Intra- and inter-rater reliability of goniometric finger range of motion using a written protocol.

Introduction: Goniometric finger range of motion (ROM) is the most common outcome measure used for functional evaluation of finger joints, but its reliability is not well-evaluated. This study aimed to investigate intra- and inter-rater reliability of goniometric finger ROM using a written protocol for active, passive, and composite movements in healthy adults. Methods: The design was a single-center, cross-sectional, reliability study. Participants were 20 healthy adults (mean ± standard deviation, 36.4 ± 10.9 years). ROM for active, passive, and composite movements of the fingers was assessed by three occupational therapists with at least 5 years clinical experience in the field of physical disabilities. To standardize the measurement method used, we developed a written protocol, stabilized the wrist position, and trained the evaluators. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) values were used for the reliability analysis. ICC (1,1) was used for intra-rater reliability. ICC (2,1) was used for inter-rater reliability. Hand-shaped heatmaps were used to summarize the reliability data. Results: Most of the results (88.7%) showed moderate to good intra-rater reliability (ICC ≥ 0.50), while inter-rater reliability showed less (69.0%). Both intra- and inter-rater reliability showed no trends between dominant and non-dominant hands, type of movement, finger, or joint. Conclusions: Intra-rater reliability was relatively high and using a written protocol was beneficial. Inter-rater reliability tended to be lower, and differences in the physical structure of both raters and participants may have affected inter-rater reliability values.

Estimating the minimal clinically important difference of upper extremity outcome measures in chronic stroke patients with moderate to severe impairment: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Approximately 70% of chronic stroke patients experience upper extremity (UE) functional impairments, and UE outcome measures are often used as quality-of-life indicators. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to estimate minimal clinically important difference (MCID) values for UE outcome measures in chronic stroke patients with moderate to severe UE hemiplegia. METHODS: This study was a cross-sectional study, conducted as a secondary analysis of data from the ReoGo-J study, a multicenter, prospective, randomized, parallel-group trial of robot-assisted self-training for UE hemiplegia in chronic stroke. The patients were randomized to 1 of 3 treatment groups. Treatment was provided 3 times a week for 10 weeks, and UE outcome measures were evaluated before and after treatment. The anchor-based method was used to estimate MCID values for UE outcome measures, with Stroke Impact Scale (SIS) subscales as anchors. MCID values were estimated by identifying cutoff values in a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. RESULTS: Between-group comparisons of UE outcome measures, based on the clinically important difference (CID) values of SIS subscales, revealed significant differences in both the Amount of Use (AOU) and Quality of Movement (QOM) components of the Motor Activity Log (MAL)-14. The estimated MCID values were 0.89 for the AOU component and 0.77 for the QOM component. CONCLUSIONS: The estimated MCID values for the MAL-14 not only add information regarding the clinical characteristics of the MAL-14 but also facilitate interpretations of changing scores in chronic stroke patients with moderate to severe UE hemiplegia undergoing rehabilitation therapy. STUDY REGISTRATION: https://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/index.htm (UMIN000022509; 1 July 2016).

The Combination of Hearing Impairment and Frailty Is Associated with Cognitive Decline among Community-Dwelling Elderly in Japan.

Hearing impairment and frailty are associated with cognitive decline in older people. This study aimed to investigate the effect of the interaction between hearing impairment and frailty on cognitive decline in community-dwelling older people. A mail survey of community-dwelling, older people (age ≥ 65 years) who lived independently was conducted. Cognitive decline was defined using the self-administered dementia checklist (≥18 out of 40 points). Hearing impairment was assessed using a validated self-rated questionnaire. Furthermore, frailty was assessed using the Kihon checklist, and robust, pre-frailty, and frailty groups were identified. Multivariate logistic regression analysis, adjusted for potential confounding factors, was performed to determine the association of the interaction between hearing impairment and frailty with cognitive decline. Data obtained from 464 participants were analyzed. Hearing impairment was independently associated with cognitive decline. Additionally, the interaction term of hearing impairment and frailty was significantly related to cognitive decline. For participants in the robust group, hearing impairment was not associated with cognitive decline. In contrast, for participants in the pre-frailty or frailty groups, hearing impairment was associated with cognitive decline. The association between hearing impairment and cognitive decline was affected by frailty status in community-dwelling, older people.

Psychometric properties of the Action Research Arm Test using decision rules for skipping items in hemiparetic patients after stroke: a retrospective study.

PURPOSE: Important properties have been studied using the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) in patients with stroke. However, whether the ARAT subtests constitute a Guttman scale (i.e., items hierarchically ordered according to difficulty) remains unclear. Guttman scales can define decision rules for skipping items in patients with low endurance. This study investigated the psychometric properties of the ARAT when applying decision rules for post-stroke hemiparetic patients. METHODS: A retrospective, single-institution study was conducted between 2020 and 2021. Datasets of 30 patients with stroke-induced hemiparesis were collected from a previous study which employed the ARAT without decision rules, Fugl-Meyer assessment (FMA), Box and Block Test (BBT), and Motor Activity Log (MAL). The ARAT was rescored with decision rules for this study, and inter-rater reliability/agreement, parallel forms reliability, and construct validity were assessed. RESULTS: Parallel forms reliability (Spearman's rho) was 0.99 (95% CI, 0.99-0.99) for both raters. The lower 95% CI limits of the sum and individual item scores in the reliability analysis exceeded the planned value (0.8). Construct validity values exceeded the planned value (0.8) for FMA, BBT, and MAL. CONCLUSION: Decision rules can be used to skip ARAT items when assessing upper extremity motor function in stroke patients.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONThe Action Research Arm Test with decision rules for skipping items was valid and reliable for measuring upper extremity motor function in hemiparetic patients after stroke.The decision rules may reduce the burden of both patients and evaluators by decreasing the number of Action Research Arm Test items to be administrated.

A tricky fetal case of isolated transposition of great arteries without the I-shaped sign.

Isolated transposition of the great arteries (TGA) is a congenital heart disease that presents with severe cyanosis after birth and a fetal diagnosis is crucial for the preservation of life. The I-shaped sign (I-sign) is useful as a fetal screening method for TGA. We herein present a tricky fetal case of isolated TGA with a side-by-side position of the great arteries and no I-sign. Severe cyanosis immediately after birth necessitated urgent interventions. A potentially fatal outcome was prevented by a prenatal diagnosis. In the fetal diagnosis of isolated TGA, it is important to not only detect the I-sign, but also conventionally examine the ventricular outflow tract.

Robot-Assisted Training as Self-Training for Upper-Limb Hemiplegia in Chronic Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to examine whether robotic self-training improved upper-extremity function versus conventional self-training in mild-to-moderate hemiplegic chronic stroke patients. METHODS: Study design was a multi-center, prospective, randomized, parallel-group study comparing three therapist-guided interventions (1-hour sessions, 3×/wk, 10 weeks). We identified 161 prospective patients with chronic, poststroke, upper-limb hemiplegia treated at participating rehabilitation centers. Patients were enrolled between November 29, 2016, and November 12, 2018 in Japan. A blinded web-based allocation system was used to randomly assign 129 qualifying patients into 3 groups: (1) conventional self-training plus conventional therapy (control, N=42); (2) robotic self-training (ReoGo-J) plus conventional therapy (robotic therapy [RT], N=44); or (3) robotic self-training plus constraint-induced movement therapy (N=43). PRIMARY OUTCOME: Fugl-Meyer Assessment for upper-extremity. SECONDARY OUTCOMES: Motor Activity Log-14 amount of use and quality of movement; Fugl-Meyer Assessment shoulder/elbow/forearm, wrist, finger, and coordination scores; Action Research Arm Test Score; Motricity Index; Modified Ashworth Scale; shoulder, elbow, forearm, wrist, and finger range of motion; and Stroke Impact Scale (the assessors were blinded). Safety outcomes were adverse events. RESULTS: Safety was assessed in 127 patients. An intention-to-treat full analysis set (N=121), and a per-protocol set (N=115) of patients who attended 80% of sessions were assessed. One severe adverse event was recorded, unrelated to the robotic device. No significant differences in Fugl-Meyer Assessment for upper-extremity scores were observed between groups (RT versus control: -1.04 [95% CI, -2.79 to 0.71], P=0.40; RT versus movement therapy: -0.33 [95% CI, -2.02 to 1.36], P=0.90). The RT in the per-protocol set improved significantly in the Fugl-Meyer Assessment for upper-extremity shoulder/elbow/forearm score (RT versus control: -1.46 [95% CI, -2.63 to -0.29]; P=0.037). CONCLUSIONS: Robotic self-training did not improve upper-limb function versus usual self-training, but may be effective combined with conventional therapy in some populations (per-protocol set). REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr; Unique identifier: UMIN000022509.

Impact of the robotic-assistance level on upper extremity function in stroke patients receiving adjunct robotic rehabilitation: sub-analysis of a randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Robotic therapy has been demonstrated to be effective in treating upper extremity (UE) paresis in stroke survivors. However, it remains unclear whether the level of assistance provided by robotics in UE training could affect the improvement in UE function in stroke survivors. We aimed to exploratorily investigate the impact of robotic assistance level and modes of adjustment on functional improvement in a stroke-affected UE. METHODS: We analyzed the data of 30 subacute stroke survivors with mild-to-severe UE hemiplegia who were randomly assigned to the robotic therapy (using ReoGo System) group in our previous randomized clinical trial. A cluster analysis based on the training results (the percentage of each stroke patient's five assistance modes of robotics used during the training) was performed. The patients were divided into two groups: high and low robotic assistance groups. Additionally, the two groups were sub-categorized into the following classes based on the severity of UE functional impairment: moderate-to-mild [Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) score ≥ 30] and severe-to-moderate class (FMA < 30). The outcomes were assessed using FMA, FMA-proximal, performance-time in the Wolf motor function test (WMFT), and functional assessment scale (FAS) in WMFT. The outcomes of each class in the two groups were analyzed. A two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was conducted with robot assistance level and severity of UE function as explanatory factors and the change in each outcome pre- and post-intervention as the objective factor. RESULTS: Overall, significant differences of the group × severity interaction were found in most of the outcomes, including FMA-proximal (p = 0.038, η2 = 0.13), WMFT-PT (p = 0.021, η2 = 0.17), and WMFT-FAS (p = 0.045, η2 = 0.14). However, only the FMA score appeared not to be significantly different in each group (p = 0.103, η2 = 0.09). CONCLUSION: An optimal amount of robotic assistance is a key to maximize improvement in post-stroke UE paralysis. Furthermore, severity of UE paralysis is an important consideration when deciding the amount of assistance in robotic therapy. Trial registration Trial enrollment was done at UMIN (UMIN 000001619, registration date was January 1, 2009).

Dimensionality and item-difficulty hierarchy of the Fugl-Meyer assessment of the upper extremity among Japanese patients who have experienced stroke.

BACKGROUND: The Fugl-Meyer Assessment of the Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) has been used in many clinical studies and in stroke rehabilitation. In studies evaluating psychometric properties, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) indicated that the FMA-UE is a multidimensional tool. Item Response Theory One-Parameter Logistic (IRT1PL) supports that item-difficulty hierarchy can be used as a treatment index of upper extremity function for stroke recovery. However, studies on the psychometric properties of the FMA-UE in Asian populations are lacking. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the dimensionality and item-difficulty hierarchy of the FMA-UE for stroke rehabilitation in Japanese patients. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study. The participants comprised 268 individuals admitted for de novo stroke (median age, 70.0 years; median days since stroke onset, 78.5) in 22 hospitals in Japan. The dimensionality of the FMA-UE was evaluated using CFA of selected items. The item-difficulty hierarchy of the FMA-UE using the appropriately selected model was demonstrated using IRT1PL analysis after confirming dimensionality. RESULTS: Two reflex items were removed by utilizing the floor and ceiling effects. The 31- and 30-item FMA-UE exhibited a good model fit of the unidimensionality in the CFA. The 30-item FMA-UE was found to be a good model by model comparison (the 31-item vs. the 30-item). The item-difficulty hierarchy of the 30-item FMA-UE was found not to be consistent with the expected item order. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides evidence that the FMA-UE has multidimensionality and the 30-item FMA-UE is a valid instrument for measuring upper-extremity impairment after stroke.

Psychometric properties of the TEMPA for the assessment of arm motor activity capacity in hemiparetic Japanese patients after stroke.

PURPOSE: To investigate the psychometric properties of the Test d'Evaluation des Membres Suprieurs de Personnes Agres (TEMPA) for the affected upper extremity in a population of Japanese patients with stroke. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective, cross-sectional, single-center study involving 30 patients with stroke was conducted. The inter-rater reliability, the validity, and the internal consistency were assessed. The Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA), the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT), the Motor Activity Log, and the Box-and-Block Test were employed for assessing the validity. RESULTS: The English TEMPA instructions were successfully translated in accordance with the accepted principles of translation. The weighted Kappa coefficients for the functional rating scores were 0.87, 0.93, and 0.91 for combined total score, unilateral total score, and bilateral total scores. No statistically significant systematic disagreement was seen in the combined scores. The Spearman's rho values were higher than 0.70 regarding the gold standard tools (the FMA-UE motor domain and the ARAT). The Cronbach's alpha was 0.940 in the functional rating scale and 0.998 in the task analysis scale. CONCLUSIONS: The most aspects of the Japanese TEMPA showed acceptable levels of inter-rater reliability and validity in patients with affected upper extremities after stroke.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONThe TEMPA is reliable and valid in measuring activity capacity of upper extremity in patients with stroke.The functional rating score of the TEMPA is recommended to assess activities related to daily living, especially when users need to focus on bimanual activities.The TEMPA may help guide intervention that improve bimanual activity as well as the affected arm activity.

Reliability and validity of Japanese version of Fugl-Meyer assessment for the lower extremities.

BACKGROUND: Understanding the degree of motor paralysis in stroke patients is important for assessing the severity of functional impairment and predicting functional prognosis. Fugl-MeyerAssessment for the lower extremities (FMA-LE)is a commonly used measure with high reliability and validity, but there is no official translated Japanese version of FMA-LE. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to develop Japanese FMA-LE and verify its reliability and validity in patients with acute stroke. METHODS: The Japanese FMA-LE was developed following a standardized translation process. The reliability and validity were evaluated in 50 stroke patients at an acute care hospital. Validity was examined by determining the correlation between FMA-LEand Brunnstrom Recovery Stage (BRS), as well as Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB). Intra-raterand inter-raterrelative reliabilities were evaluated by calculating intra-classcorrelation coefficients (ICCs). Absolute reliability was assessed by determining the standard error of the measurement and minimum detectible change (MDC). Systematic error was also assessed. RESULTS: FMA-LEtotal score was high correlated with BRS (ρ = 0.73,p < .01) and moderately correlated with SPPB (ρ = 0.69,p < .01). For intra-raterreliability, ICC was 0.98 (p < .01), only fixed systematic error was observed (p < .01), and MDC of the FMA-LEtotal score was 1.24. For inter-raterreliability, ICC was 0.98 (p < .01), no systematic error was observed, and MDC of the FMA-LEtotal score was 3.23. CONCLUSIONS: The Japanese FMA-LE was reliable, valid, and useful for evaluating lower extremity function of acute stroke patients.

Use of an iPad App (Aid for Decision-making in Occupational Choice) for Collaborative Goal Setting in Interprofessional Rehabilitation: Qualitative Descriptive Study.

BACKGROUND: Goal setting is a key part of the rehabilitation process. The use of technology and electronic tools such as smartphone apps and websites has been suggested as a way of improving the engagement of users in meaningful goal setting and facilitating shared decision-making between patients and health professionals. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to describe experiences of health professionals and patients in the use of the English language version of the iPad app Aid for Decision-making in Occupational Choice (ADOC) to facilitate collaborative goal setting in rehabilitation. METHODS: We recruited participants from 3 acute and postacute care rehabilitation wards in both public and private organizations in New Zealand. Participants were registered allied health professionals, including physiotherapists, occupational therapists, and speech-language therapists, who engage in goal setting as part of their normal work, and their adult patients. We collected data via semistructured interviews to gather information about the experiences of the participants in the use of ADOC for goal setting. Data were analyzed with thematic analysis. RESULTS: A total of 8 health professionals and 8 patients participated in the study. Six main themes emerged from the data: changing patients' perspective on what is possible, changing health professionals' perspective on what is important, facilitating shared decision-making, lack of guides for users, logistic and organizational barriers, and app-related and technical issues. CONCLUSIONS: Health professionals and patients found ADOC to be a valuable tool when setting shared rehabilitation goals. The use of ADOC promoted a patient-centered approach that empowered patients to engage in collaborative goal setting. The technological limitations of the app that negatively impacted experiences can be addressed in the future implementation of ADOC in rehabilitation settings.

Occupational Therapists' Perceptions of Robotics Use for Patients With Chronic Stroke.

IMPORTANCE: The effectiveness of robotic therapy in stroke rehabilitation has been established by many studies, and occupational therapists should consider using robotics in their clinical practice. However, little is known about occupational therapy practitioners' experience using robotics. OBJECTIVE: To explore occupational therapists' perceptions of the mechanisms and outcomes of occupational therapy using robotics with chronic stroke patients. DESIGN: Qualitative study with semistructured focus group interviews. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis. SETTING: Hospitals and institutions in Japan in which occupational therapists used robotics in their clinical practice. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-seven occupational therapists with experience in using robotics with chronic stroke patients as a self-training method that involved repetitive movements of a paralyzed upper extremity. Participants were interviewed in nine focus groups. RESULTS: Five themes-(1) body function, (2) values, (3) performance skills, (4) occupational performance, and (5) participation-and 12 subthemes were identified on the basis of the Occupational Therapy Practice Framework: Domain and Process (3rd ed.). Participants indicated that robotics improved patients' body function and promoted a desire for independence, which resulted in improved occupational performance and participation in their desired occupations. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Occupational therapists regarded robotics as an adjunct to other therapy, which improved patients' body function and promoted their desire for independence. What This Article Adds: Findings from this research provide insights into using robotics to enhance occupational therapy practice.

Mental Health Crisis and Stress Coping among Healthcare College Students Momentarily Displaced from Their Campus Community Because of COVID-19 Restrictions in Japan.

College students are one of the most affected groups by self-quarantine due to COVID-19, as they may live in loneliness and anxiety, increasing their risk of mental health crisis. This study aimed to identify risk factors for poor mental health and stress coping strategies among healthcare college students during the COVID-19 pandemic in Japan. A cross-sectional survey was conducted over 7 consecutive days starting on 28 April 2020 using a web-based questionnaire. The survey assessed socioeconomic characteristics and the General Health Questionnaire-12 score, self-reported health status, anxiety, and satisfaction with daily life, work, leisure, and new activities. Approximately 70% of 223 respondents had poor mental health. Less communication with friends was the main risk factor for mental health problems. Good health status and satisfaction with leisure and new activities were associated with reduced risk of mental health problems. Students with poor mental health tended to seek social support as a stress coping strategy. This study showed that the mental health of students declined during self-quarantine, and loneliness could be the major reason. There is a need for a new form of communication and learning that deals with the isolation and loneliness of students, especially for students living alone.

Effects of Lifestyle Changes on the Mental Health of Healthcare Workers with Different Sense of Coherence Levels in the Era of COVID-19 Pandemic.

Sense of coherence (SOC) is a psychological factor that contributes to mental health maintenance under stressful environment. Likewise, level of SOC might affect mental health among healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic differently. In this study, we investigated the relationships between lifestyle changes and mental health (General Health Questionnaire-12: GHQ-12) among different level of SOC (weak, moderate, or strong by SOC-13). The data of 898 healthcare workers from cross-sectional survey dataset were extracted and analyzed. As results, based on GHQ-12 score, 86.1% of 244 participants with weak SOC, 60.1% of 606 participants with moderate SOC, and 31.3% of 48 participants with strong SOC had poor mental health. Both SOC levels and lifestyle changes (except alcohol consumption) had significant main effects on the GHQ-12 score. Analysis on the association between lifestyle changes and mental health status stratified by SOC level reveled that among participants with weak SOC, those who increased their leisure and activity time had reduced odds of poor mental health than those who made no changes (OR: 0.08, CI: 0.01 to 0.64). Healthcare workers with weak SOC were at risk of poor mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic, and lifestyle changes may improve their mental health.

Coping Mechanisms: Exploring Strategies Utilized by Japanese Healthcare Workers to Reduce Stress and Improve Mental Health during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

The COVID-19 pandemic is a major problem affecting the mental health of millions of people, including healthcare workers. In this study, we analyzed risk factors and coping mechanisms that could reduce the risk of poor mental health among healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic in Japan. A cross-sectional survey was conducted for 7 days from 30 April 2020 using a web-based questionnaire. The survey assessed various outcome measures, including the General Health Questionnaire-12 (GHQ-12), health status, satisfaction with daily life activities, work, leisure, and new activities, and anxiety over COVID-19. Data from 661 participants were analyzed, and 440 participants (66.6%) showed poor mental health (GHQ-12 ≥ 4). Also, our result showed that female gender, lower levels of communication with friends, and high anxiety were associated with poorer mental health. In contrast, good health status, high work satisfaction, and high satisfaction from new activities were associated with buffering mental health problem. Most participants chose an escape-avoidance coping strategy, and participants with worse mental health were more likely to adopt seeking social support as a coping strategy. These results may support healthcare workers to cope with mental health problems associated with the COVID-19 pandemic.

Use of technology in supporting goal setting in rehabilitation for adults: a scoping review.

OBJECTIVE: To map the extant literature evaluating the use of technology for goal setting in adult rehabilitation and the impact of technology for patient outcomes. DESIGN: Scoping review. METHODS: MEDLINE (via Ovid), CINAHL (via EBSCO), AMED and Scopus were searched for articles describing observational or interventional studies. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database were searched for grey literature. Two review authors independently screened all titles and abstracts for potentially relevant articles. We included articles describing studies that had evaluated the development or application of technology to facilitate goal setting in rehabilitation for adults. Articles were excluded if the technology described did not include features to facilitate goal setting or were not in English. Narrative reviews, opinion pieces and editorials were also excluded. RESULTS: After screening 1640 publications of potential interest, we identified 27 studies for inclusion. These 27 articles described studies involving a total of 16 different technologies including, seven mobile apps, three websites, two mobile apps/website hybrids, two apps and two websites connected to a pedometer. We found that most technologies described were designed to facilitate self-management with goal setting as a feature and that only five included a shared decision moment around goal setting. Only six of the 16 technologies had research providing evidence of effectiveness in terms of improved patient outcomes, with the best evidence of beneficial effects associated with technologies that linked goal setting to pedometer use. CONCLUSIONS: The identified technologies for use in adult rehabilitation that included goal setting as a feature were largely accepted and valued by patients and health professionals. The limited data suggest that there is a need for further research; specific foci may include the impact of incorporation of a shared decision-making moment and evaluation of effectiveness on patient outcomes.

Timing of Communication Device Introduction Defined by ALSFRS-R Score in Patients with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis.

OBJECTIVE: Augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) devices are crucial for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) patients because disease progression impairs verbal speech. Although the introduction of AAC devices must be appropriately timed, no guidelines currently exist. In this study, we examined the usefulness of the ALS functional rating scale-revised (ALSFRS-R) for predicting the timing of device introduction. METHODS: This study was a retrospective cross-sectional study with consecutive sampling of patients diagnosed with ALS who underwent rehabilitation at Kitasato University East Hospital between 2011 and 2018. Patients were introduced to AAC devices (writing, communication boards, switch control, and/or eye control) and underwent assessment at three timepoints: the start of rehabilitation, as each communication device was introduced, and at the end of rehabilitation. ALSFRS-R multiple comparisons were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test and, as a post-test, the Steel-Dwass test was used. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and areas under the ROC curves (AUCs) based on ALSFRS-R total and sub-item scores were used to calculate cut-off values for when transitioning to a new type of device is necessary. RESULTS: In this study, 216 patients underwent rehabilitation, and 92 met the inclusion criteria. The total ALSFRS-R scores significantly differed among the four devices, except for those between communication boards and switch control devices. The bulbar and respiratory sub-scores did not significantly differ between devices. For each device type, total or sub-item scores yielded an AUC of 0.8 or more. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that the ALSFRS-R is a useful assessment for timing the introduction of communication devices, and its utilization could help therapists, caregivers, and families to provide AAC for patients with ALS.

Impact of initial flexor synergy pattern scores on improving upper extremity function in stroke patients treated with adjunct robotic rehabilitation: A randomized clinical trial.

Background: Robot-assisted rehabilitation is an appealing strategy for patients after stroke, as it generates repetitive movements in a consistent, precise, and automated manner. Objective: To identify patients who will benefit most from robotic rehabilitation for upper extremity (UE) hemiparesis. Methods:We used data from our previous randomized clinical trial comparing 6 weeks of robotic therapy (ReoGeo system) plus standard therapy (n=30) with self-guided therapy plus standard therapy (n=26) for sub-acute phase rehabilitation in adults with mild to moderate UE hemiparesis. The outcome measures were three Fugl-Meyer (FMA) motor scores: total UE score, proximal UE score, and UE flexor synergy score. Based on pre-therapy UE flexor synergy scores, participants were categorized into mild (10-12 points), moderate (6-9 points), and severe (0-5 points) impairment classes. Results: In the robotic group, all outcome measures improved after therapy in patients with moderate or severe impairment. In the self-guided therapy, most outcomes did not improve, regardless of the impairment class. When changes from pre- to post-therapy were compared between robotic and self-guided groups, most outcomes were similar in all impairment classes. However, robotic therapy was associated with greater improvement in UE flexor synergy than self-guided therapy in patients with moderate impairment (2.3±1.3 vs. -0.1±2.8, P=0.027). Conclusions: Post-strokerobot-assisted rehabilitation, as an adjunct to standard rehabilitation therapy, improved UE function in patients with moderate or severe pre-therapy UE flexor synergy impairment. Adjunct robotic therapy produced greater improvement in UE flexor synergy motor function than adjunct self-guided rehabilitation in patients with moderate pre-therapy impairment.

Clinimetric properties of the shortened Fugl-Meyer Assessment for the assessment of arm motor function in hemiparetic patients after stroke.

Background: The Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) is widely used as the gold standard in stroke research. However, the FMA has not been used in general clinical practice, which may be related to the fact that the FMA is a time-consuming measurement. Therefore, the FMA (upper extremity motor section) has already been shortened to a 6-item version using Rasch analysis for routine assessments of patients with low endurance. Although the shortened FMA has already demonstrated sound clinical utility, data on its psychometric properties remain insufficient.Objective: This study aimed to investigate the psychometric properties of the shortened FMA for the affected upper extremity in patients following stroke.Methods: A retrospective single-center study involving 30 patients was conducted. This study was registered in 2018 as a pre-initiation condition. The data used in this study were obtained from a study conducted between 2016 and 2017. The FMA (33- and 6-item versions) and the Action Research Arm Test, the Box-and-Block Test, and the Motor Activity Log were employed, and inter-rater reliability/agreement, validity, and internal consistency were assessed.Results: Regarding inter-rater reliability, the intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.994 (95% confidence interval: 0.988-0.997; P < .001). The mean differences between the raters of the shortened FMA were 0.07, and the limits of agreement were calculated to be between -0.81 and 0.95. Regarding the motor-related measurements, Spearman's rho were all higher than 0.91. On the other hand, regarding the sensation and joint motion/pain domain, Spearman's rho ranged from 0.25 to 0.50, and Cronbach's alpha was 0.92.Conclusions: The shortened FMA can reliably assess the affected upper extremity in patients with hemiparesis after stroke.

Clinimetric properties of the action research arm test for the assessment of arm activity in hemiparetic patients after stroke.

Background: The Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) has been extensively used for patients with stroke in many countries. However, the ARAT has been reported to have ceiling effects. Employing a time evaluation system could be expected to improve the ceiling effects in the ARAT.Objective: To investigate (1) the psychometric properties of the Japanese version of the ARAT in patients with stroke; (2) the psychometric properties of the performance timescale of the ARAT in patients with stroke.Methods: A prospective, cross-sectional, single-center study involving 30 patients with mild-to-severe hemiparesis was conducted. All patients were recruited from the college hospital in Japan from June 2016 to March 2017. The ARAT and the Fugl-Meyer Assessment, the Box-and-Block Test, and the Motor Activity Log were employed. The simultaneous/non-simultaneous inter-rater reliability/agreement, the internal consistency, the validity, and the floor/ceiling effects were assessed.Results: Regarding the ARAT score, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) ranged from 0.974 to 0.990 (P < 0.001) for non-simultaneous evaluation; and from 0.994 to 0.998 (P < 0.001) for simultaneous evaluation. Regarding the ARAT time, ICC was 0.992 (P < 0.001) for non-simultaneous evaluation; and 1.000 (P < 0.001) for simultaneous evaluation.Conclusions: The Japanese version of the ARAT is highly reliable and valid for measuring upper-extremity function in patients with stroke. Adding the performance timescale on the ARAT score scale can partially solve the "ceiling effect problem".