The early effect of COVID-19 on dental infections by neuroimaging in the emergency department setting.

OBJECTIVES: In early 2020, at COVID-19's onset in the United States, the American Dental Association recommended postponing elective dental procedures to minimize viral spread. Subsequently, concerns arose that this could result in increased dental infections and resultant emergency department visits. This study quantifies the number and severity of dental infections at the onset of the early COVID-19 outbreak in early 2020 in the Northeast United States resulting in emergency room visits and radiographic imaging compared to 2017-2019 with an analysis of geographic population characteristics. METHODS: Cross-sectional head and neck imaging performed at an East Coast hospital system was retrospectively reviewed for dental infections from March 2020 through December 2020, and compared to prior years 2017-2019. Inclusion criteria included radiology reporting of a dental infection, ranging in severity. Electronic medical records (EMR) and imaging reports were queried for patient characteristics and dental findings. RESULTS: There were 735 confirmed imaging reports of odontogenic infections. There was a significant increase in imaging reporting of odontogenic infections in the post-shutdown period. These were more frequently early-type infections, involved a higher proportion of male and non-white patients, and the patients were more often from disadvantaged zip codes when compared with prior years. CONCLUSIONS: These findings highlight the varying impact of outpatient dental office closures on different socioeconomic groups in the setting of a pandemic. Potential implications include increased morbidity and mortality for patients, as well as increased cost and resource allocations for the healthcare system.

Pain Medication Beliefs Mediate the Relationship Between Pain Catastrophizing and Opioid Prescription Use in Patients With Chronic Non-Cancer Pain.

Little is known about the mechanisms by which pain catastrophizing may be associated with opioid use outcomes. This study aimed to investigate the potential mediating role of beliefs about the appropriateness of pain medicines for pain treatment on the association between pain catastrophizing and prescription opioid use in a community chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP) sample. Individuals (N = 420) diagnosed with CNCP participated in a cross-sectional online self-report study with validated measures of pain medication beliefs, pain catastrophizing, and current prescription opioid use. Two parallel multiple mediator analyses with percentile-based bootstrapping examined pathways to both prescription opioid use and high-dose use (≥ 100mg oral morphine equivalents/day), while controlling for pain intensity and other relevant covariates. Pain medication beliefs significantly mediated the association between pain catastrophizing and prescription opioid use (CI = 0.011, 0.033). A similar pattern of findings was found for high-dose opioid use, with pain medication beliefs significantly mediating the pain catastrophizing-high-dose use association (CI = 0.006, 0.050). Pain medication beliefs are a potentially modifiable psychological mechanism by which pain catastrophizing is associated with opioid use, including high-dose use. These findings have important implications for personalizing prevention and treatment programs.