syndrome. Comparisons across the three the Berlin categories showed significant differences in the number of ventilator-free days (21, 20, and 5 d, p = 0.001) and mortality for severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (41%) in comparison with mild (0) and moderate (15%) acute respiratory distress syndrome(p = 0.02). No differences in PICU or hospital stay were observed across the groups. CONCLUSIONS: The Berlin definition can identify a subgroup of patients with distinctly worse outcomes, as shown by the increased mortality and reduced number of ventilator-free days in pediatric patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome.


Asunto(s)
Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Pediátrico/estadística & datos numéricos , Respiración Artificial/estadística & datos numéricos , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/epidemiología , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/terapia , Adolescente , Brasil/epidemiología , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Respiración Artificial/mortalidad , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/mortalidad , Factores de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA