Squamous cell carcinoma initially occurring on the tongue dorsum: a case series report with molecular analysis.

BACKGROUND: Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the dorsum of the tongue is extremely rare, and it clinically resembles various benign lesions. Somatic mutations in TP53 and some driver genes were implicated in the development of SCC; however, the somatic genetic characteristics of dorsal tongue SCC remain unknown. With a detailed analysis of gene mutations in dorsal tongue SCC, we aimed to better understand its biology. METHODS: Four cases of SCC initially occurring on the tongue dorsum were evaluated for clinical and histological findings and immunohistochemical expression of p53 and p16. Gene mutations were analyzed using next-generation sequencing with a custom panel of driver genes. RESULTS: We retrospectively investigated 557 cases of tongue SCC, and only four cases of SCC initially occurred on the tongue dorsum. The four patients (cases 1-4) were one woman and three men with a mean age of 53.75 years (range: 15-74 years). Histological analysis revealed well-differentiated SCC. Through molecular analysis, we identified pathogenic somatic mutations, namely, TP53 p.C176F (c.527G > T) in case 3 and TP53 p.R282W (c.844 C > T) in case 4. No pathogenic variants were identified in the PI3K/AKT or RAS/RAF pathways. The p53 immunohistochemical examination revealed a wild-type expression pattern in cases 1-3 and strong expression in case 4. The results of p16 immunostaining were negative in all cases. CONCLUSIONS: We described four previously unreported genetic characteristics of dorsal tongue SCC. Somatic TP53 mutations may contribute to the development of a subset of dorsal tongue SCC; however, more cases with genetic analysis need to be accumulated.

Clear Cell Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Maxillary Gingiva Associated with PIK3CA and HRAS Mutations: Report of a Case and Literature Review.

BACKGROUND: Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is the most common oral malignancy, and somatic mutations in some driver genes have been implicated in SCC development. Clear cell SCC (CCSCC) is a rare histological variant of SCC, and various clear cell neoplasms must be considered in the differential diagnosis of CCSCC in the oral cavity. Based on a limited number of CCSCC cases reported in the oral cavity, CCSCC is considered an aggressive variant of SCC with a poor prognosis; however, its genetic characteristics remain unknown. METHODS: A maxillary gingival tumor in an 89-year-old female was described and investigated using immunohistochemical staining, special staining, fluorescence in situ hybridization, and next-generation sequencing (NGS) with a custom panel of driver genes, including those associated with SCC and clear cell neoplasm development. RESULTS: Histopathological examination revealed a proliferation of atypical epithelial cells with abundant clear cytoplasm and enlarged and centrally placed round nuclei. The tumor was exophytic with deep, penetrating proliferation. The atypical clear cells were continuous with the conventional SCC cells. Immunohistochemical analysis showed that the clear cells were positive for CK AE1/AE3 and CK5/6 and nuclear-positive for p63. In contrast, the clear cells were negative for αSMA, S100, HMB45, Melan-A, CD10, and p16. p53 immunoreactivity exhibited a wild-type expression pattern. Additionally, the clear cells were positive for periodic acid-Schiff (PAS) and negative for diastase-PAS, mucicarmine, and Alcian blue. Based on these results, the diagnosis of CCSCC was confirmed. Molecular analysis of the clear cells identified PIK3CA p.E542K (c.1624G>A) and HRAS p.G12A (c.35 G>C) somatic mutations classified as oncogenic. No pathogenic variants were identified in TP53, EWSR1, AKT1, PTEN, BRAF, KRAS, NRAS, RASA1, or MAML2. CONCLUSIONS: We report a case of CCSCC of the oral cavity with PIK3CA and HRAS mutations. The identification of PIK3CA and/or HRAS mutations is rare in SCC; however, both mutations are important potential targets for antitumor therapy. A detailed analysis of gene mutations in CCSCC may lead to a better understanding of its biological behavior and an improved prognosis, as well as a differential diagnosis from other clear cell neoplasms.

Differential Diagnosis between Oral Metastasis of Renal Cell Carcinoma and Salivary Gland Cancer.

Renal cell carcinoma, which has clear cells in 70% of cases, has a high frequency of hematogenous distant metastases to lung, bone, liver, and other areas. Metastatic cancer accounts for 1 to 3% of malignant tumors in the stomatognathic region, and the metastasis of renal cell carcinoma to the oral mucosal tissue, though extremely rare, does occur. In addition, clear cells have been observed in some salivary gland cancers in the oral cavity. Therefore, the differential diagnosis of metastatic renal cell carcinoma and salivary gland cancer is important. This review discusses the differential diagnosis between metastatic renal cell carcinoma and malignant tumors of the salivary gland.

Transcription factor MafB is a marker of tumor-associated macrophages in both mouse and humans.

The transcription factor MafB is specifically expressed in macrophages. We have recently demonstrated that MafB is expressed in anti-inflammatory alternatively activated M2 macrophages in vitro. Tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) are a subset of M2 type macrophages that can promote immunosuppressive activity, induce angiogenesis, and promote tumor cell proliferation. To examine whether MafB express in TAMs, we analyzed green fluorescent protein (GFP) expression in Lewis lung carcinoma tumors of MafB-GFP knock-in heterozygous mice. FACS analysis demonstrated GFP fluorescence in cells positive for macrophage-markers (F4/80, CD11b, CD68, and CD204). Moreover, quantitative RT-PCR analysis with F4/80+GFP+ and F4/80+GFP- sorted cells showed that the GFP-positive macrophages express IL-10, Arg-1, and TNF-α, which were known to be expressed in TAMs. These results indicate that MafB is expressed in TAMs. Furthermore, immunostaining analysis using an anti-MAFB antibody revealed that MAFB is expressed in CD204-and CD68-positive macrophages in human lung cancer samples. In conclusion, MafB can be a suitable marker of TAMs in both mouse and human tumor tissues.