Impact of selective screening in the emergency department on meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus control programmes.

Identification of the meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) reservoir by active screening followed by the implementation of contact precautions is one of the major components of MRSA control programmes. The objective of this study was to evaluate the results of a programme of selective screening in an emergency department (ED) and the appropriateness of the contact precautions implemented. This was estimated by distinguishing necessary and unnecessary days of contact precautions. This estimation was performed for all days of contact precautions and, more specifically, for days of preventive contact precautions implemented before the availability of screening results. During a three-year period, screening of MRSA carriers was performed on 0.95% (N=605) of patients visiting the emergency ward. Among the 193 (31.9%) MRSA carriers identified, 159 were hospitalized in the short-length-hospitalization area (SLHA) of the ED and/or in other wards. Among the 140 patients admitted to the SLHA, 44 were hospitalized for at least 48 h, with a mean length of hospitalization of 5.9 days. The cumulative duration of hospitalization of carriers identified by screening was 1897 days. In total, 2370 days of contact precautions (including 924 days of preventive precautions) were implemented for patients screened in the ED. Considering the whole hospital, the appropriateness of this entire programme of contact precautions for patients screened in the ED was 80.0% (52.1% for the SLHA), whereas the specific appropriateness of preventive isolation days was 48.6% (43.6% for the SLHA). This study underscores the risk of MRSA cross-transmission in the SLHA, and the usefulness of implementing a control programme of screening carriers in the ED.

Y-STR DNA amplification as biological evidence in sexually assaulted female victims with no cytological detection of spermatozoa.

Identification of spermatozoa is the biological evidence most often sought in specimens from rape victims. Absence of spermatozoa usually terminates biological investigations, and the victim's testimony can be contested. We assessed the utility and reliability of PCR amplification using Y-chromosomal STR polymorphisms in specimens from female victims of sexual assault with negative cytology. One hundred and four swabs without spermatozoa detected by cytology were collected from 79 alleged sexually assaulted female victims and amplification of Y-STR and of amelogenin was performed.Overall, Y-chromosome was detected and evidenced sexual penetration in 28.8% of swabs. In the population of victims examined more than 48 h after the sexual assault, Y-STR were still evidenced in 30% of the cases. These results show that swabs should be taken from victims for Y-chromosome DNA typing even after long delays between sexual assault and medical examination.

[Anti-infection prophylaxis after sexual assault. Experience of the Raymond Poincaré-Garches Hospital]. / Prophylaxies anti-infectieuses après agression sexuelle. Expérience de l'Hôpital Raymond Poincaré-Garches (Hauts-de-Seine).

OBJECTIVE: The August 1997 Directive of the Direction of General Health in France extended indications for antiretroviral treatment to risk of HIV exposure by sexual intercourse or syringe sharing. In November 1997, in collaboration with the Hauts-de-Seine MedicoJudiciary center, the Infectious Disease unit of the Raymond Poincaré Garches Hospital established a health care and anti-HIV prophylaxis clinic for victims of sexual assault. We report here the experience in 1998 and 1999. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 1998 and December 1999, 109 victims of sexual assault, 105 women and 4 men, mean age 24.7 +/- 10.6 years attended the clinic. RESULTS: Mean delay from assault to antiretroviral tritherapy (AZT, 3TC, indinavir) was 18.35 +/- 17.39 hours. Mean duration of antiretroviral treatment was 17.4 +/- 11.8 days. HIV screening in perpetrators enabled early interruption of the antiretroviral treatment in 23 cases (21.1%). Sixty-two victims (62%) were still in follow-up at W4/W7. Excellent compliance to tritherapy was observed in these subjects. Clinical intolerance was observed in 46.6% with nausea-vomiting in 91.4% of the cases. Adverse effects led to interruption of indinavir in 5 cases. Initial HIV serology was negative in all cases and no case of HIV seroconversion was observed. Among the 23 known perpetrators, one was HIV-positive with an HIV-RNA at 88,000 copies. Sixty-one victims (55.9%) had been previously vaccinated against the hepatitis B virus; 16 victims were vaccinated after the assault. There were no cases of hepatitis B virus seroconversion. Search for chlamydiae in vaginal secretions was positive in 3 cases and chlamydia serology demonstrated a seroconversion in 1 case. There was no case of syphylitic seroconversion and no case of gonococcal or trichomonas infection. CONCLUSION: The low rate of attendance for follow-up in regards to the gravity of the potential risk of HIV and/or hepatitis B virus transmission and the burden and cost of the antiretroviral treatment highlight the need for better medico-psycho-social support for rape victims. For the victims who attended the clinic, antiretroviral treatment was generally well accepted and well tolerated.

Postoperative death and malpractice suits: is autopsy useful?

This report demonstrates the extremely high yield of autopsies performed in the case of postoperative death with suspicion of malpractice. They frequently identified undetected complications. They could also suggest faulty or negligent practice that would otherwise go unrecognized. This report supports the widespread use of autopsies to investigate perioperative death.

Prolonged activity after an ultimately fatal gunshot wound to the heart: case report.

In this article, we describe an unusual case of suicide involving a gunshot wound to the left ventricle. The victim engaged in premortem activity that was both prolonged and methodical. This report stresses the importance of a complete investigation to distinguish such case from an homicide.