Remdesivir versus Favipiravir in Hospitalized Patients with Moderate to Severe COVID-19 Pneumonia: A Propensity Score-Matched Retrospective Cohort Study.

Background: Remdesivir treatment was associated with a reduced 28-day mortality and recovery time among patients hospitalized with severe COVID-19. Favipiravir is broadly used to treat COVID-19. However, various studies have had conflicting results on the efficacy of favipiravir for COVID-19. We hypothesized that remdesivir is more effective in clinical outcomes regarding the 29-day mortality rates, length of stay, and recovery rate than favipiravir in patients with moderate to severe COVID-19 pneumonia. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study that included adult hospitalized COVID-19 pneumonia patients with hypoxemia. Patients were classified into two groups according to the antiviral drugs. Age, oxygen saturation, fraction of inspired oxygen, and Charlson comorbidity index were used for propensity score matching. The primary objective was to determine whether the type of antiviral agent is associated with 29-day mortality. Other outcomes were the 15-day recovery rate and the length of intensive care unit or hospital stay. Results: A total of 249 patients with moderate to severe COVID-19 pneumonia were included. With an adjustment for propensity score-matched, there were 204 patients for further analysis (102 patients in each antiviral drug group). Remdesivir patients had higher Radiographic Assessment of Lung Edema (RALE) scores on Chest X-ray (14.32±9.08 vs 11.34±8.46; standardized mean difference =33.9%). The Charlson Comorbidity Index Scores were comparable. The prevalences of diabetes, obesity, hypertension, and non-HIV immunocompromised state were higher in the remdesivir group. Regarding the primary outcomes, after adjusting by diabetes, obesity, and RALE score, there was no difference in the 29-day mortality rate between both groups [26 patients (25.5%) in the remdesivir group vs 28 patients (27.5%) in the favipiravir group]. The Kaplan-Meier curve analysis at 29 days indicated no significant difference in cumulative survival rate. The two groups' adjusted hazard ratio was 0.72; 95% CI, 0.41 to 1.25, p=0.24. A Kaplan-Meier analysis on the 15-day cumulative survival rate observed a trend towards a higher survival rate in the remdesivir group (adjusted hazard ratio 0.41; 95% CI, 0.20 to 0.84; p= 0.02) The proportion of patients who recovered on day 15, the length of intensive care unit(ICU) stays, and the hospital stay were not different between remdesivir and favipiravir groups (62 patients (60.8%) vs 56 patients (54.9%), p=0.39; 11.48 ± 11.88 days vs 10.87 ± 9.31 days, p=0.69; and 16.64±14.28 days vs 16.59 ±11.31 days, p=0.98, respectively). Conclusion: In patients with moderate to severe COVID-19 pneumonia, Remdesivir did not demonstrate superior benefits over Favipiravir regarding 29-day mortality, 15-day recovery rates, or hospital and ICU stay lengths. However, further investigation into the 15-day cumulative survival rate revealed a trend towards improved survival in the Remdesivir group.

Prevalence and risk factors of cytomegalovirus reactivation in critically Ill patients with COVID-19 pneumonia.

BACKGROUNDS: In critically ill patients with COVID-19, secondary infections are potentially life-threatening complications. This study aimed to determine the prevalence, clinical characteristics, and risk factors of CMV reactivation among critically ill immunocompetent patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted among adult patients who were admitted to ICU and screened for quantitative real-time PCR for CMV viral load in a tertiary-care hospital during the third wave of the COVID-19 outbreak in Thailand. Cox regression models were used to identify significant risk factors for developing CMV reactivation. RESULTS: A total of 185 patients were studied; 133 patients (71.9%) in the non-CMV group and 52 patients (28.1%) in the CMV group. Of all, the mean age was 64.7±13.3 years and 101 patients (54.6%) were males. The CMV group had received a significantly higher median cumulative dose of corticosteroids than the non-CMV group (301 vs 177 mg of dexamethasone, p<0.001). Other modalities of treatments for COVID-19 including anti-viral drugs, anti-cytokine drugs and hemoperfusion were not different between the two groups (p>0.05). The 90-day mortality rate for all patients was 29.1%, with a significant difference between the CMV group and the non-CMV group (42.3% vs. 24.1%, p = 0.014). Median length of stay was longer in the CMV group than non-CMV group (43 vs 24 days, p<0.001). The CMV group has detectable CMV DNA load with a median [IQR] of 4,977 [1,365-14,742] IU/mL and 24,570 [3,703-106,642] in plasma and bronchoalveolar fluid, respectively. In multivariate analysis, only a cumulative corticosteroids dose of dexamethasone ≥250 mg (HR = 2.042; 95%CI, 1.130-3.688; p = 0.018) was associated with developing CMV reactivation. CONCLUSION: In critically ill COVID-19 patients, CMV reactivation is frequent and a high cumulative corticosteroids dose is a significant risk factor for CMV reactivation, which is associated with poor outcomes. Further prospective studies are warranted to determine optimal management.

Metformin-associated lactic acidosis and factors associated with 30-day mortality.

BACKGROUND: Metformin-associated lactic acidosis (MALA) is a rare event but underrecognition may lead to unfavorable outcomes in type 2 diabetes patients. While many risk factors of MALA have been identified, how to reduce mortality from MALA is a matter of debate. This study aimed to explore the factors associated with 30-day mortality amongst MALA patients. METHODS: An observational study enrolled patients diagnosed with MALA between January 2014 and December 2017. MALA was defined by a history of metformin administration, metabolic acidosis (arterial blood gas pH <7.35 or HCO3 <15 mmol/L), and elevated plasma lactate level (>5 mmol/L). We examined risk factors including age, sex, underlying diseases, current medications, blood tests, disease severity, and dialysis data. Mortality status was identified from medical records or report on telephone. RESULTS: We included 105 MALA patients. Most patients (95.2%) were diagnosed acute kidney injury stage 3 according to KDIGO 2012 definition. The 30-day mortality rate was 36.2% and dialysis rate was 85.7%. The survivors had higher proportions of underlying chronic kidney disease, presence of metabolic acidosis, receiving renal replacement therapy within 6 hours, and haemodialysis, whereas the non-survivors had higher percentage of hypertension and disease severity. Lower APACHE II score (HR = 0.95; 95%CI, 0.91-0.99; p = 0.038), time to dialysis < 6 hours (0.31; 0.14-0.69; 0.004), and haemodialysis (0.20;0.06-0.67; 0.010) were associated with lower 30-day mortality, using multivariate Cox-regression analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Mortality rate amongst patients with MALA was high. Early dialysis treatment within 6 hours after admission and haemodialysis were independently associated with lower 30-day mortality. The large scale, well-designed studies need to confirm these encouraging results.

Spontaneous tension hemothorax in a severe COVID-19 patient receiving ECMO therapy: The other side of COVID-19-associated coagulopathy.

As opposed to widely recognized Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)-associated thrombotic events, the unusual but serious bleeding complications in COVID-19 patients are worth-mentioned. Here, we describe a 44-year-old man afflicted by COVID-19 pneumonia with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and submassive pulmonary embolism. The patient's condition initially improved with the prescription of ECMO, tocilizumab, and hemoadsorption, however, he later developed spontaneous tension hemothorax, which is considered rare but devastating in the setting of COVID-19. While the exact pathogenesis of COVID-19-associated bleeding events remains poorly understood, we aim to highlight the other aspect of coagulation dysfunction potentially caused by COVID-19.

Pulmonary function and six-minute-walk test in patients after recovery from COVID-19: A prospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: To study abnormality of spirometry, six-minute walk distance, and chest radiograph among patients recovered from Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). METHODS AND STUDY DESIGN: A prospective cohort study was conducted in 87 COVID-19 confirmed cases who recovered and discharged from a medical school hospital in Thailand. At the follow-up visit on day 60 after onset of symptoms, patients underwent an evaluation by spirometry (FVC, FEV1, FEV1/FVC, FEF25-75, and PEF), a six-minute-walk test (6MWT), and a chest radiograph. RESULTS: There were 35 men and 52 women, with a mean age of 39.6±11.8 years and the mean body mass index (BMI) was 23.8±4.3 kg/m2. Of all, 45 cases had mild symptoms; 35 had non-severe pneumonia, and 7 had severe pneumonia. Abnormality in spirometry was observed in 15 cases (17.2%), with 8% of restrictive defect and 9.2% of obstructive defect. Among the patients with an abnormal spirometry, the majority of the cases were in the severe pneumonia group (71.4%), compared with 15.6% in the non-severe pneumonia group, and 10.2% in the mild symptom group (p = 0.001). The mean six-minute-walk distance (6MWD) in the mild symptom and non-severe pneumonia groups was 538±56.8 and 527.5±53.5 meters, respectively. Although the severe pneumonia group tended to have a shorter mean 6-min walking distance, but this was not statistically significant (p = 0.118). Twelve patients (13.8%) had abnormal chest radiographs that showed residual fibrosis. This abnormality was more common in the severe pneumonia group (85.7%) and in others (7.5%) (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Abnormal spirometry was noted in 17.2% of COVID-19 survivors with both restrictive and obstructive defects. Severe COVID-19 pneumonia patients had higher prevalence rates of abnormal spirometry and residual fibrosis on the chest radiographs when compared to patients in the mild symptom and non-severe pneumonia groups.

The association between body mass index and severity of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): A cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has become a worst pandemic. The clinical characteristics vary from asymptomatic to fatal. This study aims to examine the association between body mass index (BMI) levels and the severity of COVID-19. METHODS AND STUDY DESIGN: A cohort study included 147 adult patients with confirmed COVID-19 were categorized into 4 groups by BMI levels on admission: <18.5 (underweight), 18.5-22.9 (normal weight), 23.0-24.9 (overweight), and ≥25.0 kg/m2 (obese). Rates of pneumonia, severe pneumonia, acute kidney injury (AKI), and ICU stay during hospitalization across BMI group was determined. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine the association between BMI and severe pneumonia. RESULTS: Of the totals, patients having a BMI <18.5, 18.5-22.9, 23.0-24.9, and ≥25.0 kg/m2 were 12.9%, 38.1%, 17.7%, and 31.3%, respectively. The rates of pneumonia and severe pneumonia tended to be higher in patients with higher BMI, whereas the rates of AKI and ICU stay were higher in patients with BMI <18.5 kg/m2 and ≥ 25 kg/m2, when compared to patients with normal BMI. After controlling for age, sex, diabetes, hypertension and dyslipidemia in the logistic regression analysis, having a BMI ≥25.0 kg/m2 was associated with higher risk of severe pneumonia (OR 4.73; 95% CI, 1.50-14.94; p = 0.003) compared to having a BMI 18.5-22.9 kg/m2. During admission, elevated hemoglobin and alanine aminotransferase levels on day 7 and 14 of illness were associated with higher BMI levels. In contrast, rising of serum creatinine levels was observed in underweight patients on days 12 and 14 of illness. CONCLUSIONS: Obesity in patients with COVID-19 was associated with severe pneumonia and adverse outcomes such as AKI, transaminitis and ICU stay. Underweight patients should be closely monitored for AKI. Further studies in body composition are warranted to explore the links between adiposity and COVID-19 pathogenesis.

Customized versus conventional video counseling for peritoneal dialysis decision-making in patients with stage 5 chronic kidney disease under a PD-first policy: a randomized controlled study.

BACKGROUND: Indecision regarding the start of peritoneal dialysis (PD) is a challenging problem in chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage 5 patients who receive conventional video counseling. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of video counseling customized to the local context versus conventional video counseling on PD decision-making in CKD stage 5 patients under PD-first policy. METHODS: We enrolled 120 patients with stage 5 CKD in Thailand who initiate PD between May 2016 to January 2017 in a randomized, open-label, controlled study. Patients were randomized to either a customized or conventional video counseling group. The primary outcome was PD acceptance rate with complete PD catheter insertion on schedule. The secondary outcomes were change in patient knowledge and confidence in PD and reasons for indecision PD. RESULTS: We analyzed 120 patients (customized, n = 60 vs. conventional, n = 60). The two groups were similar for age (55 vs. 56 years), blood urea nitrogen (89 vs. 86 mg/dL), creatinine (10.37 vs. 11.29 mg/dL), and eGFR (4.7 vs. 5.6 mL/min/1.73 m2). The PD acceptance rate along with PD catheter insertion on schedule in the customized video counseling group was not significantly different from that in the conventional video counseling group (66.6% vs. 63.3%, relative risk: 0.97, 95% confidence interval: 0.73 to 1.29; P = 0.86). Patient knowledge of and confidence in PD increased after counseling, but the difference was not significant. CONCLUSION: Among stage 5 CKD patients, counseling content customized to a local context did not differ in a rate of acceptance for beginning PD with PD catheter insertion on schedule compared with conventional video counseling.

Left ventricular thrombus and pulmonary embolism: A case series of thrombosis in COVID-19 in Thai patients.

Thrombosis in COVID-19 is increasingly recognized and is generally associated with a high mortality rate. The key clinical question of this report was whether COVID-19 could be complicated with cardiac thrombus and pulmonary embolism in Asian population. We demonstrated the case series of thrombosis in Thai patients with confirmed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection. One patient had the first case of a large left ventricular thrombus, and three other patients had pulmonary embolism. All patients were male and had low absolute lymphocyte count, while lactate dehydrogenase level and d-dimer were markedly elevated, especially at the time when the thrombosis was diagnosed. All patients had severe COVID-19 with pneumonia. Two patients who needed mechanical ventilation were successfully extubated. After hospitalization for 13-49 days, pneumonia and thrombosis improved and all of them could be discharged from the hospital. Thrombosis is common in COVID-19 and could present in both arterial and venous sites even in Asian populations. d-dimer is a strong marker to predict thrombosis and could be a prognostic predictor for severity of COVID-19.

Bioimpedance Analysis-Guided Volume Expansion for the Prevention of Contrast-Induced Acute Kidney Injury (the BELIEVE Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial).

INTRODUCTION: Peri-procedural i.v. fluid administration is important for the prevention of contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI). However, standardized fluid management protocols may not be suitable for all patients. We therefore wished to determine whether an individualized fluid administration protocol guided by measuring extracellular water (ECW) using bioimpedance analysis (BIA) would be safe and would reduce the incidence CI-AKI compared to a standardized fluid administration prescription. METHODS: In this pilot, randomized, parallel-group, single-blind, controlled trial, we compared the effect of BIA-guided isotonic bicarbonate administration according to the ratio of ECW to total body water (ECW/TBW) to our standard isotonic bicarbonate protocol in regard to the safety and efficacy of preventing CI-AKI in chronic kidney disease patients undergoing elective cardiac angiography. Our primary outcome was the incidence of CI-AKI, which was defined as a ≥0.3 mg/dl or 150% increase in serum creatinine concentration within 48 to 72 hours after cardiac angiography. RESULTS: We studied 61 patients, 30 in the bioimpedance group and 31 in the control group. Age was similar (72.5 ± 7 vs. 71.4 ± 7.9 years), as were body mass index (25.5 vs. 25.8 kg/m2) and baseline serum creatinine (1.3 ± 0.3 vs. 1.4 ± 0.4 mg/dl). The peri-procedural fluid volume administered was significantly greater in the BIA-guided hydration group (899.0 ± 252.7 ml vs. 594.4 ± 125.9 ml, P < .01). The incidence of CI-AKI was 3.3% in BIA-guided hydration group and 6.5% in the control group (relative risk = 0.52, 95% confidence interval = 0.05-5.40, P = 1.00). Adverse events reported were comparable between groups (6.7% vs. 6.5%, P = 1.00). CONCLUSIONS: The overall incidence of CI-AKI after cardiac angiography in our patients with mild-to-moderate renal insufficiency was lower than anticipated. Isotonic bicarbonate administration guided by bioimpedance measurements was safe, and probably led to a lower incidence of CI-AKI, although this not reach statistical significance.