Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros




Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Sex Transm Infect ; 94(4): 298-303, 2018 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29066628

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Proper antibiotic treatment of STI reduces transmission, antimicrobial resistance and serious disease complications. In this study, we assessed compliance with STI treatment guidelines for genital gonorrhoea and chlamydia infections in Estonia. METHODS: Prescription data from the Estonian Health Insurance Fund on 7556 treatment episodes of 6499 patients treated for gonorrhoea or chlamydia during 2012-2014 were analysed to assess compliance with the guidelines and factors associated with it. RESULTS: Between 1 January 2012 and 31 December 2014, a total of 6074 patients were treated for chlamydia and 425 for gonorrhoea in Estonia. Among all prescriptions, 48.6% were non-compliant with gonorrhoea treatment guidelines and 3.8% for chlamydia. Non-compliant antibiotic treatment for gonorrhoea was associated with patient gender (female (adjusted OR (AOR)) 3.0, 95% CI 1.6 to 5.9), region (east AOR 3.3, 95% CI 1.3 to 8.2; west AOR 6.5, 95% CI 2.2 to 19.7) and prescribing physician specialty (general healthcare doctors: AOR 5.6, 95% CI 2.3 to 13.8; gynaecologists: AOR 5.9, 95% CI 2.8 to 12.4). Non-compliant antibiotic treatment for chlamydia was associated with younger patient age (15-24 AOR 0.5, 95% CI 0.4 to 0.7), region (north AOR 1.9, 95% CI 1.4 to 2.6; west AOR 2.3, 95% CI 1.5 to 3.4) and multiple treatment episodes (AOR 2.7, 95% CI 2.1 to 3.9). Approximately 14% of prescriptions were multiple treatments for the same patient for the same infection over the 3-year period (6.1% for gonorrhoea and 14.5% for chlamydia). CONCLUSION: There are significant differences in terms of compliance with treatment guidelines for gonorrhoea and chlamydia, and several factors associated with non-compliance that can potentially be targeted with interventions. Future research should explore reasons clinicians do not follow guidelines and examine ways to improve practice among doctors and patients and assess factors associated with multiple treatments, particularly multiple treatments for the same STI.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Infecciones por Chlamydia/tratamiento farmacológico , Gonorrea/tratamiento farmacológico , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios Transversales , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Estonia , Femenino , Adhesión a Directriz , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Adulto Joven
2.
BMJ Open ; 7(9): e017528, 2017 Sep 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28951413

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine the needs of primary healthcare general practice (GP) staff, stakeholders and trainers to inform the adaptation of a locally successful complex intervention (Chlamydia Intervention Randomised Trial (CIRT)) aimed at increasing chlamydia testing within primary healthcare within South West England to three EU countries (Estonia, France and Sweden) and throughout England. DESIGN: Qualitative interviews. SETTING: European primary healthcare in England, France, Sweden and Estonia with a range of chlamydia screening provision in 2013. PARTICIPANTS: 45 GP staff, 13 trainers and 18 stakeholders. INTERVIEWS: The iterative interview schedule explored participants' personal attitudes, subjective norms and perceived behavioural controls around provision of chlamydia testing, sexual health services and training in general practice. Researchers used a common thematic analysis. RESULTS: Findings were similar across all countries. Most participants agreed that chlamydia testing and sexual health services should be offered in general practice. There was no culture of GP staff routinely offering opportunistic chlamydia testing or sexual health advice, and due to other priorities, participants reported this would be challenging. All participants indicated that the CIRT workshop covering chlamydia testing and sexual health would be useful if practice based, included all practice staff and action planning, and was adequately resourced. Participants suggested minor adaptations to CIRT to suit their country's health services. CONCLUSIONS: A common complex intervention can be adapted for use across Europe, despite varied sexual health provision. The intervention (ChlamydiA Testing Training in Europe (CATTE)) should comprise: a staff workshop covering sexual health and chlamydia testing rates and procedures, action planning and patient materials and staff reminders via computer prompts, emails or newsletters, with testing feedback through practice champions. CATTE materials are available at: www.STItraining.eu.


Asunto(s)
Actitud del Personal de Salud , Infecciones por Chlamydia/diagnóstico , Medicina General/educación , Medicina General/organización & administración , Atención Primaria de Salud/organización & administración , Salud Sexual/educación , Adolescente , Infecciones por Chlamydia/prevención & control , Educación Médica Continua/métodos , Inglaterra , Estonia , Femenino , Francia , Medicina General/economía , Humanos , Entrevistas como Asunto , Masculino , Tamizaje Masivo/economía , Evaluación de Necesidades , Atención Primaria de Salud/economía , Investigación Cualitativa , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Servicios de Salud Reproductiva/organización & administración , Participación de los Interesados , Suecia , Factores de Tiempo , Carga de Trabajo , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA