Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 43
Filtrar
1.
Sci Rep ; 7(1): 16369, 2017 11 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29180716

RESUMEN

Transcriptional coordination is a vital process contributing to metabolic homeostasis. As one of the key nodes in the metabolic network, the forkhead transcription factor FOXO has been shown to interact with diverse transcription co-factors and integrate signals from multiple pathways to control metabolism, oxidative stress response, and cell cycle. Recently, insulin/FOXO signaling has been implicated in the regulation of insect development via the interaction with insect hormones, such as ecdysone and juvenile hormone. In this study, we identified an interaction between Drosophila FOXO (dFOXO) and the zinc finger transcription factor Kruppel homolog 1 (Kr-h1), one of the key players in juvenile hormone signaling. We found that Kr-h1 mutants show delayed larval development and altered lipid metabolism, in particular induced lipolysis upon starvation. Notably, Kr-h1 physically and genetically interacts with dFOXO in vitro and in vivo to regulate the transcriptional activation of insulin receptor (InR) and adipose lipase brummer (bmm). The transcriptional co-regulation by Kr-h1 and dFOXO may represent a broad mechanism by which Kruppel-like factors integrate with insulin signaling to maintain metabolic homeostasis and coordinate organism growth.


Asunto(s)
Proteínas de Drosophila/metabolismo , Drosophila/metabolismo , Factores de Transcripción Forkhead/metabolismo , Factores de Transcripción de Tipo Kruppel/metabolismo , Tejido Adiposo , Animales , Sitios de Unión , Drosophila/genética , Proteínas de Drosophila/genética , Metabolismo Energético , Insulina/metabolismo , Hormonas Juveniles/metabolismo , Factores de Transcripción de Tipo Kruppel/genética , Larva , Lipasa , Metabolismo de los Lípidos , Lipólisis , Mutación , Regiones Promotoras Genéticas , Unión Proteica , Transducción de Señal , Transcripción Genética , Triglicéridos/metabolismo
2.
J Surg Orthop Adv ; 26(2): 86-93, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28644119

RESUMEN

The purpose of this study was to evaluate damage control plating (DCP) as an alternative to external fixation (EF) in the provisional stabilization of open tibial shaft fractures. Through retrospective analysis, the study found 445 patients who underwent operative fixation for tibial shaft fractures from 2008 to 2012. Twenty patients received DCP or EF before intramedullary nailing with a minimum follow-up of 3 months. Charts and radiographs were reviewed for postoperative complications. Hospital charges were reviewed for implant costs. Nine patients (45%) with DCP and 11 patients (55%) with EF were analyzed. There was no significant difference in the complication rates. The mean implant cost of DCP was $1028, whereas mean EF construct cost was $4204. Therefore, DCP resulted in significant cost savings with no difference in complication rates, making it a valuable alternative to EF for the provisional stabilization of open tibial shaft fractures.


Asunto(s)
Placas Óseas , Fijadores Externos , Fijación Interna de Fracturas , Fracturas Abiertas/cirugía , Fracturas de la Tibia/cirugía , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Placas Óseas/economía , Ahorro de Costo , Fijadores Externos/economía , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto Joven
3.
J Surg Orthop Adv ; 26(1): 48-53, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28459424

RESUMEN

This study investigated whether current Medicare reimbursements for orthopaedic trauma procedures correlate with complications. A total of 18,510 patients representing 33 orthopaedic trauma procedures from 2005 to 2011 were studied. Adverse events and Medicare payments for each orthopaedic trauma procedure were collected. Linear regressions determined correlations between complications and Medicare payments for orthopaedic trauma procedures. A weak correlation between Medicare payments and complications was found for all procedures (r = .399, p = .021). A 1.0% increase in complications was associated with a payment increase of only $100. There were no correlations between complications and reimbursements for upper extremity (p = .878) and lower extremity (p = .713) procedures. A strong correlation (r = .808, p = .015) existed for hip and pelvic fractures, but a 1.1% increase in hip and pelvic complications correlated with only an increase of $100 in reimbursements. This study is the first to show that Medicare payments are not strongly correlated with complications, therefore demonstrating the potential risks of a bundled payment system for orthopaedic trauma surgeons.


Asunto(s)
Fracturas Óseas/cirugía , Reembolso de Seguro de Salud/economía , Procedimientos Ortopédicos/economía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Mecanismo de Reembolso , Amputación Quirúrgica , Artroplastia de Reemplazo , Bases de Datos Factuales , Fijación de Fractura , Hemiartroplastia , Humanos , Modelos Lineales , Medicare , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
4.
J Surg Orthop Adv ; 25(2): 105-9, 2016.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27518295

RESUMEN

The objective of this study was to determine the clinical factors that are predictors for intraoperative transfusion in orthopaedic trauma patients. A retrospective chart review of patients admitted to a level I trauma center with isolated fractures was conducted. Variables such as gender, height, weight, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification, and medical comorbidities were assessed to determine likelihood of blood transfusion. A total of 1819 patients with isolated fractures were identified. ASA class was strongly associated with patients receiving intraoperative blood transfusion. For example, compared with patients with an ASA class I, patients with an ASA class IV were 14.71 times more likely to receive transfusion. Patients' ASA class is correlated with the need for intraoperative blood transfusion in patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery for isolated fractures. Institutional or departmental maximum surgical blood order schedule algorithms could use patients' preoperative ASA class to determine whether blood transfusion will be necessary during procedures.


Asunto(s)
Pérdida de Sangre Quirúrgica , Transfusión Sanguínea/estadística & datos numéricos , Fracturas Óseas/cirugía , Complicaciones Intraoperatorias/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anestesiología , Niño , Comorbilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Complicaciones Intraoperatorias/terapia , Funciones de Verosimilitud , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Sociedades Médicas , Centros Traumatológicos , Adulto Joven
5.
J Orthop ; 13(4): 264-7, 2016 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27408500

RESUMEN

We investigated geographic variations in Medicare spending for DRG 536 (hip and pelvis fracture). We identified 22,728 patients. The median number of charges, discharges, and payments were recorded. Hospitals were aggregated into core based statistical (CBS) areas and the coefficient of variation (CV) was calculated for each area. On average, hospitals charged 3.75 times more than they were reimbursed. Medicare charges and reimbursements demonstrated variability within each area. Geographic variation in Medicare spending for hip fractures is currently unexplained. It is imperative for orthopedists to understand drivers behind such high variability in hospital charges for management of hip and pelvis fractures.

7.
R I Med J (2013) ; 99(8): 31-3, 2016 Aug 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27472773

RESUMEN

Exposure to research early in medical school facilitates the development of physician-scientists and competent clinicians. In the last decade, institutions have established programs and policies to address the physician- scientist shortage. However, student-led initiatives to promote medical student engagement in research remain unexplored. This paper presents the design and results of the third iteration of a symposium in which senior medical students provided guidance and advice to preclinical students interested in research. It also reviews the lessons learned from three years of conducting the symposium. [Full article available at http://rimed.org/rimedicaljournal-2016-08.asp, free with no login].


Asunto(s)
Investigación Biomédica/métodos , Educación de Pregrado en Medicina/métodos , Grupo Paritario , Estudiantes de Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Congresos como Asunto , Humanos , Facultades de Medicina
8.
J Surg Orthop Adv ; 25(1): 13-7, 2016.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27082883

RESUMEN

The objective of this study was to compare complication rates and costs of staged columnar fixation (SCF) to external fixation for bicondylar tibial plateau fractures. Patients who received SCF or temporary external fixation across a 3-year period at a major level I trauma center underwent a retrospective chart review for associated complications. Fisher's exact analysis was used to determine any statistical difference in complication rates between both groups. However, there was no significant difference in complication rates between the SCF and external fixator groups. Average medial plate costs for SCF were $2131 compared with an average external fixator cost of $4070 (p < .0001). Given that all patients with external fixation undergo eventual medial and lateral plating, savings with SCF include $4070 plus operative costs for removing the fixator. As our health care system focuses on cost-cutting efforts, orthopaedic trauma surgeons must explore cheaper and equally effective treatment alternatives.


Asunto(s)
Fijación Interna de Fracturas/métodos , Traumatismos de la Rodilla/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Fracturas de la Tibia/cirugía , Placas Óseas/economía , Estudios de Cohortes , Fijadores Externos/economía , Femenino , Fijación de Fractura/economía , Fijación de Fractura/métodos , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/economía , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
9.
J Surg Orthop Adv ; 25(1): 49-53, 2016.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27082888

RESUMEN

The purpose of this study was to investigate operative costs and postoperative complication rates in relation to utilization of locking versus nonlocking implants in isolated, lower limb fractures. Seventy-seven patients underwent plate fixation of isolated bicondylar tibial plateau, bimalleolar ankle, and trimalleolar ankle fractures at a large tertiary care center. Fixation with locking versus nonlocking implants was compared to incidence of postsurgical complications. Costs of these implants were directly compared. No significant correlation was found between locking versus nonlocking implants and incidence of complications. However, the cost of fixation with locking implants was significantly greater than nonlocking for all fractures. Utilization of more costly locking implants was not associated with reduced postoperative complications compared with nonlocking implants. More attention must be dedicated toward maximizing cost efficiency, since uniform usage of nonlocking implants has the potential to reduce surgical costs without compromising patient outcomes in isolated lower extremity fractures.


Asunto(s)
Fracturas de Tobillo/cirugía , Placas Óseas/economía , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/instrumentación , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Traumatismos de la Rodilla/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Fracturas de la Tibia/cirugía , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/economía , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto Joven
10.
R I Med J (2013) ; 99(5): 22-4, 2016 May 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27128512

RESUMEN

Idiopathic intracranial hypertension, also known as pseudotumor cerebri, is an unexplained increase in intracranial pressure associated with permanent severe visual loss in 25% of cases and debilitating headaches. The condition is often associated with obesity. The Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension Treatment Trial, a large, randomized, collaborative clinical trial, evaluated the efficacy of acetazolamide with weight loss versus placebo with weight loss in participants. Herein, we describe the major components of the clinical trial and discuss its shortcomings. [Full article available at http://rimed.org/rimedicaljournal-2016-05.asp, free with no login].


Asunto(s)
Acetazolamida/administración & dosificación , Diuréticos/administración & dosificación , Obesidad/complicaciones , Seudotumor Cerebral/tratamiento farmacológico , Pérdida de Peso , Acetazolamida/efectos adversos , Adolescente , Adulto , Diuréticos/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , América del Norte , Seudotumor Cerebral/terapia , Adulto Joven
11.
Fed Pract ; 33(9): 10-13, 2016 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30930612

RESUMEN

A survey finds low rates for femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery, intracameral antibiotics, and immediate sequential bilateral cataract surgery in cataract surgery practice.

12.
R I Med J (2013) ; 98(12): 44-9, 2015 Dec 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26623456

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine ophthalmologists' views on the Medicare bundled payment model for specialty physicians in the outpatient setting. DESIGN AND METHODS: The New England Ophthalmology Society (NEOS) was emailed an anonymous survey. Views of bundled payments and demographic characteristics were analyzed. RESULTS: Of responding members, 72% (115/160) strongly opposed bundled payments; 68% (108/160) believed bundled payments will lead to financial losses, and the majority did not support including costs of prescription drugs (69%, 109/159) or preoperative (77%, 123/159) or postoperative complications (59%, 94/159) in the bundle. Respondents who held office in a medical society, were in private practice, solely billed for income, and had mostly conservative political views were significantly more likely to oppose bundling. CONCLUSION: The majority of NEOS ophthalmologists were opposed to bundled payments. Personal beliefs and practice type may influence the level of ophthalmologist support of bundled payments.


Asunto(s)
Actitud del Personal de Salud , Gastos en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicare/economía , Oftalmología , Médicos , Humanos , New England , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estados Unidos
13.
J Clin Orthop Trauma ; 6(1): 1-5, 2015 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26549944

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Heterotopic ossification (HO) about the hip after total hip arthroplasty and internal fixation of the hip, pelvis, and acetabulum has been linked to surgical approach. However, no study has investigated surgical approach and HO in patients undergoing hemiarthroplasty. We therefore aimed to explore the influence of operative approach in patients undergoing hemiarthroplasty. METHODS: Through a retrospective case series at an Urban level I trauma center, we found 80 patients over the age of 60 undergoing hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fractures from 2000 to 2009. Patient charts, operative notes, and radiographs were reviewed for demographics, operative approach (anterior: A, anterior-lateral: AL, posterior: P), and any development of HO. Fisher's exact test compared rates of HO among the three approaches. Student's t-tests compared Brooker Classification levels of HO among the approaches. RESULTS: 82 hemiarthroplasties (26 A, 32 AL, 24 P) were included for analysis. 22 patients (27%) had HO. There was no significant difference in the development of HO based upon surgical approach: A: 19% (n = 5); AL: 34% (n = 11); P: 25% (n = 6). There was a significant difference in the grade of HO based on Brooker Classification (BC) with the posterior approach resulting in significantly lower grade of HO: A (BC: 2.60); AL (BC: 2.64); P (BC: 1.50) (p = 0.012). CONCLUSIONS: Our data is the first to evaluate surgical approach and HO in patients with hemiarthroplasty. Patients have a significant risk of developing higher grade HO based on surgical approach (A or AL). Orthopedists should be mindful of these risks when considering A or AL approaches.

14.
J Clin Orthop Trauma ; 6(4): 220-6, 2015 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26566333

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: With the shift of our healthcare system toward a value-based system of reimbursement, complications such as surgical site infections (SSI) may not be reimbursed. The purpose of our study was to investigate the costs and risk factors of SSI for orthopedic trauma patients. METHODS: Through retrospective analysis, 1819 patients with isolated fractures were identified. Of those, 78 patients who developed SSIs were compared to 78 uninfected control patients. Patients were matched by fracture location, type of fracture, duration of surgery, and as close as possible to age, year of surgery, and type of procedure. Costs for treatment during primary hospitalization and initial readmission were determined and potential risk factors were collected from patient charts. A Wilcoxon test was used to compare the overall costs of treatment for case and control patients. Costs were further broken down into professional fees and technical charges for analysis. Risk factors for SSIs were analyzed through a chi-squared analysis. RESULTS: Median cost for treatment for patients with SSIs was $108,782 compared to $57,418 for uninfected patients (p < 0.001). Professional fees and technical charges were found to be significantly higher for infected patients. No significant risk factors for SSIs were determined. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate the potential for financial losses in our new healthcare system due to uncompensated care. SSIs nearly double the cost of treatment for orthopedic trauma patients. There is no single driver of these costs. Reducing postoperative stay may be one method for reducing the cost of treating SSIs, whereas quality management programs may decrease risk of infection.

15.
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) ; 44(11): E438-43, 2015 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26566559

RESUMEN

Length of stay (LOS) drives costs for hip fracture patients. One factor that affects LOS is delayed transfer of patients to rehabilitation centers. It is therefore imperative that orthopedists have a mechanism for identifying which patients require rehabilitation services after surgery. We conducted a study to identify patient risk factors that are significantly associated with discharge to rehabilitation. Using 2011 ACS-NSQIP (American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program) data, we prospectively analyzed the cases of 4815 patients who underwent hip fracture surgery and had discharge information available. Discharge location, surgery type, patient demographics, 32 patient comorbidities, and 7 operative factors were identified in these patients. Fisher exact tests were used to determine which patient factors were significantly associated with discharge to rehabilitation. Of the 4815 patients, 80.3% were discharged to rehabilitation and 19.7% to home. After multivariable analysis, age over 65 years, female sex, dialysis, prior percutaneous coronary intervention, hypertension, general anesthesia, and ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) class higher than 2 had higher odds of discharge to rehabilitation, and DNR (do not resuscitate) status had higher odds of discharge to home. This study was the first to determine which factors predicted discharge to rehabilitation in hip fracture patients. Knowing these risk factors provides orthopedists with a mechanism that can be used to identify which patients require rehabilitation after surgery, thereby facilitating transfer and potentially decreasing LOS and associated costs.


Asunto(s)
Fracturas de Cadera/rehabilitación , Fracturas de Cadera/cirugía , Tiempo de Internación , Alta del Paciente , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Centros de Rehabilitación , Factores de Riesgo , Factores Sexuales
16.
World J Orthop ; 6(8): 629-35, 2015 Sep 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26396939

RESUMEN

AIM: To investigate inpatient length of stay (LOS), complication rates, and readmission rates for sacral fracture patients based on operative approach. METHODS: All patients who presented to a large tertiary care center with isolated sacral fractures in an 11-year period were included in a retrospective chart review. Operative approach (open reduction internal fixation vs percutaneous) was noted, as well as age, gender, race, and American Society of Anesthesiologists' score. Complications included infection, nonunion and malunion, deep venous thrombosis, and hardware problems; 90-d readmissions were broken down into infection, surgical revision of the sacral fracture, and medical complications. LOS was collected for the initial admission and readmission visits if applicable. Fisher's exact and non-parametric t-tests (Mann-Whitney U tests) were employed to compare LOS, complications, and readmissions between open and percutaneous approaches. RESULTS: Ninety-four patients with isolated sacral fractures were identified: 31 (30.4%) who underwent open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) vs 63 (67.0%) who underwent percutaneous fixation. There was a significant difference in LOS based on operative approach: 9.1 d for ORIF patients vs 6.1 d for percutaneous patients (P = 0.043), amounting to a difference in cost of $13590. Ten patients in the study developed complications, with no significant difference in complication rates or reasons for complications between the two groups (19.4% for ORIF patients vs 6.3% for percutaneous patients). Eight patients were readmitted, with no significant difference in readmission rates or reasons for readmission between the two groups (9.5% percutaneous vs 6.5% ORIF). CONCLUSION: There is a significant difference in LOS based on operative approach for sacral fracture patients. Given similar complications and readmission rates, we recommend a percutaneous approach.

17.
Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med ; 8(3): 276-89, 2015 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26047781

RESUMEN

The use of antibiotic prophylaxis and debridement is controversial when treating low- and high-velocity gunshot-induced fractures, and established treatment guidelines are currently unavailable. The purpose of this review was to evaluate the literature for the prophylactic antibiotic and debridement policies for (1) low-velocity gunshot fractures of the extremities, joints, and pelvis and (2) high-velocity gunshot fractures of the extremities. Low-velocity gunshot fractures of the extremities were subcategorized into operative and non-operative cases, whereas low-velocity gunshot fractures of the joints and pelvis were evaluated based on the presence or absence of concomitant bowel injury. In the absence of surgical necessity for fracture care such as concomitant absence of gross wound contamination, vascular injury, large soft-tissue defect, or associated compartment syndrome, the literature suggests that superficial debridement for low-velocity ballistic fractures with administration of antibiotics is a satisfactory alternative to extensive operative irrigation and debridement. In operative cases or those involving bowel injuries secondary to pelvic fractures, the literature provides support for and against extensive debridement but does suggest the use of intravenous antibiotics. For high-velocity ballistic injuries, the literature points towards the practice of extensive immediate debridement with prophylactic intravenous antibiotics. Our systematic review demonstrates weak evidence for superficial debridement of low-velocity ballistic fractures, extensive debridement for high-velocity ballistic injuries, and antibiotic use for both types of injury. Intra-articular fractures seem to warrant debridement, while pelvic fractures with bowel injury have conflicting evidence for debridement but stronger evidence for antibiotic use. Given a relatively low number of studies on this subject, we recommend that further high-quality research on the debridement and antibiotic use for gunshot-induced fractures of the extremities should be conducted before definitive recommendations and guidelines are developed.

18.
J Orthop Trauma ; 29(7): 337-41, 2015 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26091531

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: As our healthcare system moves toward bundling payments, orthopaedic trauma surgeons will be increasingly benchmarked on perioperative complications. We therefore sought to determine financial risks under bundled payments by identifying adverse event rates for (1) orthopaedic trauma patients compared with general orthopaedic patients and (2) based on anatomic region and (3) to identify patient factors associated with complications. DESIGN: Prospective. SETTING: Multicenter. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: A total of 146,773 orthopaedic patients (22,361 trauma) from 2005 to 2011 NSQIP data were identified. INTERVENTIONS: Minor and major adverse events, demographics, surgical variables, and patient comorbidities were collected. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Multivariate regressions determined significant risk factors for the development of complications. RESULTS: The complication rate in the trauma group was 11.4% (2554/22,361) versus 4.1% (5137/124,412) in the general orthopaedic group (P = 0.001). When controlling for all variables, trauma was a risk factor for developing complications [odds ratio (OR): 1.69, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.57-1.81]. After controlling for several patient factors, hip and pelvis patients were 4 times more likely to develop any perioperative complication than upper extremity patients (OR: 3.79, 95% CI: 3.01-4.79, P = 0.01). Lower extremity patients are 3 times more likely to develop any complication versus upper extremity patients (OR: 2.82, 95% CI: 2.30-3.46, P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Our study is the first to show that orthopaedic trauma patients are 2 times more likely than general orthopaedic patients to sustain complications, despite controlling for identical risk factors. There is also an alarming difference in complication rates among anatomic regions. Orthopaedic trauma surgeons will face increased financial risk with bundled payments. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


Asunto(s)
Reembolso de Seguro de Salud/economía , Procedimientos Ortopédicos/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Ortopédicos/economía , Paquetes de Atención al Paciente/economía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/economía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Heridas y Lesiones/cirugía , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Extremidad Inferior/cirugía , Masculino , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Periodo Perioperatorio , Estudios Prospectivos , Análisis de Regresión , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Extremidad Superior/cirugía
19.
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) ; 44(5): 228-32, 2015 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25950538

RESUMEN

Hip fractures are the most costly fall-related fractures. Differences in hospital length of stay (LOS) based on type of surgery could have major financial implications in a potential bundled payment system in which all hip fractures are reimbursed a standard amount. We conducted a study to analyze differences in hospital LOS and costs for total hip arthroplasty (THA), hemiarthroplasty (HA), cephalomedullary nailing, open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), and closed reduction and percutaneous pinning (CRPP). Through retrospective chart review, 615 patients over age 60 years across a 9-year period at an urban level I trauma center were identified. Mean LOS and costs for hip fracture repair were 6.91 days and $30,011.25, respectively. HA/THA was associated with the longest mean LOS (7.43 days) and highest costs ($33,657.90). After several patient factors were adjusted for, ORIF was associated with 0.84 fewer in-patient days and $3805.20 less in hospitalization costs compared with HA/THA (P=.042). CRPP was associated with 1.63 fewer days and $7383.90 less in costs than HA/THA (P=.0076). Our results provide insight into the financial implications of hip fracture fixation and identify targets for quality improvement initiatives to improve efficiency of resource utilization.


Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo/economía , Fijación de Fractura/economía , Fracturas de Cadera/cirugía , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Fijación de Fractura/métodos , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Fracturas de Cadera/economía , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos
20.
Adv Orthop ; 2015: 974543, 2015.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25861480

RESUMEN

As the American healthcare system shifts towards bundled payments, readmissions will become a measure of healthcare quality. The purpose of this study was to characterize readmission trends and factors influencing readmission in patients with diaphyseal femur and tibia fractures. Through a retrospective chart review, all patients who presented to a level 1 trauma center from 2004 to 2006 were evaluated. By using current procedural terminology codes, 1,040 patients with diaphyseal tibia or femur fractures fixed by IMN were identified. 645 patients were included for analysis. 30-day, 60-day, and 90-day readmission rates were compared with fracture type, reason for readmission, and basic demographic information. The 60-day readmission rate for open tibia fractures (14.8%) was significantly higher than the 60-day readmission rate for closed tibia fractures (8.0%) (p = 0.037). When comparing reasons for 60-day readmissions, 50% of closed fractures were readmitted due to infection, while the other 50% needed additional surgery. 91.7% of open fractures readmitted in 60 days were due to infection. In a bundled payment system, orthopedic trauma must gain insight into drivers of readmission to identify those at risk for readmission and design effective healthcare plans for these patients.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA