Setting the Target: Comparing Family Medicine Among US Allopathic Target Schools.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Despite the persistent primary care physician shortage over 2 decades of allopathic medical school expansion, some medical schools are absent a department of family medicine; these schools are designated as "target" schools. These absences are important because evidence has demonstrated the association between structured exposure to family medicine during medical school and the proportion of students who ultimately select a career in family medicine. In this study, we aimed to address part of this gap by defining and characterizing the current landscape of US allopathic target schools. METHODS: We identified allopathic target schools by reviewing all Liaison Committee of Medical Education (LCME) accredited institutions for the presence of a family medicine department. To compare these schools in terms of family medicine representation and outcomes, we curated descriptive data from publicly available websites, previously published family medicine match results, and school rankings for primary care. RESULTS: We identified 12 target schools (8.7% of all US allopathic accredited medical schools) with considerable heterogeneity in opportunities for family medicine engagement, leadership, and training. Target schools with greater family medicine representation had increased outcomes for family medicine workforce and primary care opportunities. CONCLUSION: With growing primary care workforce gaps, target schools have a responsibility to enhance family medicine presence and representation at their institutions. We provide recommendations at the institutional, specialty, and national level to increase family medicine representation at target schools, with the goal that all schools eventually establish a department of family medicine.

Unintended pregnancy and contraceptive use among women in the U.S. military: a systematic literature review.

U.S. servicewomen's ability to plan pregnancies is of concern to the military in terms of troop readiness and cost and is an important public health issue. Contraception access and use are crucial, particularly given the high prevalence of sexual assault in the military and the benefits of menstrual suppression for deployment. We systematically searched for publications on contraception, unintended pregnancy, and abortion in the military. Pregnancy and unintended pregnancy rates are higher among servicewomen than the general U.S. population. Contraceptive use may be somewhat higher than the nonmilitary population, although use decreases during deployment. Reported use of hormonal methods for menstrual suppression is lower than interest. There are limited data on these topics; more large, representative studies and longitudinal data from all branches are needed, along with qualitative research to explore findings more deeply. Emergency contraception and abortion are particularly underresearched.

Pediatric brain natriuretic peptide and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide reference intervals.

BACKGROUND: Brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) have been shown to be useful biomarkers for the diagnosis of heart failure. Pediatric reference intervals for these analytes have been reported in part. Previous studies lack large numbers in each group, have not covered all age ranges and have not compared results for BNP with NT-proBNP in simultaneously drawn samples. METHODS: We measured BNP in whole blood using the Biosite Triage point-of-care method and plasma NT-proBNP using the Dade RxL Dimension. We assessed between and within-day precision of both methods and after removing outliers employed the Hoffmann approach to calculate pediatric reference intervals over the age range of 0-21 y. We also compared the 2 methods on simultaneously drawn samples. RESULTS: Reference intervals revealed approximately 20-fold higher 97.5th percentiles for neonates than for children >3 y of age. 97.5th percentiles decreased significantly over the first 3 years of life. As shown by others, the CVs for the automated Dade RxL platform were somewhat lower than those for the POCT method. BNP and NT-proBNP correlated well in simultaneously drawn samples (r=0.947). DISCUSSION: Reference intervals for BNP and NT-proBNP are far higher in neonates and infants than in children older than three years of age. The reasons for this are unknown but resemble the elevated CK-MBs and troponins also found in neonates, although the 97.5th percentiles for these latter 2 cardiac markers decrease more rapidly to values found in older children by 6 months of age.