Risk factors for pregnancy outcomes in Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes.

BACKGROUND: Understanding the risk factors and pregnancy outcomes in women affected by Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes is important for pre-pregnancy counselling. AIM: To explore differences in pregnancy outcomes between women with Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes, and healthy controls, and to examine the relationships between potential adverse risk factors and pregnancy outcomes in this cohort of women. METHODS: This is a 10-year retrospective study of women with Type 1 diabetes (n = 92), Type 2 diabetes (n = 106) and healthy women without diabetes (controls) (n = 119) from a tertiary obstetric centre. Clinical and biochemical characteristics of women with Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes were determined and related to major obstetric outcomes using univariate analysis. RESULTS: Women with pre-existing diabetes had higher adverse pregnancy outcomes (preeclampsia, emergency caesarean section, preterm birth <32 and 37 weeks, large for gestational age, neonatal jaundice, Apgar score < 7 at 5 min, neonatal intensive care admission and neonatal hypoglycaemia) compared to controls. A higher birth weight gestational centile (97.4% vs 72.4%, P = 0.001) and large for gestational age rate (63.4% vs 35.8%, P = 0.001) were observed in Type 1 diabetes compared to Type 2 diabetes. There were no differences in other outcomes between women with Type 1 and 2 diabetes. CONCLUSION: In this exploratory study, risk factors for maternal adverse outcomes differ between Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes. Maternal and foetal adverse outcomes were higher in pregnancies affected by diabetes compared to healthy women but occurred with similar frequency in women with Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes.

The association between maternal renal function and pregnancy outcomes in type 1 and type 2 diabetes.

AIMS: To investigate the prognostic value of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and albuminuria in determining pregnancy outcomes in women with type 1 and type 2 diabetes. METHODS: An observational study of pregnant women with type 1 (n = 92) and type 2 diabetes (n = 106) who delivered between 2004 and 2014 at a single tertiary obstetric centre. Clinical and biochemical characteristics were determined and related to major obstetric outcomes: preeclampsia, preterm birth <32 and <37 weeks, and neonatal intensive care admission. We used univariate analyses and multivariable logistic regression models with eGFR using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation and albuminuria as covariates. RESULTS: In the pooled diabetes cohort, multivariable logistic regression with eGFR and albuminuria status demonstrated that the presence of albuminuria (albumin-to-creatinine ratio ≥ 3.5 mg/mmol) (OR, 2.7; 95% CI, 1.42-4.99; P = 0.002) was associated with preeclampsia, whilst an eGFR of < 120 mL/min/1.73 m2 was associated with preterm birth < 32 weeks (OR, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.00-1.09; P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Despite its recognized limitations in pregnancy, lower eGFR values were associated with increased risk of adverse outcomes. Our exploratory data suggest eGFR, along with albuminuria, can aid in identifying women at high risk of developing adverse obstetric outcomes.

Metformin: time to review its role and safety in chronic kidney disease.

■Metformin is recommended as first-line therapy for type 2 diabetes because of its safety, low cost and potential cardiovascular benefits. ■The use of metformin was previously restricted in people with chronic kidney disease (CKD) - a condition that commonly coexists with diabetes - due to concerns over drug accumulation and metformin-associated lactic acidosis. ■There are limited data from observational studies and small randomised controlled trials to suggest that metformin, independent of its antihyperglycaemic effects, may be associated with lower risk of myocardial infarction, stroke and all-cause mortality in people with type 2 diabetes and CKD. ■Research into the risk of metformin-associated lactic acidosis in CKD has previously been limited and conflicting, resulting in significant variation across international guidelines on the safe prescribing and dosing of metformin at different stages of renal impairment. ■Present-day large scale cohort studies now provide supporting evidence for the safe use of metformin in mild to moderate renal impairment (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] 30-60 mL/min/1.73m2 ). However, prescribing metformin in people with severe renal impairment (eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73m2 ) remains a controversial issue. Due to observed increased risk of lactic acidosis and all-cause mortality in people with type 2 diabetes and severe renal impairment, it is generally recommended that metformin is discontinued if renal function falls below this level or during acute renal deterioration.