Efficacy, immunogenicity and safety of respiratory syncytial virus prefusion F vaccine: systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: A notable research gap exists in the systematic review and meta-analysis concerning the efficacy, immunogenicity, and safety of the respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) prefusion F vaccine. METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive search across PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov to retrieve articles related to the efficacy, immunogenicity, and safety of RSV prefusion F vaccines, published through September 8, 2023. We adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. RESULTS: A total of 22 randomized controlled trials involving 78,990 participants were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. The RSV prefusion F vaccine exhibited a vaccine effectiveness of 68% (95% CI: 59-75%) against RSV-associated acute respiratory illness, 70% (95% CI: 60-77%) against medically attended RSV-associated lower respiratory tract illness, and 87% (95% CI: 71-94%) against medically attended severe RSV-associated lower respiratory tract illness. Common reported local adverse reactions following RSV prefusion F vaccination include pain, redness, and swelling at the injection site, and systemic reactions such as fatigue, headache, myalgia, arthralgia, nausea, and chills. CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis suggests that vaccines using the RSV prefusion F protein as antigen exhibit appears broadly acceptable efficacy, immunogenicity, and safety in the population. In particular, it provides high protective efficiency against severe RSV-associated lower respiratory tract disease.

Safety and Efficacy of the Modified Vaccinia Ankara-Bavaria Nordic Vaccine Against Mpox in the Real World: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

In May 2022, mpox began to spread worldwide, posing a serious threat to human public health. Modified Vaccinia Ankara-Bavaria Nordic (MVA-BN) is a live attenuated orthopoxvirus vaccine that has been authorized by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration as the vaccine of choice for the prevention of mpox. In this study, we conducted a meta-analysis of all currently published literature on the efficacy and safety of the MVA-BN vaccine in the real world, showing that the MVA-BN vaccine is effective and safe, with efficacy of up to 75% with a single dose and up to 80% with a two-dose vaccine. Meanwhile, we found that subcutaneous injection has lower local and systemic adverse events than intradermal injection, regardless of single- or two-dose vaccination, and subcutaneous injection is better tolerated in children, the elderly, or people with underlying medical conditions. These results have important reference value for clinical practice.

High Prevalence of Respiratory Co-Infections and Risk Factors in COVID-19 Patients at Hospital Admission During an Epidemic Peak in China.

Background: Recent research highlights the contribution of co-infections to elevated disease severity and mortality among COVID-19 patients. Given China's decision to ease epidemic prevention policies in December 2022, a comprehensive exploration of the risks and characteristics of co-infections with respiratory pathogens becomes imperative. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 716 COVID-19 patients admitted to a primary hospital in China. The detection of twelve respiratory pathogens was conducted using qPCR, and the potential risk factors were analyzed through Cox regression analysis. Results: Within this cohort, 76.82% of cases exhibited co-infection involving eleven distinct pathogens. Among these, bacterial co-infections were observed in 74% of cases, with Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae emerging as the most prevalent bacterial co-infection agents. Additionally, 15% of cases presented with viral co-infections, predominantly involving influenza A virus and respiratory syncytial virus. Nevertheless, our investigation suggested that there might be some inappropriate antibiotic use in treatments. Furthermore, risk analysis unveiled dyspnea, hypoproteinemia, low lymphocyte counts, and co-infection with Mycoplasma pneumoniae as prominent risk factors for COVID-19 inpatients. Conclusion: Our findings underscore a significant occurrence of co-infections among COVID-19 patients during the epidemic, emphasizing the need for enhanced antibiotic stewardship. Effective management strategies should encompass respiratory status, nutritional aspects, and vigilance towards co-infections involving M. pneumoniae during COVID-19 treatment. This study underscores the significance of comprehensive management protocols to address the multifaceted challenges presented by co-infections in COVID-19 patients.