Management of acute non-specific low back pain in the emergency department: do emergency physicians follow the guidelines? Results of a cross-sectional survey.

OBJECTIVES: Clinical guidelines for acute non-specific low back pain (LBP) recommend avoiding imaging studies or invasive treatments and to advise patients to stay active. The aim of this study was to evaluate the management of acute non-specific LBP in the emergency departments (ED). SETTING: We invited all department chiefs of Swiss EDs and their physician staff to participate in a web-based survey using two clinical case vignettes of patients with acute non-specific LBP presenting to an ED. In both cases, no neurological deficits or red flags were present. Guideline adherence and low-value care was defined based on current guideline recommendations. RESULTS: In total, 263 ED physicians completed at least one vignette, while 212 completed both vignettes (43% residents, 32% senior/attending physicians and 24% chief physicians). MRI was considered in 31% in vignette 1 and 65% in vignette 2. For pain management, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, paracetamol and metamizole were mostly used. A substantial proportion of ED physicians considered treatments with questionable benefit and/or increased risk for adverse events such as oral steroids (vignette 1, 12% and vignette 2, 19%), muscle relaxants (33% and 38%), long-acting strong opioids (25% and 33%) and spinal injections (22% and 43%). Although guidelines recommend staying active, 72% and 67% of ED physicians recommended activity restrictions. CONCLUSION: Management of acute non-specific LBP in the ED was not in agreement with current guideline recommendations in a substantial proportion of ED physicians. Overuse of imaging studies, the use of long-acting opioids and muscle relaxants, as well as recommendations for activity and work restrictions were prevalent and may potentially be harmful.

Haemoglobin thresholds for transfusion: how are we doing in the era of Choosing Wisely? A retrospective cohort study.

INTRODUCTION:  Clinical practice guidelines and the Choosing Wisely initiative launched in 2012 recommend a haemoglobin (Hb) threshold of 70-80 g/lfor red blood cell (RBC) transfusions in stable hospitalised patients. Data on transfusion practices and their trends in medical inpatients are limited. To address this gap, we investigated transfusion practices and their trends in general internal medicine and other clinics. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study analysed data from all hospitalisations with RBC transfusions at a Swiss university hospital between 2012 and 2019. We included all first transfusion episodes if pretransfusion Hb was available. The primary endpoint was mean pretransfusion Hb; secondary endpoints included potentially inadequate transfusions (i.e., transfusions at Hb ≥80 g/l) and receipt of a single RBC unit. Trends in mean pretransfusion Hb over time were estimated using generalised estimating equations, and risk factors for potentially inadequate transfusions were identified using multivariable adjusted generalised estimating equations models. RESULTS:  Of 14,598 hospitalisations with RBC transfusions, 1980 (13.6%) were discharged from general internal medicine. From 2012 to 2019, mean pretransfusion Hb decreased from 74.0 g/l to 68.8 g/l in general internal medicine (mean annual decrease -0.76 g/l, 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.51 to -1.02) and from 78.2 g/l to 72.7 g/l in other clinics (mean annual decrease -0.69, 95% CI -0.62 to -0.77; p for interaction 0.53). The overall proportion of potentially inadequate transfusions was 17.8% in general internal medicine and 24.1% in other clinics (p <0.001) and decreased over the study period from 26.9% to 5.5% in general internal medicine and from 37.0% to 15.2% in other clinics. In contrast, the proportion of cases receiving a single RBC unit increased (39.5% to 81.4% in general internal medicine, 42.7% to 66.1% in other clinics). Older age (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.45, 95% CI 1.32-1.58 for ≥65 vs <65 years), having surgery (aOR 1.24, 95% CI 1.14-1.36), acute haemorrhage (aOR 1.16, 95% CI 1.02-1.33), chronic heart failure (aOR 1.17, 95% CI 1.04-1.32), ischaemic heart diseases (aOR 1.27, 95% CI 1.15-1.41), chronic pulmonary diseases (aOR 1.24, 95% CI 1.08-1.42), malignancy (aOR 1.11, 95% CI 1.01-1.21), and rheumatic disease (aOR 1.27, 95% CI 1.01-1.59) were risk factors for potentially inadequate transfusions. CONCLUSIONS:  More restrictive transfusion practices were adopted in general internal medicine and other clinics over time, suggesting that guideline recommendations and the Choosing Wisely initiative may have been increasingly followed. Interventions to reduce potentially inadequate transfusions should target providers who care for older patients and those with surgery or chronic cardiac and pulmonary diseases.