Plastid expression of a double-pentameric vaccine candidate containing human papillomavirus-16 L1 antigen fused with LTB as adjuvant: transplastomic plants show pleiotropic phenotypes.

Human papillomavirus (HPV) causes cervical cancer in women worldwide, which is currently prevented by vaccines based on virus-like particles (VLPs). However, these vaccines have certain limitations in their availability to developing countries, largely due to elevated costs. Concerning the highest burden of disease in resource-poor countries, development of an improved mucosal and cost-effective vaccine is a necessity. As an alternative to VLPs, capsomeres have been shown to be highly immunogenic and can be used as vaccine candidate. Furthermore, coupling of an adjuvant like Escherichia coli heat-labile enterotoxin subunit B (LTB) to an antigen can increase its immunogenicity and reduce the costs related to separate co-administration of adjuvants. Our study demonstrates the expression of two pentameric proteins: the modified HPV-16 L1 (L1_2xCysM) and LTB as a fusion protein in tobacco chloroplasts. Homoplasmy of the transplastomic plants was confirmed by Southern blotting. Western blot analysis showed that the LTB-L1 fusion protein was properly expressed in the plastids and the recombinant protein was estimated to accumulate up to 2% of total soluble protein. Proper folding and display of conformational epitopes for both LTB and L1 in the fusion protein was confirmed by GM1-ganglioside binding assay and antigen capture ELISA, respectively. However, all transplastomic lines showed chlorosis, male sterility and growth retardation, which persisted in the ensuing four generations studied. Nevertheless, plants reached maturity and produced seeds by pollination with wild-type plants. Taken together, these results pave the way for the possible development of a low-cost adjuvant-coupled vaccine with potentially improved immunogenicity against cervical cancer.

Transplastomic expression of a modified human papillomavirus L1 protein leading to the assembly of capsomeres in tobacco: a step towards cost-effective second-generation vaccines.

Certain types of human papillomaviruses (HPV) are causatively associated with cervical carcinoma, the second most common cancer in women worldwide. Due to limitations in the availability of currently used virus-like particle (VLP)-based vaccines against HPV to women of developing countries, where most cases of cervical cancer occur, the development of a cost-effective second-generation vaccine is a necessity. Capsomeres have recently been demonstrated to be highly immunogenic and to have a number of advantages as a potential cost-effective alternative to VLP-based HPV vaccines. We have expressed a mutated HPV-16 L1 (L1_2xCysM) gene that retained the ability to assemble L1 protein to capsomeres in tobacco chloroplasts. The recombinant protein yielded up to 1.5% of total soluble protein. The assembly of capsomeres was examined and verified by cesium chloride density gradient centrifugation and sucrose sedimentation analysis. An antigen capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay confirmed the formation of capsomeres by using a conformation-specific monoclonal antibody which recognized the conformational epitopes. Transplastomic tobacco plants exhibited normal growth and morphology, but all such lines showed male sterility in the T0, T1 and T2 generations. Taken together, these results indicate the possibility of producing a low-cost capsomere-based vaccine by plastids.

A direct comparison of human papillomavirus type 16 L1 particles reveals a lower immunogenicity of capsomeres than viruslike particles with respect to the induced antibody response.

Capsomeres are considered to be an alternative to viruslike particle (VLP)-based vaccines as they can be produced in prokaryotic expression systems. So far, no detailed side-by-side comparison of VLPs and capsomeres has been performed. In the present study, we immunized mice with insect cell-derived human papillomavirus type 16 VLPs and capsomeres. VLPs induced consistently higher antibody titers than capsomeres but the two forms induced similar CD8 T-cell responses after subcutaneous, intranasal, and oral immunization, and at least 20 to 40 times more L1 in the form of capsomeres than in the form of VLPs was needed to achieve comparable antibody responses. These results were confirmed by DNA immunization. The lower immunogenicity of capsomeres was independent of the isotype switch, as it was also observed for the early immunoglobulin M responses. Although there were differences in the display of surface epitopes between the L1 particles, these did not contribute significantly to the differences in the immune responses. capsomeres were less immunogenic than VLPs in Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4)-deficient mice, suggesting that the lower immunogenicity is not due to a failure of capsomeres to trigger TLR4. We observed better correlation between antibody results from enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays and neutralization assays for sera from VLP-immunized mice than for sera from capsomere-immunized mice, suggesting qualitative differences between VLPs and capsomeres. We also showed that the lower immunogenicity of capsomeres could be compensated by the use of an adjuvant system containing MPL. Taken together, these results suggest that, presumably because of the lower degree of complexity of the antigen organization, capsomeres are significantly less immunogenic than VLPs with respect to the humoral immune response and that this characteristic should be considered in the design of putative capsomere-based prophylactic vaccines.

Immunotherapy of equine sarcoid: dose-escalation trial for the use of chimeric papillomavirus-like particles.

Equine sarcoids are fibrosarcoma-like skin tumours with a prevalence of approximately 1-2 %. Strong evidence exists for a causative role of bovine papillomavirus (BPV) type 1 or type 2 in the development of sarcoids. No effective treatment of equine sarcoid is available and after surgical excision relapse of the tumours is very frequent. We developed chimeric virus-like particles (CVLPs) of BPV 1 L1-E7 for the immunotherapy of equine sarcoid. In a phase I clinical trial 12 horses suffering from equine sarcoid with an average number of more than 22 tumours per animal were vaccinated in a dose-escalation setting. The animals were followed-up for 63 days, eight of the twelve horses were followed-up for more than a year and side-effects, humoral immune responses and tumour appearance were recorded. BPV DNA was detected in tumours of 11 cases. CVLPs were well tolerated in all dose groups, a robust anti-L1 antibody response was induced in all but one of the horses. Anti-E7 antibodies were detected in five of the 12 animals at low titres. Two animals showed a clear improvement of the clinical status after treatment, i.e. the number of the tumours per horse was reduced. In another horse regression of five sarcoids was observed; three of them relapsed during the study. Two animals showed tumour regression as well as growth of new sarcoids. In two horses the clinical status remained unchanged, in another two horses growth of existing tumours or growth of additional tumours was observed. The remaining three animals showed simultaneously regression and growth of existing tumours. Neither the humoral immune responses nor the observed effects on the tumours was correlated with the dose group.

Oral immunization with different assembly forms of the HPV 16 major capsid protein L1 induces neutralizing antibodies and cytotoxic T-lymphocytes.

Human papillomaviruses have been recognized as the causative agent of anogenital cancer. In 2006, a commercial vaccine based on virus-like particles composed of the L1 major capsid protein of the papillomaviruses has been available. This vaccine induces virus-neutralizing antibody responses upon parenteral injection. Here we investigated the oral immunogenicity of different assembly forms of HPV 16 L1, that is: T7-VLPs, T1 particles and capsomeres. Our results show that all three assembly forms induce humoral and cellular immune responses after oral vaccination of mice. The anti-L1 antibodies were conformation-specific and showed neutralizing activity in a pseudovirion-based assay. We also investigated if adjuvants have an influence on the oral immunogenicity of the different L1 forms. For saponins we observed a significant toxicity if applied orally. Co-administration of either CpG DNA or Escherichia coli heat-labile enterotoxin LT(R192G) had no apparent enhancing effect on the production of anti-L1 antibodies. More pronounced was the effect of CpG administration on the long-term immunity as we observed a significantly stronger recall response 244 days after the first vaccination. Compared to capsomeres, VLPs induced stronger humoral immune responses while the CTL responses were induced at comparable levels. Finally, we were also able to induce neutralizing antibodies and L1-specific cytotoxic T-lymphocytes after oral administration of crude extracts of L1-expressing insect cells. In conclusion, all three assembly forms of the L1 protein are immunogenic when administered orally.

Prophylactic DNA immunization against multiple papillomavirus types.

At least 15 different papillomavirus types are causatively associated with the development of tumors in humans. Since the middle of 2006 a protective, virus-like particle based vaccine against the tumor-related HPV types 16 and 18 is commercially available. We investigated the possibility of applying DNA vaccination to obtain protective antibody responses against multiple papillomavirus types. Our data indicate that low amounts of DNA were sufficient to induce neutralizing antibodies in mice although a DNA dose-dependency in respect to the L1-specific antibody titers was observed. Furthermore, we found that immune responses against different PV types could be induced by simultaneous DNA vaccination with a mixture of expression vectors encoding L1 proteins of different papillomavirus types. However, we observed that there was a strong interference when plasmids encoding different L1 genes were used together. HPV 16 responses were repressed by co-administration of HPV 11 and/or BPV 1 L1 expression constructs. Likewise, BPV 1 responses were repressed by co-administration of HPV 16 or HPV 11 L1 plasmids. This interference could be overcome by administration of the different constructs into different sites of the animals or by sequential immunization. Thus, our results suggest that the mode of repression was due to interference with L1 particle assembly and was not a consequence of immunodominance of certain L1 proteins.