Cluster-randomized crossover trial of chlorhexidine-alcohol versus iodine-alcohol for prevention of surgical-site infection (SKINFECT trial).

Background: Surgical-site infection (SSI) is a serious surgical complication that can be prevented by preoperative skin disinfection. In Western European countries, preoperative disinfection is commonly performed with either chlorhexidine or iodine in an alcohol-based solution. This study aimed to investigate whether there is superiority of chlorhexidine-alcohol over iodine-alcohol for preventing SSI. Methods: This prospective cluster-randomized crossover trial was conducted in five teaching hospitals. All patients who underwent breast, vascular, colorectal, gallbladder or orthopaedic surgery between July 2013 and June 2015 were included. SSI data were reported routinely to the Dutch National Nosocomial Surveillance Network (PREZIES). Participating hospitals were assigned randomly to perform preoperative skin disinfection using either chlorhexidine-alcohol (0·5 per cent/70 per cent) or iodine-alcohol (1 per cent/70 per cent) for the first 3 months of the study; every 3 months thereafter, they switched to using the other antiseptic agent, for a total of 2 years. The primary endpoint was the development of SSI. Results: A total of 3665 patients were included; 1835 and 1830 of these patients received preoperative skin disinfection with chlorhexidine-alcohol or iodine-alcohol respectively. The overall incidence of SSI was 3·8 per cent among patients in the chlorhexidine-alcohol group and 4·0 per cent among those in the iodine-alcohol group (odds ratio 0·96, 95 per cent c.i. 0·69 to 1·35). Conclusion: Preoperative skin disinfection with chlorhexidine-alcohol is similar to that for iodine-alcohol with respect to reducing the risk of developing an SSI.

Antecedentes: La infección del sitio quirúrgico (surgical site infection, SSI) es una complicación quirúrgica grave que se puede prevenir mediante una desinfección cutánea preoperatoria. En los países de Europa occidental, la desinfección preoperatoria se realiza habitualmente usando clorhexidina o yodo en una solución a base de alcohol. Nuestro objetivo fue investigar si la clorhexidina alcohólica es superior al yodo con alcohol para prevenir la SSI. Métodos: Este ensayo prospectivo aleatorizado por conglomerados y de grupos cruzados se realizó en cinco hospitales docentes. Se incluyeron todos los pacientes que se sometieron a cirugía mamaria, vascular, colorrectal, biliar y ortopédica entre julio de 2013 y junio de 2015. Los datos de SSI se presentaron de manera rutinaria a la Red Nacional Holandesa de Vigilancia Nosocomial (PREZIES). Los hospitales participantes fueron asignados al azar para realizar una desinfección cutánea preoperatoria con clorhexidina alcohólica (0,5%/70%) o yodo con alcohol (1%/70%) durante los primeros tres meses del estudio; cada 3 meses a partir de entonces, cambiaron a usar el otro agente antiséptico, durante un total de 2 años. El criterio de valoración principal fue el desarrollo de SSI. Resultados: Se incluyeron un total de 3.665 pacientes; 1.835 y 1.830 de estos pacientes recibieron desinfección cutánea preoperatoria con clorhexidina alcohólica o yodo con alcohol, respectivamente. La incidencia global de SSI fue del 3,8% entre los pacientes en el grupo de clorhexidina alcohólica y del 4,0% entre los pacientes en el grupo de yodo con alcohol (razón de oportunidades, odds ratio, OR 0,96; i.c. del 95%: 0,69­1,35). Conclusión: La desinfección cutánea preoperatoria con clorhexidina alcohólica es similar al yodo con alcohol con respecto a la reducción del riesgo de desarrollar una SSI.

The natural history of the rheumatoid shoulder: a prospective long-term follow-up study.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the natural history of rheumatoid disease of the shoulder over an eight-year period. Our hypothesis was that progression of the disease is associated with a decrease in function with time. A total of 22 patients (44 shoulders; 17 women, 5 men, (mean age 63)) with rheumatoid arthritis were followed for eight years. All shoulders were assessed using the Constant score, anteroposterior radiographs (Larsen score, Upward-Migration-Index (UMI)) and ultrasound (US). At final follow-up, the Short Form-36, disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) Score, erythrocyte sedimentation rate and use of anti-rheumatic medication were determined. The mean Constant score was 72 points (50 to 88) at baseline and 69 points (25 to 100) at final follow-up. Radiological evaluation showed progressive destruction of the peri-articular structures with time. This progression of joint and rotator cuff destruction was significantly associated with the Constant score. However, at baseline only the extent of rotator cuff disease and the UMI could predict the Constant score at final follow-up. A plain anteroposterior radiograph of the shoulder is sufficient to assess any progression of rheumatoid disease and to predict functional outcome in the long term by using the UMI as an indicator of rotator cuff degeneration.

Autologous wound drains have no effect on allogeneic blood transfusions in primary total hip and knee replacement: a three-arm randomised trial.

We hypothesised there was no clinical value in using an autologous blood transfusion (ABT) drain in either primary total hip (THR) or total knee replacement (TKR) in terms of limiting allogeneic blood transfusions when a modern restrictive blood management regime was followed. A total of 575 patients (65.2% men), with a mean age of 68.9 years (36 to 94) were randomised in this three-arm study to no drainage (group A), or to wound drainage with an ABT drain for either six hours (group B) or 24 hours (group C). The primary outcome was the number of patients receiving allogeneic blood transfusion. Secondary outcomes were post-operative haemoglobin (Hb) levels, length of hospital stay and adverse events. This study identified only 41 transfused patients, with no significant difference in distribution between the three groups (p = 0.857). The mean pre-operative haemoglobin (Hb) value in the transfused group was 12.8 g/dL (9.8 to 15.5) versus 14.3 g/dL (10.6 to 18.0) in the non-transfused group (p < 0.001, 95% confidence interval: 1.08 to 1.86). Post-operatively, the median of re-transfused shed blood in patients with a THR was 280 mL (Interquartile range (IQR) 150 to 400) and in TKR patients 500 mL (IQR 350 to 650) (p < 0.001). ABT drains had no effect on the proportion of transfused patients in primary THR and TKR. The secondary outcomes were also comparable between groups.

Long-Term Alendronate Use Not without Consequences?

A previously unknown side effect of biphosphonate use is emerging. In a specific patient group on long term biphosphonate therapy stress femur fractures seem to occur. The typical presentation consists of prodromal pain in the affected leg and/or a discrete cortical thickening on the lateral side of the femur in conventional radiological examination or the presentation with a spontaneous transverse subtrochanteric femur with typical features. We present three cases of this stress fracture in patients on bisphosphonate therapy. One of these patients suffered a bilateral femur fracture of the same type. In our opinion, in patients on bisphosphonate therapy who present with a spontaneous femur fracture, seizing therapy is advisable. In bilateral cases preventive nailing should be considered.

Pre-operative injections of epoetin-alpha versus post-operative retransfusion of autologous shed blood in total hip and knee replacement: a prospective randomised clinical trial.

This prospective randomised clinical trial evaluated the effect of alternatives for allogeneic blood transfusions after total hip replacement and total knee replacement in patients with pre-operative haemoglobin levels between 10.0 g/dl and 13.0 g/dl. A total of 100 patients were randomly allocated to the Eprex (pre-operative injections of epoetin) or Bellovac groups (post-operative retransfusion of shed blood). Allogeneic blood transfusions were administered according to hospital policy. In the Eprex group, 4% of the patients (two patients) received at least one allogeneic blood transfusion. In the Bellovac group, where a mean 216 ml (0 to 700) shed blood was retransfused, 28% (14 patients) required the allogeneic transfusion (p = 0.002). When comparing Eprex with Bellovac in total hip replacement, the percentages were 7% (two of 30 patients) and 30% (nine of 30 patients) (p = 0.047) respectively, whereas in total knee replacement, the percentages were 0% (0 of 20 patients) and 25% (five of 20 patients) respectively (p = 0.042). Pre-operative epoetin injections are more effective but more costly in reducing the need for allogeneic blood transfusions in mildly anaemic patients than post-operative retransfusion of autologous blood.

Femoral nerve block using ropivacaine 0.025%, 0.05% and 0.1%: effects on the rehabilitation programme following total knee arthroplasty: a pilot study.

Femoral nerve blockade is recommended for analgesia following total knee arthroplasty. Following implementation of this type of postoperative analgesia in our hospital we found that active mobilization the day after surgery, may be difficult due to insufficient quadriceps muscle strength. We therefore designed a pilot study comparing the effect of ropivacaine 0.1%, 0.05% or 0.025% on the patient's postoperative rehabilitation and analgesia. Three groups of 12 patients received bolus doses of ropivacaine via their femoral nerve catheters for postoperative analgesia. The ability to actively mobilize, quadriceps muscle strength, pain VAS-scores and patient's satisfaction were measured during in the first three postoperative days. There were no significant differences in the patient's ability to actively mobilize and the pain VAS-scores. The overall satisfaction of the patients with the pain treatment was significantly better (p = 0.049) in the 0.1% compared with the 0.025% group. This pilot-study demonstrated no advantage associated with the use of a ropivacaine concentration less than 0.1%.

Retransfusion of filtered shed blood in everyday orthopaedic practice.

The efficiency of post-operative cell saving after major joint arthroplasty has been demonstrated in prospective studies focusing on blood management. In everyday practice, however, it is likely that transfusion policy is followed less rigorously because of a slackening in attention to blood management, with a reduced efficiency of post-operative cell saving. The primary research question of this retrospective study was whether the number of allogeneic blood transfusions administered to patients treated with a retransfusion system was similar to the results found in a preceding prospective study. A total of 438 patients treated with the Bellovac ABT retransfusion system were analysed in which the majority was operated on a total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The amount of retransfused shed blood, the perioperative haemoglobin levels and the number of allogeneic blood transfusions were registered. The average amount of retransfusion was 152 mL in THA and 410 mL in TKA, whereas the allogeneic blood transfusion rate was 8.4 and 5.1% in both groups, respectively. The average percentage of allogeneic blood transfusions administered in this study (i.e. 7%) proved to be marginally higher than the percentage found in a preceding prospective study (i.e. 6%) because of slackening of attention for transfusion policy in everyday practice. Limited bone resection procedures such as resurfacing THA or unicompartmental knee arthroplasty were associated with very limited shed blood and low risk of allogeneic blood transfusion, indicating the doubtful cost efficiency of using a retransfusion system in these patients. It can be concluded that the efficiency of the retransfusion system in everyday practice was similar to the efficiency shown in a preceding prospective study focusing on blood management. However, continual training of the clinical team is crucial.

Alignment of the femoral component in a mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a study in 10 cadaver femora.

Use of an intramedullary rod is advised for the alignment of the femoral component of an Oxford phase-III prosthesis. There are users moving toward extramedullary alignment, which is merely an indicator of frustration with accuracy of intramedullary alignment. The results of our study with 10 cadaver femora demonstrate that use of a short and long intramedullary femoral rod may result in excessive flexion alignment error of the femoral component. Understanding of the extramedullary alignment possibility and experience with the visual alignment of the femoral drill guide is essential toward minimizing potential errors in the alignment of the femoral component.