Levels of YKL-40 in pleural effusion and blood from patients with pleuritis.

INTRODUCTION: In recent years, there have been a significant increase in the tests and biomarkers available for pleural fluid analysis. YKL-40 is one of the inflammatory biomarkers that is used for this purpose. The aim of our study is to assess the levels and diagnostic values of YKL-40 in patients with different types of pleural effusions (PE). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a prospective, observational and crosssectional study. Pleural and serum YKL-40 levels were measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in 119 patients with PEs, including 23 transudates PE, 47 malignant PE, 26 parapneumonic PE (PPPE), 17 paramalignant PE (PME) and 6 tuberculous PE (TBPE). RESULT: Median pleural YKL-40 level was higher in exudates (390.3 ng/mL) than in transudates (369.5 ng/mL) (p<0.02). For a cut-off level of 378 ng/mL, it was found to predict exudates with 70% sensitivity and 64% specificity. [area under the curve (AUC)= 0.660, p= 0.01]. Median pleural YKL-40 level was highest in PMEs (407.1 ng/mL) and the lowest in transudates (369.5 ng/ mL) and high levels, with a cut-off value of 396 ng/mL, differentiated PMEs from other subgroups with 65% sensitivity and 68% specificity. (AUC= 0.680, p= 0.02). Median serum YKL-40 level was the highest in PPPEs (351.4 ng/mL) and the lowest in TBPEs (114.2 ng/mL) (p= 0.01). For a cut-off level of 284 ng/mL, it differentiated PPPEs from TBPEs with 61% sensitivity and 100% specificity (AUC= 0.830, p= 0.01). In TBPEs, pleural/serum YKL-40 ratio was strongly related with pleural ADA (r= 1, p= 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Pleural YKL-40 may be useful for differentiating exudates and detecting PMEs. Serum YKL-40 may be good diagnostic biomarker for differentiating PPPEs and TBPEs. Additionally, measuring serum and pleural YKL-40 and pleural ADA may be reliable way to diagnose TBPEs.

Outbreak of Hospital Infection from Biofilm-embedded Pan Drug-resistant Pseudomonas aeroginosa, Due to a Contaminated Bronchoscope.

Background: Colistin-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa) has been defined as pandrug-resistant (PDR) strain. Outbreaks of PDR P. aeruginosa especially in pulmonary tract infections due to contaminated bronchoscopes have rarely been reported. The emergence of pandrug-resistant strains in both CF (Cystic Fibrosis) and non-CF clinical isolates over recent years remains of a great concern. Hospital wards contaminated with PDR P. aeruginosa infection, must be shot down until their eradication. Health Authorities must be informed immediately and infection control strategies must be implemented. Aim: To report such an outbreak and modify the infection control strategy in an academic hospital in Ankara Turkey. Methods: From October to December 2013, PDR-Pseudomonas aerogionsa were identified from bronchial cultures of 15 patients who had undergone bronchoscopy prior to the infection. Three batches of surveillance cultures were obtained from the environmental objects and healthcare workers related to the procedures. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) was used for bacterial typing. Antimicrobial susceptibility was assessed by disc diffusion and E-test methods. Findings: A total of 70 specimens were obtained during the first surveillance operation. One Colistin-resistant P. aeroginosa was isolated from a bronchoscope. Although the disinfection protocols for bronchoscope were revised and implemented, seven additional bronchial cases were identified thereafter. The pathogen was identified from two subsequent surveillance cultures and was not eliminated until Ethylene oxide sterilization was added to the disinfection protocol. PFGE revealed that all 15 isolates from the patients and the three isolates from the bronchoscope shared a common pattern with minor variance. XbaI restriction enzyme turned out better than SpeI in interpreting bacterial pulse types with BioNumerics 6.0. The most suitable cut off value for SpeI was above 80% Dice similarity while for XbaI above 95%Dice similarity with BioNumerics 6.0. Conclusion: The outbreak of "Colistin" pan drug-resistant Pseudomonas aeroginosa was caused by a contaminated bronchoscope and was terminated by the implementation of a revised disinfection protocol for bronchoscope.

Prognostic significance of serum vascular endothelial growth factor and Angiopoietin-2 in patients with lung cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and Angiopoietin-2 (Ang-2) are major angiogenic mediators in neovascularization process. In current literature both biomarkers are discussed separately and only for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). So in this study we aimed to examine them together for both cell types NSCLC and small cell lung cancer (SCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: 100 patients with lung cancer were enrolled to this single center study. 87 of patients were diagnosed with NSCLC including 28 adenocarcinomas and 59 squamous cell cancers and 13 were SCLC. Results were compared with 30 healthy volunteers. Pre-treatment serum VEGF and Ang-2 levels were measured by using ELISA method. RESULTS: While serum Ang-2 levels were higher in patients than healthy controls (23395 pg/mL vs. 4025 pg/mL, p< 0.001), VEGF levels didn't differ (2308 pg/mL vs. 2433 pg/mL, p> 0.05). There was no difference between cases with SCLC and NSCLC in terms of Ang-2. But serum VEGF values were significantly lower in SCLC than NSCLC and control groups. None of these mediators were correlated with cell type, tumor size, TNM staging, performance status and operability. VEGF levels were higher in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), but it was not significant. Three cut of values were determined according to sensitivity and specificity by using youden index. They were 8515.73 pg/mL (sensitivity 78%, specificity 76%), 7097 pg/mL (sensitivity 80%, specificity 70%) and 11063.48 pg/mL (sensitivity 76%, specificity 70%). Patients with SCLC had shorter survival time above cut-off values (p> 0.05). VEGF and Ang-2 showed a weak positive correlation (p= 0.1 and r= 0.638). CONCLUSION: In conclusion, serum VEGF wasn't useful to predict lung cancer, prognosis or cell type. Albeit Ang-2 was higher in patients with lung cancer without any effect on survival. Due to the heterogeneity of the studies done with serum measurement Ang-2 on tumor tissue should be more meaningful.