RESUMEN
Educating and training a multisectoral food systems workforce is a critical part of developing sustainable, resilient, and healthy food and water systems. This paper shares perspectives from a working group of educators, learners, and food systems subject matter experts that collaborated over the course of a year to develop, pilot test, and evaluate two interactive webinar series with a multi-site cohort of dietetics interns and graduate students. The three-part webinar series format included a training webinar, a practice activity, and a synthesis webinar. In reflecting on the effectiveness of this format, we provide direct assessments of student learning from subject matter experts alongside indirect assessments from pre- and post-surveys fielded with learners. Learners who participated in an interactive webinar series demonstrated skills in several dimensions of systems thinking and gained confidence in food systems learning outcomes. Learners also shared valuable feedback on the opportunities and challenges of using online platforms for this experience. As online learning opportunities become more common, it will become increasingly important for educators to prioritize strategies that effectively equip students with the higher-order thinking skills, such as systems thinking, needed to address the complexities of sustainable food systems. The interactive webinar series format described here provides an opportunity to leverage didactic webinars in combination with interactive experiences that enable learners to deepen their knowledge through practice with peers and subject matter experts. Though this format was piloted within dietetics education programs, many of the lessons learned are transferable to other food systems educational contexts.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The US faces remarkable food and nutrition challenges. A new federal effort to strengthen and coordinate nutrition research could rapidly generate the evidence base needed to address these multiple national challenges. However, the relevant characteristics of such an effort have been uncertain. OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to provide an objective, informative summary of 1) the mounting diet-related health burdens facing our nation and corresponding economic, health equity, national security, and sustainability implications; 2) the current federal nutrition research landscape and existing mechanisms for its coordination; 3) the opportunities for and potential impact of new fundamental, clinical, public health, food and agricultural, and translational scientific discoveries; and 4) the various options for further strengthening and coordinating federal nutrition research, including corresponding advantages, disadvantages, and potential executive and legislative considerations. METHODS: We reviewed government and other published documents on federal nutrition research; held various discussions with expert groups, advocacy organizations, and scientific societies; and held in-person or phone meetings with >50 federal staff in executive and legislative roles, as well as with a variety of other stakeholders in academic, industry, and nongovernment organizations. RESULTS: Stark national nutrition challenges were identified. More Americans are sick than are healthy, largely from rising diet-related illnesses. These conditions create tremendous strains on productivity, health care costs, health disparities, government budgets, US economic competitiveness, and military readiness. The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak has further laid bare these strains, including food insecurity, major diet-related comorbidities for poor outcomes from COVID-19 such as diabetes, hypertension, and obesity, and insufficient surveillance on and coordination of our food system. More than 10 federal departments and agencies currently invest in critical nutrition research, yet with relatively flat investments over several decades. Coordination also remains suboptimal, documented by multiple governmental reports over 50 years. Greater harmonization and expansion of federal investment in nutrition science, not a silo-ing or rearrangement of existing investments, has tremendous potential to generate new discoveries to improve and sustain the health of all Americans. Two identified key strategies to achieve this were as follows: 1) a new authority for robust cross-governmental coordination of nutrition research and other nutrition-related policy and 2) strengthened authority, investment, and coordination for nutrition research within the NIH. These strategies were found to be complementary, together catalyzing important new science, partnerships, coordination, and returns on investment. Additional complementary actions to accelerate federal nutrition research were identified at the USDA. CONCLUSIONS: The need and opportunities for strengthened federal nutrition research are clear, with specific identified options to help create the new leadership, strategic planning, coordination, and investment the nation requires to address the multiple nutrition-related challenges and grasp the opportunities before us.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Coronavirus/complicaciones , Trastornos Nutricionales/complicaciones , Fenómenos Fisiológicos de la Nutrición , Neumonía Viral/complicaciones , Investigación/normas , COVID-19 , Costo de Enfermedad , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/economía , Humanos , Personal Militar , National Institutes of Health (U.S.)/economía , Trastornos Nutricionales/economía , Trastornos Nutricionales/epidemiología , Pandemias , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , United States Department of Agriculture/economía , United States Dept. of Health and Human Services/economíaAsunto(s)
Educación en Salud/métodos , Educación en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Política Nutricional , Encuestas Nutricionales , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Dieta Saludable , Femenino , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Promoción de la Salud/métodos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nutricionistas , Estados Unidos , United States Department of Agriculture , United States Dept. of Health and Human ServicesAsunto(s)
Dieta Saludable , Dietética/métodos , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Promoción de la Salud/métodos , Política Nutricional/historia , Ciencias de la Nutrición/métodos , United States Department of Agriculture/historia , Enfermedad Crónica/prevención & control , Dieta Saludable/tendencias , Dietética/tendencias , Promoción de la Salud/tendencias , Historia del Siglo XIX , Historia del Siglo XX , Historia del Siglo XXI , Humanos , Política Nutricional/tendencias , Ciencias de la Nutrición/tendencias , Estados Unidos , United States Dept. of Health and Human Services/historiaAsunto(s)
Dietética , Práctica Clínica Basada en la Evidencia , Comunicación en Salud/métodos , Política Nutricional , Medicina de Precisión , Rol Profesional , United States Department of Agriculture , Dietética/métodos , Dietética/tendencias , Comunicación en Salud/tendencias , Recursos en Salud/tendencias , Humanos , Internet , Política Nutricional/tendencias , Educación del Paciente como Asunto , Estados Unidos , Recursos HumanosAsunto(s)
Abastecimiento de Alimentos , Alimentos , United States Department of Agriculture , Desayuno , Organizaciones de Beneficencia , Conservación de los Recursos Naturales , Alimentos/economía , Servicios de Alimentación , Abastecimiento de Alimentos/economía , Humanos , Almuerzo , Reciclaje , Instituciones Académicas , Estados Unidos , Residuos/economíaRESUMEN
Sustainability is the ability of a system to be maintained over the long term. Resilience is the ability of a system to withstand disturbances and continue to function in a sustainable manner. Issues of sustainability and resilience apply to all aspects of nutrition and dietetics practice, can be practiced at both the program and systems level, and are broader than any one specific practice setting or individual intervention. Given an increasing need to apply principles of sustainability and resilience to nutrition and dietetics practice, as well as growing interest among the public and by Registered Dietitian Nutritionists of health issues related to food and water systems, the Hunger and Environmental Nutrition Dietetic Practice Group, with guidance from the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics Quality Management Committee, has developed the Standards of Professional Performance as a tool for Registered Dietitian Nutritionists working in sustainable, resilient, and healthy food and water systems to assess their current skill levels and to identify areas for further professional development in this emerging practice area. This Standards of Professional Performance document covers six standards of professional performance: quality in practice, competence and accountability, provision of services, application of research, communication and application of knowledge, and utilization and management of resources. Within each standard, specific indicators provide measurable action statements that illustrate how sustainable, resilient, and healthy food and water systems principles can be applied to practice. The indicators describe three skill levels (competent, proficient, and expert) for Registered Dietitian Nutritionists working in sustainable, resilient, and healthy food and water systems.
Asunto(s)
Competencia Clínica/normas , Conservación de los Recursos Naturales , Dietética/normas , Alimentos , Nutricionistas/normas , Agua , Academias e Institutos , Agricultura , Bienestar del Animal , Animales , Biodiversidad , Diversidad Cultural , Promoción de la Salud , Humanos , Abastecimiento de AguaRESUMEN
The involvement of public health professionals in food and agricultural policy provides tremendous opportunities for advancing the public's health. It is particularly challenging, however, for professionals to understand and consider the numerous policy drivers that impact the food system, which range from agricultural commodity policies to local food safety ordinances. Confronted with this complexity in the food system, policy advocates often focus on narrow objectives with disregard for the larger system. This commentary contends that, in order to be most effective, public health professionals need to consider the full range of interdependent policies that affect the system. Food policy councils have proven to be an effective tool, particularly at the local and state level, for developing comprehensive food systems policies that can improve public health.
RESUMEN
Increased integration and collaboration of health promotion and nutrition education professionals to effectively engage consumers, debunk nutrition and health information, and mitigate the effect of chronic diseases is the vision presented for success in the future. Current and optimal roles of educators are discussed in relation to societal trends and their inherent opportunities and barriers. Recommendations for strengthening the role of health promotion in settings where nutrition educators work are provided and include the need for strong academic preparation, field-based training, and continual professional development. The overall goal of these recommendations is to enable nutrition educators and health promotion professionals to advance their professions and develop effective strategies that support the achievement of improved health for all.