Do live-stream telemedicine follow-up appointments for a Ponseti-treated clubfoot caseload compare favourably with a face-to-face review? Observed clinical outcomes and treatment provision during the COVID-19 pandemic.

INTRODUCTION: Restrictions on face-to-face (F2F) healthcare services during the recent COVID-19 pandemic necessitated novel provision of care for Ponseti-treated clubfoot patients. This retrospective review compares the effectiveness of telemedicine (TM) using live-stream videoconferencing compared to conventional F2F review, in two cohorts of 78 patients attending routine follow-up, during Ponseti-treated clubfoot bracing in their first 5 years. METHODS: Rates of compliance, recurrence of deformity, and type of intervention provided were compared between cohorts. The TM cohort was re-evaluated F2F as part of routine follow-up care. Attendance rates were compared between cohorts and with an equivalent time period the previous year. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the rate of compliance between cohorts (77% in the TM group, 74% in the F2F group), or in the rate of recurrence. Subsequent F2F review of the TM cohort showed that compliance had improved in some patients, indicating successful TM intervention. There were no missed cases of recurrence. TM follow-up appointments offered similar rates of management of skin problems, brace adjustment, and provision of exercises. At least one element of intervention was provided in 64% of the TM group, and 72% of the F2F group. TM connection was successful in 74% of booked appointments. The number of patients attending was similar to F2F bookings one year prior. DISCUSSION: The use of TM for routine follow-up of Ponseti-treated clubfoot patients can be as clinically effective as F2F assessment, and has potential for integration into routine follow-up care.

Attaining a British consensus on managing idiopathic congenital talipes equinovarus up to walking age.

AIMS: The aim of this study was to gain an agreement on the management of idiopathic congenital talipes equinovarus (CTEV) up to walking age in order to provide a benchmark for practitioners and guide consistent, high-quality care for children with CTEV. METHODS: The consensus process followed an established Delphi approach with a predetermined degree of agreement. The process included the following steps: establishing a steering group; steering group meetings, generating statements, and checking them against the literature; a two-round Delphi survey; and final consensus meeting. The steering group members and Delphi survey participants were all British Society of Children's Orthopaedic Surgery (BSCOS) members. Descriptive statistics were used for analysis of the Delphi survey results. The Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation checklist was followed for reporting of the results. RESULTS: The BSCOS-selected steering group, the steering group meetings, the Delphi survey, and the final consensus meeting all followed the pre-agreed protocol. A total of 153/243 members voted in round 1 Delphi (63%) and 132 voted in round 2 (86%). Out of 61 statements presented to round 1 Delphi, 43 reached 'consensus in', no statements reached 'consensus out', and 18 reached 'no consensus'. Four statements were deleted and one new statement added following suggestions from round 1. Out of 15 statements presented to round 2, 12 reached 'consensus in', no statements reached 'consensus out', and three reached 'no consensus' and were discussed and included following the final consensus meeting. Two statements were combined for simplicity. The final consensus document includes 57 statements allocated into six successive stages. CONCLUSION: We have produced a consensus document for the treatment of idiopathic CTEV up to walking age. This will provide a benchmark for standard of care in the UK and will help to reduce geographical variability in treatment and outcomes. Appropriate dissemination and implementation will be key to its success. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(6):758-764.

MRI for paediatric flatfoot: is it necessary?

OBJECTIVE: To determine the additional benefit of MRI for children with flatfoot deformity assessed with weight-bearing radiographs in a specialist paediatric orthopaedic unit. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patient cohort was obtained by searching the Radiology Information System for children referred for investigation of flatfoot. All patients with flatfoot on weight-bearing radiographs who had undergone MRI were included. Radiographs were classified by a consultant musculoskeletal radiologist as showing no underlying abnormality, talo-calcaneal coalition, calcaneonavicular coalition, accessory navicular or other abnormality. MRI studies were classified similarly by a different consultant musculoskeletal radiologist blinded to the radiographic findings. RESULTS: 33 males and 24 females were included (mean age 12.5 years; range 3-18 years). 24 had bilateral abnormality, so 81 feet were assessed. Radiographs showed no specific abnormality (n = 51), talocalcaneal coalition (n = 6), calcaneonavicular coalition (n = 3), os naviculare (n = 12) or other abnormality (n = 9). MRI showed no specific abnormality (n = 40), talocalcaneal coalition (n = 10), calcaneonavicular coalition (n = 5), os naviculare (n = 12) or other abnormality (n = 14). Assuming MRI as the diagnostic gold-standard, additional relevant diagnostic information was identified in 19 (23.5%) cases, while in the 51 cases for which radiographs provided no specific diagnosis MRI confirmed no underlying abnormality in 31 (60.8%). CONCLUSION: MRI is a valuable adjunct to weight-bearing radiography for investigating paediatric flatfoot deformity. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: MRI is of value in the assessment of paediatric flatfoot, additional diagnostic information to radiography being identified in 23.5% cases, while in 60.8% of cases for which radiographs provided no specific diagnosis MRI confirmed no underlying abnormality.

Attaining a British consensus statement on managing idiopathic congenital talipes equinovarus (CTEV) through a Delphi process: a study protocol.

INTRODUCTION: Idiopathic congenital talipes equinovarus (CTEV) is the most common congenital limb deformity. Non-operative intervention using the Ponseti method has shown to be superior to soft tissue release and has become the gold standard for first-line treatment. However, numerous deviations from the Ponseti protocol are still reported following incomplete correction or deformity relapse. Significant variation in treatment protocols and management is evident in the literature. Reducing geographical treatment variation has been identified as one of The James Lind Alliance priorities in children's orthopaedics. For this reason, the British Society of Children's Orthopaedic Surgery (BSCOS) commissioned a consensus document to form a benchmark for practitioners and ensure consistent high quality care for children with CTEV. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The consensus will follow an established Delphi approach aiming at gaining an agreement on the items to be included in the consensus statement for the management of primary idiopathic CTEV up to walking age. The process will include the following steps: (1) establishing a steering group, (2) steering group meetings, (3) a two-round Delphi survey aimed at BSCOS members, (4) final consensus meeting and (5) dissemination of the consensus statement. Degree of agreement for each item will be predetermined. Descriptive statistics will be used for analysis of the Delphi survey results. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: No patient involvement is required for this project. Informed consent will be assumed from participants taking part in the Delphi survey. Study findings will be published in an open access journal and presented at relevant national and international conferences. Charities and associations will be engaged to promote awareness of the consensus statement.

Multimodality imaging of the paediatric flatfoot.

Flatfoot is commonly encountered in the paediatric population and describes a spectrum of clinical and radiological presentations which encompass both normally developing and pathological feet. Flatfoot can be categorised as flexible or rigid, a distinction which has important implications when considering the potential underlying aetiology and treatment options, and therefore imaging is an important component of the diagnostic workup. Weight-bearing plain radiographs are established initial investigations, although the significance of a number of the commonly derived quantitative parameters in children remains unclear. CT and MRI are important additional imaging modalities reserved for the investigation of symptomatic cases or those in which an underlying structural abnormality is suspected, rigid flatfoot commonly falling into one of these two categories. We review and illustrate the multimodality imaging of the paediatric flatfoot, with reference to both qualitative and quantitative radiographic assessment and cross-sectional imaging appearances.

Bilateral Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip: Does Closed Reduction Have a Role in Management? Outcome of Closed and Open Reduction in 92 Hips.

BACKGROUND: Bilateral developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is believed to have a worse outcome than unilateral DDH with the optimal treatment unclear. To define indications for treatment we report a retrospective series of 92 hips (46 patients) who underwent closed reduction (CR) and/or open reduction (OR). METHODS: A total of 58 hips in 29 patients underwent attempted CR using our standardized protocol. In the same 12 year time period, 54 hips in 27 patients underwent an OR. Outcome measures included resolution of acetabular dysplasia, need for further surgery, development of osteonecrosis (ON), and modified Severin Grade. RESULTS: CR was successful in 57% of hips; in this group secondary surgery was required in 15% and ON was seen in 12%. In the OR group, 11% failed to stabilize and required further early surgery: ON rate was 15% overall, and secondary surgery was required in 5%. In Tonnis 2/3 hips younger than 2 years, Severin grading was comparable following CR and OR, with 92% and 90% graded as Severin 1, respectively. The rate of significant ON was higher after CR in Tonnis 2/3 hips (12%) than after OR (0%). Overall, Tonnis 4 hips did badly: 94% failed CR and following OR, further surgery for redislocation/residual dysplasia was required in 21%. CONCLUSIONS: CR can be successful in Tonnis 2/3 bilateral hips, with acceptable rates of secondary surgery, ON, and Severin grading, the latter equivalent to open reduction. Importantly, persisting with casting of a unilateral dislocation, to allow the contra-lateral hip to stabilize, does not have an adverse effect. CR is not advised in Tonnis 4 bilateral hips. Parents should be counseled that the outcome of surgery for bilateral hips is not as good as for unilateral DDH, particularly for Tonnis 4 hips which are more difficult to stabilize and more likely to require supplementary surgery even after open reduction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV-Therapeutic Study.

Deep peroneal nerve palsy during growth spurt: a case report.

UNLABELLED: Peripheral nerve injuries may have a number of causes, most commonly mechanical. We describe a case of a deep peroneal nerve palsy in an adolescent boy which coincided with a large growth spurt. Spontaneous recovery of full function was seen without intervention. CONCLUSION: In the absence of any other causative factors, we believe that this growth spurt resulted in temporary compression of the deep peroneal nerve at the level of the knee producing transient neurapraxia.

Iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury after the surgical treatment of displaced supracondylar fractures of the humerus: number needed to harm, a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Supracondylar fractures of the humerus are common pediatric elbow injuries. Most displaced or angulated fractures are treated by closed reduction and percutaneous pinning, with either a crossed pin or lateral pin configuration. The purpose of this study was to conduct a systematic review to determine if there is an increased risk of iatrogenic nerve injury associated with the crossed pin configuration. METHODS: Relevant articles were identified by searching electronic databases and hand searching-related journal and conference proceedings. Within each trial, the risk of iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury was calculated for each pinning technique. For studies comparing crossed versus lateral pinning, the resulting trial-based differences in risk estimates were pooled using a random effects meta-analysis. A number needed to harm was determined using the pooled risk difference. RESULTS: Thirty-two trials consisting of 2639 patients were used in the pooled analysis. The pooled risk difference of iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury is 0.035 (95% confidence interval, 0.014-0.056), with a higher incidence of injury in the crossed pinning group. The weighed number needed to harm for the crossed pinning is 28 (95% confidence interval, 17-71). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this review suggest that there is an iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury for every 28 patients treated with the crossed pinning compared with the lateral pinning. Further research is necessary to ensure that the optimal pinning technique is chosen to treat these factors. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.