Dysautonomia and activity in the early stroke recovery period.

Maintaining cerebral perfusion in the early stages of recovery after stroke is paramount. Autoregulatory function may be impaired during this period leaving cerebral perfusion directly reliant on intravascular volume and blood pressure (BP) with increased risk for expanding cerebral infarction during periods of low BP and hemorrhagic transformation during BP elevations. We suspected that dysautonomia is common during the acute period related to both pre-existing vascular risk factors and potentially independent of such conditions. Thus, we sought to understand the state of the science specific to dysautonomia and acute stroke. The scoping review search included multiple databases and key terms related to acute stroke and dysautonomia. The team employed a rigorous review process to identify, evaluate, and summarize relevant literature. We additionally summarized common clinical approaches used to detect dysautonomia at the bedside. The purpose of this scoping review is to understand the state of the science for the identification, treatment, and impact of dysautonomia on acute stroke patient outcomes. There is a high prevalence of dysautonomia among persons with stroke, though there is significant variability in the type of measures and definitions used to diagnose dysautonomia. While dysautonomia appears to be associated with poor functional outcome and post-stroke complications, there is a paucity of high-quality evidence, and generalizability is limited by heterogenous approaches to these studies. There is a need to establish common definitions, standard measurement tools, and a roadmap for incorporating these measures into clinical practice so that larger studies can be conducted.

Understanding Barriers and Facilitators to Nonpharmacological Pain Management on Adult Inpatient Units.

Interprofessional staff are in a position to champion nonpharmacological pain management interventions, which can be effective when used in conjunction with analgesic medications. The purposes of this study were to understand the barriers and facilitators to using nonpharmacological pain management interventions as perceived by interprofessional staff, as well as to describe current knowledge, attitudes, and practices of interprofessional staff. An interpretive, descriptive study design at a large, urban, academic teaching hospital in the United States was used. This study provides a starting point for further understanding the potential implementation of nonpharmacological pain management interventions at the bedside. Recommendations include further evaluation of the current use of nonpharmacological pain management interventions as well as promoting education about available resources.