Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Más filtros




Base de datos
Asunto de la revista
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Am J Trop Med Hyg ; 110(5): 989-993, 2024 May 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38531097

RESUMEN

Many SARS-CoV-2 infections are asymptomatic, thus reported cases underestimate actual cases. To improve estimates, we conducted surveillance for SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence among pregnant women attending their first antenatal care visit (ANC1) from June 2021 through May 2022. We administered a questionnaire to collect demographic, risk factors, and COVID-19 vaccine status information and tested dried blood spots for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. Although <1% of ANC1 participants reported having had COVID-19, monthly SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence increased from 15.4% (95% CI: 10.5-21.5) in June 2021 to 65.5% (95% CI: 55.5-73.7) in May 2022. Although COVID-19 vaccination was available in March 2021, uptake remained low, reaching a maximum of 9.5% (95% CI: 5.7-14.8) in May 2022. Results of ANC1 serosurveillance provided prevalence estimates helpful in understanding this population case burden that was available through self-report and national case reports. To improve vaccine uptake, efforts to address fears and misconceptions regarding COVID-19 vaccines are needed.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo , Atención Prenatal , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , Femenino , Embarazo , Estudios Seroepidemiológicos , COVID-19/prevención & control , COVID-19/epidemiología , Adulto , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/administración & dosificación , SARS-CoV-2/inmunología , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/prevención & control , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/epidemiología , Malaui/epidemiología , Adulto Joven , Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Mujeres Embarazadas
2.
Am J Trop Med Hyg ; 110(1): 69-78, 2024 Jan 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38081055

RESUMEN

Malaria remains a leading cause of childhood morbidity and mortality in sub-Saharan Africa, particularly among children under 5 years of age. To help address this challenge, the WHO recommends chemoprevention for certain populations. For children and infants, the WHO recommends seasonal malaria chemoprevention (SMC), perennial malaria chemoprevention (PMC; formerly intermittent preventive treatment in infants [IPTi]), and, more recently, intermittent preventive treatment in school children (IPTsc). This review describes the contextual factors, including feasibility, acceptability, health equity, financial considerations, and values and preferences, that impact implementation of these strategies. A systematic search was conducted on July 5, 2022, and repeated April 13, 2023, to identify relevant literature. Two reviewers independently screened titles for eligibility, extracted data from eligible articles, and identified and summarized themes. Of 6,295 unique titles identified, 65 were included. The most frequently evaluated strategy was SMC (n = 40), followed by IPTi (n = 18) and then IPTsc (n = 6). Overall, these strategies were highly acceptable, although with IPTsc, there were community concerns with providing drugs to girls of reproductive age and the use of nonmedical staff for drug distribution. For SMC, door-to-door delivery resulted in higher coverage, improved caregiver acceptance, and reduced cost. Lower adherence was noted when caregivers were charged with giving doses 2 and 3 unsupervised. For SMC and IPTi, travel distances and inclement weather limited accessibility. Sensitization and caregiver education efforts, retention of high-quality drug distributors, and improved transportation were key to improving coverage. Additional research is needed to understand the role of community values and preferences in chemoprevention implementation.


Asunto(s)
Antimaláricos , Malaria , Lactante , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Preescolar , Antimaláricos/uso terapéutico , Malaria/epidemiología , Malaria/prevención & control , Malaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Quimioprevención/métodos , Tiempo (Meteorología) , Cuidadores , Estaciones del Año
3.
Malar J ; 16(1): 9, 2017 01 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28049489

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Expanded malaria control efforts in Sénégal have resulted in increased use of rapid diagnostic tests (RDT) to identify the primary disease-causing Plasmodium species, Plasmodium falciparum. However, the type of RDT utilized in Sénégal does not detect other malaria-causing species such as Plasmodium ovale spp., Plasmodium malariae, or Plasmodium vivax. Consequently, there is a lack of information about the frequency and types of malaria infections occurring in Sénégal. This study set out to better determine whether species other than P. falciparum were evident among patients evaluated for possible malaria infection in Kédougou, Sénégal. METHODS: Real-time polymerase chain reaction speciation assays for P. vivax, P. ovale spp., and P. malariae were developed and validated by sequencing and DNA extracted from 475 Plasmodium falciparum-specific HRP2-based RDT collected between 2013 and 2014 from a facility-based sample of symptomatic patients from two health clinics in Kédougou, a hyper-endemic region in southeastern Sénégal, were analysed. RESULTS: Plasmodium malariae (n = 3) and P. ovale wallikeri (n = 2) were observed as co-infections with P. falciparum among patients with positive RDT results (n = 187), including one patient positive for all three species. Among 288 negative RDT samples, samples positive for P. falciparum (n = 24), P. ovale curtisi (n = 3), P. ovale wallikeri (n = 1), and P. malariae (n = 3) were identified, corresponding to a non-falciparum positivity rate of 2.5%. CONCLUSIONS: These findings emphasize the limitations of the RDT used for malaria diagnosis and demonstrate that non-P. falciparum malaria infections occur in Sénégal. Current RDT used for routine clinical diagnosis do not necessarily provide an accurate reflection of malaria transmission in Kédougou, Sénégal, and more sensitive and specific methods are required for diagnosis and patient care, as well as surveillance and elimination activities. These findings have implications for other malaria endemic settings where species besides P. falciparum may be transmitted and overlooked by control or elimination activities.


Asunto(s)
Malaria/epidemiología , Plasmodium malariae/aislamiento & purificación , Plasmodium ovale/aislamiento & purificación , Plasmodium vivax/aislamiento & purificación , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Niño , Preescolar , Pruebas Diagnósticas de Rutina/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Plasmodium malariae/clasificación , Plasmodium malariae/genética , Plasmodium ovale/clasificación , Plasmodium ovale/genética , Plasmodium vivax/clasificación , Plasmodium vivax/genética , Prevalencia , Reacción en Cadena en Tiempo Real de la Polimerasa , Senegal/epidemiología , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Adulto Joven
4.
Malar J ; 10: 86, 2011 Apr 13.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21489278

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In 2009, the first national long-lasting insecticide-treated net (LLIN) distribution campaign in Senegal resulted in the distribution of 2.2 million LLINs in two phases to children aged 6-59 months. Door-to-door teams visited all households to administer vitamin A and mebendazole, and to give a coupon to redeem later for an LLIN. METHODS: A nationwide community-based two-stage cluster survey was conducted, with clusters selected within regions by probability proportional to size sampling, followed by GPS-assisted mapping, simple random selection of households in each cluster, and administration of a questionnaire using personal digital assistants (PDAs). The questionnaire followed the Malaria Indicator Survey format, with rosters of household members and bed nets, and questions on campaign participation. RESULTS: There were 3,280 households in 112 clusters representing 33,993 people. Most (92.1%) guardians of eligible children had heard about the campaign, the primary sources being health workers (33.7%), neighbours (26.2%), and radio (22.0%). Of eligible children, 82.4% received mebendazole, 83.8% received vitamin A, and 75.4% received LLINs. Almost all (91.4%) LLINs received during the campaign remained in the household; of those not remaining, 74.4% had been given away and none were reported sold. At least one insecticide-treated net (ITN) was present in 82.3% of all households, 89.2% of households with a child < 5 years and 57.5% of households without a child < 5 years. Just over half (52.4%) of ITNs had been received during the campaign. Considering possible indicators of universal coverage, 39.8% of households owned at least one ITN per two people, 21.6% owned at least one ITN per sleeping space and 34.7% of the general population slept under an ITN the night before the survey. In addition, 45.6% of children < 5 years, and 49.2% of pregnant women had slept under an ITN. CONCLUSIONS: The nationwide integrated LLIN distribution campaign allowed household ITN ownership of one or more ITNs to surpass the RBM target of 80% set for 2010, though additional distribution strategies are needed to reach populations missed by the targeted campaign and to reach the universal coverage targets of one ITN per sleeping space and 80% of the population using an ITN.


Asunto(s)
Mosquiteros Tratados con Insecticida , Malaria/prevención & control , Control de Mosquitos/métodos , Adulto , Antimaláricos/administración & dosificación , Preescolar , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Promoción de la Salud/economía , Humanos , Lactante , Insecticidas/administración & dosificación , Malaria/transmisión , Masculino , Mebendazol/administración & dosificación , Propiedad/estadística & datos numéricos , Embarazo , Senegal , Factores Socioeconómicos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Vitamina A/administración & dosificación
5.
Am J Trop Med Hyg ; 80(3): 487-91, 2009 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19270303

RESUMEN

We conducted a health facility-based survey of patients with fever during malaria transmission season to determine the proportion with laboratory-confirmed malaria in Luanda, Angola. We enrolled 864 patients at 30 facilities; each underwent a blood film for malaria and a questionnaire. Only 3.6% had a positive blood film. When stratified by distance of the facility to city center (< 15 km and > or = 15 km), the proportions were 1.5% (9/615) and 8.8% (22/249), respectively (P < 0.0001). Of patients traveling outside Luanda in the preceding 3 months, 6.8% (6/88) had malaria, compared with 3.2% (26/776) not traveling (P = 0.13). Children < 5 years of age were less likely to have malaria (2.4%; 12/510) than children ages 5-14 (8.7%; 9/104) and adults (4.0%; 10/250) (P = 0.03). The prevalence of laboratory-confirmed malaria in febrile patients in Luanda is very low, but increases with distance from the urban center. Prevention and treatment should be focused in surrounding rural areas.


Asunto(s)
Malaria/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Angola/epidemiología , Ropa de Cama y Ropa Blanca , Niño , Preescolar , Demografía , Femenino , Instituciones de Salud , Humanos , Insecticidas/farmacología , Masculino , Control de Mosquitos/métodos , Población Urbana
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA