The mesolimbic system and the loss of higher order network features in schizophrenia when learning without reward.

Introduction: Schizophrenia is characterized by a loss of network features between cognition and reward sub-circuits (notably involving the mesolimbic system), and this loss may explain deficits in learning and cognition. Learning in schizophrenia has typically been studied with tasks that include reward related contingencies, but recent theoretical models have argued that a loss of network features should be seen even when learning without reward. We tested this model using a learning paradigm that required participants to learn without reward or feedback. We used a novel method for capturing higher order network features, to demonstrate that the mesolimbic system is heavily implicated in the loss of network features in schizophrenia, even when learning without reward. Methods: fMRI data (Siemens Verio 3T) were acquired in a group of schizophrenia patients and controls (n=78; 46 SCZ, 18 ≤ Age ≤ 50) while participants engaged in associative learning without reward-related contingencies. The task was divided into task-active conditions for encoding (of associations) and cued-retrieval (where the cue was to be used to retrieve the associated memoranda). No feedback was provided during retrieval. From the fMRI time series data, network features were defined as follows: First, for each condition of the task, we estimated 2nd order undirected functional connectivity for each participant (uFC, based on zero lag correlations between all pairs of regions). These conventional 2nd order features represent the task/condition evoked synchronization of activity between pairs of brain regions. Next, in each of the patient and control groups, the statistical relationship between all possible pairs of 2nd order features were computed. These higher order features represent the consistency between all possible pairs of 2nd order features in that group and embed within them the contributions of individual regions to such group structure. Results: From the identified inter-group differences (SCZ ≠ HC) in higher order features, we quantified the respective contributions of individual brain regions. Two principal effects emerged: 1) SCZ were characterized by a massive loss of higher order features during multiple task conditions (encoding and retrieval of associations). 2) Nodes in the mesolimbic system were over-represented in the loss of higher order features in SCZ, and notably so during retrieval. Discussion: Our analytical goals were linked to a recent circuit-based integrative model which argued that synergy between learning and reward circuits is lost in schizophrenia. The model's notable prediction was that such a loss would be observed even when patients learned without reward. Our results provide substantial support for these predictions where we observed a loss of network features between the brain's sub-circuits for a) learning (including the hippocampus and prefrontal cortex) and b) reward processing (specifically constituents of the mesolimbic system that included the ventral tegmental area and the nucleus accumbens. Our findings motivate a renewed appraisal of the relationship between reward and cognition in schizophrenia and we discuss their relevance for putative behavioral interventions.

Learning without contingencies: A loss of synergy between memory and reward circuits in schizophrenia.

Motivational deficits in schizophrenia may interact with foundational cognitive processes including learning and memory to induce impaired cognitive proficiency. If such a loss of synergy exists, it is likely to be underpinned by a loss of synchrony between the brains learning and reward sub-networks. Moreover, this loss should be observed even during tasks devoid of explicit reward contingencies given that such tasks are better models of real world performance than those with artificial contingencies. Here we applied undirected functional connectivity (uFC) analyses to fMRI data acquired while participants engaged in an associative learning task without contingencies or feedback. uFC was estimated and inter-group differences (between schizophrenia patients and controls, n = 54 total, n = 28 patients) were assessed within and between reward (VTA and NAcc) and learning/memory (Basal Ganglia, DPFC, Hippocampus, Parahippocampus, Occipital Lobe) sub-networks. The task paradigm itself alternated between Encoding, Consolidation, and Retrieval conditions, and uFC differences were quantified for each of the conditions. Significantly reduced uFC dominated the connectivity profiles of patients across all conditions. More pertinent to our motivations, these reductions were observed within and across classes of sub-networks (reward-related and learning/memory related). We suggest that disrupted functional connectivity between reward and learning sub-networks may drive many of the performance deficits that characterize schizophrenia. Thus, cognitive deficits in schizophrenia may in fact be underpinned by a loss of synergy between reward-sensitivity and cognitive processes.

Neural activity is modulated by trial history: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study of the effects of a previous antisaccade.

Saccadic latencies are influenced by what occurred during the previous trial. When the previous trial is an antisaccade, the latencies of both prosaccades and antisaccades are prolonged. The aim of this study was to identify neural correlates of this intertrial effect of antisaccades. Specifically, based on both monkey electrophysiology and human neuroimaging findings, we expected trials preceded by antisaccades to be associated with reduced frontal eye field (FEF) activity relative to those preceded by prosaccades. Twenty-one healthy participants performed pseudorandom sequences of prosaccade and antisaccade trials during functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) with concurrent monitoring of eye position. We compared activity in trials preceded by an antisaccade with activity in trials preceded by a prosaccade. The primary result was that a previous antisaccade prolonged saccadic latency and reduced fMRI activity in the FEF and other regions. No regions showed increased activity. We interpret the reduced FEF activity and slower saccadic responses to reflect inhibitory influences on the response system as a consequence of performing an antisaccade in the previous trial. This demonstrates that neural activity is modulated by trial history, consistent with a rapid, dynamic form of learning. More generally, these results highlight the importance of trial history as a source of variability in both behavioral and neuroimaging studies.